The biggest swing of the game · Q1 7:07 · 4th and 6
Drew Lock
Chargers
(7:07) (Shotgun) 3-D.Lock sacked at DEN 46 for -10 yards (99-J.Tillery).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 2:23 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2021 Week 17 · Sun, Jan 2, 2022 · SoFi Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2021 Week 17
It turned at Q1 7:07, 4th and 6, on Drew Lock — 4.5 win-probability points to the Chargers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 7:07 · 4th and 6
Drew Lock
Chargers
(7:07) (Shotgun) 3-D.Lock sacked at DEN 46 for -10 yards (99-J.Tillery).
Los Angeles Chargers 34–13 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 7:07, Chargers +4.5% win probability on one snap.
4.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Third down
Chargers won this one — 9 of 15 on third down, against Broncos at 3 of 11 on third down.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Chargers won this one — +0.47 expected points per dropback, against Broncos at -0.13 expected points per dropback.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Chargers won this one — +0.14 expected points per snap, against Broncos at -0.14 expected points per snap.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Broncos owned this one and still lost it — 5 chunk plays, against Chargers at 3 chunk plays.
Broncosthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 7.5 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 21 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Broncos.
(7:07) (Shotgun) 3-D.Lock sacked at DEN 46 for -10 yards (99-J.Tillery).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Austin Ekeler's 3-yard rushing touchdown with 11:54 left in the 1st put Los Angeles Chargers ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 8 scores that followed.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Chargers ahead 6–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.47 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Broncos ran 56 snaps at a 55% dropback rate against Chargers’s 64 at 50%. Red-zone trips: Broncos 3, Chargers 6.
Chargers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.14 expected points added per play vs -0.14.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
8 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
LAC's early-down pass rate, 41.7%, is past their previous low of 45.5% in week 14 — the lowest of their 16 charted games through week 17.
48 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.2 points.
LAC's pass rate over expected, −7.4 pts, is past their previous low of −4.4 pts in week 15 — the lowest of their 16 charted games through week 17.
64 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.2 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
8 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -20 pts to 20 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −6.0 vs their -4.6 pts, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (−1.03× that swing) · 56 snaps
leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −11.4 vs their 3.9 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−1.84× that swing) · 64 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 23% to 88%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.9 vs their 52.2%, and they swing ±11.1 week to week (−0.09× that swing) · 41 early downs
leaned — ran early · −19.8 vs their 61.5%, and they swing ±10.2 week to week (−1.93× that swing) · 48 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -31% to 131%
Fourth Down room →leaned — went for it · +25.4 vs their 34.6%, and they swing ±24.6 week to week (+1.03× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
leaned — took the kick · −34.3 vs their 54.3%, and they swing ±29.6 week to week (−1.16× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 30%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −3.6 vs their 12.9%, and they swing ±4.6 week to week (−0.77× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −4.2 vs their 13.9%, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (−0.65× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
Play-action rate
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
Blitz rate sent
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
LAC's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 41.7%, 19.8 points below their season mean of 61.5% and 1.9 times their own 10.2-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Denver Broncos
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Los Angeles Chargers
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · DEN
18/25, 245 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
2.2 expected points added · +2.7% completion over expected
Passing · LAC
22/31, 237 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
14.9 expected points added · +2.5% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Noah Fant banked 9.0 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.2 | +9.0 | 88% | 77% | 26% | 17% | 6/7, 92 yd, 1 TD | |
| 20.2 | +1.0 | 58% | 59% | 10% | 0% | 17 car, 58 yd, 1 TD · 3/3, 54 yd | |
| 17.7 | −4.4 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/31, 237 yd, 2 TD · 4 car, 2 yd | |
| 15.9 | −0.4 | 95% | — | 4% | 0% | 18/25, 245 yd, 1 TD · 3 car, 10 yd · 1/1, 1 yd | |
| 15.3 | +6.8 | 84% | 94% | 13% | 36% | 3/4, 63 yd, 1 TD | |
| 14.4 | −6.9 | 73% | 78% | 30% | 48% | 4/9, 44 yd, 1 TD | |
| 10.2 | −0.1 | 50% | 52% | 15% | 5% | 10 car, 43 yd · 3/4, 29 yd | |
| 9.1 | −4.5 | 37% | 34% | 10% | 2% | 12 car, 41 yd · 3/3, 20 yd | |
| 9.0 | +0.5 | 87% | 84% | 19% | 38% | 3/5, 60 yd | |
| 6.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 5.2 | +0.6 | 52% | 31% | 10% | 4% | 3/3, 22 yd | |
| 4.6 | −6.4 | 46% | 44% | 17% | 10% | 3/5, 16 yd | |
| 4.4 | +2.7 | 72% | 71% | 4% | 14% | 1/1, 34 yd | |
| 4.3 | −5.2 | 60% | 68% | 19% | 28% | 1/1, 1 yd · 2/5, 23 yd | |
| 4.2 | −7.8 | 50% | 42% | 4% | 0% | 14 car, 30 yd · 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 3.1 | −2.0 | 48% | 50% | 7% | 4% | 1 car, 1 yd · 2/2, 10 yd | |
| 2.5 | −3.5 | 50% | 42% | 7% | 0% | 2/2, 5 yd | |
| 1.8 | +0.1 | 78% | 84% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 8 yd | |
| 0.2 | −0.3 | 15% | 6% | 0% | — | 1 car, 2 yd | |
| 0.0 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.6 | 32% | 23% | 4% | 4% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Chargers attack right, the Broncos attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(3:24) 1-T.Long punts 42 yards to DEN 48, Center-54-M.Overton. 11-D.Spencer MUFFS catch, RECOVERED by LAC-37-K.Hall at DEN 49.
Q2 3:24 · Chargers · 4th & 2 at LAC 10 · gained nothing · +4.00 EP · +7.9% win probability
153 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 164 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 164 snaps. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
9 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was LAC moving 78 yards from the LAC 17 for a field goal. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; LAC attacks right, DEN attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
164 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
164 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Broncos at Chargers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew Lock | 18/25 | 245 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +2.2 |
| Kendall Hinton | 1/1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −3.1 |
| Brett Rypien | 0/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2.1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melvin Gordon | 10 | 43 | 4.3 | 0 | +3.0 |
| Javonte Williams | 14 | 30 | 2.1 | 0 | −7.1 |
| Drew Lock |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Fant | 6 | 7 | 92 | 1 | 26% | +4.8 |
| Courtland Sutton | 3 | 5 | 60 | 0 | 19% | +2.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micah Kiser | 3 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonas Griffith | 2 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kareem Jackson | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Fuller |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 22/31 | 237 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +14.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Ekeler |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2021_17_DEN_LAC
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chargers closed -8 and covered, winning by 21.
Total closed 45.5; the game landed 47 — over by 1.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| 3 |
| 10 |
| 3.3 |
| 0 |
| −0.5 |
| Seth Williams | 1 | 1 | 34 | 0 | 4% | +2.1 |
| Melvin Gordon | 3 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 15% | −2.0 |
| Kendall Hinton | 2 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 19% | −2.5 |
| Albert Okwuegbunam | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7% | +0.3 |
| Javonte Williams | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| Drew Lock | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4% | −3.1 |
| Eric Saubert | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.9 |
| 5 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jonathan Harris | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Surtain | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Shelby Harris | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nate Hairston | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Simmons | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| P.J. Locke | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 |
| 58 |
| 3.4 |
| 1 |
| −4.2 |
| Justin Jackson | 12 | 41 | 3.4 | 0 | −1.3 |
| Justin Herbert | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | −2.3 |
| Gabe Nabers | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Jalen Guyton | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Williams | 3 | 4 | 63 | 1 | 13% | +5.7 |
| Austin Ekeler | 3 | 3 | 54 | 0 | 10% | +5.8 |
| Keenan Allen | 4 | 9 | 44 | 1 | 30% | −0.0 |
| Tre' McKitty | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 10% | +1.9 |
| Justin Jackson | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 10% | +2.8 |
| Josh Palmer | 3 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 17% | −3.4 |
| Jalen Guyton | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 7% | +2.2 |
| Stephen Anderson | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3% | +0.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyzir White | 3 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nasir Adderley | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joey Bosa | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Davis | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derwin James | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asante Samuel | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jerry Tillery | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Jones | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Niemann | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Jackson | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |