The biggest swing of the game · Q3 0:32 · 4th and 2
T.J. Hockenson
Vikings
(:32) (Shotgun) 8-K.Cousins pass short right to 87-T.Hockenson to NYG 25 for 18 yards (20-J.Love).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 6:56 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2022 Wild Card · Sun, Jan 15, 2023 · U.S. Bank Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2022 Wild Card
It turned at Q3 0:32, 4th and 2, on T.J. Hockenson — 15.8 win-probability points to the Vikings on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 0:32 · 4th and 2
T.J. Hockenson
Vikings
(:32) (Shotgun) 8-K.Cousins pass short right to 87-T.Hockenson to NYG 25 for 18 yards (20-J.Love).
New York Giants 31–24. Biggest swing: Q3 0:32, Vikings +15.8% win probability on one snap.
15.8
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Giants won this one — 10 chunk plays, against Vikings at 4 chunk plays.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Giants won this one — 7 of 12 on third down, against Vikings at 4 of 10 on third down.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Giants won this one — +0.21 expected points per carry, against Vikings at -0.02 expected points per carry.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Giants won this one — +0.37 expected points per snap, against Vikings at +0.17 expected points per snap.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market saw this game the same way — never more than 5 points apart.
(:32) (Shotgun) 8-K.Cousins pass short right to 87-T.Hockenson to NYG 25 for 18 yards (20-J.Love).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Saquon Barkley's 2-yard rushing touchdown with 7:52 left in the 4th put New York Giants ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Giants ahead 5–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Vikings, in sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.44 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Giants ran 64 snaps at a 69% dropback rate against Vikings’s 56 at 71%. Red-zone trips: Giants 5, Vikings 4.
Giants won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.37 expected points added per play vs 0.17.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
NYG's pass rate over expected, +15.3 pts, sat 21.1 points above their season number of −5.8 pts — they threw more than the situation asked by 2.5 times their own 8.5-point weekly swing.
64 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.5 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
This is not a regular-season game, so every season number below is that team's 2022 regular season — the only stretch long enough to be a habit.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -28 pts to 18 pts
Over Expected room →off script — threw more than the situation asked · +21.1 vs their -5.8 pts, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (+2.48× that swing) · 64 snaps
right on their number · +2.3 vs their 2.5 pts, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (+0.44× that swing) · 56 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 19% to 86%
Tendencies room →leaned — passed early · +18.1 vs their 51.9%, and they swing ±12.8 week to week (+1.41× that swing) · 50 early downs
right on their number · +3.7 vs their 59.9%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (+0.38× that swing) · 44 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 56%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −8.8 vs their 24.7%, and they swing ±12.2 week to week (−0.72× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −8.4 vs their 28.4%, and they swing ±10.8 week to week (−0.78× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -36% to 108%
Fourth Down room →Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 24.3%.
right on their number · −11.9 vs their 36.9%, and they swing ±28.0 week to week (−0.42× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 70%
Tendencies room →leaned — sat back · −14.8 vs their 39.8%, and they swing ±11.2 week to week (−1.32× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
right on their number · −0.9 vs their 19.1%, and they swing ±7.8 week to week (−0.12× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 38%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +10.7 vs their 16.8%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (+1.26× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
right on their number · −2.7 vs their 11.8%, and they swing ±5.6 week to week (−0.49× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
NYG's pass rate over expected was the night's one real departure: 15.3 pts, 21.1 points above their season mean of -5.8 pts and 2.5 times their own 8.5-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
New York Giants
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Minnesota Vikings
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · NYG
24/35, 301 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
13.6 expected points added · -1.3% completion over expected
Passing · MIN
31/39, 273 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
12.2 expected points added · +13.7% completion over expected
Receiving · MIN
10/11 for 129 yds, 0 TD
28% of team targets · 10.9 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Saquon Barkley banked 12.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.9 | +12.6 | 90% | 84% | 18% | 0% | 9 car, 53 yd, 2 TD · 5/6, 56 yd | |
| 27.8 | −1.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 24/35, 301 yd, 2 TD · 17 car, 78 yd | |
| 25.8 | +3.4 | 100% | — | 3% | 0% | 31/39, 273 yd, 2 TD · 1 car, 1 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, -2 yd | |
| 24.5 | +5.0 | 92% | 86% | 27% | 37% | 8/9, 105 yd, 1 TD | |
| 22.9 | +6.3 | 88% | 88% | 28% | 28% | 10/11, 129 yd | |
| 13.1 | −5.0 | 90% | 82% | 24% | 43% | 1 car, 3 yd · 4/8, 88 yd | |
| 13.0 | −4.2 | 88% | 85% | 18% | 0% | 15 car, 60 yd · 6/7, 10 yd | |
| 11.6 | −5.1 | 98% | 100% | 23% | 38% | 1/1, -2 yd · 7/9, 47 yd | |
| 10.0 | +4.2 | 58% | 73% | 8% | 11% | 2/3, 20 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.7 | +5.0 | 82% | 70% | 6% | 4% | 2/2, 17 yd, 1 TD | |
| 8.0 | +0.8 | 91% | 95% | 10% | 27% | 3/4, 50 yd | |
| 7.3 | +2.3 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 7.1 | −2.5 | 60% | 57% | 18% | 6% | 4/6, 31 yd | |
| 2.2 | +1.1 | 37% | 23% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 12 yd | |
| 1.4 | −3.9 | 33% | 27% | 6% | 4% | 1/2, 4 yd | |
| 1.2 | +0.2 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.8 | −0.9 | 29% | 18% | 0% | — | 3 car, 8 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. |
6 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 4 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Vikings attack right, the Giants attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:32) (Shotgun) 8-K.Cousins pass short right to 87-T.Hockenson to NYG 25 for 18 yards (20-J.Love).
Q3 0:32 · Vikings · 4th & 2 at NYG 43 · gained 18 · +3.77 EP · +16.1% win probability
156 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 167 plays across 17 drives, personnel groupings on 167 snaps, manual charting on 138. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
9 of 17 drives ended in points. The longest march was NYG moving 85 yards from the NYG 15 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; MIN attacks right, NYG attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
167 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
167 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Giants at Vikings, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | 24/35 | 301 | 2 | 0 | 3 | +13.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | 17 | 78 | 4.6 | 0 | +9.8 |
| Saquon Barkley | 9 | 53 | 5.9 | 2 | +0.2 |
| Matt Breida | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | +0.4 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Hodgins | 8 | 9 | 105 | 1 | 27% | +8.5 |
| Darius Slayton | 4 | 8 | 88 | 0 | 24% | +5.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier McKinney | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dexter Lawrence | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adoree' Jackson | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darnay Holmes |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Cousins | 31/39 | 273 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +12.2 |
| Justin Jefferson | 1/1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2.4 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2022_19_NYG_MIN
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Vikings closed -2.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 48; the game landed 55 — over by 7.0.
Conditions and crew
| Darius Slayton | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Saquon Barkley | 5 | 6 | 56 | 0 | 18% | +4.7 |
| Richie James | 4 | 6 | 31 | 0 | 18% | −0.5 |
| Daniel Bellinger | 2 | 2 | 17 | 1 | 6% | +2.0 |
| Lawrence Cager | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6% | −1.1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jaylon Smith | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Love | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony Jefferson | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leonard Williams | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Fabian Moreau | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick McCloud | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalvin Cook | 15 | 60 | 4.0 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Kirk Cousins | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | +0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T.J. Hockenson | 10 | 11 | 129 | 0 | 28% | +10.9 |
| Adam Thielen | 3 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 10% | +3.4 |
| Justin Jefferson | 7 | 9 | 47 | 0 | 23% | +0.6 |
| K.J. Osborn | 2 | 3 | 20 | 1 | 8% | +0.7 |
| Johnny Mundt | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3% | +0.8 |
| Dalvin Cook | 6 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 18% | −2.3 |
| Irv Smith | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5% | +0.2 |
| Alexander Mattison | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3% | −0.2 |
| Kirk Cousins | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 3% | −2.4 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Hicks | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eric Kendricks | 5 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Camryn Bynum | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Duke Shelley | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Patrick Peterson | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danielle Hunter | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dalvin Tomlinson | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chandon Sullivan | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Za'Darius Smith | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harrison Phillips | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |