The biggest swing of the game · Q2 5:47 · 2nd and 8
Roquan Smith
Ravens
(5:47) (Shotgun) 10-M.Trubisky pass short middle intended for 88-P.Freiermuth INTERCEPTED by 18-R.Smith at BAL 10. 18-R.Smith to BAL 29 for 19 yards (18-D.Johnson).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 7:03 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 14 · Sun, Dec 11, 2022 · Acrisure Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 14
It turned at Q2 5:47, 2nd and 8, on Roquan Smith — 16.2 win-probability points to the Ravens on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 5:47 · 2nd and 8
Roquan Smith
Ravens
(5:47) (Shotgun) 10-M.Trubisky pass short middle intended for 88-P.Freiermuth INTERCEPTED by 18-R.Smith at BAL 10. 18-R.Smith to BAL 29 for 19 yards (18-D.Johnson).
Baltimore Ravens 16–14 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q2 5:47, Ravens +16.2% win probability on one snap.
16.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Giveaways
Ravens won this one — no giveaways, against Steelers at 3 giveaways.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Ravens won this one — 7 chunk plays, against Steelers at 4 chunk plays.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Steelers owned this one and still lost it — 4 of 8 on third down, against Ravens at 4 of 12 on third down.
Steelersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Running the ball
Ravens won this one — +0.08 expected points per carry, against Steelers at -0.16 expected points per carry.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 2.1 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 7 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Steelers.
(5:47) (Shotgun) 10-M.Trubisky pass short middle intended for 88-P.Freiermuth INTERCEPTED by 18-R.Smith at BAL 10. 18-R.Smith to BAL 29 for 19 yards (18-D.Johnson).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Justin Tucker's 42-yard field goal with 4:50 left in the 1st put Baltimore Ravens ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Steelers ahead 6–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Ravens, in turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Ravens ran 57 snaps at a 40% dropback rate against Steelers’s 53 at 66%. Red-zone trips: Ravens 3, Steelers 4.
Steelers outgained Ravens 329-315 but lost the turnover battle 3-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
BAL's early-down pass rate turned over: 75.0% in week 13 against 34.9% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 3.1 of their own weekly swings across the two.
43 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 12.8 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -27 pts to 17 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · −7.2 vs their -5.0 pts, and they swing ±8.7 week to week (−0.82× that swing) · 57 snaps
right on their number · +3.4 vs their -3.7 pts, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (+0.46× that swing) · 53 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 18% to 83%
Tendencies room →leaned — ran early · −16.0 vs their 50.8%, and they swing ±12.8 week to week (−1.25× that swing) · 43 early downs
inside their normal wobble · +8.2 vs their 51.8%, and they swing ±12.3 week to week (+0.67× that swing) · 45 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -10% to 59%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −3.0 vs their 24.7%, and they swing ±13.6 week to week (−0.22× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +12.1 vs their 13.6%, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (+1.63× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -46% to 104%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +5.5 vs their 34.5%, and they swing ±26.7 week to week (+0.21× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 18.3%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 65%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.8 vs their 26.5%, and they swing ±10.4 week to week (−0.08× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +10.9 vs their 28.2%, and they swing ±14.3 week to week (+0.76× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 30%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.3 vs their 14.6%, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (−0.06× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
right on their number · +0.3 vs their 12.7%, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.06× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
PIT's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 25.7%, 12.1 points above their season mean of 13.6% and 1.6 times their own 7.4-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Baltimore Ravens
48 dressed · 7 inactive
Inactive · 7
Pittsburgh Steelers
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · PIT
22/30, 276 yds, 1 TD, 3 INT
6.6 expected points added · +11.4% completion over expected
Passing · BAL
8/12, 88 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
1.7 expected points added · +1.3% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
J.K. Dobbins banked 8.7 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.0 | +8.7 | 43% | 35% | 0% | — | 15 car, 120 yd, 1 TD | |
| 14.2 | +2.7 | 95% | 89% | 26% | 40% | 6/8, 82 yd | |
| 13.0 | −0.5 | 56% | 46% | 10% | 5% | 12 car, 33 yd, 1 TD · 2/3, 17 yd | |
| 12.3 | +2.9 | 56% | 57% | 19% | 15% | 3/6, 33 yd, 1 TD | |
| 10.8 | +6.0 | 76% | 86% | 10% | 21% | 3/3, 78 yd | |
| 10.2 | +2.6 | 61% | 61% | 35% | 48% | 5/6, 52 yd | |
| 9.0 | −1.4 | 85% | — | 0% | — | 22/30, 276 yd, 1 TD, 3 INT | |
| 7.1 | +1.8 | 49% | 49% | 13% | 6% | 1 car, 1 yd · 4/4, 30 yd | |
| 6.6 | −0.9 | 62% | — | 0% | — | 8/12, 88 yd · 9 car, 31 yd | |
| 6.6 | +0.4 | 34% | 13% | 0% | — | 13 car, 66 yd | |
| 5.4 | +2.7 | 18% | 35% | 12% | 22% | 2/2, 34 yd | |
| 4.7 | −0.2 | 40% | 49% | 10% | 0% | 3 car, 11 yd · 2/3, 16 yd | |
| 3.7 | −4.5 | 89% | 78% | 35% | 25% | 2/6, 17 yd | |
| 2.3 | +0.7 | 20% | 17% | 3% | 4% | 1/1, 13 yd | |
| 2.2 | −1.1 | 18% | 22% | 12% | 0% | 1 car, 1 yd · 2/2, 1 yd | |
| 1.7 | −1.1 | 36% | 31% | 6% | 6% | 1/2, 7 yd | |
| 1.6 | −0.1 | 15% | — | 0% | — | 0/1, 0 yd · 2 car, 16 yd | |
| 0.4 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.2 | −0.1 | 74% | 26% | 0% | — | 1 car, 2 yd | |
| 0.1 | −0.8 | 38% | — | 0% | — | 3/5, 16 yd · 3 car, -5 yd | |
| 0.0 | −1.7 | 57% | 48% | 6% | 8% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.5 | 45% | 40% | 3% | 3% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 18% | 6% | 0% | — | No touches. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Steelers attack right, the Ravens attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(5:47) (Shotgun) 10-M.Trubisky pass short middle intended for 88-P.Freiermuth INTERCEPTED by 18-R.Smith at BAL 10. 18-R.Smith to BAL 29 for 19 yards (18-D.Johnson).
Q2 5:47 · Steelers · 2nd & 8 at BAL 17 · gained nothing · -5.15 EP · −16.7% win probability
139 snaps placed · 10 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 149 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 149 snaps, manual charting on 128. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was PIT moving 75 yards from the PIT 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; PIT attacks right, BAL attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
149 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
149 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the second read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Ravens at Steelers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Huntley | 8/12 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1.7 |
| Anthony Brown | 3/5 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J.K. Dobbins | 15 | 120 | 8.0 | 1 | +6.1 |
| Gus Edwards | 13 | 66 | 5.1 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Tyler Huntley |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demarcus Robinson | 5 | 6 | 52 | 0 | 35% | +2.2 |
| DeSean Jackson | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | 12% | +3.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Clark | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Hamilton | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marlon Humphrey | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Queen |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell Trubisky | 22/30 | 276 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +6.6 |
| Kenny Pickett | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −3.9 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_14_BAL_PIT
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Steelers closed -1.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 37; the game landed 30 — under by 7.0.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| 9 |
| 31 |
| 3.4 |
| 0 |
| −3.0 |
| Patrick Ricard | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | +0.4 |
| Kenyan Drake | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Anthony Brown | 3 | -5 | -1.7 | 0 | +0.0 |
| Mark Andrews | 2 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 35% | −1.1 |
| Kenyan Drake | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12% | −1.0 |
| Devin Duvernay | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6% | −0.4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Marcus Peters | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Roquan Smith | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Calais Campbell | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Williams | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jason Pierre-Paul | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyus Bowser | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Najee Harris | 12 | 33 | 2.8 | 1 | −2.7 |
| Kenny Pickett | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | +1.2 |
| Jaylen Warren | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 | +0.6 |
| Benny Snell | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Steven Sims | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diontae Johnson | 6 | 8 | 82 | 0 | 26% | +4.0 |
| George Pickens | 3 | 3 | 78 | 0 | 10% | +4.8 |
| Pat Freiermuth | 3 | 6 | 33 | 1 | 19% | −4.0 |
| Steven Sims | 4 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 13% | +0.4 |
| Najee Harris | 2 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 10% | +1.2 |
| Jaylen Warren | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 10% | +0.2 |
| Connor Heyward | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 3% | +0.7 |
| Gunner Olszewski | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6% | −0.4 |
| Zach Gentry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minkah Fitzpatrick | 6 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Terrell Edmunds | 2 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Myles Jack | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin Bush | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Heyward | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| T.J. Watt | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damontae Kazee | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arthur Maulet | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Wormley | 1 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Sutton | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |