The biggest swing of the game · Q2 12:21 · 3rd and 7
Matt Ryan
Jaguars
(12:21) (Shotgun) 2-M.Ryan sacked at IND 38 for -9 yards (41-J.Allen).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:47 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 2 · Sun, Sep 18, 2022 · TIAA Bank Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 2
It turned at Q2 12:21, 3rd and 7, on Matt Ryan — 8.3 win-probability points to the Jaguars on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 12:21 · 3rd and 7
Matt Ryan
Jaguars
(12:21) (Shotgun) 2-M.Ryan sacked at IND 38 for -9 yards (41-J.Allen).
Jacksonville Jaguars 24–0 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q2 12:21, Jaguars +8.3% win probability on one snap.
8.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Jaguars won this one — +0.59 expected points per dropback, against Colts at -0.58 expected points per dropback.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Jaguars won this one — no giveaways, against Colts at 3 giveaways.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Jaguars won this one — +0.11 expected points per snap, against Colts at -0.44 expected points per snap.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Jaguars won this one — 2 touchdowns on 3 trips, against Colts at 0 touchdowns on 2 trips.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 7.5 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 19 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Jaguars.
(12:21) (Shotgun) 2-M.Ryan sacked at IND 38 for -9 yards (41-J.Allen).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Christian Kirk's 10-yard touchdown catch with 2:27 left in the 1st put Jacksonville Jaguars ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 3 scores that followed.
4 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Jaguars ahead 8–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.59 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Colts ran 48 snaps at a 73% dropback rate against Jaguars’s 66 at 45%. Red-zone trips: Colts 2, Jaguars 3.
Jaguars won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.11 expected points added per play vs -0.44.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
JAX's sack or hit rate, 34.3%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 2 — 3.0 points clear of the next team along.
35 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.9 points.
JAX's early-down pass rate turned over: 65.3% in week 1 against 37.5% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 2.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
48 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.0 points.
IND's blitz rate sent turned over: 22.0% in week 1 against 3.3% here — they sent pressure then and sat back now, a turn of 2.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
30 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.6 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -21 pts to 14 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +1.6 vs their -3.9 pts, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (+0.24× that swing) · 48 snaps
leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −5.2 vs their 0.1 pts, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (−1.01× that swing) · 66 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 31% to 82%
Tendencies room →leaned — passed early · +9.8 vs their 56.9%, and they swing ±9.4 week to week (+1.04× that swing) · 36 early downs
leaned — ran early · −19.3 vs their 56.8%, and they swing ±10.0 week to week (−1.92× that swing) · 48 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 46%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.9 vs their 16.3%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (−0.53× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +9.4 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (+0.97× that swing) · 30 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -53% to 125%
Fourth Down room →Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 36.3%.
inside their normal wobble · +18.5 vs their 31.5%, and they swing ±23.3 week to week (+0.79× that swing) · 6 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 43%
Tendencies room →leaned — sat back · −12.0 vs their 15.3%, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (−1.82× that swing) · 30 dropbacks
leaned — sat back · −9.2 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (−1.03× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 39%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −7.3 vs their 14.0%, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (−1.12× that swing) · 30 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +17.5 vs their 16.8%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (+1.97× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
JAX's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 34.3%, 17.5 points above their season mean of 16.8% and 2.0 times their own 8.9-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Indianapolis Colts
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Jacksonville Jaguars
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · JAX
25/30, 235 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
17.6 expected points added · +14.3% completion over expected
Passing · IND
16/30, 195 yds, 0 TD, 3 INT
-20.3 expected points added · -5.6% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Christian Kirk banked 12.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.8 | +12.6 | 90% | 93% | 20% | 22% | 6/6, 78 yd, 2 TD | |
| 18.5 | +3.8 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 25/30, 235 yd, 2 TD · 3 car, 11 yd | |
| 15.8 | +0.9 | 63% | 53% | 7% | 1% | 23 car, 64 yd, 1 TD · 2/2, 14 yd | |
| 13.2 | +2.1 | 64% | 71% | 24% | 32% | 1 car, 3 yd · 5/7, 79 yd | |
| 11.6 | +0.9 | 69% | 87% | 27% | 15% | 7/8, 46 yd | |
| 8.3 | −1.1 | 37% | 47% | 10% | 0% | 9 car, 20 yd · 3/3, 33 yd | |
| 7.7 | −0.2 | 30% | 40% | 17% | 6% | 1 car, 0 yd · 4/5, 37 yd | |
| 7.3 | +1.6 | 74% | 71% | 3% | 0% | 9 car, 54 yd · 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 6.3 | −1.2 | 90% | 93% | 17% | 34% | 3/5, 33 yd | |
| 5.3 | −0.5 | 68% | 80% | 13% | 12% | 3/4, 23 yd | |
| 4.4 | −5.0 | 48% | 43% | 21% | 29% | 2/6, 24 yd | |
| 3.4 | +1.2 | 54% | 54% | 7% | 2% | 2/2, 14 yd | |
| 3.3 | −3.6 | 70% | 69% | 10% | 16% | 1/3, 23 yd | |
| 1.9 | −4.2 | 54% | 49% | 10% | 6% | 1/3, 9 yd | |
| 1.8 | −10.8 | 96% | — | 0% | — | 16/30, 195 yd, 3 INT | |
| 1.8 | +0.2 | 23% | 17% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 8 yd | |
| 0.1 | −3.7 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −2.6 | 86% | 86% | 7% | 8% | 0/2, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| -0.3 | −1.6 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Jaguars attack right, the Colts attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(8:05) (Shotgun) 16-T.Lawrence pass short right to 7-Z.Jones pushed ob at IND 39 for 8 yards (23-K.Moore).
Q1 8:05 · Jaguars · 4th & 3 at IND 47 · gained 8 · +3.13 EP · +9.5% win probability
144 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 156 plays across 22 drives, personnel groupings on 156 snaps, manual charting on 135. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
4 of 22 drives ended in points. The longest march was JAX moving 92 yards from the JAX 8 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; JAX attacks right, IND attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
156 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
156 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Colts at Jaguars, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Ryan | 16/30 | 195 | 0 | 3 | 5 | −20.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Taylor | 9 | 54 | 6.0 | 0 | +0.3 |
| Ashton Dulin | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Nyheim Miller-Hines | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashton Dulin | 5 | 7 | 79 | 0 | 24% | +1.5 |
| Nyheim Miller-Hines | 4 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 17% | +0.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bobby Okereke | 8 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zaire Franklin | 7 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| E.J. Speed | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Cross |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Lawrence | 25/30 | 235 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +17.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Robinson |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_02_IND_JAX
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Colts closed -3 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 24 — under by 19.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Deon Jackson | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Dezmon Patmon | 2 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 21% | −7.6 |
| Mike Strachan | 1 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 10% | −1.6 |
| Kylen Granson | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 7% | −0.5 |
| Jonathan Taylor | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 3% | +1.0 |
| Mo Alie-Cox | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 10% | −1.6 |
| Parris Campbell | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7% | −3.8 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Stephon Gilmore | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kenny Moore | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grover Stewart | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandon Facyson | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Rodney McLeod | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kwity Paye | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 |
| 64 |
| 2.8 |
| 1 |
| −6.0 |
| Travis Etienne | 9 | 20 | 2.2 | 0 | −3.7 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 | +0.8 |
| Jamal Agnew | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | −1.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Kirk | 6 | 6 | 78 | 2 | 20% | +10.4 |
| Evan Engram | 7 | 8 | 46 | 0 | 27% | +0.3 |
| Travis Etienne | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 10% | +1.2 |
| Marvin Jones | 3 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 17% | +1.8 |
| Zay Jones | 3 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 13% | +3.4 |
| James Robinson | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 7% | +0.7 |
| Dan Arnold | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3% | +0.3 |
| Jamal Agnew | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Cisco | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Devin Lloyd | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 3 |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 2 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyson Campbell | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chad Muma | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roy Robertson-Harris | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shaquill Griffin | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Rayshawn Jenkins | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 4 |
| Andrew Wingard | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |