For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending .md to those URLs or by sending Accept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
DYNATYZE
DYNATYZE
Loading
Have Dynasty Leagues Gone Too Far With Custom Scoring?
NFL Analysis
Have Dynasty Leagues Gone Too Far With Custom Scoring?
I love the settings like Tight End Premium, Points Per Carry, and Points Per First Down, but at what point do we need to stop adding more layers?
Have Dynasty Leagues Gone Too Far With Custom Scoring?
Dynasty commissioners love tweaking league settings.
Tight End Premium. Points Per Carry. Points Per First Down. Half-point first downs. Tiered PPR. Bonuses for big plays. Bonuses for long touchdowns. You can keep going if you want.
Custom scoring can make a league feel unique. It can help shift positional value, reward certain types of players, and create a format that feels different from every other dynasty league you’re in.
Instead of adding more TEP, PPC, PP1D type of scoring modifiers, the answer might be going back to the basics.
Why Commissioners Add Niche Scoring in the First Place
Most niche scoring rules are trying to fix something.
Tight End Premium (TEP)
TEP exists because tight end is usually top-heavy and shallow. In many leagues, once the elite options are gone, the position becomes a guessing game. Premium scoring is meant to make the position matter more and give managers a reason to care beyond the top few names.
Points Per Carry (PPC)
PPC is usually added to push value back toward running backs, especially in formats where full PPR can heavily favor pass-catching backs and wide receivers. It gives early-down runners and volume backs a little more life.
Points Per First Down (PP1D/PPFD)
PP1D is often used to reward players for making meaningful football plays instead of just catching short dump-offs. In theory, it shifts value toward players who actually move the chains and contribute to sustaining drives.
And on their own, none of these are bad ideas. Those three settings are my personal favorites to add to a league.
The problem is when leagues keep adding new scoring layers whenever we think a position needs a little more juice.
Are You Fixing Value or Just Inflating It?
If your solution to every imbalance is "add another premium," eventually you stop creating a better dynasty format, and start creating a league where managers no longer understand the scoring system.
I think it's worth asking the league, would we be better off changing the format instead of tweaking the scoring?
The Alternative: Go Back to the Core Format
If your league feels like running backs don't matter enough, or tight ends feel replaceable, or depth doesn't matter, you don't always need a scoring patch.
Sometimes the better solution is as simple as expanding the lineup.
Instead of piling on more scoring modifiers, try increasing the number of starters. Move from a Start 9 to a Start 10 or Start 11. Add another flex. Add a Superflex if your league doesn't already have one.
That change alone can do a lot of the heavy lifting.
How Bigger Starting Lineups Help
It’s all about roster depth
Bigger starting lineups reward managers who draft well, stash the right players, and build out their benches. It turns roster construction into a bigger edge.
Trading becomes more important
When more players are required in starting lineups, managers can't just sit on all of the league's depth and still dominate. It creates more reasons to trade and keeps the player pool moving.
What "Back to Basics" Can Look Like
If I were trying to simplify a league without making it a dud, I'd start with something like this:
• 12 teams
• 1 QB
• 2 RB
• 3 WR
• 1 TE
• 2 FLEX
• 1 Superflex
• 0.5 PPR
• Deep benches
• Taxi squad for rookies
That's still a strong dynasty setup. It rewards good roster building. It creates trade demand and lineup decisions. But it doesn't require an explanation as to why a player scored 18.7 points.
When Custom Scoring Starts Going Too Far
I don't think custom scoring is bad. I use some of it. I like some of it. But there are definitely points where it can cross the line.
1. The scoring stops matching real football value
If a meaningless checkdown is scoring more than an impactful real-life play, that's a red flag.
For example, if a tight end catches a one-yard pass for a first down in a full PPR + TEP + PP1D setup, that single play can become absurdly valuable in fantasy. Meanwhile, a running back can grind out a hard 9-yard run and get less for a much better football play.
Once that starts happening regularly, you've got to look at your league settings a little closer.
2. You're rewarding bad efficiency
PPC is the biggest example here.
I understand why people like it. In the right setup, it can help balance out how fantasy values running backs. But if the carry bonus gets too aggressive, you start rewarding empty carries.
A running back carrying the ball 20 times for 42 yards should not be getting bailed out by your scoring system just because he touched the ball. Volume matters, but bad football shouldn't be propped up to the point where it beats efficient production.
3. Trade values stop making sense
The more extreme your scoring gets, the less useful outside trade tools and consensus rankings become. That doesn't mean custom leagues are bad, but it does create a challenge. If nobody in the league has a shared baseline for player value, trading gets harder. Especially those newer to dynasty.
And I don’t know about you, but when trading slows down, dynasty leagues lose one of the best things about the game we love.
I Still Like the Niche Stuff, But It Needs a Limit
I am not saying the answer is "never use TEP" or "never use PPC." That's not how I feel at all. I think these additions can really improve a league, but only when used in moderation.
The real question is not whether you should use niche scoring.
It's how much is too much?
As a commissioner, this is where I stand
I love creative dynasty formats. I love commissioners trying new things. I love niche scoring when it is used strategically.
But not every league problem needs another scoring bonus attached to it.
Once the scoring gets harder to follow than the actual football, that’s usually when I’d start asking if the league would be better off getting back to the basics.
