The biggest swing of the game · Q1 12:11 · 1st and 10
Michael Carter
Jets
(12:11) (Shotgun) 32-Mi.Carter left end to NYJ 24 for 4 yards (96-S.Harris).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:43 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2021 Week 3 · Sun, Sep 26, 2021 · Empower Field at Mile High
FinalThe verdict · 2021 Week 3
It turned at Q1 12:11, 1st and 10, on Michael Carter — 5.1 win-probability points to the Jets on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 12:11 · 1st and 10
Michael Carter
Jets
(12:11) (Shotgun) 32-Mi.Carter left end to NYJ 24 for 4 yards (96-S.Harris).
Denver Broncos 26–0 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 12:11, Jets +5.1% win probability on one snap.
5.1
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Broncos won this one — +0.47 expected points per dropback, against Jets at -0.60 expected points per dropback.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Broncos won this one — 10 chunk plays, against Jets at 3 chunk plays.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Broncos won this one — -0.01 expected points per snap, against Jets at -0.51 expected points per snap.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Broncos won this one — 46% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Jets at 34% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 8.4 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 31 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Jets.
(12:11) (Shotgun) 32-Mi.Carter left end to NYJ 24 for 4 yards (96-S.Harris).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Javonte Williams's 1-yard rushing touchdown with 3:32 left in the 1st put Denver Broncos ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Broncos ahead 9–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.60 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Jets ran 53 snaps at a 75% dropback rate against Broncos’s 63 at 46%. Red-zone trips: Jets 1, Broncos 5.
Broncos won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.01 expected points added per play vs -0.51.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
8 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DEN's sack or hit rate, 22.5%, sat 9.6 points above their season number of 12.9% — they got home by 2.1 times their own 4.6-point weekly swing.
40 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 4.6 points.
DEN's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 50.0% in week 2 against 0.0% here — they went for it then and took the kick now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
5 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 12 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 24.6 points.
NYJ's pass rate over expected turned over: −12.4 pts in week 2 against +6.3 pts here — they ran more than the situation asked then and threw more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
53 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.8 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
8 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -20 pts to 18 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +6.1 vs their 0.3 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (+0.89× that swing) · 53 snaps
right on their number · −1.7 vs their -4.6 pts, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (−0.29× that swing) · 63 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 23% to 91%
Tendencies room →leaned — passed early · +14.6 vs their 59.1%, and they swing ±12.3 week to week (+1.18× that swing) · 38 early downs
leaned — ran early · −13.7 vs their 52.2%, and they swing ±11.1 week to week (−1.24× that swing) · 52 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -35% to 102%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · −0.5 vs their 33.8%, and they swing ±26.8 week to week (−0.02× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
leaned — took the kick · −34.6 vs their 34.6%, and they swing ±24.6 week to week (−1.41× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 28%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −2.9 vs their 13.3%, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (−0.50× that swing) · 29 dropbacks
off script — got home · +9.6 vs their 12.9%, and they swing ±4.6 week to week (+2.07× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
Play-action rate
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
Blitz rate sent
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
DEN's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 22.5%, 9.6 points above their season mean of 12.9% and 2.1 times their own 4.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
New York Jets
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 4 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 4
Denver Broncos
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · DEN
19/25, 235 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
11.9 expected points added · +12.7% completion over expected
Passing · NYJ
19/35, 160 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT
-24.1 expected points added · -8.9% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Tim Patrick banked 5.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.1 | −5.2 | 54% | 55% | 8% | 0% | 18 car, 60 yd, 1 TD · 1/2, 21 yd | |
| 14.8 | +5.6 | 76% | 72% | 21% | 43% | 5/5, 98 yd | |
| 13.2 | −9.7 | 40% | 38% | 17% | 2% | 12 car, 29 yd, 1 TD · 3/4, 33 yd | |
| 11.8 | −1.5 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 19/25, 235 yd · 4 car, 24 yd | |
| 9.1 | −5.3 | 94% | 93% | 30% | 40% | 5/10, 41 yd | |
| 8.7 | −1.5 | 76% | 90% | 21% | 13% | 5/5, 37 yd | |
| 5.2 | −2.1 | 48% | 48% | 18% | 11% | 3/6, 22 yd | |
| 5.0 | +2.0 | 50% | 48% | 6% | 11% | 2/2, 30 yd | |
| 4.9 | −3.0 | 43% | 33% | 9% | 0% | 9 car, 24 yd · 2/3, 5 yd | |
| 4.6 | +0.7 | 78% | 85% | 9% | 17% | 2/3, 26 yd | |
| 3.8 | −1.5 | 22% | 38% | 13% | 31% | 1/3, 28 yd | |
| 3.5 | −1.4 | 87% | 76% | 13% | 12% | 2/3, 15 yd | |
| 3.3 | −5.5 | 57% | 68% | 15% | 11% | 3 car, 17 yd · 1/5, 6 yd | |
| 3.2 | +0.6 | 43% | 43% | 6% | 4% | 2/2, 12 yd | |
| 2.6 | −5.8 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 19/35, 160 yd, 2 INT · 1 car, 2 yd | |
| 2.3 | +0.7 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.6 | +0.2 | 43% | 41% | 4% | 2% | 1/1, 6 yd | |
| 1.5 | +0.1 | 61% | 53% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 5 yd | |
| 0.7 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.7 | −0.9 | 36% | 31% | 4% | 0% | 1/1, -3 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 36% | 14% | 0% | — | No touches. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Broncos attack right, the Jets attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(6:45) (Shotgun) 5-T.Bridgewater pass deep right to 1-K.Hamler to NYJ 22 for 28 yards (20-M.Maye).
Q1 6:45 · Broncos · 3rd & 9 at 50 · gained 28 · +3.17 EP · +12.9% win probability
147 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 158 plays across 22 drives, personnel groupings on 158 snaps. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 22 drives ended in points. The longest march was DEN moving 75 yards from the DEN 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; DEN attacks right, NYJ attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
158 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
158 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Jets at Broncos, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Wilson | 19/35 | 160 | 0 | 2 | 5 | −24.1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Carter | 9 | 24 | 2.7 | 0 | −3.0 |
| Ty Johnson | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Zach Wilson | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | +0.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Davis | 5 | 10 | 41 | 0 | 30% | −7.1 |
| Keelan Cole | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 6% | +2.0 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Mosley | 4 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Maye | 7 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Franklin-Myers | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quincy Williams |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teddy Bridgewater | 19/25 | 235 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +11.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melvin Gordon |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2021_03_NYJ_DEN
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Broncos closed -10.5 and covered, winning by 26.
Total closed 42; the game landed 26 — under by 16.0.
Conditions and crew
| Braxton Berrios | 2 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 9% | −1.9 |
| Elijah Moore | 3 | 6 | 22 | 0 | 18% | −3.7 |
| Jeff Smith | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 3% | +0.9 |
| Tyler Kroft | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 6% | +1.4 |
| Ty Johnson | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 15% | −3.4 |
| Michael Carter | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 9% | −2.0 |
| Ryan Griffin | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | −0.6 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Bryce Hall | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Carter | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandin Echols | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Adrian Colbert | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Folorunso Fatukasi | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quinnen Williams | 3 | 1 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 |
| 60 |
| 3.3 |
| 1 |
| −1.8 |
| Javonte Williams | 12 | 29 | 2.4 | 1 | −12.0 |
| Teddy Bridgewater | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Damarea Crockett | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | −0.9 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Patrick | 5 | 5 | 98 | 0 | 21% | +8.4 |
| Courtland Sutton | 5 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 21% | +3.8 |
| Javonte Williams | 3 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 17% | +2.3 |
| K.J. Hamler | 1 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 13% | +2.2 |
| Melvin Gordon | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 8% | +1.3 |
| Noah Fant | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 13% | −1.0 |
| Albert Okwuegbunam | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4% | +0.1 |
| Diontae Spencer | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 4% | −1.0 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Johnson | 5 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Patrick Surtain | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Malik Reed | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Strnad | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Von Miller | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Fuller | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shamar Stephen | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Simmons | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kareem Jackson | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eric Saubert | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |