The biggest swing of the game · Q3 10:47 · 4th and 1
James Robinson
Jaguars
(10:47) 25-J.Robinson left tackle for 50 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:20 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 3 · Sun, Sep 25, 2022 · SoFi Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 3
It turned at Q3 10:47, 4th and 1, on James Robinson — 15.2 win-probability points to the Jaguars on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 10:47 · 4th and 1
James Robinson
Jaguars
(10:47) 25-J.Robinson left tackle for 50 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Jacksonville Jaguars 38–10 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q3 10:47, Jaguars +15.2% win probability on one snap.
15.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Running the ball
Jaguars won this one — +0.06 expected points per carry, against Chargers at -0.66 expected points per carry.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Jaguars won this one — +0.22 expected points per snap, against Chargers at -0.26 expected points per snap.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Jaguars won this one — no giveaways, against Chargers at 2 giveaways.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Jaguars won this one — +0.35 expected points per dropback, against Chargers at -0.16 expected points per dropback.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 9.5 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 20 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Jaguars.
(10:47) 25-J.Robinson left tackle for 50 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Riley Patterson's 22-yard field goal with 15:00 left in the 2nd put Jacksonville Jaguars ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 8 scores that followed.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Jaguars ahead 9–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.66 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Jaguars ran 74 snaps at a 55% dropback rate against Chargers’s 58 at 81%. Red-zone trips: Jaguars 7, Chargers 3.
Jaguars won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.22 expected points added per play vs -0.26.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
JAX's play-action rate turned over: 30.0% in week 2 against 10.0% here — they faked the run then and dropped back clean now, a turn of 2.1 of their own weekly swings across the two.
40 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.7 points.
JAX's sack or hit rate turned over: 34.3% in week 2 against 12.8% here — they got home then and stayed blocked now, a turn of 2.4 of their own weekly swings across the two.
47 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -14 pts to 19 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +4.3 vs their 0.1 pts, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (+0.84× that swing) · 73 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +3.1 vs their 4.3 pts, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (+0.54× that swing) · 58 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 93%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.7 vs their 56.8%, and they swing ±10.0 week to week (−0.77× that swing) · 55 early downs
leaned — passed early · +15.3 vs their 63.7%, and they swing ±11.4 week to week (+1.34× that swing) · 43 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 49%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −10.6 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (−1.09× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −11.8 vs their 26.7%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (−1.36× that swing) · 47 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -28% to 91%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +11.4 vs their 31.5%, and they swing ±23.3 week to week (+0.49× that swing) · 7 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · +2.9 vs their 30.4%, and they swing ±18.2 week to week (+0.16× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 60%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +7.0 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (+0.79× that swing) · 47 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +8.7 vs their 31.3%, and they swing ±11.2 week to week (+0.78× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 39%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −4.0 vs their 16.8%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (−0.45× that swing) · 47 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −8.6 vs their 13.5%, and they swing ±7.0 week to week (−1.23× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
LAC's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 14.9%, 11.8 points below their season mean of 26.7% and 1.4 times their own 8.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Jacksonville Jaguars
48 dressed · 5 inactive
Inactive · 5
Los Angeles Chargers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Who moved the needle
Passing · LAC
25/45, 297 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
-9.1 expected points added · -6.7% completion over expected
Passing · JAX
28/39, 262 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT
14.7 expected points added · +2.2% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
James Robinson banked 5.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.2 | −1.9 | 99% | — | 0% | — | 28/39, 262 yd, 3 TD · 3 car, 7 yd | |
| 24.5 | +1.7 | 76% | 78% | 29% | 20% | 1 car, 0 yd · 10/11, 85 yd, 1 TD | |
| 20.6 | +5.6 | 58% | 59% | 8% | 0% | 17 car, 100 yd, 1 TD · 3/3, 16 yd | |
| 19.2 | +0.6 | 92% | 95% | 24% | 31% | 6/9, 72 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.9 | +4.0 | 93% | 91% | 22% | 19% | 6/9, 99 yd | |
| 13.3 | −1.5 | 68% | 80% | 18% | 49% | 4/7, 33 yd, 1 TD | |
| 13.3 | −0.1 | 56% | 57% | 20% | 0% | 4 car, 5 yd · 8/8, 48 yd | |
| 12.6 | −7.4 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 25/45, 297 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 1 car, 7 yd | |
| 10.5 | −0.8 | 43% | 39% | 8% | 0% | 13 car, 45 yd · 3/3, 30 yd | |
| 8.5 | −3.7 | 90% | 87% | 15% | 31% | 1/6, 15 yd, 1 TD | |
| 8.4 | +2.3 | 26% | 26% | 7% | 25% | 2/3, 64 yd | |
| 5.6 | −1.8 | 74% | 72% | 10% | 7% | 1 car, -5 yd · 3/4, 31 yd | |
| 4.5 | −6.4 | 75% | 74% | 15% | 21% | 2/6, 25 yd | |
| 4.1 | −1.8 | 23% | 17% | 5% | 2% | 5 car, 22 yd · 1/2, 9 yd | |
| 3.9 | −4.3 | 76% | 83% | 8% | 10% | 1 car, 0 yd · 1/3, 9 yd | |
| 2.7 | +1.1 | 16% | 12% | 3% | 3% | 1/1, 17 yd | |
| 2.3 | −1.6 | 21% | 23% | 5% | 0% | 1 car, -3 yd · 2/2, 6 yd | |
| 0.0 | −1.4 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.0 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 31% | 32% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| -0.1 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. |
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Chargers attack right, the Jaguars attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(14:49) 10-J.Herbert pass short left intended for 20-S.Michel INTERCEPTED by 33-D.Lloyd (32-T.Campbell) at LAC 15. 33-D.Lloyd to LAC 5 for 10 yards (7-G.Everett).
Q2 14:49 · Chargers · 1st & 10 at LAC 9 · gained nothing · -6.29 EP · −15.4% win probability
165 snaps placed · 8 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 173 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 173 snaps, manual charting on 149. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
9 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was LAC moving 75 yards from the LAC 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; LAC attacks right, JAX attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
173 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
173 plays
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, dropped.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
The sack was on the quarterback.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, from outside the pocket, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Jaguars at Chargers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Lawrence | 28/39 | 262 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +14.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Robinson | 17 | 100 | 5.9 | 1 | +1.6 |
| Travis Etienne | 13 | 45 | 3.5 | 0 | −0.8 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | +1.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zay Jones | 10 | 11 | 85 | 1 | 29% | +4.6 |
| Christian Kirk | 6 | 9 | 72 | 1 | 24% | +1.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tre Herndon | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin Lloyd | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 3 |
| Rayshawn Jenkins |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 25/45 | 297 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −9.1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony Michel |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_03_JAX_LAC
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chargers closed -6.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 46; the game landed 48 — over by 2.0.
Conditions and crew
| Zay Jones | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Evan Engram | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| C.J. Beathard | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | +0.0 |
| Marvin Jones | 4 | 7 | 33 | 1 | 18% | +0.8 |
| Travis Etienne | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 8% | +3.6 |
| Jamal Agnew | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 3% | +2.2 |
| James Robinson | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 8% | +1.7 |
| Evan Engram | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 8% | +1.5 |
| Jamycal Hasty | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.6 |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Andre Cisco | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyson Campbell | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dawuane Smoot | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darious Williams | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Travon Walker | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 |
| 22 |
| 4.4 |
| 0 |
| −0.0 |
| Justin Herbert | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | +1.5 |
| Austin Ekeler | 4 | 5 | 1.3 | 0 | −4.1 |
| Joshua Kelley | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | 0 | −1.9 |
| DeAndre Carter | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Palmer | 6 | 9 | 99 | 0 | 22% | +6.0 |
| Jalen Guyton | 2 | 3 | 64 | 0 | 7% | +5.6 |
| Austin Ekeler | 8 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 20% | −0.3 |
| DeAndre Carter | 3 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 10% | −1.3 |
| Gerald Everett | 2 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 15% | −0.4 |
| Mike Williams | 1 | 6 | 15 | 1 | 15% | −4.0 |
| Sony Michel | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 5% | −5.5 |
| Joshua Kelley | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5% | −0.2 |
| Zander Horvath | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2% | −0.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drue Tranquill | 9 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Michael Davis | 8 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derwin James | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sebastian Joseph | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Van Noy | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalil Mack | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nasir Adderley | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryce Callahan | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenneth Murray | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asante Samuel | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |