The biggest swing of the game · Q1 10:42 · 4th and 1
Lamar Jackson
Ravens
(10:42) 8-L.Jackson left end for 7 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:21 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 7 · Sun, Oct 22, 2023 · M&T Bank Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 7
It turned at Q1 10:42, 4th and 1, on Lamar Jackson — 6.2 win-probability points to the Ravens on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 10:42 · 4th and 1
Lamar Jackson
Ravens
(10:42) 8-L.Jackson left end for 7 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Baltimore Ravens 38–6 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 10:42, Ravens +6.2% win probability on one snap. Played in 15.8 mph wind — weigh that when reading the passing lines.
6.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Ravens won this one — +0.74 expected points per dropback, against Lions at -0.23 expected points per dropback.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Ravens won this one — +0.47 expected points per snap, against Lions at -0.16 expected points per snap.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Ravens won this one — 5 touchdowns on 6 trips, against Lions at 0 touchdowns on 3 trips.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Ravens won this one — 11 chunk plays, against Lions at 5 chunk plays.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 0.9 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 5 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Lions.
(10:42) 8-L.Jackson left end for 7 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Lamar Jackson's 7-yard rushing touchdown with 10:42 left in the 1st put Baltimore Ravens ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 6 scores that followed.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Ravens ahead 8–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.74 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Lions ran 73 snaps at a 81% dropback rate against Ravens’s 54 at 61%. Red-zone trips: Lions 3, Ravens 6.
Ravens won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.47 expected points added per play vs -0.16.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DET's early-down pass rate, 80.0%, was the highest of the 26 team-games charted in week 7 — 8.6 points clear of the next team along.
50 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.5 points.
BAL's pass rate over expected, +12.4 pts, is past their previous high of +2.6 pts in week 5 — the highest of their 7 charted games through week 7.
54 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.5 points.
BAL's sack or hit rate turned over: 33.3% in week 6 against 13.6% here — they got home then and stayed blocked now, a turn of 3.3 of their own weekly swings across the two.
59 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.0 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -25 pts to 18 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +9.7 vs their -3.9 pts, and they swing ±8.4 week to week (+1.15× that swing) · 72 snaps
off script — threw more than the situation asked · +13.0 vs their -0.6 pts, and they swing ±5.5 week to week (+2.37× that swing) · 54 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 26% to 84%
Tendencies room →off script — passed early · +27.3 vs their 52.7%, and they swing ±10.5 week to week (+2.60× that swing) · 50 early downs
inside their normal wobble · +5.4 vs their 52.4%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (+0.55× that swing) · 45 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 53%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −11.1 vs their 24.7%, and they swing ±11.0 week to week (−1.01× that swing) · 59 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +10.3 vs their 20.0%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (+1.21× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -35% to 114%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +0.6 vs their 59.4%, and they swing ±19.9 week to week (+0.03× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 16.7%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -9% to 63%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.0 vs their 35.4%, and they swing ±10.3 week to week (+0.09× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
right on their number · −5.1 vs their 23.7%, and they swing ±12.6 week to week (−0.40× that swing) · 59 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 39%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −14.5 vs their 17.5%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (−1.69× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
right on their number · −2.8 vs their 16.4%, and they swing ±6.0 week to week (−0.46× that swing) · 59 dropbacks
DET's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 80.0%, 27.3 points above their season mean of 52.7% and 2.6 times their own 10.5-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Detroit Lions
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 4 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 4
Baltimore Ravens
48 dressed · 6 inactive
Inactive · 6
Who moved the needle
Passing · BAL
21/27, 357 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT
25.3 expected points added · +11.1% completion over expected
Passing · DET
33/53, 284 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
-13.3 expected points added · -1.8% completion over expected
Receiving · DET
13/19 for 102 yds, 0 TD
39% of team targets · 3.1 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Gus Edwards banked 9.3 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.9 | +9.1 | 95% | — | 0% | — | 21/27, 357 yd, 3 TD · 9 car, 36 yd, 1 TD | |
| 27.6 | +5.7 | 87% | 88% | 20% | 1% | 11 car, 68 yd, 1 TD · 9/10, 58 yd | |
| 23.2 | −3.5 | 97% | 97% | 39% | 36% | 13/19, 102 yd | |
| 22.3 | +6.6 | 73% | 67% | 21% | 16% | 4/6, 63 yd, 2 TD | |
| 21.4 | +9.3 | 50% | 27% | 4% | 2% | 14 car, 64 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, 80 yd | |
| 11.5 | +1.7 | 72% | 70% | 21% | 21% | 4/6, 75 yd | |
| 11.2 | +1.6 | 72% | 76% | 14% | 15% | 6/7, 52 yd | |
| 9.9 | −1.7 | 57% | 48% | 25% | 34% | 5/7, 49 yd | |
| 9.4 | −8.1 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 33/53, 284 yd, 1 INT | |
| 8.2 | +4.6 | 37% | 33% | 4% | 5% | 1/1, 12 yd, 1 TD | |
| 6.3 | −0.3 | 73% | 73% | 6% | 12% | 2/3, 43 yd | |
| 5.8 | +1.8 | 50% | 58% | 4% | 0% | 4 car, 46 yd · 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 5.6 | +0.2 | 48% | 36% | 11% | 21% | 2/3, 36 yd | |
| 5.1 | +2.4 | 40% | 33% | 7% | 4% | 2/2, 31 yd | |
| 4.0 | +1.3 | 36% | 41% | 4% | 0% | 2/2, 20 yd | |
| 3.5 | +0.6 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.9 | +0.4 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 15% | 12% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | −0.6 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 18% | 6% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | −10.5 | 44% | 44% | 12% | 41% | 0/6, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | −1.2 | 44% | 46% | 2% | 3% | 0/1, 0 yd |
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Ravens attack right, the Lions attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(13:46) (Shotgun) 8-L.Jackson pass deep middle to 4-Z.Flowers to DET 16 for 46 yards (21-T.Walker).
Q1 13:46 · Ravens · 1st & 10 at BAL 38 · gained 46 · +2.82 EP · +8.7% win probability
156 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 165 plays across 20 drives, personnel groupings on 156 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 160. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 20 drives ended in points. The longest march was BAL moving 94 yards from the BAL 6 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; BAL attacks right, DET attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
165 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
165 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Lions at Ravens, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Goff | 33/53 | 284 | 0 | 1 | 5 | −13.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jahmyr Gibbs | 11 | 68 | 6.2 | 1 | +1.2 |
| Craig Reynolds | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | +0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 13 | 19 | 102 | 0 | 39% | +3.1 |
| Jahmyr Gibbs | 9 | 10 | 58 | 0 | 20% | −1.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerby Joseph | 9 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tracy Walker III | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Anzalone | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aidan Hutchinson |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Jackson | 21/27 | 357 | 3 | 0 | 0 | +25.3 |
| Tyler Huntley | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −0.9 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_07_DET_BAL
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Ravens closed -3 and covered, winning by 32.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 44 — over by 0.5.
Conditions and crew
Wind at 15.8 mph is the kind that drags passing depth and kicking range — weigh it when reading the splits.
| Sam LaPorta | 6 | 7 | 52 | 0 | 14% | +4.6 |
| Josh Reynolds | 2 | 3 | 43 | 0 | 6% | +0.6 |
| Kalif Raymond | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 4% | +1.3 |
| Craig Reynolds | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2% | +0.6 |
| Jameson Williams | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12% | −6.3 |
| Antoine Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2% | −2.9 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jack Campbell | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Josh Paschal | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Sutton | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alim McNeill | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derrick Barnes | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Harris | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gus Edwards | 14 | 64 | 4.6 | 1 | +1.2 |
| Justice Hill | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 0 | +1.3 |
| Lamar Jackson | 9 | 36 | 4.0 | 1 | −1.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gus Edwards | 1 | 1 | 80 | 0 | 4% | +5.4 |
| Zay Flowers | 4 | 6 | 75 | 0 | 21% | +3.8 |
| Mark Andrews | 4 | 6 | 63 | 2 | 21% | +6.1 |
| Odell Beckham | 5 | 7 | 49 | 0 | 25% | +1.6 |
| Rashod Bateman | 2 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 11% | +3.3 |
| Patrick Ricard | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 7% | +1.4 |
| Nelson Agholor | 1 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 4% | +2.5 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4% | +0.7 |
| Justice Hill | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Maulet | 7 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roquan Smith | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kyle Hamilton | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Van Noy | 2 | 3 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Queen | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nnamdi Madubuike | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Odafe Oweh | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandon Stephens | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Geno Stone | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Travis Jones | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |