The biggest swing of the game · Q1 9:32 · 4th and 3
Russell Wilson
Chiefs
(9:32) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson sacked at KC 41 for -3 yards (20-J.Reid).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 2:37 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 6 · Thu, Oct 12, 2023 · GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 6
It turned at Q1 9:32, 4th and 3, on Russell Wilson — 8.2 win-probability points to the Chiefs on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 9:32 · 4th and 3
Russell Wilson
Chiefs
(9:32) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson sacked at KC 41 for -3 yards (20-J.Reid).
Kansas City Chiefs 19–8. Biggest swing: Q1 9:32, Chiefs +8.2% win probability on one snap.
8.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Broncos owned this one and still lost it — 1 touchdown on 1 trip, against Chiefs at 1 touchdown on 5 trips.
Broncosthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Running the ball
Broncos owned this one and still lost it — +0.13 expected points per carry, against Chiefs at -0.47 expected points per carry.
Broncosthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Chiefs won this one — +0.17 expected points per dropback, against Broncos at -0.65 expected points per dropback.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Chiefs won this one — 1 giveaway, against Broncos at 3 giveaways.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 9.3 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 28 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Broncos.
(9:32) (Shotgun) 3-R.Wilson sacked at KC 41 for -3 yards (20-J.Reid).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Harrison Butker's 35-yard field goal with 5:44 left in the 1st put Kansas City Chiefs ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Chiefs ahead 7–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.65 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Broncos ran 50 snaps at a 58% dropback rate against Chiefs’s 67 at 69%. Red-zone trips: Broncos 1, Chiefs 5.
Chiefs won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.03 expected points added per play vs -0.32.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DEN's play-action rate turned over: 10.0% in week 5 against 27.6% here — they dropped back clean then and faked the run now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
29 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.7 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -15 pts to 23 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −0.9 vs their -3.7 pts, and they swing ±4.0 week to week (−0.22× that swing) · 49 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +4.3 vs their 6.8 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (+0.69× that swing) · 67 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 33% to 83%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +4.3 vs their 56.2%, and they swing ±8.9 week to week (+0.48× that swing) · 38 early downs
right on their number · +1.6 vs their 62.5%, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (+0.21× that swing) · 53 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 44%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +6.5 vs their 21.1%, and they swing ±8.7 week to week (+0.74× that swing) · 29 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −7.4 vs their 16.1%, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (−1.00× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -35% to 97%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +3.4 vs their 21.6%, and they swing ±19.1 week to week (+0.18× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · −6.4 vs their 31.4%, and they swing ±25.8 week to week (−0.25× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -0% to 64%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −12.3 vs their 31.9%, and they swing ±12.7 week to week (−0.97× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
right on their number · −5.5 vs their 33.1%, and they swing ±12.1 week to week (−0.46× that swing) · 29 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 35%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.2 vs their 15.0%, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (−0.64× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.5 vs their 18.7%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−0.23× that swing) · 29 dropbacks
KC's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 8.7%, 7.4 points below their season mean of 16.1% and 1.0 times their own 7.4-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Denver Broncos
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Kansas City Chiefs
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · KC
30/40, 306 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
4.6 expected points added · +6.2% completion over expected
Passing · DEN
13/22, 95 yds, 1 TD, 2 INT
-18.3 expected points added · -11.7% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Travis Kelce banked 5.5 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.4 | +5.5 | 69% | 78% | 23% | 48% | 9/9, 124 yd | |
| 17.3 | −5.9 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 30/40, 306 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 6 car, 31 yd | |
| 15.8 | −4.1 | 63% | 48% | 15% | 0% | 16 car, 62 yd · 6/6, 36 yd | |
| 14.6 | +5.2 | 94% | 86% | 27% | 43% | 4/6, 46 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.2 | +4.5 | 49% | 48% | 10% | 10% | 4/4, 72 yd | |
| 9.4 | −4.7 | 42% | 35% | 15% | 5% | 0/1, 0 yd · 2 car, -5 yd · 3/6, 9 yd, 1 TD | |
| 7.2 | +1.7 | 35% | 7% | 0% | — | 10 car, 52 yd | |
| 6.9 | −2.0 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 13/22, 95 yd, 1 TD, 2 INT · 4 car, 31 yd | |
| 6.2 | +0.4 | 40% | 45% | 9% | 0% | 7 car, 30 yd · 2/2, 12 yd | |
| 5.0 | −3.3 | 27% | 35% | 13% | 3% | 3/5, 20 yd | |
| 4.4 | −3.4 | 65% | 79% | 23% | 30% | 3/5, 14 yd | |
| 4.2 | −5.8 | 52% | 48% | 10% | 22% | 2/4, 22 yd | |
| 3.5 | −0.3 | 55% | 41% | 5% | 2% | 1 car, 1 yd · 2/2, 14 yd | |
| 2.6 | −0.5 | 13% | 15% | 3% | 0% | 2 car, 7 yd · 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 1.6 | −1.1 | 17% | 28% | 9% | 0% | 2/2, 16 yd | |
| 1.4 | −1.6 | 69% | 55% | 9% | 16% | 1/2, 4 yd | |
| 1.3 | −1.3 | 21% | 31% | 9% | 3% | 1/2, 3 yd | |
| 0.2 | −0.5 | 23% | 21% | 0% | — | 2 car, 2 yd | |
| 0.0 | −1.4 | 46% | 24% | 5% | 0% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | −2.7 | 31% | 34% | 9% | 21% | 0/2, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 23% | 24% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | −1.9 | 39% | 37% | 3% | 17% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | −3.2 | 56% | 65% | 3% | 4% | 0/1, 0 yd |
1 player played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Chiefs attack right, the Broncos attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(5:00) 3-R.Wilson pass short left intended for 10-J.Jeudy INTERCEPTED by 32-N.Bolton at KC 42. 32-N.Bolton to KC 43 for 1 yard (10-J.Jeudy).
Q1 5:00 · Broncos · 1st & 10 at DEN 43 · gained nothing · -4.52 EP · −11.8% win probability
146 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 158 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 146 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 153. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was KC moving 68 yards from the KC 25 for a field goal. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; KC attacks right, DEN attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
158 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
158 plays
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Broncos at Chiefs, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell Wilson | 13/22 | 95 | 1 | 2 | 4 | −18.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javonte Williams | 10 | 52 | 5.2 | 0 | +3.8 |
| Russell Wilson | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 0 | +3.7 |
| Jaleel McLaughlin | 7 | 30 | 4.3 | 0 | +0.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courtland Sutton | 4 | 6 | 46 | 1 | 27% | +3.7 |
| Samaje Perine | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 9% | −3.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Singleton | 9 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Josey Jewell | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Surtain | 7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ja'Quan McMillian |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Mahomes | 30/40 | 306 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +4.6 |
| Kadarius Toney | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −0.4 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_06_DEN_KC
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chiefs closed -10.5 and covered, winning by 11.
Total closed 47.5; the game landed 27 — under by 20.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Michael Burton | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | −1.9 |
| Jerry Jeudy | 3 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 23% | −6.0 |
| Jaleel McLaughlin | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 9% | +0.3 |
| Adam Trautman | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9% | −2.0 |
| Greg Dulcich | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9% | −6.6 |
| Brandon Johnson | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9% | −2.0 |
| Chris Manhertz | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −0.5 |
| 6 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Kareem Jackson | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Simmons | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Zach Allen | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Harris | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathon Cooper | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Damarri Mathis | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isiah Pacheco | 16 | 62 | 3.9 | 0 | −2.7 |
| Patrick Mahomes | 6 | 31 | 5.2 | 0 | +0.4 |
| Clyde Edwards-Helaire | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | −0.8 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −2.8 |
| Kadarius Toney | 2 | -5 | -2.5 | 0 | −3.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Kelce | 9 | 9 | 124 | 0 | 23% | +8.3 |
| Rashee Rice | 4 | 4 | 72 | 0 | 10% | +4.6 |
| Isiah Pacheco | 6 | 6 | 36 | 0 | 15% | +2.1 |
| Skyy Moore | 2 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 10% | −3.1 |
| Jerick McKinnon | 3 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 13% | −0.8 |
| Noah Gray | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 5% | −0.3 |
| Clyde Edwards-Helaire | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 3% | +1.1 |
| Kadarius Toney | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 15% | −0.4 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −1.4 |
| Justin Watson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willie Gay | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| L'Jarius Sneed | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Reid | 4 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chris Jones | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Drue Tranquill | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Bolton | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| George Karlaftis | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 2 |
| Trent McDuffie | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryan Cook | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leo Chenal | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |