The biggest swing of the game · Q1 8:49 · 3rd and 6
Demario Douglas
Patriots
(8:49) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass deep left to 81-D.Douglas ran ob at DAL 15 for 42 yards (55-L.Vander Esch).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 7:43 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 4 · Sun, Oct 1, 2023 · AT&T Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 4
It turned at Q1 8:49, 3rd and 6, on Demario Douglas — 11.0 win-probability points to the Patriots on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 8:49 · 3rd and 6
Demario Douglas
Patriots
(8:49) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass deep left to 81-D.Douglas ran ob at DAL 15 for 42 yards (55-L.Vander Esch).
Dallas Cowboys 38–3 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 8:49, Patriots +11.0% win probability on one snap.
11.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Every snap
Cowboys won this one — +0.11 expected points per snap, against Patriots at -0.48 expected points per snap.
Cowboysthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Cowboys won this one — no giveaways, against Patriots at 3 giveaways.
Cowboysthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Cowboys won this one — 48% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Patriots at 31% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Cowboysthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Cowboys won this one — +0.04 expected points per carry, against Patriots at -0.44 expected points per carry.
Cowboysthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 5.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 19 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Patriots.
(8:49) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass deep left to 81-D.Douglas ran ob at DAL 15 for 42 yards (55-L.Vander Esch).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
CeeDee Lamb's 20-yard touchdown catch with 1:34 left in the 1st put Dallas Cowboys ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Cowboys ahead 8–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.50 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Patriots ran 55 snaps at a 62% dropback rate against Cowboys’s 66 at 61%. Red-zone trips: Patriots 1, Cowboys 5.
Cowboys won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.11 expected points added per play vs -0.48.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
NE's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 0.0% in week 3 against 66.7% here — they took the kick then and went for it now, a turn of 2.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
3 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 15 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 24.0 points.
DAL's play-action rate turned over: 15.6% in week 3 against 37.5% here — they dropped back clean then and faked the run now, a turn of 2.5 of their own weekly swings across the two.
40 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.8 points.
DAL's pass rate over expected turned over: −8.2 pts in week 3 against +7.8 pts here — they ran more than the situation asked then and threw more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.5 of their own weekly swings across the two.
65 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.3 points.
DAL's blitz rate sent turned over: 58.3% in week 3 against 20.6% here — they sent pressure then and sat back now, a turn of 3.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 11.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -21 pts to 20 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · −4.9 vs their -3.3 pts, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (−0.74× that swing) · 55 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +4.7 vs their 3.1 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (+0.74× that swing) · 65 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 82%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −3.2 vs their 55.7%, and they swing ±10.2 week to week (−0.31× that swing) · 40 early downs
right on their number · −2.9 vs their 56.9%, and they swing ±8.2 week to week (−0.35× that swing) · 50 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 48%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −3.9 vs their 15.7%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (−0.51× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +12.2 vs their 25.3%, and they swing ±8.8 week to week (+1.39× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -32% to 119%
Fourth Down room →leaned — went for it · +35.4 vs their 31.2%, and they swing ±24.0 week to week (+1.48× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · −13.3 vs their 46.7%, and they swing ±28.3 week to week (−0.47× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 59%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +4.5 vs their 33.0%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (+0.47× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −8.6 vs their 29.1%, and they swing ±11.9 week to week (−0.72× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 32%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +5.4 vs their 12.1%, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (+0.87× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −9.9 vs their 15.8%, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−1.59× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
DAL's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 5.9%, 9.9 points below their season mean of 15.8% and 1.6 times their own 6.2-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
New England Patriots
48 dressed · 5 inactive
Inactive · 5
Dallas Cowboys
48 dressed · 7 inactive
Inactive · 7
Who moved the needle
Passing · DAL
28/34, 261 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
3.9 expected points added · +12.9% completion over expected
Passing · NE
12/21, 150 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT
-12.8 expected points added · -16.7% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Kavontae Turpin banked 3.2 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.8 | +0.6 | 63% | 75% | 17% | 24% | 1 car, 12 yd · 4/6, 36 yd, 1 TD | |
| 14.7 | +1.2 | 56% | 73% | 19% | 23% | 7/7, 77 yd | |
| 14.3 | −5.2 | 90% | — | 0% | — | 28/34, 261 yd, 1 TD · 1 car, -1 yd | |
| 11.0 | +2.2 | 53% | 63% | 17% | 12% | 5/6, 60 yd | |
| 9.3 | +2.1 | 34% | 23% | 11% | 18% | 4/4, 53 yd | |
| 9.1 | +1.4 | 80% | 74% | 17% | 18% | 4/5, 51 yd | |
| 9.0 | −7.8 | 53% | 60% | 8% | 2% | 11 car, 47 yd · 3/3, 13 yd | |
| 6.7 | +0.2 | 70% | 75% | 11% | 8% | 4/4, 27 yd | |
| 6.5 | +2.4 | 33% | 38% | 10% | 11% | 2/3, 45 yd | |
| 6.4 | +2.0 | 20% | 13% | 0% | — | 2 car, 4 yd, 1 TD | |
| 6.1 | +3.2 | 30% | 23% | 3% | 1% | 1 car, 46 yd · 1/1, 5 yd | |
| 6.0 | −5.2 | 64% | 56% | 10% | 3% | 14 car, 30 yd · 2/3, 10 yd | |
| 5.6 | +0.9 | 53% | 56% | 10% | 11% | 2/3, 36 yd | |
| 5.3 | −0.7 | 82% | 82% | 14% | 18% | 2/4, 33 yd | |
| 4.2 | −2.7 | 40% | 44% | 10% | 0% | 6 car, 16 yd · 2/3, 6 yd | |
| 2.7 | −1.0 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 2.4 | −5.0 | 47% | 38% | 17% | 21% | 1/5, 14 yd | |
| 2.3 | −0.4 | 27% | — | 0% | — | 4/9, 57 yd | |
| 2.2 | −5.4 | 60% | 59% | 10% | 18% | 1/3, 12 yd | |
| 2.1 | −5.8 | 31% | 23% | 3% | 0% | 8 car, 9 yd · 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 0.7 | −8.8 | 73% | — | 0% | — | 12/21, 150 yd, 2 INT · 3 car, 7 yd | |
| 0.6 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −7.9 | 56% | 48% | 8% | 9% | 0/3, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 26% | 10% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Cowboys attack right, the Patriots attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(8:49) (Shotgun) 10-M.Jones pass deep left to 81-D.Douglas ran ob at DAL 15 for 42 yards (55-L.Vander Esch).
Q1 8:49 · Patriots · 3rd & 6 at NE 43 · gained 42 · +4.41 EP · +13.9% win probability
158 snaps placed · 10 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 168 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 157 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 163. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was NE moving 82 yards from the NE 5 for a opp touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; DAL attacks right, NE attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
168 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
168 plays
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a man in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
From outside the pocket.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Patriots at Cowboys, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Jones | 12/21 | 150 | 0 | 2 | 1 | −12.8 |
| Bailey Zappe | 4/9 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −3.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 14 | 30 | 2.1 | 0 | −4.4 |
| Ezekiel Elliott | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 0 | −1.5 |
| Mac Jones |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Henry | 4 | 5 | 51 | 0 | 17% | +4.4 |
| Demario Douglas | 2 | 3 | 45 | 0 | 10% | +2.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Dugger | 10 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Myles Bryant | 6 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jabrill Peppers | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shaun Wade |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dak Prescott | 28/34 | 261 | 1 | 0 | 3 | +3.9 |
| Cooper Rush | 2/2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1.6 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_04_NE_DAL
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Cowboys closed -6.5 and covered, winning by 35.
Total closed 43; the game landed 41 — under by 2.0.
Conditions and crew
| 3 |
| 7 |
| 2.3 |
| 0 |
| −4.5 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 2 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 10% | −6.0 |
| DeVante Parker | 2 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 14% | +0.3 |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 1 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 17% | −5.8 |
| Mike Gesicki | 1 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 10% | −1.4 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10% | −0.9 |
| Ezekiel Elliott | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 10% | −0.6 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jalen Mills | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ja'Whaun Bentley | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jahlani Tavai | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Deatrich Wise | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joshua Uche | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marte Mapu | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Pollard | 11 | 47 | 4.3 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Kavontae Turpin | 1 | 46 | 46.0 | 0 | +3.5 |
| CeeDee Lamb | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | +0.7 |
| Rico Dowdle | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Deuce Vaughn | 8 | 9 | 1.1 | 0 | −4.8 |
| Hunter Luepke | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 1 | +2.1 |
| Dak Prescott | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | +0.0 |
| Cooper Rush | 3 | -2 | -0.7 | 0 | −2.9 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Ferguson | 7 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 19% | +5.7 |
| Michael Gallup | 5 | 6 | 60 | 0 | 17% | +2.9 |
| Jalen Tolbert | 4 | 4 | 53 | 0 | 11% | +4.8 |
| CeeDee Lamb | 4 | 6 | 36 | 1 | 17% | +0.4 |
| Brandin Cooks | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 11% | +0.5 |
| Tony Pollard | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 8% | +0.7 |
| Rico Dowdle | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3% | +0.4 |
| Kavontae Turpin | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | +1.6 |
| Deuce Vaughn | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3% | −0.7 |
| Luke Schoonmaker | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8% | −2.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leighton Vander Esch | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donovan Wilson | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damone Clark | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jourdan Lewis | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daron Bland | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2 | 3 |
| Micah Parsons | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Markquese Bell | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jayron Kearse | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Stephon Gilmore | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malik Hooker | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |