The biggest swing of the game · Q3 10:05 · 1st and 10
Zonovan Knight
Jets
(10:05) (Shotgun) 27-Z.Knight left tackle for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
11.8
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 10:10 AM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 14 · Sun, Dec 11, 2022 · New Era Field
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 14
It turned at Q3 10:05, 1st and 10, on Zonovan Knight — 11.8 win-probability points to the Jets on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
Buffalo Bills 20–12. Biggest swing: Q3 10:05, Jets +11.8% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 10:05 · 1st and 10
Zonovan Knight
Jets
(10:05) (Shotgun) 27-Z.Knight left tackle for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
11.8
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Third down
Jets owned this one and still lost it — 8 of 17 on third down, against Bills at 2 of 13 on third down.
Jetsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Giveaways
Bills won this one — no giveaways, against Jets at 2 giveaways.
Billsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Jets owned this one and still lost it — 38% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Bills at 34% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Jetsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Running the ball
Bills won this one — -0.19 expected points per carry, against Jets at -0.32 expected points per carry.
Billsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 13.3 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 29 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Jets.
(10:05) (Shotgun) 27-Z.Knight left tackle for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Josh Allen's 5-yard rushing touchdown with 7:24 left in the 3rd put Buffalo Bills ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 4 scores that followed.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Jets ahead 4–3 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Bills, in turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Jets ran 73 snaps at a 70% dropback rate against Bills’s 53 at 62%. Red-zone trips: Jets 3, Bills 3.
Jets outgained Bills 309-233 but lost the turnover battle 2-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
2 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
BUF's fourth-and-short go rate, 0.0%, is past their previous low of 33.3% in week 4 — the lowest of their 5 charted games through week 14.
5 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 5 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 43.9 points. · −1.4σ from their own normal
NYJ's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 75.0% in week 13 against 0.0% here — they went for it then and took the kick now, a turn of 2.3 of their own weekly swings across the two.
3 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 14 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 32.9 points. · −0.9σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -18 pts to 26 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +3.3 vs their -3.1 pts, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.64× that swing) · 73 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −6.1 vs their 6.1 pts, and they swing ±7.7 week to week (−0.79× that swing) · 53 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 24% to 89%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +8.8 vs their 56.6%, and they swing ±12.7 week to week (+0.69× that swing) · 55 early downs
right on their number · −3.1 vs their 60.6%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (−0.32× that swing) · 40 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -10% to 47%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.2 vs their 18.5%, and they swing ±11.2 week to week (+0.10× that swing) · 51 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.4 vs their 19.8%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (+0.17× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -58% to 174%
Fourth Down room →inside their normal wobble · −30.4 vs their 30.4%, and they swing ±32.9 week to week (−0.92× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
leaned — took the kick · −61.7 vs their 61.7%, and they swing ±43.9 week to week (−1.40× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -14% to 47%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +9.7 vs their 14.5%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (+1.52× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
right on their number · +5.2 vs their 16.4%, and they swing ±11.9 week to week (+0.43× that swing) · 51 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 39%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −1.4 vs their 19.6%, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (−0.19× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.7 vs their 14.0%, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (+0.28× that swing) · 51 dropbacks
NYJ's blitz rate sent was the night's one real departure: 24.2%, 9.7 points above their season mean of 14.5% and 1.5 times their own 6.4-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
New York Jets
48 dressed · 6 inactive
Inactive · 6
Buffalo Bills
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · NYJ
27/44, 268 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
1.9 expected points added · -1.3% completion over expected
Passing · BUF
16/27, 147 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
-4.8 expected points added · -8.2% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Zonovan Knight banked 5.5 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh AllenQB · Starter QB | 20.6 | +3.2 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 16/27, 147 yd, 1 TD · 10 car, 47 yd, 1 TD |
| Zonovan KnightRB · Committee Back | 15.7 | +5.5 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. |
| Dawson KnoxTE · Alpha Receiver | 14.1 | +3.6 | 86% | 94% | 26% | 29% | 4/7, 41 yd, 1 TD |
| Garrett WilsonWR · Rotational Receiver | 13.8 | +4.4 | 97% | 100% | 16% | 24% | 6/7, 78 yd |
| Elijah MooreWR · Featured Receiver | 12.0 | −1.9 | 83% | 92% | 23% | 29% | 6/10, 60 yd |
| Mike WhiteQB · Starter QB | 10.7 | 0.0 | 91% | — | 0% | — | 27/44, 268 yd |
| Tyler ConklinTE · Featured Receiver | 7.8 | −3.0 | 72% | 80% | 18% | 14% | 5/8, 28 yd |
| Stefon DiggsWR · Featured Receiver | 6.7 | −0.3 | 78% | 91% | 19% | 13% | 3/5, 37 yd |
| Denzel MimsWR · Rotational Receiver | 6.5 | −1.1 | 69% | 69% | 11% | 13% | 3/5, 35 yd |
| Gabe DavisWR | 6.1 | −0.4 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. |
| Isaiah McKenzieWR · Featured Receiver | 5.8 | −2.2 | 64% | 73% | 19% | 15% | 1 car, 7 yd · 3/5, 21 yd |
| Devin SingletaryRB | 5.3 | −1.6 | 49% | 48% | 7% | 4% | 8 car, 39 yd · 1/2, 4 yd |
| Braxton BerriosWR · Rotational Receiver | 3.5 | −1.0 | 23% | 24% | 7% | 12% | 1/3, 25 yd |
| Michael CarterRB · Receiving Back | 3.0 | −7.3 | 50% | 63% | 14% | 1% | 5 car, 5 yd · 3/6, 15 yd |
| James CookRB | 2.5 | −1.2 | 41% | 39% | 4% | 0% | 4 car, 6 yd · 1/1, 9 yd |
| Corey DavisWR · Rotational Receiver | 2.5 | +1.3 | 12% | 12% | 2% | 4% | 1/1, 15 yd |
| Nyheim Miller-HinesRB | 1.7 | −0.5 | 17% | 18% | 4% | 2% | 1 car, 3 yd · 1/1, 4 yd |
| C.J. UzomahTE · Rotational Receiver | 1.7 | −1.4 | 46% | 27% | 5% | 5% | 1/2, 7 yd |
| Taiwan JonesRB | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| John BrownWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −2.4 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. |
| Khalil ShakirWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.7 | 20% | 12% | 4% | 5% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| Kenny YeboahTE | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Joe FlaccoQB | -2.0 | −3.0 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
6 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Bills attack right, the Jets attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(5:42) M.White returns at QB. (Shotgun) 5-M.White pass short right to 17-G.Wilson ran ob at BUF 38 for 12 yards.
Q2 5:42 · Jets · 3rd & 10 at 50 · gained 12 · +2.06 EP · +9.8% win probability
168 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 179 plays across 26 drives, personnel groupings on 179 snaps, manual charting on 156. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 26 drives ended in points. The longest march was BUF moving 75 yards from the BUF 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; BUF attacks right, NYJ attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
179 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
179 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Jets at Bills, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike White | 27/44 | 268 | 0 | 0 | 3 | +1.9 |
| Joe Flacco | 1/3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −7.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zonovan Knight | 17 | 71 | 4.2 | 1 | +1.6 |
| Michael Carter | 5 | 5 | 1.0 | 0 | −8.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Wilson | 6 | 7 | 78 | 0 | 16% | +10.9 |
| Elijah Moore | 6 | 10 | 60 | 0 | 23% |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Mosley | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| D.J. Reed | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quincy Williams |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 16/27 | 147 | 1 | 0 | 3 | −4.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_14_NYJ_BUF
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Bills closed -10, won by 8 — but didn't cover.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 32 — under by 11.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| −2.5 |
| Denzel Mims | 3 | 5 | 35 | 0 | 11% | +1.2 |
| Tyler Conklin | 5 | 8 | 28 | 0 | 18% | −2.3 |
| Braxton Berrios | 1 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 7% | +1.2 |
| Michael Carter | 3 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 14% | −3.1 |
| Corey Davis | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 2% | +2.3 |
| C.J. Uzomah | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 5% | −1.2 |
| Zonovan Knight | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5% | −0.4 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jordan Whitehead | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lamarcus Joyner | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ahmad Gardner | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sheldon Rankins | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quinnen Williams | 3 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Franklin-Myers | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenny Yeboah | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 10 | 47 | 4.7 | 1 | −2.2 |
| Devin Singletary | 8 | 39 | 4.9 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | +0.3 |
| James Cook | 4 | 6 | 1.5 | 0 | −1.8 |
| Nyheim Miller-Hines | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dawson Knox | 4 | 7 | 41 | 1 | 26% | +1.4 |
| Stefon Diggs | 3 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 19% | −0.6 |
| Gabe Davis | 3 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 15% | +1.9 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 3 | 5 | 21 | 0 | 19% | −0.4 |
| James Cook | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4% | +0.3 |
| Devin Singletary | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7% | −0.9 |
| Nyheim Miller-Hines | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4% | −0.2 |
| Khalil Shakir | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.9 |
| John Brown | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taron Johnson | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tremaine Edmunds | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Poyer | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matt Milano | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dane Jackson | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Tre'Davious White | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| A.J. Epenesa | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Carlos Basham | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damar Hamlin | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Siran Neal | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |