The biggest swing of the game · Q2 12:51 · 1st and 10
Josh Jacobs
Raiders
(12:51) 8-J.Jacobs left end for 63 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:22 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 12 · Sun, Nov 26, 2023 · Allegiant Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 12
It turned at Q2 12:51, 1st and 10, on Josh Jacobs — 13.7 win-probability points to the Raiders on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 12:51 · 1st and 10
Josh Jacobs
Raiders
(12:51) 8-J.Jacobs left end for 63 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Kansas City Chiefs 31–17. Biggest swing: Q2 12:51, Raiders +13.7% win probability on one snap.
13.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Staying on schedule
Chiefs won this one — 52% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Raiders at 33% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Chiefs won this one — +0.14 expected points per carry, against Raiders at -0.22 expected points per carry.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Chiefs won this one — 3 touchdowns on 5 trips, against Raiders at 1 touchdown on 5 trips.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Chiefs won this one — +0.26 expected points per snap, against Raiders at -0.03 expected points per snap.
Chiefsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 21.7 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 40 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Raiders.
(12:51) 8-J.Jacobs left end for 63 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Isiah Pacheco's 1-yard rushing touchdown with 9:18 left in the 3rd put Kansas City Chiefs ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 3 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Chiefs ahead 5–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Chiefs ran 56 snaps at a 68% dropback rate against Raiders’s 58 at 60%. Red-zone trips: Chiefs 5, Raiders 5.
Chiefs won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.26 expected points added per play vs -0.03.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
Nothing cleared the bars. No reading led the week's slate, set a season mark, reversed the week before, or sat two of the team's own standard deviations off their number — which is what most Sundays look like, and is the finding rather than a gap.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -19 pts to 23 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +5.0 vs their 6.8 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (+0.81× that swing) · 56 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −5.0 vs their -2.2 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (−0.79× that swing) · 58 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 28% to 84%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +2.7 vs their 62.5%, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (+0.34× that swing) · 46 early downs
right on their number · −4.5 vs their 54.5%, and they swing ±10.5 week to week (−0.43× that swing) · 42 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 46%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +2.3 vs their 16.1%, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (+0.32× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +9.8 vs their 21.6%, and they swing ±9.4 week to week (+1.04× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -35% to 97%
Fourth Down room →Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 31.4%.
right on their number · +7.4 vs their 26.0%, and they swing ±17.9 week to week (+0.41× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 64%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +12.6 vs their 33.1%, and they swing ±12.1 week to week (+1.04× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
leaned — sat back · −11.7 vs their 22.2%, and they swing ±9.0 week to week (−1.29× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 35%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −7.3 vs their 18.7%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−1.14× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −8.1 vs their 13.4%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−1.27× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
LV's blitz rate sent was the night's one real departure: 10.5%, 11.7 points below their season mean of 22.2% and 1.3 times their own 9.0-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Kansas City Chiefs
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Las Vegas Raiders
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · KC
27/34, 298 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
12.6 expected points added · +7.7% completion over expected
Passing · LV
23/33, 248 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
4.3 expected points added · -2.8% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Rashee Rice banked 9.3 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.9 | +3.1 | 78% | 74% | 16% | 0% | 15 car, 55 yd, 2 TD · 5/5, 34 yd | |
| 24.7 | +9.3 | 67% | 66% | 31% | 26% | 8/10, 107 yd, 1 TD | |
| 22.5 | +3.9 | 76% | 66% | 19% | 0% | 20 car, 110 yd, 1 TD · 4/6, 15 yd | |
| 20.8 | +2.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 27/34, 298 yd, 2 TD · 5 car, 9 yd | |
| 20.1 | +8.5 | 91% | 94% | 22% | 39% | 0/1, 0 yd · 1 car, 2 yd · 6/7, 79 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.1 | +2.1 | 77% | 76% | 22% | 48% | 6/7, 91 yd | |
| 13.9 | +5.0 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 23/33, 248 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.3 | +1.8 | 100% | 100% | 22% | 48% | 5/7, 73 yd | |
| 7.8 | +2.3 | 48% | 51% | 13% | 12% | 4/4, 38 yd | |
| 7.3 | +1.4 | 57% | 61% | 9% | 22% | 1/3, 3 yd, 1 TD | |
| 6.4 | +1.6 | 57% | 42% | 9% | 0% | 3/3, 34 yd | |
| 6.0 | +1.0 | 50% | 45% | 9% | 8% | 3/3, 30 yd | |
| 4.7 | −0.7 | 84% | 86% | 13% | 7% | 2/4, 27 yd | |
| 2.4 | −0.3 | 41% | 29% | 6% | 3% | 1/2, 14 yd | |
| 2.3 | +0.1 | 21% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 1 car, 11 yd · 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 0.9 | −1.2 | 53% | 47% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, -1 yd | |
| 0.5 | −4.4 | 20% | 18% | 0% | — | 3 car, 5 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 15% | 16% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | −0.4 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.5 | 22% | 31% | 3% | 7% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Raiders attack right, the Chiefs attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(13:48) (Shotgun) 15-P.Mahomes pass short left to 4-R.Rice for 39 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q4 13:48 · Chiefs · 3rd & 6 at LV 39 · gained 39 · +4.96 EP · +10.8% win probability
145 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 154 plays across 20 drives, personnel groupings on 145 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 149. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 20 drives ended in points. The longest march was KC moving 79 yards from the KC 21 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; LV attacks right, KC attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
154 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
154 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Chiefs at Raiders, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Mahomes | 27/34 | 298 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +12.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isiah Pacheco | 15 | 55 | 3.7 | 2 | +2.7 |
| Patrick Mahomes | 5 | 9 | 1.8 | 0 | −3.5 |
| Clyde Edwards-Helaire | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rashee Rice | 8 | 10 | 107 | 1 | 31% | +7.6 |
| Travis Kelce | 6 | 7 | 91 | 0 | 22% | +5.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L'Jarius Sneed | 7 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Reid | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Drue Tranquill | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Danna |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aidan O'Connell | 23/33 | 248 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +4.3 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −0.8 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_12_KC_LV
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chiefs closed -9 and covered, winning by 14.
Total closed 42.5; the game landed 48 — over by 5.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Isiah Pacheco | 5 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 16% | +1.2 |
| Skyy Moore | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 9% | +0.8 |
| Noah Gray | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 9% | +1.9 |
| Justin Watson | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9% | −0.9 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 3% | −0.6 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| George Karlaftis | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryan Cook | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Charles Omenihu | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Willie Gay | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trent McDuffie | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jaylen Watson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs | 20 | 110 | 5.5 | 1 | −4.7 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | +0.5 |
| Zamir White | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakobi Meyers | 6 | 7 | 79 | 1 | 22% | +5.8 |
| Davante Adams | 5 | 7 | 73 | 0 | 22% | +1.4 |
| Hunter Renfrow | 4 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 13% | +1.6 |
| Michael Mayer | 2 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 13% | +1.2 |
| Josh Jacobs | 4 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 19% | −1.7 |
| Austin Hooper | 1 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 6% | +0.5 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3% | −1.2 |
| Tre Tucker | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.7 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Spillane | 4 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nate Hobbs | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jack Jones | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trevon Moehrig | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malcolm Koonce | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Divine Deablo | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amik Robertson | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luke Masterson | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Epps | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerry Tillery | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |