2014 Week 9 · Sun, Nov 2, 2014 · Heinz Field
Baltimore Ravens
23
at
Pittsburgh SteelersWinner
43
PIT -2.5 ✓O 47.5 ✓
Pittsburgh Steelers 43–23 — never really in doubt late.
Pre-2018 game — box score & context only; play-by-play visuals start in 2018
Who moved the needle
Top performers
Passing · PIT
25/37, 340 yds, 6 TD, 0 INT
23.5 expected points added · +3.8% completion over expected
Passing · BAL
30/45, 303 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
-5.5 expected points added · +1.5% completion over expected
Receiving · PIT
11/16 for 144 yds, 1 TD
43% of team targets · 9.0 expected points added
Full stat lines
Box score
Baltimore Ravens
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Flacco | 30/45 | 303 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -5.5 |
Rushing
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Forsett | 9 | 38 | 4.2 | 0 | -1.1 |
| Lorenzo Taliaferro | 7 | 21 | 3.0 | 0 | -8.4 |
| Joe Flacco | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| Bernard Pierce | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | -0.4 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Forsett | 5 | 8 | 67 | 0 | 18% | 3.0 |
| Torrey Smith | 4 | 7 | 63 | 1 | 16% | 4.3 |
| Owen Daniels | 6 | 9 | 53 | 0 | 20% | 3.4 |
| Steve Smith | 5 | 8 | 36 | 0 | 18% | -3.9 |
| Lorenzo Taliaferro | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 7% | 0.8 |
| Marlon Brown | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 7% | 0.0 |
| Kamar Aiken | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2% | 0.4 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 5% | 0.4 |
| Crockett Gillmore | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5% | -5.8 |
| Phillip Supernaw | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 2% | -1.0 |
Defense (top contributors)
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Mosley | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Hill | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daryl Smith | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominique Franks | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Matt Elam | 1 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Canty | 1 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Lardarius Webb | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Terrell Suggs | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elvis Dumervil | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darian Stewart | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Pittsburgh Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 25/37 | 340 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 23.5 |
Rushing
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeGarrette Blount | 10 | 23 | 2.3 | 0 | -1.6 |
| Le'Veon Bell | 10 | 20 | 2.0 | 0 | -4.5 |
| Markus Wheaton | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | -0.1 |
| Dri Archer | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Martavis Bryant | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | -0.2 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | -4.7 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Brown | 11 | 16 | 144 | 1 | 43% | 9.0 |
| Markus Wheaton | 2 | 4 | 62 | 1 | 11% | 3.8 |
| Martavis Bryant | 3 | 5 | 44 | 2 | 14% | 4.8 |
| Le'Veon Bell | 5 | 6 | 38 | 1 | 16% | 4.2 |
| Matt Spaeth | 1 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6.3 |
| Heath Miller | 1 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 5% | 0.7 |
| Lance Moore | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | -0.2 |
| Will Johnson | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3% | -0.5 |
| Dri Archer | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | -0.5 |
Defense (top contributors)
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence Timmons | 6 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| James Harrison | 3 | 3 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Allen | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mike Mitchell | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Valentino Blake | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| William Gay | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brice McCain | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arthur Moats | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jason Worilds | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Terence Garvin | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Closing number vs result
Betting context
- Closing spread
- PIT -2.5
- Closing total
- 47.5
- BAL moneyline
- +116
- PIT moneyline
- -128
Steelers closed -2.5 and covered, winning by 20.
Total closed 47.5; the game landed 66 — over by 18.5.
Conditions and crew
Game environment
- Venue
- Heinz Field
- Roof / surface
- outdoors · grass
- Kickoff weather
- 38°F, wind 6 mph
- Referee
- Bill Vinovich
- Rest
- BAL 7 days · PIT 7 days
- Coaches
- John Harbaugh vs Mike Tomlin
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.