The biggest swing of the game · Q1 14:20 · 2nd and 6
Travis Etienne
Lions
(14:20) 1-T.Etienne left end to JAX 38 for 13 yards (5-D.Elliott). FUMBLES (5-D.Elliott), RECOVERED by DET-34-A.Anzalone at JAX 38.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 300s tick · as of 5:29 PM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 13 · Sun, Dec 4, 2022 · Ford Field
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 13
It turned at Q1 14:20, 2nd and 6, on Travis Etienne — 10.3 win-probability points to the Lions on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 14:20 · 2nd and 6
Travis Etienne
Lions
(14:20) 1-T.Etienne left end to JAX 38 for 13 yards (5-D.Elliott). FUMBLES (5-D.Elliott), RECOVERED by DET-34-A.Anzalone at JAX 38.
Detroit Lions 40–14 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 14:20, Lions +10.3% win probability on one snap.
10.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Third down
Lions won this one — 8 of 12 on third down, against Jaguars at 3 of 12 on third down.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Lions won this one — +0.50 expected points per dropback, against Jaguars at -0.05 expected points per dropback.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Lions won this one — +0.29 expected points per snap, against Jaguars at -0.09 expected points per snap.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Lions won this one — 54% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Jaguars at 41% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 1.7 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 8 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Lions.
(14:20) 1-T.Etienne left end to JAX 38 for 13 yards (5-D.Elliott). FUMBLES (5-D.Elliott), RECOVERED by DET-34-A.Anzalone at JAX 38.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Jamaal Williams's 1-yard rushing touchdown with 10:58 left in the 1st put Detroit Lions ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 10 scores that followed.
11 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Lions ahead 7–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.50 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Jaguars ran 56 snaps at a 71% dropback rate against Lions’s 72 at 60%. Red-zone trips: Jaguars 2, Lions 5.
Lions won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.29 expected points added per play vs -0.09.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DET's pass rate over expected, +11.1 pts, is past their previous high of +8.2 pts in week 2 — the highest of their 12 charted games through week 13.
72 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.4 points.
JAX's fourth-and-short go rate, 66.7%, is past their previous high of 50.0% in week 2 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 13.
6 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 11 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 23.3 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -18 pts to 15 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +3.8 vs their 0.1 pts, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (+0.73× that swing) · 55 snaps
off script — threw more than the situation asked · +13.0 vs their -1.8 pts, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (+2.02× that swing) · 72 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 29% to 83%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +9.9 vs their 56.8%, and they swing ±10.0 week to week (+0.98× that swing) · 39 early downs
right on their number · +3.6 vs their 53.1%, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (+0.39× that swing) · 60 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 50%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +2.5 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (+0.26× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +7.2 vs their 27.7%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (+0.84× that swing) · 43 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -30% to 115%
Fourth Down room →leaned — went for it · +35.2 vs their 31.5%, and they swing ±23.3 week to week (+1.51× that swing) · 6 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 50.7%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 62%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −4.4 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (−0.49× that swing) · 43 dropbacks
right on their number · −2.3 vs their 33.1%, and they swing ±11.2 week to week (−0.21× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 40%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.5 vs their 16.8%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (−0.84× that swing) · 43 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −7.1 vs their 14.6%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (−0.83× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
DET's pass rate over expected was the night's one real departure: 11.1 pts, 13.0 points above their season mean of -1.8 pts and 2.0 times their own 6.4-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Jacksonville Jaguars
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Detroit Lions
48 dressed · 6 inactive
Inactive · 6
Who moved the needle
Passing · DET
31/41, 340 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
21.6 expected points added · +4.6% completion over expected
Passing · JAX
17/31, 179 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
-1.2 expected points added · -10.1% completion over expected
Receiving · DET
11/12 for 114 yds, 2 TD
31% of team targets · 14.8 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Amon-Ra St. Brown banked 5.0 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.6 | +5.0 | 87% | 91% | 31% | 31% | 1 car, 2 yd · 11/12, 114 yd, 2 TD | |
| 21.6 | −1.2 | 97% | — | 0% | — | 31/41, 340 yd, 2 TD | |
| 21.1 | −1.0 | 51% | 53% | 15% | 0% | 14 car, 62 yd, 1 TD · 4/6, 49 yd | |
| 16.4 | +0.8 | 86% | 78% | 24% | 32% | 6/8, 104 yd | |
| 16.4 | −4.8 | 93% | — | 0% | — | 17/31, 179 yd, 1 TD · 4 car, 32 yd | |
| 14.8 | +1.5 | 84% | 95% | 15% | 44% | 5/6, 98 yd | |
| 14.0 | +1.0 | 77% | 75% | 21% | 11% | 5/7, 30 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.5 | +0.4 | 30% | 26% | 0% | — | 11 car, 35 yd, 1 TD | |
| 7.6 | −4.0 | 88% | 80% | 9% | 0% | 13 car, 54 yd · 3/3, 12 yd | |
| 5.3 | −3.1 | 21% | 26% | 13% | 0% | 1 car, 4 yd · 3/5, 19 yd | |
| 4.9 | −1.8 | 79% | 79% | 10% | 7% | 3/4, 19 yd | |
| 4.5 | +0.9 | 46% | 37% | 5% | 1% | 2/2, 25 yd | |
| 3.6 | −8.2 | 82% | 78% | 21% | 18% | 2/7, 16 yd | |
| 2.7 | −5.1 | 68% | 63% | 12% | 29% | 1/4, 17 yd | |
| 2.6 | −1.1 | 17% | 21% | 5% | 4% | 1 car, -6 yd · 2/2, 12 yd | |
| 2.3 | −1.0 | 16% | 18% | 3% | 1% | 1 car, 3 yd · 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 1.4 | −0.2 | 30% | 28% | 3% | 2% | 1/1, 4 yd | |
| 1.3 | −0.2 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.3 | −0.1 | 20% | 18% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 3 yd | |
| 0.6 | +0.1 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.4 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.2 | −0.4 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −2.2 | 11% | 5% | 3% | 9% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | −2.2 | 27% | 18% | 3% | 5% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 14% | 15% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| -0.1 | +0.1 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. |
5 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Lions attack right, the Jaguars attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(14:20) 1-T.Etienne left end to JAX 38 for 13 yards (5-D.Elliott). FUMBLES (5-D.Elliott), RECOVERED by DET-34-A.Anzalone at JAX 38.
Q1 14:20 · Jaguars · 2nd & 6 at JAX 25 · gained 13 · -4.58 EP · −11.9% win probability
161 snaps placed · 10 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 171 plays across 18 drives, personnel groupings on 171 snaps, manual charting on 143. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
11 of 18 drives ended in points. The longest march was DET moving 75 yards from the DET 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; DET attacks right, JAX attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
171 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
171 plays
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Jaguars at Lions, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Lawrence | 17/31 | 179 | 1 | 0 | 2 | −1.2 |
| C.J. Beathard | 2/3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −4.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Etienne | 13 | 54 | 4.2 | 0 | −5.3 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 4 | 32 | 8.0 | 0 | +3.7 |
| Snoop Conner |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Kirk | 6 | 8 | 104 | 0 | 24% | +7.5 |
| Evan Engram | 5 | 7 | 30 | 1 | 21% | +1.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad Muma | 7 | 4 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 6 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrew Wingard | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Davon Hamilton |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Goff | 31/41 | 340 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +21.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre Swift |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_13_JAX_DET
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Lions closed -1 and covered, winning by 26.
Total closed 51.5; the game landed 54 — over by 2.5.
Conditions and crew
| 1 |
| 6 |
| 6.0 |
| 0 |
| −0.0 |
| Jamal Agnew | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | +2.1 |
| Marvin Jones | 1 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 12% | −1.4 |
| Zay Jones | 2 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 21% | −4.2 |
| Travis Etienne | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 9% | −1.6 |
| Luke Farrell | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3% | −3.3 |
| Tim Jones | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3% | −0.1 |
| Jamal Agnew | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | +0.3 |
| Chris Manhertz | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −1.2 |
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 0.5 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Travon Walker | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin Lloyd | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rayshawn Jenkins | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyson Campbell | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dawuane Smoot | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darious Williams | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| 14 |
| 62 |
| 4.4 |
| 1 |
| +0.6 |
| Jamaal Williams | 11 | 35 | 3.2 | 1 | +0.4 |
| Justin Jackson | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Jason Cabinda | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Nate Sudfeld | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | 0 | −3.5 |
| Kalif Raymond | 1 | -6 | -6.0 | 0 | −1.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 11 | 12 | 114 | 2 | 31% | +14.8 |
| D.J. Chark | 5 | 6 | 98 | 0 | 15% | +6.5 |
| D'Andre Swift | 4 | 6 | 49 | 0 | 15% | +2.0 |
| Brock Wright | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 5% | +1.4 |
| Justin Jackson | 3 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 13% | +0.0 |
| Josh Reynolds | 3 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 10% | +1.2 |
| Kalif Raymond | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 5% | +0.4 |
| Shane Zylstra | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | −0.2 |
| Jameson Williams | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerby Joseph | 7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeShon Elliott | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Harris | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Benito Jones | 0 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Malcolm Rodriguez | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jeff Okudah | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerry Jacobs | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Alex Anzalone | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Cominsky | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Derrick Barnes | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |