The biggest swing of the game · Q3 11:47 · 2nd and 6
Marcus Peters
Raiders
(11:47) 16-J.Goff pass short right intended for 14-A.St. Brown INTERCEPTED by 24-M.Peters at LV 25. 24-M.Peters for 75 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:22 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 8 · Mon, Oct 30, 2023 · Ford Field
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 8
It turned at Q3 11:47, 2nd and 6, on Marcus Peters — 17.4 win-probability points to the Raiders on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 11:47 · 2nd and 6
Marcus Peters
Raiders
(11:47) 16-J.Goff pass short right intended for 14-A.St. Brown INTERCEPTED by 24-M.Peters at LV 25. 24-M.Peters for 75 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Detroit Lions 26–14. Biggest swing: Q3 11:47, Raiders +17.4% win probability on one snap.
17.4
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Lions won this one — 10 chunk plays, against Raiders at 0 chunk plays.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Raiders owned this one and still lost it — 1 touchdown on 1 trip, against Lions at 1 touchdown on 6 trips.
Raidersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Lions won this one — -0.16 expected points per dropback, against Raiders at -0.87 expected points per dropback.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Lions won this one — 6 of 14 on third down, against Raiders at 1 of 9 on third down.
Lionsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 8.7 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 19 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Raiders.
(11:47) 16-J.Goff pass short right intended for 14-A.St. Brown INTERCEPTED by 24-M.Peters at LV 25. 24-M.Peters for 75 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Riley Patterson's 44-yard field goal with 7:56 left in the 1st put Detroit Lions ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 7 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Lions ahead 6–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — explosive plays.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.87 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Raiders ran 45 snaps at a 62% dropback rate against Lions’s 79 at 48%. Red-zone trips: Raiders 1, Lions 6.
Lions won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.13 expected points added per play vs -0.52.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DET's sack or hit rate, 32.1%, is past their previous high of 23.8% in week 4 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 8.
28 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.6 points.
LV's play-action rate, 32.1%, is past their previous high of 28.6% in week 5 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 8.
28 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.4 points.
DET's early-down pass rate turned over: 80.0% in week 7 against 40.6% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 3.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
64 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.5 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -25 pts to 18 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −0.3 vs their -2.2 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (−0.05× that swing) · 45 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −5.4 vs their -3.9 pts, and they swing ±8.4 week to week (−0.65× that swing) · 79 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 26% to 81%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.0 vs their 54.5%, and they swing ±10.5 week to week (+0.00× that swing) · 33 early downs
leaned — ran early · −12.1 vs their 52.7%, and they swing ±10.5 week to week (−1.15× that swing) · 64 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 53%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +10.5 vs their 21.6%, and they swing ±9.4 week to week (+1.12× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.0 vs their 24.7%, and they swing ±11.0 week to week (−0.09× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -23% to 113%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +7.4 vs their 26.0%, and they swing ±17.9 week to week (+0.41× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 59.4%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 62%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +9.4 vs their 22.2%, and they swing ±9.0 week to week (+1.03× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
right on their number · +3.9 vs their 35.4%, and they swing ±10.3 week to week (+0.38× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 39%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.2 vs their 13.4%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−0.03× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +14.6 vs their 17.5%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (+1.70× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
DET's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 32.1%, 14.6 points above their season mean of 17.5% and 1.7 times their own 8.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Las Vegas Raiders
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Detroit Lions
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · DET
26/37, 272 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
2.4 expected points added · +1.7% completion over expected
Passing · LV
10/21, 126 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
-24.2 expected points added · -17.4% completion over expected
Receiving · DET
6/9 for 108 yds, 0 TD
26% of team targets · -4.2 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Jahmyr Gibbs banked 7.2 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.9 | +7.2 | 70% | 79% | 15% | 0% | 26 car, 152 yd, 1 TD · 5/5, 37 yd | |
| 19.7 | +0.1 | 94% | 97% | 29% | 29% | 8/10, 57 yd, 1 TD | |
| 16.8 | +2.8 | 92% | 95% | 26% | 39% | 6/9, 108 yd | |
| 16.8 | +2.9 | 76% | 68% | 19% | 4% | 15 car, 61 yd, 1 TD · 2/4, 27 yd | |
| 12.7 | −1.9 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 26/37, 272 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 2 car, -2 yd | |
| 7.6 | −3.9 | 28% | 21% | 3% | 0% | 14 car, 74 yd · 1/1, 12 yd | |
| 4.2 | −5.8 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 10/21, 126 yd, 1 INT · 2 car, 12 yd | |
| 4.2 | −2.6 | 24% | 37% | 12% | 5% | 1 car, -2 yd · 2/4, 24 yd | |
| 3.9 | +1.5 | 22% | 29% | 10% | 0% | 2/2, 19 yd | |
| 3.9 | −2.6 | 61% | 64% | 19% | 13% | 2/4, 19 yd | |
| 3.6 | −1.6 | 40% | 37% | 9% | 13% | 2/3, 16 yd | |
| 2.9 | +0.7 | 22% | 29% | 5% | 3% | 1 car, 7 yd · 1/1, 12 yd | |
| 2.9 | −1.2 | 91% | 82% | 10% | 14% | 1/2, 19 yd | |
| 2.9 | +0.8 | 98% | 93% | 5% | 8% | 1/1, 19 yd | |
| 2.1 | −9.6 | 96% | 89% | 33% | 59% | 1/7, 11 yd | |
| 1.5 | −0.3 | 53% | 37% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 5 yd | |
| 0.3 | −1.5 | 83% | 87% | 3% | 8% | 1/1, 13 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Lions attack right, the Raiders attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(11:47) 16-J.Goff pass short right intended for 14-A.St. Brown INTERCEPTED by 24-M.Peters at LV 25. 24-M.Peters for 75 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q3 11:47 · Lions · 2nd & 6 at LV 28 · gained nothing · -11.21 EP · −21.5% win probability
159 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 171 plays across 23 drives, personnel groupings on 159 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 166. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 23 drives ended in points. The longest march was DET moving 79 yards from the DET 21 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; DET attacks right, LV attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
171 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
171 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Raiders at Lions, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Garoppolo | 10/21 | 126 | 0 | 1 | 6 | −24.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 15 | 61 | 4.1 | 1 | +0.3 |
| Jimmy Garoppolo | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | +0.6 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 2 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 19% | +0.8 |
| Michael Mayer | 1 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 10% | +0.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevon Moehrig | 7 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Epps | 8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Jenkins | 0 | 8 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Robert Spillane |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Goff | 26/37 | 272 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2.4 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jahmyr Gibbs |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_08_LV_DET
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Lions closed -7 and covered, winning by 12.
Total closed 46; the game landed 40 — under by 6.0.
Conditions and crew
| Hunter Renfrow | 2 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 19% | −4.4 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 5% | +1.1 |
| Austin Hooper | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 10% | +1.2 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 5% | −1.8 |
| Davante Adams | 1 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 33% | −8.8 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Maxx Crosby | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amik Robertson | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nate Hobbs | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amari Burney | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Peters | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Malcolm Koonce | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 |
| 152 |
| 5.8 |
| 1 |
| −0.2 |
| Craig Reynolds | 14 | 74 | 5.3 | 0 | −3.7 |
| Jared Goff | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 | −2.0 |
| Kalif Raymond | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 | −0.8 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | 6 | 9 | 108 | 0 | 26% | −4.2 |
| Sam LaPorta | 8 | 10 | 57 | 1 | 29% | +3.3 |
| Jahmyr Gibbs | 5 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 15% | +2.5 |
| Kalif Raymond | 2 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 12% | −0.1 |
| Jameson Williams | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 9% | −0.4 |
| Josh Reynolds | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 3% | −4.9 |
| Craig Reynolds | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3% | +0.9 |
| Brock Wright | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | +1.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Anzalone | 5 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brian Branch | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tracy Walker III | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alim McNeill | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jack Campbell | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Okwara | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerry Jacobs | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derrick Barnes | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kerby Joseph | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Aidan Hutchinson | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |