The biggest swing of the game · Q2 0:22 · 2nd and 10
Deshaun Watson
Browns
(:22) (Shotgun) 4-D.Watson left end for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
13.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 11:23 PM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 1 · Sun, Sep 10, 2023 · FirstEnergy Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 1
It turned at Q2 0:22, 2nd and 10, on Deshaun Watson — 13.7 win-probability points to the Browns on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Cleveland Browns 24–3 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q2 0:22, Browns +13.7% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 0:22 · 2nd and 10
Deshaun Watson
Browns
(:22) (Shotgun) 4-D.Watson left end for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
13.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Browns won this one — 12 chunk plays, against Bengals at 2 chunk plays.
Brownsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Browns won this one — 41% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Bengals at 21% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Brownsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Bengals owned this one and still lost it — no giveaways, against Browns at 2 giveaways.
Bengalsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Every snap
Browns won this one — -0.14 expected points per snap, against Bengals at -0.47 expected points per snap.
Brownsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 8.3 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 16 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Browns.
(:22) (Shotgun) 4-D.Watson left end for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Dustin Hopkins's 42-yard field goal with 14:19 left in the 2nd put Cleveland Browns ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Browns ahead 7–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.58 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Bengals ran 52 snaps at a 65% dropback rate against Browns’s 73 at 48%. Red-zone trips: Bengals 0, Browns 3.
Browns won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.14 expected points added per play vs -0.47.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
2 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
CLE's play-action rate, 45.7%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 1 — 9.4 points clear of the next team along.
35 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.2 points. · +2.3σ from their own normal
CLE's sack or hit rate, 29.4%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 1 — 2.1 points clear of the next team along.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.6 points. · +1.5σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -23 pts to 26 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −10.1 vs their 5.7 pts, and they swing ±7.7 week to week (−1.31× that swing) · 52 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −5.2 vs their -3.8 pts, and they swing ±7.2 week to week (−0.72× that swing) · 72 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 29% to 89%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.6 vs their 63.1%, and they swing ±9.7 week to week (−0.78× that swing) · 36 early downs
leaned — ran early · −10.6 vs their 53.7%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (−1.16× that swing) · 58 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 49%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −2.6 vs their 17.3%, and they swing ±7.8 week to week (−0.33× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
off script — faked the run · +22.9 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±10.2 week to week (+2.25× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29% to 102%
Fourth Down room →inside their normal wobble · −17.1 vs their 29.6%, and they swing ±20.8 week to week (−0.82× that swing) · 8 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 36.8%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 62%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +18.3 vs their 24.6%, and they swing ±10.5 week to week (+1.74× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
right on their number · +2.8 vs their 29.5%, and they swing ±12.9 week to week (+0.22× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 38%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −2.2 vs their 16.5%, and they swing ±7.3 week to week (−0.30× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +11.4 vs their 18.0%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+1.50× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
CLE's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 45.7%, 22.9 points above their season mean of 22.8% and 2.3 times their own 10.2-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Cincinnati Bengals
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Cleveland Browns
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · CLE
16/29, 154 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
-10.9 expected points added · -6.9% completion over expected
Passing · CIN
14/31, 82 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-18.6 expected points added · -18.2% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Harrison Bryant banked 3.1 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun WatsonQB · Starter QB | 20.7 | +0.8 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 16/29, 154 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 5 car, 45 yd, 1 TD |
| Nick ChubbRB · Committee Back | 16.7 | +1.5 | 49% | 46% | 14% | 0% | 18 car, 106 yd · 4/4, 21 yd |
| Joe MixonRB · Bell Cow Back | 10.3 | −2.2 | 63% | 59% | 16% | 0% | 13 car, 56 yd · 3/5, 17 yd |
| Elijah MooreWR · Featured Receiver | 9.2 | −2.3 | 69% | 80% | 24% | 19% | 2 car, 19 yd · 3/7, 43 yd |
| Ja'Marr ChaseWR · Alpha Receiver | 9.1 | −3.9 | 96% | 100% | 29% | 38% | 1 car, 2 yd · 5/9, 39 yd |
| Harrison BryantTE · Rotational Receiver | 8.5 | +3.1 | 36% | 29% | 7% | 1% | 2/2, 5 yd, 1 TD |
| Amari CooperWR · Featured Receiver | 6.7 | −6.5 | 62% | 63% | 24% | 37% | 3/7, 37 yd |
| Irv SmithTE · Rotational Receiver | 4.7 | −1.9 | 54% | 71% | 16% | 1% | 3/5, 17 yd |
| David NjokuTE · Rotational Receiver | 4.4 | −0.1 | 73% | 83% | 10% | 2% | 2/3, 24 yd |
| Joe BurrowQB · Starter QB | 3.2 | −6.3 | 93% | — | 0% | — | 14/31, 82 yd · 1 car, -1 yd |
| Tyler BoydWR · Rotational Receiver | 3.0 | −1.3 | 84% | 94% | 10% | 3% | 2/3, 10 yd |
| Donovan Peoples-JonesWR · Rotational Receiver | 2.2 | −1.6 | 89% | 80% | 7% | 9% | 1/2, 12 yd |
| Jordan AkinsTE · Rotational Receiver | 2.2 | +0.5 | 31% | 26% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 12 yd |
| Chris EvansRB | 2.1 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
| Jerome FordRB · Committee Back | 1.6 | −5.4 | 41% | 40% | 0% | — | 15 car, 36 yd |
| Trayveon WilliamsRB | 0.7 | −0.2 | 29% | 32% | 0% | — | 2 car, 7 yd |
| Tee HigginsWR · Alpha Receiver | 0.0 | −13.5 | 95% | 100% | 26% | 64% | 0/8, 0 yd |
| Mitchell WilcoxTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
| Charlie JonesWR | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Marquise GoodwinWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −5.4 | 14% | 23% | 7% | 26% | 0/2, 0 yd |
| David BellWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.6 | 14% | 11% | 3% | 4% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| Pierre StrongRB | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Jake BrowningQB | -0.1 | −0.1 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. |
5 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Browns attack right, the Bengals attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(3:44) (Shotgun) 4-D.Watson to CIN 25 for -4 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at CIN 25. 4-D.Watson to CIN 24 for 1 yard. Handoff to 34-J.Ford to CIN 16 for 8 yards (57-G.Pratt; 33-N.Scott). FUMBLES (57-G.Pratt), RECOVERED by CIN-22-C.Awuzie at CIN 13. 22-C.Awuzie to CIN 13 for no gain (8-E.Moore).
Q1 3:44 · Browns · 2nd & 5 at CIN 21 · gained 5 · -4.57 EP · −13.0% win probability
164 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 173 plays across 29 drives, personnel groupings on 164 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 168. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 29 drives ended in points. The longest march was CLE moving 67 yards from the CLE 33 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; CLE attacks right, CIN attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
173 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
173 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Bengals at Browns, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Burrow | 14/31 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 2 | −18.6 |
| Jake Browning | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Mixon | 13 | 56 | 4.3 | 0 | −2.9 |
| Chris Evans | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr Chase | 5 | 9 | 39 | 0 | 29% | +2.4 |
| Joe Mixon | 3 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 16% |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Scott | 4 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sam Hubbard | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Germaine Pratt |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun Watson | 16/29 | 154 | 1 | 1 | 3 | −10.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_01_CIN_CLE
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Bengals closed -1 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 46.5; the game landed 27 — under by 19.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Trayveon Williams | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Ja'Marr Chase | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Joe Burrow | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | +0.0 |
| Jake Browning | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | +0.0 |
| −1.0 |
| Irv Smith | 3 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 16% | −4.6 |
| Tyler Boyd | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10% | −1.3 |
| Tee Higgins | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 26% | −7.5 |
| Chris Evans | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 3% | −1.3 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 1.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Logan Wilson | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cam Sample | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dax Hill | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mike Hilton | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chidobe Awuzie | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trey Hendrickson | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| B.J. Hill | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Chubb | 18 | 106 | 5.9 | 0 | +2.5 |
| Deshaun Watson | 5 | 45 | 9.0 | 1 | +7.4 |
| Jerome Ford | 15 | 36 | 2.4 | 0 | −9.6 |
| Elijah Moore | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 | +0.4 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elijah Moore | 3 | 7 | 43 | 0 | 24% | −7.3 |
| Amari Cooper | 3 | 7 | 37 | 0 | 24% | −0.5 |
| David Njoku | 2 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 10% | +1.0 |
| Nick Chubb | 4 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 14% | +0.8 |
| Jordan Akins | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3% | +1.7 |
| Donovan Peoples-Jones | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 7% | +0.3 |
| Harrison Bryant | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 7% | +0.1 |
| David Bell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.4 |
| Marquise Goodwin | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7% | −2.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant Delpit | 7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Greg Newsome | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Denzel Ward | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Rodney McLeod | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ogbonnia Okoronkwo | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sione Takitaki | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matthew Adams | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shelby Harris | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Za'Darius Smith | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |