The biggest swing of the game · Q1 14:22 · 2nd and 5
Justin Watson
Chiefs
(14:22) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep left to 84-Ju.Watson pushed ob at LV 3 for 67 yards (21-A.Robertson).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:22 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Week 18 · Sat, Jan 7, 2023 · Allegiant Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Week 18
It turned at Q1 14:22, 2nd and 5, on Justin Watson — 12.9 win-probability points to the Chiefs on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 14:22 · 2nd and 5
Justin Watson
Chiefs
(14:22) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep left to 84-Ju.Watson pushed ob at LV 3 for 67 yards (21-A.Robertson).
Kansas City Chiefs 31–13 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 14:22, Chiefs +12.9% win probability on one snap.
12.9
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Running the ball
Chiefs won this one — +0.44 expected points per carry, against Raiders at -0.23 expected points per carry.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Chiefs won this one — 56% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Raiders at 39% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Chiefs won this one — +0.26 expected points per snap, against Raiders at -0.16 expected points per snap.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Chiefs won this one — no giveaways, against Raiders at 2 giveaways.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 11.0 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 32 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Raiders.
(14:22) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep left to 84-Ju.Watson pushed ob at LV 3 for 67 yards (21-A.Robertson).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Jerick McKinnon's 2-yard touchdown catch with 12:58 left in the 1st put Kansas City Chiefs ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 7 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Chiefs ahead 9–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.44 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Chiefs ran 54 snaps at a 57% dropback rate against Raiders’s 67 at 73%. Red-zone trips: Chiefs 5, Raiders 3.
Chiefs won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.26 expected points added per play vs -0.16.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
KC's play-action rate, 32.3%, is past their previous high of 30.0% in week 10 — the highest of their 17 charted games through week 18.
31 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.8 points.
KC's early-down pass rate turned over: 76.6% in week 17 against 55.6% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 2.3 of their own weekly swings across the two.
45 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.3 points.
KC's pass rate over expected turned over: +24.4 pts in week 17 against +8.3 pts here — they threw more than the situation asked then and ran more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.4 of their own weekly swings across the two.
54 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.8 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -22 pts to 29 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −2.4 vs their 10.7 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (−0.35× that swing) · 54 snaps
leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +9.8 vs their -3.4 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (+1.44× that swing) · 67 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 86%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −6.6 vs their 62.2%, and they swing ±9.3 week to week (−0.71× that swing) · 45 early downs
leaned — passed early · +10.9 vs their 56.4%, and they swing ±10.3 week to week (+1.06× that swing) · 49 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 47%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +14.6 vs their 17.7%, and they swing ±8.8 week to week (+1.66× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.7 vs their 20.7%, and they swing ±10.4 week to week (+0.17× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -59% to 116%
Fourth Down room →Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 19.2%.
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 39.4%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -9% to 57%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.5 vs their 25.8%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−0.90× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.4 vs their 24.0%, and they swing ±12.9 week to week (−0.11× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 33%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +10.4 vs their 16.2%, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (+1.64× that swing) · 49 dropbacks
right on their number · −0.6 vs their 13.5%, and they swing ±6.9 week to week (−0.08× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
KC's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 32.3%, 14.6 points above their season mean of 17.7% and 1.7 times their own 8.8-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Kansas City Chiefs
48 dressed · 7 inactive
Inactive · 7
Las Vegas Raiders
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · LV
22/36, 219 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
-9.5 expected points added · -2.8% completion over expected
Passing · KC
18/26, 202 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
1.0 expected points added · +6.7% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Hunter Renfrow banked 8.3 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.3 | +8.3 | 57% | 65% | 21% | 11% | 7/7, 63 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.0 | −11.0 | 88% | — | 0% | — | 18/26, 202 yd, 1 TD · 3 car, 29 yd | |
| 13.8 | −9.5 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/36, 219 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 7 car, 50 yd | |
| 12.4 | +4.8 | 36% | 39% | 0% | — | 8 car, 64 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.4 | +4.8 | 31% | 19% | 8% | 0% | 3 car, 26 yd, 1 TD · 2/2, 18 yd | |
| 12.3 | −6.3 | 90% | 73% | 26% | 39% | 5/9, 73 yd | |
| 10.5 | +3.5 | 29% | 13% | 0% | — | 10 car, 45 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.8 | −8.7 | 73% | 81% | 29% | 13% | 6/7, 38 yd | |
| 8.6 | −0.4 | 37% | 35% | 13% | 0% | 2 car, 6 yd · 2/3, 0 yd, 1 TD | |
| 7.7 | +2.8 | 51% | 52% | 8% | 32% | 1/2, 67 yd | |
| 7.0 | −6.2 | 71% | 51% | 9% | 0% | 17 car, 45 yd · 2/3, 5 yd | |
| 5.7 | −7.2 | 59% | 61% | 25% | 43% | 3/6, 27 yd | |
| 5.5 | +1.2 | 73% | 71% | 8% | 10% | 2/2, 35 yd | |
| 5.5 | −8.4 | 67% | 67% | 18% | 27% | 2/6, 35 yd | |
| 3.5 | −1.2 | 94% | 82% | 9% | 13% | 2/3, 15 yd | |
| 2.4 | +0.8 | 58% | 48% | 4% | 0% | 1/1, 14 yd | |
| 2.0 | −1.7 | 26% | 33% | 6% | 2% | 1/2, 10 yd | |
| 2.0 | +0.3 | 40% | 18% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 10 yd | |
| 1.5 | −2.1 | 14% | 16% | 6% | 8% | 1/2, 5 yd | |
| 1.3 | −0.1 | 31% | 19% | 4% | 0% | 1/1, 3 yd | |
| 1.3 | −0.2 | 27% | 14% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 3 yd | |
| 0.4 | −0.1 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| -0.2 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Raiders attack right, the Chiefs attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(14:22) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep left to 84-Ju.Watson pushed ob at LV 3 for 67 yards (21-A.Robertson).
Q1 14:22 · Chiefs · 2nd & 5 at KC 30 · gained 67 · +5.04 EP · +18.4% win probability
154 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 165 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 165 snaps, manual charting on 140. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was KC moving 98 yards from the KC 2 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; LV attacks right, KC attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
165 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
165 plays
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Chiefs at Raiders, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Mahomes | 18/26 | 202 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isiah Pacheco | 8 | 64 | 8.0 | 1 | +3.9 |
| Ronald Jones | 10 | 45 | 4.5 | 1 | +2.3 |
| Patrick Mahomes | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 0 | +3.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Watson | 1 | 2 | 67 | 0 | 8% | +4.4 |
| Travis Kelce | 6 | 7 | 38 | 0 | 29% | −0.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Bolton | 8 | 8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trent McDuffie | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Juan Thornhill | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Willie Gay |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarrett Stidham | 22/36 | 219 | 1 | 1 | 6 | −9.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarrett Stidham |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_18_KC_LV
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chiefs closed -9 and covered, winning by 18.
Total closed 51.5; the game landed 44 — under by 7.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Kadarius Toney | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 1 | +3.8 |
| Jerick McKinnon | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | +0.1 |
| Chad Henne | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 | −5.1 |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 8% | +2.5 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 3 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 25% | −0.5 |
| Kadarius Toney | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 8% | +0.6 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 4% | +1.5 |
| Blake Bell | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4% | −0.2 |
| Jerick McKinnon | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13% | −0.4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Chris Jones | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Leo Chenal | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Reid | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Michael Danna | 2 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| George Karlaftis | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| L'Jarius Sneed | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 |
| 50 |
| 7.1 |
| 0 |
| +3.0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 17 | 45 | 2.6 | 0 | −3.9 |
| Zamir White | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante Adams | 5 | 9 | 73 | 0 | 26% | +0.8 |
| Hunter Renfrow | 7 | 7 | 63 | 1 | 21% | +7.4 |
| Darren Waller | 2 | 6 | 35 | 0 | 18% | −1.6 |
| Mack Hollins | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 9% | −1.5 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6% | +0.1 |
| Foster Moreau | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.4 |
| Josh Jacobs | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 9% | −0.9 |
| Keelan Cole | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 6% | −0.7 |
| Jakob Johnson | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3% | −0.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duron Harmon | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luke Masterson | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trevon Moehrig | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sidney Jones | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Maxx Crosby | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roderic Teamer | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clelin Ferrell | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyler Hall | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amik Robertson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Isaiah Pola-Mao | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |