The biggest swing of the game · Q1 4:55 · 2nd and 5
Marcus Jones
Patriots
(4:55) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass short left to 25-Ma.Jones for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 300s tick · as of 5:29 PM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 13 · Thu, Dec 1, 2022 · Gillette Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 13
It turned at Q1 4:55, 2nd and 5, on Marcus Jones — 11.2 win-probability points to the Patriots on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 4:55 · 2nd and 5
Marcus Jones
Patriots
(4:55) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass short left to 25-Ma.Jones for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Buffalo Bills 24–10. Biggest swing: Q1 4:55, Patriots +11.2% win probability on one snap.
11.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Bills won this one — 3 touchdowns on 3 trips, against Patriots at 0 touchdowns on 2 trips.
Billsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Bills won this one — 9 of 14 on third down, against Patriots at 3 of 12 on third down.
Billsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Bills won this one — +0.33 expected points per dropback, against Patriots at +0.01 expected points per dropback.
Billsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Bills won this one — +0.17 expected points per snap, against Patriots at -0.03 expected points per snap.
Billsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 8.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 20 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Patriots.
(4:55) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass short left to 25-Ma.Jones for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Stefon Diggs's 8-yard touchdown catch with 15:00 left in the 2nd put Buffalo Bills ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 3 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Bills ahead 6–3 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Bills ran 68 snaps at a 54% dropback rate against Patriots’s 51 at 75%. Red-zone trips: Bills 3, Patriots 2.
Bills won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.17 expected points added per play vs -0.03.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
NE's early-down pass rate, 73.7%, is past their previous high of 69.8% in week 12 — the highest of their 12 charted games through week 13.
38 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.6 points.
BUF's early-down pass rate turned over: 66.1% in week 12 against 46.3% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
54 early downs this game, floor 15 — 16 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.7 points.
BUF's sack or hit rate turned over: 23.1% in week 12 against 10.5% here — they got home then and stayed blocked now, a turn of 2.1 of their own weekly swings across the two.
38 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 16 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -19 pts to 26 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −10.2 vs their 6.1 pts, and they swing ±7.7 week to week (−1.32× that swing) · 68 snaps
right on their number · +0.5 vs their -1.3 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (+0.07× that swing) · 51 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 31% to 86%
Tendencies room →leaned — ran early · −14.3 vs their 60.6%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (−1.48× that swing) · 54 early downs
leaned — passed early · +17.4 vs their 56.3%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (+1.82× that swing) · 38 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -9% to 45%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.9 vs their 19.8%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−0.11× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
right on their number · −4.9 vs their 18.0%, and they swing ±10.6 week to week (−0.46× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -53% to 174%
Fourth Down room →Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 61.7%.
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 21.7%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -15% to 59%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −8.5 vs their 16.4%, and they swing ±11.9 week to week (−0.71× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −7.3 vs their 26.3%, and they swing ±12.6 week to week (−0.58× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 31%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −3.5 vs their 14.0%, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (−0.59× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
right on their number · +2.0 vs their 14.2%, and they swing ±6.7 week to week (+0.30× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
NE's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 73.7%, 17.4 points above their season mean of 56.3% and 1.8 times their own 9.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Buffalo Bills
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
New England Patriots
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · BUF
22/33, 223 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
11.8 expected points added · +3.5% completion over expected
Passing · NE
22/36, 195 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
0.8 expected points added · -5.1% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Stefon Diggs banked 4.0 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.2 | +4.0 | 73% | 81% | 27% | 52% | 7/9, 92 yd, 1 TD | |
| 16.9 | −3.4 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/33, 223 yd, 2 TD · 8 car, 20 yd | |
| 16.5 | 0.0 | 43% | 41% | 18% | 1% | 14 car, 64 yd · 6/6, 41 yd | |
| 13.8 | −1.9 | 98% | 97% | 24% | 0% | 10 car, 54 yd · 6/8, 24 yd | |
| 12.5 | +0.3 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/36, 195 yd, 1 TD · 3 car, 7 yd | |
| 11.1 | −0.9 | 44% | 35% | 6% | 0% | 13 car, 51 yd, 1 TD · 0/2, 0 yd | |
| 9.5 | −5.2 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. | |
| 9.4 | +2.1 | 52% | 68% | 15% | 8% | 5/5, 44 yd | |
| 5.2 | −1.7 | 57% | 61% | 15% | 16% | 3/5, 22 yd | |
| 5.1 | −0.2 | 39% | 34% | 9% | 32% | 2/3, 31 yd | |
| 3.7 | −1.4 | 56% | 50% | 9% | 16% | 2/3, 17 yd | |
| 3.6 | −3.0 | 87% | 84% | 12% | 20% | 2/4, 16 yd | |
| 3.3 | −4.7 | 87% | 82% | 15% | 14% | 2/5, 13 yd | |
| 2.8 | −2.8 | 31% | 30% | 6% | 5% | 2 car, -3 yd · 1/2, 21 yd | |
| 2.6 | +0.1 | 31% | 29% | 6% | 0% | 2/2, 6 yd | |
| 2.5 | −0.3 | 37% | 42% | 6% | 5% | 1/2, 15 yd | |
| 2.0 | +0.4 | 21% | 14% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 10 yd | |
| 0.0 | −1.1 | 84% | 92% | 3% | 0% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 29% | 14% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| -0.1 | −0.6 | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Patriots attack right, the Bills attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(4:55) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass short left to 25-Ma.Jones for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q1 4:55 · Patriots · 2nd & 5 at BUF 48 · gained 48 · +4.22 EP · +13.7% win probability
155 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 166 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 166 snaps, manual charting on 143. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was BUF moving 94 yards from the BUF 6 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NE attacks right, BUF attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
166 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
166 plays
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
A screen, play action, nobody in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Bills at Patriots, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 22/33 | 223 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +11.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Cook | 14 | 64 | 4.6 | 0 | −1.5 |
| Devin Singletary | 13 | 51 | 3.9 | 1 | +1.7 |
| Josh Allen | 8 | 20 | 2.5 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefon Diggs | 7 | 9 | 92 | 1 | 27% | +7.9 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 5 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 15% | +4.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tremaine Edmunds | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matt Milano | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Poyer | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gregory Rousseau |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Jones | 22/36 | 195 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +0.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamondre Stevenson |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_13_BUF_NE
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Bills closed -3.5 and covered, winning by 14.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 34 — under by 9.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Nyheim Miller-Hines | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 | −1.6 |
| James Cook | 6 | 6 | 41 | 0 | 18% | +1.2 |
| Nyheim Miller-Hines | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 6% | +2.9 |
| Gabe Davis | 2 | 7 | 15 | 1 | 21% | +0.8 |
| Khalil Shakir | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.3 |
| Devin Singletary | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6% | −1.1 |
| Dawson Knox | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Tre'Davious White | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Taron Johnson | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Damar Hamlin | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Shaq Lawson | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Siran Neal | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| A.J. Epenesa | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 |
| 54 |
| 5.4 |
| 0 |
| +0.7 |
| Mac Jones | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | −1.8 |
| Kevin Harris | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Jones | 2 | 2 | 51 | 1 | 6% | +3.9 |
| Tyquan Thornton | 2 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 9% | +2.6 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 6 | 8 | 24 | 0 | 24% | −0.1 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 3 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 15% | −2.3 |
| Nelson Agholor | 2 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 9% | +0.7 |
| DeVante Parker | 2 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 12% | +1.4 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 6% | +0.5 |
| Hunter Henry | 2 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 15% | −1.8 |
| Jonnu Smith | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6% | −0.7 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davon Godchaux | 2 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Jones | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ja'Whaun Bentley | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joshua Uche | 4 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin McCourty | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jabrill Peppers | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Dugger | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Jack Jones | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deatrich Wise | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mack Wilson | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |