2019 Week 17 · Sun, Dec 29, 2019 · TIAA Bank Stadium
Indianapolis Colts
20
Jacksonville JaguarsWinner
38
Jacksonville Jaguars 38–20 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q4 9:41, IND +14% win probability on one snap.
The game in one curve — scrub to replay it
Win probability
(9:41) (Shotgun) 7-J.Brissett scrambles right end to IND 9 for 6 yards (91-Y.Ngakoue). FUMBLES (91-Y.Ngakoue), RECOVERED by JAX-93-C.Campbell at IND 8. 93-C.Campbell for 8 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Highest-leverage plays
- Q4 · 9:41IND +14% win prob(9:41) (Shotgun) 7-J.Brissett scrambles right end to IND 9 for 6 yards (91-Y.Ngakoue). FUMBLES (91-Y.Ngakoue), RECOVERED by JAX-93-C.Campbell at IND 8. 93-C.Campbell for 8 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
- Q2 · 1:35IND +12% win prob(1:35) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 15-G.Minshew II pass short left intended for 23-R.Armstead INTERCEPTED by 53-D.Leonard at JAX 37. 53-D.Leonard to JAX 37 for no gain (23-R.Armstead). The Replay Official reviewed the interception ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands.
- Q2 · 6:17JAX +11% win prob(6:17) (Shotgun) 15-G.Minshew II pass deep left to 84-K.Cole to IND 14 for 45 yards (34-R.Ya-Sin).
- Q3 · 9:22JAX +11% win prob(9:22) (Shotgun) 15-G.Minshew II pass incomplete deep left to 17-D.Chark Jr.. PENALTY on IND-34-R.Ya-Sin, Defensive Pass Interference, 20 yards, enforced at IND 29 - No Play.
Down-to-down truth
Situational splits
| Metric | Colts | Jaguars |
|---|---|---|
| Offensive plays | 55 | 64 |
| Total yards | 275 | 358 (edge) |
| Yards per play | 5.0 | 5.6 (edge) |
| Expected points added / play | -0.14 | 0.14 (edge) |
| Success rate | 44% | 53% (edge) |
| Dropback rate | 55% | 70% |
| Dropback efficiency (EPA/play) | -0.42 | 0.26 (edge) |
| Rush efficiency (EPA/play) | 0.19 (edge) | -0.14 |
| Third downs | 4/12 | 8/13 (edge) |
| Red-zone trips → TDs | 0 → 0 | 0 → 0 |
| Explosive plays (10+ rush / 20+ pass) | 5 (edge) | 2 |
| First downs gained on snaps | 16 | 22 (edge) |
| Sacks taken | 3 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 (edge) |
Jaguars won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.14 expected points added per play vs -0.14.
Possession by possession
Drive chart
| # | Team | Start | Plays | Scrim yds | Clock | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IND | IND 25 | 12 | 83 | 5:54 | Turnover on downs | |
| 2 | JAX | IND 44 | 8 | 42 | 2:47 | Turnover on downs | |
| 3 | IND | IND 21 | 14 | 62 | 5:38 | Touchdown | |
| 4 | JAX | JAX 25 | 10 | 40 | 3:41 | Turnover on downs | |
| 5 | IND | IND 25 | 6 | 24 | 2:19 | Punt | |
| 6 | JAX | JAX 10 | 8 | 90 | 3:59 | Touchdown | |
| 7 | IND | IND 45 | 8 | 55 | 3:31 | Touchdown | |
| 8 | JAX | JAX 25 | 4 | 10 | 0:45 | Interception | |
| 9 | IND | JAX 37 | 4 | 5 | 0:47 | Turnover on downs | |
| 10 | JAX | JAX 27 | 8 | 35 | 0:39 | Turnover on downs | |
| 11 | JAX | JAX 20 | 13 | 62 | 6:33 | Touchdown | |
| 12 | IND | IND 25 | 7 | 8 | 2:22 | Punt | |
| 13 | JAX | JAX 18 | 7 | 26 | 4:03 | Punt | |
| 14 | IND | IND 25 | 5 | 26 | 2:18 | Punt | |
| 15 | JAX | JAX 11 | 8 | 9 | 4:14 | Punt | |
| 16 | IND | IND 5 | 3 | 3 | 1:02 | Defensive touchdown | |
| 17 | IND | IND 25 | 5 | 9 | 1:43 | Fumble | |
| 18 | JAX | IND 34 | 7 | 34 | 3:03 | Touchdown | |
| 19 | IND | IND 20 | 5 | 0 | 0:33 | Turnover on downs | |
| 20 | JAX | IND 20 | 6 | 10 | 4:09 | End of game |
0 of 20 drives ended in points. Longest march: Jaguars gained 90 scrimmage yards over 8 plays for a touchdown.
Box score unavailable
Player stat lines for this game have not been ingested yet. Scores, lines, and environment context above are complete.
Closing number vs result
Betting context
- Closing spread
- IND -5
- Closing total
- 41.5
- IND moneyline
- -232
- JAX moneyline
- +204
Colts closed -5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 58 — over by 16.5.
Conditions and crew
Game environment
- Venue
- TIAA Bank Stadium
- Roof / surface
- outdoors · grass
- Kickoff weather
- —
- Referee
- Brad Allen
- Rest
- IND 7 days · JAX 7 days
- Coaches
- Frank Reich vs Doug Marrone
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.