For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending .md to those URLs or by sending Accept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
DYNATYZE
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
Loading the football page
Game Center
polling · 300s tick · as of 6:41 PM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Seattle Seahawks 0 at Green Bay Packers 17. Final.
Packers -3 ✓U 49.5 ✓
The verdict · 2021 Week 10
Green Bay Packers 17, Seahawks 0 — and it was over early.
It turned at Q3 7:53, 3rd and 10, on Kevin King — 15.3 win-probability points to the Packers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Packers closed -3 and covered, winning by 17.
Green Bay Packers 17–0 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q3 7:53, Packers +15.3% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 7:53 · 3rd and 10
Kevin King
Packers
(7:53) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass short left intended for 14-D.Metcalf INTERCEPTED by 20-K.King at GB -3. Touchback.
15.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
Aaron RodgersSeahawksQ2 1:07(1:07) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 13-A.Lazard (22-T.Brown). Yard marker changed due to change in possession
10.6pts
Jamal AdamsSeahawksQ3 2:39(2:39) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass deep right intended for 81-J.Deguara INTERCEPTED by 33-J.Adams [94-R.Green] at SEA -5. Touchback.
11.7pts
What separated them
Every snap
Packers won this one — +0.06 expected points per snap, against Seahawks at -0.30 expected points per snap.
Packersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Packers won this one — +0.08 expected points per dropback, against Seahawks at -0.40 expected points per dropback.
Packersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Packers won this one — 2 touchdowns on 5 trips, against Seahawks at 0 touchdowns on 1 trip.
Packersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Packers won this one — 6 chunk plays, against Seahawks at 3 chunk plays.
2 other measures were inside a third of the league's own spread — two clubs doing the same thing, so they are not shown.
Drawn from the officially scored play-by-play, which lands usually within two hours of the final, or the next morning when its release runs late.
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
How the game was won
The model and the market were 1.9 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 9 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Seahawks.
MarketModelmodel higher on Packershigher on Seahawks156 of 167 plays carry both curves
(7:53) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass short left intended for 14-D.Metcalf INTERCEPTED by 20-K.King at GB -3. Touchback.
Swing +15.3 for PackersExpected points +4.71 for PackersThe model had Seahawks 2 points higher than the market did.play 103
The solid line is the betting market's home win probability; the dashed line is the play-by-play model's. The shaded band between them is the disagreement — emerald where the model liked the home team more, red where it liked the away team more. Drag across the curve or use arrow keys to replay the game; gold diamonds mark the biggest swings.
Highest-leverage plays
3rd · 7:53SEA +15% win prob(7:53) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass short left intended for 14-D.Metcalf INTERCEPTED by 20-K.King at GB -3. Touchback.
3rd · 2:39SEA +12% win prob(2:39) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass deep right intended for 81-J.Deguara INTERCEPTED by 33-J.Adams [94-R.Green] at SEA -5. Touchback.
2nd · 1:07SEA +11% win prob(1:07) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 13-A.Lazard (22-T.Brown). Yard marker changed due to change in possession
1st · 14:12GB +10% win prob(14:12) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass deep left to 83-M.Valdes-Scantling to SEA 20 for 41 yards (2-D.Reed).
1st · 10:53SEA +8% win prob(10:53) 2-M.Crosby 42 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Right, Center-46-S.Wirtel, Holder-7-C.Bojorquez.
3rd · 9:26GB +7% win prob(9:26) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 41-A.Collins up the middle to GB 25 for 4 yards (53-J.Garvin).
SettledThe modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
The margin ledger
Mason Crosby's 27-yard field goal with 9:35 left in the 2nd put Green Bay Packers ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 2 scores that followed.
Lead
2nd9:35Mason Crosby·27-yd field goal27-yard field goalholder C.Bojorquez · snap S.WirtelLead never changed again+30–3
Packers ahead 9–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.40 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
−0.30Seahawks: −0.30 expected points added per play
+0.06Packers: +0.06 expected points added per play
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
−0.40Seahawks: −0.40 expected points added per play
+0.08Packers: +0.08 expected points added per play
Running itexpected points added per rush
+0.11Seahawks: +0.11 expected points added per play
+0.05Packers: +0.05 expected points added per play
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Seahawks ran 59 snaps at a 81% dropback rate against Packers’s 70 at 56%. Red-zone trips: Seahawks 1, Packers 5.
NotePackers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.06 expected points added per play vs -0.30.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
The Read
6 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
Too few to read
2 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
highest in the league that weekAgainst the weekTendencies
SEA's early-down pass rate, 79.1%, was the highest of the 28 team-games charted in week 10 — 0.5 points clear of the next team along.
Past their previous high of 67.4% in week 3.
2.0 times their own weekly swing above their number.
43 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 11.9 points. · +2.0σ from their own normal
high through week 10Against their seasonOver Expected
SEA's pass rate over expected, +10.9 pts, is past their previous high of +7.7 pts in week 3 — the highest of their 9 charted games through week 10.
2.1 times their own weekly swing above their number.
59 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.2 points. · +2.1σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
Was this normal for them?
6 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
their week-to-week swingall 32 teams
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -18 pts to 17 pts
right on their number · +0.5 vs their 12.3%, and they swing ±5.4 week to week (+0.09× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
Packers10.4%
inside their normal wobble · −2.8 vs their 13.3%, and they swing ±4.6 week to week (−0.62× that swing) · 48 dropbacks
Play-action rate
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
Blitz rate sent
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
NoteSEA's pass rate over expected was the night's one real departure: 10.9 pts, 13.0 points above their season mean of -2.0 pts and 2.1 times their own 6.2-point weekly swing.
The Game Day Roster
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
5 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The field map
Every snap, where it happened
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Packers attack right, the Seahawks attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
Seahawks←Packers→
Q1Q2Q3Q4
R.Wilson pass−18% win probabilitymoment 3 of 4
(7:53) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson pass short left intended for 14-D.Metcalf INTERCEPTED by 20-K.King at GB -3. Touchback.
Q3 7:53 · Seahawks · 3rd & 10 at GB 12 · gained nothing · -4.71 EP · −17.6% win probability
154 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
The Film Room · post-game
Post-game film: 167 plays across 20 drives, personnel groupings on 167 snaps. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
Possession by possession
The field rail
3 of 20 drives ended in points. The longest march was GB moving 82 yards from the GB 9 for a field goal. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; GB attacks right, SEA attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Every snap
Play stream
167 of 167 plays
Team
Quarter
Down
Play type
Expected points added
Event
Charted
Plays shown
167
EPA per play
-0.08
Success rate
43%
Yards
601
Who was on the field
Personnel groupings
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
Seahawks1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR43-0.3779%
Packers1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR30-0.0853%
Packers1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR23-0.0148%
Packers1 RB, 0 TE, 4 WR17+0.4265%
Seahawks1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR16-0.1256%
snapsepapass rate
167 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
Every play
Ball
When
Play
Only
Who
167 plays
Bar length is win probability the play moved
1st quarter36 plays
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back and four receiversDefense on the fieldThree linemen, two linebackers and six backsRoute runGoCoverageCover 3, three deepMan or zoneZoneIn the boxSix defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw2.5 seconds
No good9 plays, from the Packers 36 to the Seahawks 17
Punt4 plays, from the Seahawks 32 to the Seahawks 41
Punt5 plays, from the Packers 22 to the Packers 42
Punt7 plays, from the Seahawks 9 to the Packers 39
Punt4 plays, from the Packers 7 to the Packers 10
Punt4 plays, from the Seahawks 49 to the Packers 45
The period ended2 plays
2nd quarter44 plays
Seahawks0Packers3
Field goal14 plays, from the Packers 15 to the Seahawks 9
Punt6 plays, from the Seahawks 26 to the Packers 41
Turnover on downs13 plays, from the Packers 17 to the Seahawks 34
The period ended11 plays, from the Seahawks 35 to the Packers 35
3rd quarter39 plays
Punt7 plays, from the Seahawks 25 to the Seahawks 36
Punt5 plays, from the Packers 13 to the Packers 18
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back, one tight end and three receiversDefense on the fieldOne lineman, four linebackers and six backsRoute runCornerCoverageCover 4, quartersMan or zoneZoneIn the boxFive defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was pressuredTime to throw6.2 seconds
Intercepted11 plays, from the Seahawks 38 to the Packers 12
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne back, one tight end and three receiversDefense on the fieldFour linemen, two linebackers and five backsRoute runGoCoverageCover 3, three deepMan or zoneZoneIn the boxSix defendersRushing the passerFourPressure (charted)The passer was pressuredTime to throw6.0 seconds
Intercepted9 plays, from the Packers 20 to the Seahawks 15
Punt4 plays, from the Seahawks 20 to the Seahawks 21
The period ended3 plays, from the Packers 38 to the Packers 44
4th quarter48 plays
Seahawks0Packers9
Seahawks0Packers10
Touchdown12 plays, from the Seahawks 49 to the Seahawks 3
Intercepted6 plays, from the Seahawks 34 to the Packers 43
Seahawks0Packers16
Seahawks0Packers17
Touchdown12 plays, from the Packers 20 to the Seahawks 2
Turnover on downs17 plays, from the Seahawks 24 to the Packers 37
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published