The biggest swing of the game · Q4 5:20 · 1st and 10
Keisean Nixon
Packers
(5:20) (Shotgun) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep right intended for 24-S.Moore INTERCEPTED by 25-K.Nixon at GB 33. 25-K.Nixon pushed ob at GB 35 for 2 yards (24-S.Moore).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:42 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 13 · Sun, Dec 3, 2023 · Lambeau Field
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 13
It turned at Q4 5:20, 1st and 10, on Keisean Nixon — 20.0 win-probability points to the Packers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 5:20 · 1st and 10
Keisean Nixon
Packers
(5:20) (Shotgun) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep right intended for 24-S.Moore INTERCEPTED by 25-K.Nixon at GB 33. 25-K.Nixon pushed ob at GB 35 for 2 yards (24-S.Moore).
Green Bay Packers 27–19. Biggest swing: Q4 5:20, Packers +20.0% win probability on one snap.
20.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Giveaways
Packers won this one — no giveaways, against Chiefs at 2 giveaways.
Packersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Chiefs owned this one and still lost it — 7 of 11 on third down, against Packers at 5 of 10 on third down.
Chiefsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Packers won this one — +0.42 expected points per dropback, against Chiefs at +0.15 expected points per dropback.
Packersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Packers won this one — +0.30 expected points per snap, against Chiefs at +0.17 expected points per snap.
Packersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 17.1 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 30 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Packers.
(5:20) (Shotgun) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep right intended for 24-S.Moore INTERCEPTED by 25-K.Nixon at GB 33. 25-K.Nixon pushed ob at GB 35 for 2 yards (24-S.Moore).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Ben Sims's 1-yard touchdown catch with 7:17 left in the 1st put Green Bay Packers ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 8 scores that followed.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Packers ahead 6–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.42 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Chiefs ran 61 snaps at a 64% dropback rate against Packers’s 63 at 62%. Red-zone trips: Chiefs 4, Packers 5.
Packers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.30 expected points added per play vs 0.17.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
10 of 11 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
KC's pass rate over expected turned over: +11.8 pts in week 12 against −1.7 pts here — they threw more than the situation asked then and ran more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
60 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.2 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -17 pts to 23 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −8.5 vs their 6.8 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−1.37× that swing) · 60 snaps
leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +9.1 vs their 0.4 pts, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (+1.38× that swing) · 63 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 27% to 84%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −2.1 vs their 62.5%, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (−0.27× that swing) · 48 early downs
right on their number · +2.3 vs their 55.4%, and they swing ±11.3 week to week (+0.21× that swing) · 52 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 45%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.9 vs their 16.1%, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (+0.25× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +12.7 vs their 23.2%, and they swing ±8.4 week to week (+1.51× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -35% to 109%
Fourth Down room →Only 0 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 31.4%.
Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 41.7%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 65%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +7.9 vs their 33.1%, and they swing ±12.1 week to week (+0.65× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
leaned — sat back · −12.1 vs their 22.3%, and they swing ±11.1 week to week (−1.08× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 1% to 35%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −8.5 vs their 18.7%, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−1.32× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −3.7 vs their 16.6%, and they swing ±6.0 week to week (−0.62× that swing) · 39 dropbacks
GB's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 35.9%, 12.7 points above their season mean of 23.2% and 1.5 times their own 8.4-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Kansas City Chiefs
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Green Bay Packers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · GB
25/36, 267 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT
15.4 expected points added · +5.6% completion over expected
Passing · KC
21/33, 210 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
3.9 expected points added · +1.1% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Christian Watson banked 8.1 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.6 | +8.1 | 73% | 72% | 26% | 29% | 2 car, 15 yd · 7/9, 71 yd, 2 TD | |
| 23.7 | +5.3 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 25/36, 267 yd, 3 TD · 2 car, 10 yd | |
| 21.3 | −0.9 | 70% | 49% | 13% | 0% | 18 car, 110 yd, 1 TD · 3/4, 13 yd | |
| 14.4 | +0.3 | 69% | 69% | 30% | 3% | 8/9, 64 yd | |
| 13.0 | −3.3 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 21/33, 210 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 4 car, 26 yd | |
| 12.1 | +3.4 | 88% | 90% | 17% | 20% | 4/5, 81 yd | |
| 11.2 | +1.5 | 81% | 79% | 14% | 30% | 4/5, 72 yd | |
| 9.7 | −1.3 | 63% | 49% | 3% | 0% | 18 car, 73 yd · 1/1, 14 yd | |
| 7.3 | +0.6 | 39% | 38% | 11% | 14% | 3/4, 43 yd | |
| 7.2 | +3.5 | 36% | 21% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 2 yd, 1 TD | |
| 7.1 | +3.0 | 31% | 26% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 1 yd, 1 TD | |
| 6.7 | −2.9 | 95% | 92% | 17% | 8% | 3/6, 37 yd | |
| 5.6 | −1.8 | 47% | 51% | 14% | 11% | 4/5, 16 yd | |
| 4.5 | −3.0 | 49% | 51% | 17% | 47% | 2/5, 25 yd | |
| 2.9 | +0.6 | 31% | 44% | 3% | 0% | 2 car, 29 yd · 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 2.5 | −0.9 | 17% | 15% | 6% | 8% | 1/2, 15 yd | |
| 2.4 | −3.7 | 25% | 38% | 7% | 0% | 2 car, 6 yd · 1/2, 8 yd | |
| 2.2 | −0.8 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.5 | −1.5 | 66% | 49% | 7% | 7% | 1/2, 5 yd | |
| 1.0 | −1.0 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.6 | −0.1 | 18% | 21% | 0% | — | 1 car, 6 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 14% | 13% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | 13% | — | 0% | — | No touches. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Packers attack right, the Chiefs attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(5:20) (Shotgun) 15-P.Mahomes pass deep right intended for 24-S.Moore INTERCEPTED by 25-K.Nixon at GB 33. 25-K.Nixon pushed ob at GB 35 for 2 yards (24-S.Moore).
Q4 5:20 · Chiefs · 1st & 10 at GB 49 · gained nothing · -4.00 EP · −12.5% win probability
156 snaps placed · 15 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 171 plays across 16 drives, personnel groupings on 156 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 166. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
9 of 16 drives ended in points. The longest march was GB moving 75 yards from the GB 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; GB attacks right, KC attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
171 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
171 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Chiefs at Packers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Mahomes | 21/33 | 210 | 1 | 1 | 3 | +3.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isiah Pacheco | 18 | 110 | 6.1 | 1 | +4.0 |
| Patrick Mahomes | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 0 | +1.7 |
| Clyde Edwards-Helaire | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | +0.7 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Kelce | 4 | 5 | 81 | 0 | 17% | +7.5 |
| Rashee Rice | 8 | 9 | 64 | 0 | 30% | +2.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Reid | 8 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryan Cook | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mike Edwards | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trent McDuffie |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 25/36 | 267 | 3 | 0 | 2 | +15.4 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.J. Dillon |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_13_KC_GB
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chiefs closed -5.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 46 — over by 2.5.
Conditions and crew
| Kadarius Toney | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 2 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 17% | +1.8 |
| Isiah Pacheco | 3 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 13% | −0.5 |
| Richie James | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 7% | −0.5 |
| Clyde Edwards-Helaire | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 7% | −0.8 |
| Skyy Moore | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7% | −2.8 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3% | +1.9 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Willie Gay | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| L'Jarius Sneed | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Danna | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jack Cochrane | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chamarri Conner | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Charles Omenihu | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 |
| 73 |
| 4.1 |
| 0 |
| +0.8 |
| Patrick Taylor | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 0 | +1.6 |
| Christian Watson | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | +0.3 |
| Jordan Love | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 | +1.5 |
| James Robinson | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romeo Doubs | 4 | 5 | 72 | 0 | 14% | +6.2 |
| Christian Watson | 7 | 9 | 71 | 2 | 26% | +7.1 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 3 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 11% | +3.4 |
| Tucker Kraft | 3 | 6 | 37 | 0 | 17% | +1.2 |
| Jayden Reed | 4 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 14% | −1.8 |
| Malik Heath | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 6% | +1.0 |
| A.J. Dillon | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 3% | +0.9 |
| Ben Sims | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3% | +0.7 |
| Patrick Taylor | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.2 |
| James Robinson | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 3% | −1.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quay Walker | 3 | 9 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corey Ballentine | 4 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenny Clark | 2 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Owens | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| De'Vondre Campbell | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rashan Gary | 0 | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Darnell Savage | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kingsley Enagbare | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Keisean Nixon | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tedarrell Slaton | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |