The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:10 · 1st and 10
Tank Dell
Texans
(:10) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 3-N.Dell for 15 yards, TOUCHDOWN. PENALTY on TB-54-L.David, Unsportsmanlike Conduct, 15 yards, enforced between downs.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:57 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 9 · Sun, Nov 5, 2023 · NRG Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 9
It turned at Q4 0:10, 1st and 10, on Tank Dell — 48.0 win-probability points to the Texans on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:10 · 1st and 10
Tank Dell
Texans
(:10) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 3-N.Dell for 15 yards, TOUCHDOWN. PENALTY on TB-54-L.David, Unsportsmanlike Conduct, 15 yards, enforced between downs.
Houston Texans 39–37 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q4 0:10, Texans +48.0% win probability on one snap.
48.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Texans won this one — 10 chunk plays, against Buccaneers at 7 chunk plays.
Texansthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Buccaneers owned this one and still lost it — -0.09 expected points per carry, against Texans at -0.29 expected points per carry.
Buccaneersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Staying on schedule
Texans won this one — 45% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Buccaneers at 40% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Texansthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Buccaneers owned this one and still lost it — 4 touchdowns on 5 trips, against Texans at 3 touchdowns on 5 trips.
Buccaneersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 1.9 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 7 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Buccaneers.
(:10) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 3-N.Dell for 15 yards, TOUCHDOWN. PENALTY on TB-54-L.David, Unsportsmanlike Conduct, 15 yards, enforced between downs.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Tank Dell's 15-yard touchdown catch with 0:10 left in the 4th put Houston Texans ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
14 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Texans ahead 6–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — total yards.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.55 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Buccaneers ran 63 snaps at a 54% dropback rate against Texans’s 64 at 70%. Red-zone trips: Buccaneers 5, Texans 5.
Texans won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.30 expected points added per play vs 0.15.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 11 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
TB's pass rate over expected, −9.1 pts, is past their previous low of −7.3 pts in week 2 — the lowest of their 8 charted games through week 9.
63 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.0 points.
HOU's pass rate over expected, +4.0 pts, is past their previous high of +0.9 pts in week 3 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 9.
61 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.2 points.
TB's early-down pass rate, 43.8%, is past their previous low of 50.0% in week 1 — the lowest of their 8 charted games through week 9.
48 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.6 points.
HOU's early-down pass rate turned over: 37.2% in week 8 against 67.3% here — they ran early then and passed early now, a turn of 2.7 of their own weekly swings across the two.
49 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 11.3 points.
TB's play-action rate turned over: 6.3% in week 8 against 32.4% here — they dropped back clean then and faked the run now, a turn of 2.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.2 points.
TB's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 0.0% in week 8 against 50.0% here — they took the kick then and went for it now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
4 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 11 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 24.5 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -19 pts to 14 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −7.3 vs their -1.8 pts, and they swing ±6.0 week to week (−1.22× that swing) · 63 snaps
leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +6.5 vs their -2.6 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (+1.04× that swing) · 61 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 25% to 83%
Tendencies room →leaned — ran early · −10.6 vs their 54.3%, and they swing ±10.6 week to week (−1.00× that swing) · 48 early downs
leaned — passed early · +13.1 vs their 54.2%, and they swing ±11.3 week to week (+1.16× that swing) · 49 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 46%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +9.6 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (+1.04× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.1 vs their 23.3%, and they swing ±8.7 week to week (−0.13× that swing) · 45 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -37% to 101%
Fourth Down room →inside their normal wobble · +21.4 vs their 28.6%, and they swing ±24.5 week to week (+0.87× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
Only 0 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 31.8%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 76%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −12.6 vs their 39.2%, and they swing ±14.3 week to week (−0.88× that swing) · 45 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −4.5 vs their 19.2%, and they swing ±8.1 week to week (−0.55× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 39%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +2.3 vs their 13.2%, and they swing ±7.7 week to week (+0.30× that swing) · 45 dropbacks
right on their number · −2.6 vs their 17.3%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−0.32× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
TB's pass rate over expected was the night's one real departure: -9.1 pts, 7.3 points below their season mean of -1.8 pts and 1.2 times their own 6.0-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Houston Texans
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · HOU
30/42, 470 yds, 5 TD, 0 INT
27.5 expected points added · +13.6% completion over expected
Passing · TB
21/30, 265 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
10.6 expected points added · +2.7% completion over expected
Receiving · HOU
10/11 for 130 yds, 1 TD
29% of team targets · 9.1 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
C.J. Stroud banked 20.1 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.8 | +20.1 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 30/42, 470 yd, 5 TD | |
| 29.6 | +6.7 | 85% | 87% | 29% | 48% | 2 car, 2 yd · 6/11, 114 yd, 2 TD | |
| 27.9 | +3.3 | 80% | 79% | 13% | 2% | 20 car, 73 yd, 2 TD · 4/4, 46 yd | |
| 27.3 | +17.4 | 72% | 72% | 16% | 16% | 6/6, 153 yd, 1 TD | |
| 27.0 | +8.5 | 79% | 87% | 29% | 15% | 10/11, 130 yd, 1 TD | |
| 25.0 | +8.4 | 100% | 94% | 30% | 28% | 6/9, 70 yd, 2 TD | |
| 19.0 | −4.2 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 21/30, 265 yd, 2 TD · 4 car, 4 yd | |
| 14.4 | +4.9 | 79% | 81% | 13% | 10% | 3/5, 54 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.7 | +3.1 | 83% | 85% | 17% | 31% | 4/5, 87 yd | |
| 8.1 | +0.8 | 73% | 79% | 13% | 22% | 3/4, 51 yd | |
| 4.6 | −6.9 | 75% | 66% | 5% | 0% | 13 car, 26 yd · 2/2, 0 yd | |
| 3.6 | −8.0 | 88% | 85% | 20% | 18% | 2/6, 16 yd | |
| 2.5 | −1.9 | 38% | 34% | 5% | 0% | 2/2, 5 yd | |
| 2.4 | +1.0 | 15% | 17% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 14 yd | |
| 1.8 | −1.6 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.2 | +0.4 | 13% | 11% | 0% | — | 1 car, 12 yd | |
| 0.4 | −2.1 | 12% | 12% | 3% | 0% | 3 car, -5 yd · 1/1, -1 yd | |
| 0.3 | −0.4 | 26% | 36% | 0% | — | 1 car, 3 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | 12% | 9% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | 14% | 6% | 0% | — | No touches. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Texans attack right, the Buccaneers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:10) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 3-N.Dell for 15 yards, TOUCHDOWN. PENALTY on TB-54-L.David, Unsportsmanlike Conduct, 15 yards, enforced between downs.
Q4 0:10 · Texans · 1st & 10 at TB 15 · gained 15 · +4.33 EP · +48.9% win probability
173 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 186 plays across 25 drives, personnel groupings on 173 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 181. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
14 of 25 drives ended in points. The longest march was HOU moving 79 yards from the HOU 21 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; HOU attacks right, TB attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
186 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
186 plays
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
The sack was on the quarterback.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
From outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A screen, nobody in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Buccaneers at Texans, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 21/30 | 265 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +10.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachaad White | 20 | 73 | 3.6 | 2 | +2.3 |
| Ke'Shawn Vaughn | 4 | 9 | 2.3 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Baker Mayfield | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Evans | 4 | 5 | 87 | 0 | 17% | +6.4 |
| Cade Otton | 6 | 9 | 70 | 2 | 30% | +3.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lavonte David | 8 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin White | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zyon McCollum | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Vita Vea |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Stroud | 30/42 | 470 | 5 | 0 | 3 | +27.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Singletary |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_09_TB_HOU
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Texans closed -2.5, won by 2 — but didn't cover.
Total closed 39.5; the game landed 76 — over by 36.5.
Conditions and crew
| Chase Edmonds | 3 | -5 | -1.7 | 0 | −2.3 |
| Trey Palmer | 3 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 13% | +1.0 |
| Rachaad White | 4 | 4 | 46 | 0 | 13% | +4.7 |
| Chris Godwin | 2 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 20% | −2.3 |
| Ke'Shawn Vaughn | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 3% | −1.6 |
| Chase Edmonds | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 3% | −0.9 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Carlton Davis | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Calijah Kancey | 4 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shaquil Barrett | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antoine Winfield | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ryan Neal | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Josh Hayes | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 |
| 26 |
| 2.0 |
| 0 |
| −4.7 |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | +0.7 |
| Mike Boone | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Tank Dell | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | −1.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Brown | 6 | 6 | 153 | 1 | 16% | +11.4 |
| Dalton Schultz | 10 | 11 | 130 | 1 | 29% | +9.1 |
| Tank Dell | 6 | 11 | 114 | 2 | 29% | +6.9 |
| Nico Collins | 3 | 5 | 54 | 1 | 13% | +4.3 |
| John Metchie | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 3% | +0.9 |
| Andrew Beck | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5% | −1.2 |
| Devin Singletary | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −1.4 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tavierre Thomas | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blake Cashman | 2 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henry To'oTo'o | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steven Nelson | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denzel Perryman | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerry Hughes | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalil Davis | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jalen Pitre | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Christian Harris | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| M.J. Stewart | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |