The biggest swing of the game · Q4 2:46 · 1st and 10
Kareem Hunt
Browns
(2:46) 27-K.Hunt left guard to CLE 33 for 19 yards (21-B.Roby).
10.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 3:44 AM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2020 Week 10 · Sun, Nov 15, 2020 · FirstEnergy Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2020 Week 10
It turned at Q4 2:46, 1st and 10, on Kareem Hunt — 10.5 win-probability points to the Browns on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Cleveland Browns 10–7 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q4 2:46, Browns +10.5% win probability on one snap. Played in 25 mph wind — weigh that when reading the passing lines.
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 2:46 · 1st and 10
Kareem Hunt
Browns
(2:46) 27-K.Hunt left guard to CLE 33 for 19 yards (21-B.Roby).
10.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Browns won this one — 8 chunk plays, against Texans at 3 chunk plays.
Brownsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Browns won this one — +0.19 expected points per carry, against Texans at -0.12 expected points per carry.
Brownsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Texans owned this one and still lost it — +0.09 expected points per dropback, against Browns at -0.19 expected points per dropback.
Texansthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Red zone
Texans owned this one and still lost it — 1 touchdown on 2 trips, against Browns at 1 touchdown on 3 trips.
Texansthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 6.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 15 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Texans.
(2:46) 27-K.Hunt left guard to CLE 33 for 19 yards (21-B.Roby).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Cody Parkey's 41-yard field goal with 8:31 left in the 1st put Cleveland Browns ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 2 scores that followed.
3 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Browns ahead 6–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — explosive plays.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Texans ran 53 snaps at a 64% dropback rate against Browns’s 60 at 37%. Red-zone trips: Texans 2, Browns 3.
Browns won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.05 expected points added per play vs 0.01.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
7 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
2 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
CLE's pass rate over expected, −19.8 pts, was the lowest of the 28 team-games charted in week 10 — 1.2 points clear of the next team along.
60 snaps this game, floor 20 — 16 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.9 points. · −2.0σ from their own normal
CLE's early-down pass rate, 25.5%, is past their previous low of 34.0% in week 3 — the lowest of their 9 charted games through week 10.
47 early downs this game, floor 15 — 16 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 13.3 points. · −1.8σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
7 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -24 pts to 23 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · −3.9 vs their 5.5 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (−0.63× that swing) · 53 snaps
off script — ran more than the situation asked · −15.9 vs their -3.9 pts, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (−2.02× that swing) · 60 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 15% to 84%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.8 vs their 66.3%, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (−0.83× that swing) · 39 early downs
leaned — ran early · −23.5 vs their 49.0%, and they swing ±13.3 week to week (−1.77× that swing) · 47 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -33% to 110%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +4.4 vs their 28.9%, and they swing ±23.5 week to week (+0.19× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 40.7%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 31%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.8 vs their 13.9%, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (−0.71× that swing) · 22 dropbacks
right on their number · −2.4 vs their 11.3%, and they swing ±5.3 week to week (−0.46× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
Play-action rate
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2020 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
Blitz rate sent
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2020 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
CLE's pass rate over expected was the night's one real departure: -19.8 pts, 15.9 points below their season mean of -3.9 pts and 2.0 times their own 7.9-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Houston Texans
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Cleveland Browns
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · HOU
20/30, 163 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
0.7 expected points added · +3.4% completion over expected
Passing · CLE
12/20, 132 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-3.3 expected points added · -2.2% completion over expected
No opportunity read for this era
Snap, route and expected-points data starts in 2021. This game is older than the usage record, so there is no opportunity read for it — the box score above is the complete picture we hold.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Browns attack right, the Texans attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(3:37) 7-K.Fairbairn 46 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Left, Center-46-J.Weeks, Holder-9-B.Anger.
Q3 3:37 · Texans · 4th & 2 at CLE 27 · gained nothing · -4.51 EP · −15.7% win probability
141 snaps placed · 14 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 155 plays across 16 drives, personnel groupings on 155 snaps. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
3 of 16 drives ended in points. The longest march was CLE moving 94 yards from the CLE 3 for a end of half. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; CLE attacks right, HOU attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
155 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
155 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Texans at Browns, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun Watson | 20/30 | 163 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +0.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Johnson | 14 | 54 | 3.9 | 0 | −1.7 |
| Deshaun Watson | 8 | 36 | 4.5 | 0 | +1.8 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randall Cobb | 3 | 5 | 41 | 0 | 18% | +1.4 |
| Brandin Cooks | 6 | 8 | 39 | 0 | 29% |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Cunningham | 9 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyrell Adams | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vernon Hargreaves |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 12/20 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −3.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2020_10_HOU_CLE
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Browns closed -4.5, won by 3 — but didn't cover.
Total closed 46; the game landed 17 — under by 29.0.
Conditions and crew
Wind at 25 mph is the kind that drags passing depth and kicking range — weigh it when reading the splits.
| +1.0 |
| Will Fuller | 5 | 8 | 38 | 0 | 29% | +0.3 |
| Pharaoh Brown | 2 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 7% | +2.7 |
| Darren Fells | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 4% | +1.1 |
| Kenny Stills | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4% | +1.4 |
| Jordan Akins | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4% | +0.1 |
| Duke Johnson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −1.4 |
| C.J. Prosise | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 4% | −1.4 |
| 4 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| J.J. Watt | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eric Murray | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Reid | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Whitney Mercilus | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandon Dunn | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bradley Roby | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carlos Watkins | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Chubb | 19 | 126 | 6.6 | 1 | +5.3 |
| Kareem Hunt | 19 | 104 | 5.5 | 0 | +1.9 |
| Baker Mayfield | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | −6.8 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rashard Higgins | 3 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 21% | +4.2 |
| Jarvis Landry | 3 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 26% | −0.4 |
| Kareem Hunt | 3 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 21% | −0.2 |
| Donovan Peoples-Jones | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 11% | +0.2 |
| Austin Hooper | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11% | +0.2 |
| Nick Chubb | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −1.7 |
| KhaDarel Hodge | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −0.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.J. Goodson | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Myles Garrett | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Ronnie Harrison | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sheldon Richardson | 2 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denzel Ward | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Johnson | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sione Takitaki | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrew Sendejo | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malcolm Smith | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Larry Ogunjobi | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |