The biggest swing of the game · Q4 2:00 · 4th and 1
Brock Wright
Lions
(2:00) 16-J.Goff pass short left to 89-B.Wright for 51 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:43 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 15 · Sun, Dec 18, 2022 · MetLife Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 15
It turned at Q4 2:00, 4th and 1, on Brock Wright — 45.5 win-probability points to the Lions on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 2:00 · 4th and 1
Brock Wright
Lions
(2:00) 16-J.Goff pass short left to 89-B.Wright for 51 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Detroit Lions 20–17 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q4 2:00, Lions +45.5% win probability on one snap.
45.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Jets owned this one and still lost it — 7 chunk plays, against Lions at 3 chunk plays.
Jetsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Red zone
Jets owned this one and still lost it — 1 touchdown on 3 trips, against Lions at 0 touchdowns on 4 trips.
Jetsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Third down
Jets owned this one and still lost it — 7 of 14 on third down, against Lions at 5 of 15 on third down.
Jetsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Lions won this one — +0.31 expected points per dropback, against Jets at +0.00 expected points per dropback.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 1.6 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 7 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Jets.
(2:00) 16-J.Goff pass short left to 89-B.Wright for 51 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Brock Wright's 51-yard touchdown catch with 2:00 left in the 4th put Detroit Lions ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Deadlocked at 4–4 categories. Biggest gap to Jets, in red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Lions ran 66 snaps at a 58% dropback rate against Jets’s 61 at 66%. Red-zone trips: Lions 4, Jets 3.
Lions won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.03 expected points added per play vs -0.07.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DET's sack or hit rate, 25.0%, is past their previous high of 20.4% in week 11 — the highest of their 14 charted games through week 15.
40 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.6 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -18 pts to 15 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −2.9 vs their -1.8 pts, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−0.46× that swing) · 66 snaps
right on their number · +1.9 vs their -3.1 pts, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.38× that swing) · 61 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 24% to 89%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −1.0 vs their 53.1%, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (−0.11× that swing) · 48 early downs
right on their number · +4.2 vs their 56.6%, and they swing ±12.7 week to week (+0.33× that swing) · 46 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -10% to 51%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −11.9 vs their 27.7%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (−1.39× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.5 vs their 18.5%, and they swing ±11.2 week to week (+0.14× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -54% to 116%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +9.3 vs their 50.7%, and they swing ±24.5 week to week (+0.38× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 30.4%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 62%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +11.9 vs their 33.1%, and they swing ±11.2 week to week (+1.07× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.3 vs their 14.5%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (+0.20× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 39%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +10.4 vs their 14.6%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (+1.21× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −6.4 vs their 19.6%, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (−0.87× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
DET's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 15.8%, 11.9 points below their season mean of 27.7% and 1.4 times their own 8.5-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Detroit Lions
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
New York Jets
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · NYJ
18/35, 317 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
0.7 expected points added · -2.4% completion over expected
Passing · DET
23/38, 252 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
11.7 expected points added · -5.4% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
C.J. Uzomah banked 11.7 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.4 | −0.2 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 18/35, 317 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 3 car, 7 yd | |
| 18.1 | +11.7 | 51% | 38% | 6% | 6% | 2/2, 41 yd, 2 TD | |
| 16.3 | +7.5 | 29% | 34% | 17% | 20% | 5/6, 53 yd | |
| 15.2 | +0.4 | 84% | 89% | 28% | 32% | 1 car, 6 yd · 7/10, 76 yd | |
| 14.1 | +2.3 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 23/38, 252 yd, 1 TD | |
| 13.8 | +0.2 | 98% | 98% | 26% | 34% | 4/9, 98 yd | |
| 12.5 | −3.8 | 40% | 42% | 25% | 0% | 8 car, 52 yd · 5/9, 23 yd | |
| 12.1 | +9.0 | 47% | 29% | 6% | 8% | 1/2, 51 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.7 | +3.3 | 46% | 45% | 15% | 17% | 4/5, 77 yd | |
| 9.4 | −2.5 | 75% | 85% | 21% | 14% | 1 car, 3 yd · 4/7, 51 yd | |
| 4.1 | −4.3 | 32% | 39% | 6% | 0% | 6 car, 16 yd · 1/2, 15 yd | |
| 4.1 | +0.8 | 52% | 70% | 3% | 3% | 4 car, 15 yd · 1/1, 16 yd | |
| 3.3 | −7.3 | 31% | 21% | 0% | — | 13 car, 33 yd | |
| 3.2 | +0.3 | 24% | 21% | 6% | 3% | 2/2, 12 yd | |
| 2.8 | −0.5 | 76% | 84% | 6% | 12% | 1/2, 18 yd | |
| 2.4 | −5.8 | 43% | 45% | 18% | 21% | 1/6, 14 yd | |
| 2.3 | −3.9 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. | |
| 2.3 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.9 | −1.3 | 75% | 70% | 6% | 2% | 1 car, 2 yd · 1/2, 7 yd | |
| 1.4 | −0.1 | 37% | 42% | 3% | 2% | 1/1, 4 yd | |
| 0.0 | −1.4 | 15% | 13% | 3% | 1% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | −2.7 | 19% | 16% | 3% | 23% | 0/1, 0 yd |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Jets attack right, the Lions attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(2:00) 16-J.Goff pass short left to 89-B.Wright for 51 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q4 2:00 · Lions · 4th & 1 at DET 49 · gained 51 · +6.48 EP · +47.1% win probability
160 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 172 plays across 20 drives, personnel groupings on 172 snaps, manual charting on 147. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 20 drives ended in points. The longest march was NYJ moving 78 yards from the NYJ 22 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NYJ attacks right, DET attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
172 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
172 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a man in motion.
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, no huddle, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read, the ball was not catchable.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Lions at Jets, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Goff | 23/38 | 252 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +11.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre Swift | 8 | 52 | 6.5 | 0 | +1.5 |
| Jamaal Williams | 13 | 33 | 2.5 | 0 | −8.1 |
| Justin Jackson | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 0 | −3.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 7 | 10 | 76 | 0 | 28% | +7.0 |
| Kalif Raymond | 5 | 6 | 53 | 0 | 17% | +3.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Okudah | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Alim McNeill | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kerby Joseph | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaiah Buggs |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Wilson | 18/35 | 317 | 2 | 1 | 4 | +0.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zonovan Knight |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_15_DET_NYJ
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Jets closed -2 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 44; the game landed 37 — under by 7.0.
Conditions and crew
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Brock Wright | 1 | 2 | 51 | 1 | 6% | +6.0 |
| D'Andre Swift | 5 | 9 | 23 | 0 | 25% | −2.8 |
| D.J. Chark | 1 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 6% | +0.3 |
| Justin Jackson | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 6% | −0.4 |
| James Mitchell | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 6% | +0.5 |
| Shane Zylstra | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | −0.3 |
| Jameson Williams | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Jason Cabinda | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.3 |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Will Harris | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aidan Hutchinson | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Romeo Okwara | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Anzalone | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeShon Elliott | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| James Houston | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 |
| 23 |
| 1.8 |
| 0 |
| −5.9 |
| Michael Carter | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 0 | +0.5 |
| Zach Wilson | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Elijah Moore | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | +0.8 |
| Tyler Conklin | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | +0.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Wilson | 4 | 9 | 98 | 0 | 26% | +3.1 |
| Jeff Smith | 4 | 5 | 77 | 0 | 15% | +2.6 |
| Elijah Moore | 4 | 7 | 51 | 0 | 21% | −6.6 |
| C.J. Uzomah | 2 | 2 | 41 | 2 | 6% | +4.8 |
| Michael Carter | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 3% | +2.6 |
| Braxton Berrios | 1 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 18% | −0.9 |
| Denzel Mims | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 6% | +0.3 |
| Tyler Conklin | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6% | +0.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Parks | 4 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Whitehead | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quincy Williams | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Carter | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kwon Alexander | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| C.J. Mosley | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ahmad Gardner | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jermaine Johnson | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carl Lawson | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony Adams | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |