The biggest swing of the game · Q2 12:30 · 1st and 10
Travis Etienne
Jaguars
(12:30) (Shotgun) 1-T.Etienne left tackle for 62 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
8.4
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 11:25 PM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 17 · Sun, Jan 1, 2023 · NRG Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 17
It turned at Q2 12:30, 1st and 10, on Travis Etienne — 8.4 win-probability points to the Jaguars on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Jacksonville Jaguars 31–3 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q2 12:30, Jaguars +8.4% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 12:30 · 1st and 10
Travis Etienne
Jaguars
(12:30) (Shotgun) 1-T.Etienne left tackle for 62 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
8.4
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Jaguars won this one — 2 touchdowns on 3 trips, against Texans at 0 touchdowns on 1 trip.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Jaguars won this one — 43% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Texans at 27% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Jaguars won this one — +0.05 expected points per carry, against Texans at -0.43 expected points per carry.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Jaguars won this one — -0.08 expected points per snap, against Texans at -0.51 expected points per snap.
Jaguarsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 5.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 21 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Texans.
(12:30) (Shotgun) 1-T.Etienne left tackle for 62 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Jamycal Hasty's 5-yard rushing touchdown with 8:29 left in the 1st put Jacksonville Jaguars ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Jaguars ahead 5–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.53 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Jaguars ran 60 snaps at a 52% dropback rate against Texans’s 67 at 73%. Red-zone trips: Jaguars 3, Texans 1.
Jaguars won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.08 expected points added per play vs -0.51.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
1 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
HOU's play-action rate, 10.2%, is past their previous low of 15.2% in week 15 — the lowest of their 16 charted games through week 17.
49 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.6 points. · −2.0σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -21 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −0.6 vs their 0.1 pts, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (−0.11× that swing) · 60 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +5.0 vs their -2.4 pts, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (+0.68× that swing) · 67 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 86%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −8.9 vs their 56.8%, and they swing ±10.0 week to week (−0.88× that swing) · 48 early downs
leaned — passed early · +11.3 vs their 58.2%, and they swing ±11.0 week to week (+1.03× that swing) · 46 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 45%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +8.5 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (+0.87× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −14.9 vs their 25.1%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (−1.96× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29% to 91%
Fourth Down room →leaned — took the kick · −31.5 vs their 31.5%, and they swing ±23.3 week to week (−1.35× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · +11.5 vs their 31.3%, and they swing ±23.6 week to week (+0.49× that swing) · 7 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -10% to 46%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −8.4 vs their 20.6%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (−0.94× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
right on their number · −5.3 vs their 18.2%, and they swing ±10.9 week to week (−0.48× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 39%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +9.8 vs their 16.8%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (+1.10× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −4.6 vs their 14.3%, and they swing ±8.2 week to week (−0.56× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
HOU's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 10.2%, 14.9 points below their season mean of 25.1% and 2.0 times their own 7.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Jacksonville Jaguars
48 dressed · 5 inactive
Inactive · 5
Houston Texans
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · HOU
22/40, 202 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-22.5 expected points added · -8.1% completion over expected
Passing · JAX
17/21, 152 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
1.5 expected points added · +11.6% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Travis Etienne banked 12.2 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis EtienneRB · Committee Back | 23.0 | +12.2 | 38% | 39% | 11% | 4% | 9 car, 108 yd, 1 TD · 3/3, 32 yd |
| Jamycal HastyRB · Committee Back | 17.6 | +1.6 | 40% | 42% | 21% | 0% | 10 car, 33 yd, 1 TD · 6/6, 23 yd |
| Marvin JonesWR · Alpha Receiver | 12.1 | −1.1 | 67% | 77% | 25% | 39% | 6/7, 61 yd |
| Davis MillsQB · Starter QB | 9.4 | −5.0 | 83% | — | 0% | — | 22/40, 202 yd · 4 car, 33 yd |
| Brandin CooksWR · Rotational Receiver | 7.9 | −2.8 | 77% | 82% | 17% | 35% | 4/7, 39 yd |
| Snoop ConnerRB | 7.7 | +4.3 | 17% | 13% | 0% | — | 5 car, 17 yd, 1 TD |
| Royce FreemanRB · Receiving Back | 6.9 | −2.8 | 43% | 39% | 12% | 0% | 7 car, 19 yd · 3/5, 20 yd |
| Jordan AkinsTE · Rotational Receiver | 5.8 | +0.5 | 59% | 67% | 7% | 17% | 2/3, 38 yd |
| Zay JonesWR · Rotational Receiver | 5.4 | −2.4 | 78% | 81% | 18% | 29% | 3/5, 24 yd |
| Chris MooreWR · Rotational Receiver | 5.1 | −2.5 | 84% | 86% | 12% | 21% | 3/5, 21 yd |
| Dare OgunbowaleRB | 4.5 | −2.6 | 37% | 35% | 7% | 1% | 7 car, 21 yd · 2/3, 4 yd |
| Trevor LawrenceQB · Starter QB | 4.5 | −5.4 | 70% | — | 0% | — | 17/21, 152 yd, 1 INT · 2 car, 4 yd |
| Phillip DorsettWR · Rotational Receiver | 4.4 | −4.0 | 56% | 59% | 14% | 5% | 3/6, 14 yd |
| Christian KirkWR · Rotational Receiver | 4.1 | −1.0 | 83% | 90% | 11% | 10% | 2/3, 21 yd |
| Rex BurkheadRB · Receiving Back | 4.0 | −3.2 | 19% | 27% | 12% | 2% | 3/5, 10 yd |
| Evan EngramTE · Rotational Receiver | 3.9 | −0.4 | 67% | 74% | 7% | 11% | 1 car, 13 yd · 1/2, 16 yd |
| O.J. HowardTE · Rotational Receiver | 3.6 | +1.0 | 27% | 20% | 5% | 2% | 1/2, 26 yd |
| Amari RodgersWR · Rotational Receiver | 3.6 | 0.0 | 44% | 45% | 5% | 2% | 1 car, 4 yd · 2/2, 12 yd |
| Brevin JordanTE · Rotational Receiver | 3.0 | −1.7 | 36% | 33% | 7% | 14% | 1/3, 20 yd |
| Troy HairstonRB | 1.7 | +0.3 | 11% | 4% | 2% | 1% | 1/1, 7 yd |
| Jeff DriskelQB | 1.1 | −1.1 | 21% | — | 0% | — | 3/4, 9 yd · 2 car, 7 yd |
| Jamal AgnewWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.8 | −2.0 | 27% | 29% | 4% | 0% | 2 car, -6 yd · 1/1, 4 yd |
| Dan ArnoldTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.9 | 22% | 13% | 4% | 13% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| C.J. BeathardQB | -0.8 | −3.7 | 30% | — | 0% | — | 5/8, 29 yd, 1 INT |
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Texans attack right, the Jaguars attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(12:30) (Shotgun) 1-T.Etienne left tackle for 62 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q2 12:30 · Jaguars · 1st & 10 at JAX 38 · gained 62 · +5.06 EP · +8.5% win probability
160 snaps placed · 8 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 168 plays across 25 drives, personnel groupings on 168 snaps, manual charting on 148. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
5 of 25 drives ended in points. The longest march was JAX moving 75 yards from the JAX 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; HOU attacks right, JAX attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
168 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
168 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Jaguars at Texans, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Lawrence | 17/21 | 152 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1.5 |
| C.J. Beathard | 5/8 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −7.4 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Etienne | 9 | 108 | 12.0 | 1 | +4.8 |
| Jamycal Hasty | 10 | 33 | 3.3 | 1 | −0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin Jones | 6 | 7 | 61 | 0 | 25% | +1.0 |
| Travis Etienne | 3 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 11% |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foyesade Oluokun | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin Lloyd |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Mills | 22/40 | 202 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −22.5 |
| Jeff Driskel | 3/4 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_17_JAX_HOU
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Jaguars closed -3.5 and covered, winning by 28.
Total closed 43; the game landed 34 — under by 9.0.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Snoop Conner | 5 | 17 | 3.4 | 1 | −0.5 |
| Evan Engram | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | +1.0 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | −1.6 |
| Jamal Agnew | 2 | -6 | -3.0 | 0 | −1.7 |
| −0.6 |
| Zay Jones | 3 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 18% | −3.2 |
| Jamycal Hasty | 6 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 21% | −0.2 |
| Christian Kirk | 2 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 11% | +1.2 |
| Evan Engram | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 7% | +0.8 |
| Jamal Agnew | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4% | −1.2 |
| Dan Arnold | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −1.0 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Gregory Junior | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| K'Lavon Chaisson | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chad Muma | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darious Williams | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tre Herndon | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrew Wingard | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shaquille Quarterman | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 |
| −3.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Mills | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 7 | 21 | 3.0 | 0 | −1.9 |
| Royce Freeman | 7 | 19 | 2.7 | 0 | −2.2 |
| Jeff Driskel | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | −3.1 |
| Amari Rodgers | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandin Cooks | 4 | 7 | 39 | 0 | 17% | −2.7 |
| Jordan Akins | 2 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 7% | +0.8 |
| O.J. Howard | 1 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 5% | +1.1 |
| Chris Moore | 3 | 5 | 21 | 0 | 12% | −0.9 |
| Royce Freeman | 3 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 12% | −1.2 |
| Brevin Jordan | 1 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 7% | −0.4 |
| Phillip Dorsett | 3 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 14% | −3.9 |
| Amari Rodgers | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 5% | +1.4 |
| Rex Burkhead | 3 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 12% | −8.0 |
| Troy Hairston | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 2% | +0.3 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7% | −2.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Pitre | 11 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Desmond King | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Christian Kirksey | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blake Cashman | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christian Harris | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steven Nelson | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ogbonnia Okoronkwo | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kurt Hinish | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerry Hughes | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Owens | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |