The biggest swing of the game · Q4 2:04 · 3rd and 3
Julian Love
Seahawks
(2:04) (Shotgun) 10-P.Walker pass deep right intended for 2-A.Cooper INTERCEPTED by 20-J.Love (33-J.Adams) at SEA 43. 20-J.Love to SEA 43 for no gain (11-D.Peoples-Jones).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:48 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 8 · Sun, Oct 29, 2023 · Lumen Field
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 8
It turned at Q4 2:04, 3rd and 3, on Julian Love — 24.5 win-probability points to the Seahawks on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 2:04 · 3rd and 3
Julian Love
Seahawks
(2:04) (Shotgun) 10-P.Walker pass deep right intended for 2-A.Cooper INTERCEPTED by 20-J.Love (33-J.Adams) at SEA 43. 20-J.Love to SEA 43 for no gain (11-D.Peoples-Jones).
Seattle Seahawks 24–20. Biggest swing: Q4 2:04, Seahawks +24.5% win probability on one snap.
24.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Giveaways
Seahawks won this one — 2 giveaways, against Browns at 3 giveaways.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Browns owned this one and still lost it — 8 chunk plays, against Seahawks at 6 chunk plays.
Brownsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Every snap
Seahawks won this one — +0.07 expected points per snap, against Browns at -0.09 expected points per snap.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Seahawks won this one — 3 touchdowns on 5 trips, against Browns at 2 touchdowns on 5 trips.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 3.9 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 8 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Browns.
(2:04) (Shotgun) 10-P.Walker pass deep right intended for 2-A.Cooper INTERCEPTED by 20-J.Love (33-J.Adams) at SEA 43. 20-J.Love to SEA 43 for no gain (11-D.Peoples-Jones).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Jaxon Smith-Njigba's 9-yard touchdown catch with 0:44 left in the 4th put Seattle Seahawks ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Seahawks ahead 5–4 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Browns ran 74 snaps at a 50% dropback rate against Seahawks’s 54 at 70%. Red-zone trips: Browns 5, Seahawks 5.
Browns outgained Seahawks 386-363 but lost the turnover battle 3-2. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
CLE's sack or hit rate, 7.9%, is past their previous low of 16.7% in week 7 — the lowest of their 7 charted games through week 8.
38 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.6 points.
SEA's early-down pass rate, 65.9%, is past their previous high of 61.1% in week 2 — the highest of their 7 charted games through week 8.
41 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.6 points.
CLE's blitz rate sent turned over: 60.0% in week 7 against 26.3% here — they sent pressure then and sat back now, a turn of 2.6 of their own weekly swings across the two.
38 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 12.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -22 pts to 15 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −3.3 vs their -3.8 pts, and they swing ±7.2 week to week (−0.45× that swing) · 74 snaps
right on their number · +2.0 vs their 0.0 pts, and they swing ±4.5 week to week (+0.45× that swing) · 54 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 78%
Tendencies room →leaned — ran early · −12.3 vs their 53.7%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (−1.34× that swing) · 58 early downs
leaned — passed early · +8.2 vs their 57.6%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+1.08× that swing) · 41 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 49%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +4.2 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±10.2 week to week (+0.41× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +4.8 vs their 21.6%, and they swing ±9.3 week to week (+0.51× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -58% to 110%
Fourth Down room →leaned — took the kick · −36.8 vs their 36.8%, and they swing ±25.7 week to week (−1.43× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · +7.6 vs their 25.7%, and they swing ±32.8 week to week (+0.23× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 62%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −3.2 vs their 29.5%, and they swing ±12.9 week to week (−0.25× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
leaned — sent pressure · +11.2 vs their 26.6%, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (+1.23× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 38%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −10.1 vs their 18.0%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (−1.32× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +12.4 vs their 14.7%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (+1.46× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
SEA's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 27.0%, 12.4 points above their season mean of 14.7% and 1.5 times their own 8.5-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Cleveland Browns
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Seattle Seahawks
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · SEA
23/37, 254 yds, 2 TD, 2 INT
2.6 expected points added · -0.4% completion over expected
Passing · CLE
15/31, 248 yds, 1 TD, 2 INT
-5.7 expected points added · -5.1% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Tyler Lockett banked 7.7 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.1 | +7.7 | 84% | 92% | 25% | 32% | 8/9, 81 yd, 1 TD | |
| 17.7 | +4.7 | 78% | 81% | 27% | 16% | 4/8, 77 yd, 1 TD | |
| 14.9 | −0.9 | 81% | 84% | 37% | 44% | 6/11, 89 yd | |
| 13.9 | −5.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 23/37, 254 yd, 2 TD, 2 INT · 2 car, -3 yd | |
| 13.7 | +3.3 | 35% | 30% | 3% | 0% | 14 car, 55 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, 12 yd | |
| 12.6 | +6.7 | 66% | 68% | 11% | 0% | 3/4, 36 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.7 | −16.0 | 78% | 87% | 39% | 55% | 5/14, 67 yd | |
| 10.6 | −5.6 | 99% | — | 0% | — | 15/31, 248 yd, 1 TD, 2 INT · 6 car, 27 yd | |
| 10.6 | +5.3 | 31% | 26% | 6% | 2% | 1 car, 3 yd, 1 TD · 2/2, 23 yd | |
| 9.2 | +3.4 | 31% | 27% | 3% | 0% | 10 car, 41 yd · 1/1, 41 yd | |
| 8.4 | +2.7 | 59% | 66% | 6% | 0% | 5 car, 53 yd · 2/2, 11 yd | |
| 8.0 | +1.0 | 41% | 34% | 6% | 5% | 8 car, 66 yd · 1/2, 4 yd | |
| 5.2 | +0.9 | 59% | 61% | 8% | 6% | 2/3, 32 yd | |
| 5.0 | −2.7 | 82% | 86% | 17% | 30% | 2/5, 30 yd | |
| 4.9 | −2.1 | 33% | 35% | 7% | 0% | 9 car, 37 yd · 1/2, 2 yd | |
| 1.6 | +0.3 | 12% | 11% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 6 yd | |
| 0.4 | +0.2 | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −3.3 | 31% | 11% | 3% | 5% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 83% | 81% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 40% | 32% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| -0.5 | −1.3 | 12% | 14% | 0% | — | 1 car, -5 yd | |
| -0.5 | −1.4 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. |
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 4 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Seahawks attack right, the Browns attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(2:04) (Shotgun) 10-P.Walker pass deep right intended for 2-A.Cooper INTERCEPTED by 20-J.Love (33-J.Adams) at SEA 43. 20-J.Love to SEA 43 for no gain (11-D.Peoples-Jones).
Q4 2:04 · Browns · 3rd & 3 at CLE 41 · gained nothing · -2.90 EP · −23.4% win probability
164 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 175 plays across 24 drives, personnel groupings on 164 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 170. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 24 drives ended in points. The longest march was CLE moving 81 yards from the CLE 12 for a field goal. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; SEA attacks right, CLE attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
175 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
175 plays
How the play was built
A screen, a man in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
How the play was built
No huddle, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A screen, nobody in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Browns at Seahawks, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P.J. Walker | 15/31 | 248 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −5.7 |
| Dorian Thompson-Robinson | 1/1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +0.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kareem Hunt | 14 | 55 | 3.9 | 1 | +1.4 |
| Pierre Strong | 10 | 41 | 4.1 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Jerome Ford |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amari Cooper | 6 | 11 | 89 | 0 | 37% | +2.2 |
| David Njoku | 4 | 8 | 77 | 1 | 27% | −1.7 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Thornhill | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grant Delpit | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Emerson | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Denzel Ward |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geno Smith | 23/37 | 254 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +2.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Walker |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_08_CLE_SEA
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Seahawks closed -4 and it landed exactly on the number — a push.
Total closed 39.5; the game landed 44 — over by 4.5.
Conditions and crew
| 9 |
| 37 |
| 4.1 |
| 0 |
| −2.3 |
| P.J. Walker | 6 | 27 | 4.5 | 0 | +1.5 |
| Marquise Goodwin | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Pierre Strong | 1 | 1 | 41 | 0 | 3% | +2.6 |
| Elijah Moore | 2 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 17% | +2.5 |
| Kareem Hunt | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3% | +1.1 |
| Jordan Akins | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3% | +0.3 |
| Jerome Ford | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7% | −2.7 |
| Harrison Bryant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Anthony Walker | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maurice Hurst | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jordan Elliott | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Mitchell | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Njoku | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 |
| 66 |
| 8.3 |
| 0 |
| +1.2 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 0 | +1.3 |
| Jake Bobo | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 1 | +0.8 |
| Geno Smith | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 | −3.9 |
| D'Wayne Eskridge | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | −1.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Lockett | 8 | 9 | 81 | 1 | 25% | +8.6 |
| DK Metcalf | 5 | 14 | 67 | 0 | 39% | −3.9 |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 3 | 4 | 36 | 1 | 11% | +3.2 |
| Noah Fant | 2 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 8% | −1.8 |
| Jake Bobo | 2 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 6% | +0.7 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 6% | +0.0 |
| Kenneth Walker | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6% | −0.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bobby Wagner | 3 | 10 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jordyn Brooks | 4 | 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quandre Diggs | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Boye Mafe | 3 | 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jamal Adams | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Derick Hall | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Love | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Darrell Taylor | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Young | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mario Edwards | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |