The biggest swing of the game · Q4 7:03 · 4th and 5
Bailey Zappe
Chargers
(7:03) (Shotgun) 4-B.Zappe sacked at LAC 38 for -8 yards (3-D.James).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:42 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 13 · Sun, Dec 3, 2023 · Gillette Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 13
It turned at Q4 7:03, 4th and 5, on Bailey Zappe — 11.7 win-probability points to the Chargers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 7:03 · 4th and 5
Bailey Zappe
Chargers
(7:03) (Shotgun) 4-B.Zappe sacked at LAC 38 for -8 yards (3-D.James).
Los Angeles Chargers 6–0. Biggest swing: Q4 7:03, Chargers +11.7% win probability on one snap.
11.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Running the ball
Patriots owned this one and still lost it — -0.16 expected points per carry, against Chargers at -0.47 expected points per carry.
Patriotsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Chargers won this one — +0.03 expected points per dropback, against Patriots at -0.37 expected points per dropback.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Chargers won this one — no giveaways, against Patriots at 1 giveaway.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Chargers won this one — -0.15 expected points per snap, against Patriots at -0.27 expected points per snap.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 13.1 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 24 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Patriots.
(7:03) (Shotgun) 4-B.Zappe sacked at LAC 38 for -8 yards (3-D.James).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Cameron Dicker's 38-yard field goal with 9:13 left in the 2nd put Los Angeles Chargers ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 1 score that followed.
2 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Chargers ahead 5–3 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.47 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Chargers ran 59 snaps at a 64% dropback rate against Patriots’s 62 at 53%. Red-zone trips: Chargers 3, Patriots 0.
Patriots outgained Chargers 257-243 but lost the turnover battle 1-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
NE's sack or hit rate, 5.3%, was the lowest of the 26 team-games charted in week 13 — 0.1 points clear of the next team along.
38 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.2 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -21 pts to 21 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +5.5 vs their 0.7 pts, and they swing ±7.8 week to week (+0.71× that swing) · 59 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −6.3 vs their -3.3 pts, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (−0.95× that swing) · 62 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 84%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.1 vs their 60.3%, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (+0.12× that swing) · 44 early downs
inside their normal wobble · −9.0 vs their 55.7%, and they swing ±10.2 week to week (−0.89× that swing) · 45 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 39%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.7 vs their 20.3%, and they swing ±7.2 week to week (+0.10× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +14.6 vs their 15.7%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+1.93× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -31% to 102%
Fourth Down room →leaned — took the kick · −38.2 vs their 38.2%, and they swing ±25.0 week to week (−1.53× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · +8.8 vs their 31.2%, and they swing ±24.0 week to week (+0.37× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 3% to 58%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +6.6 vs their 29.8%, and they swing ±10.3 week to week (+0.64× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
right on their number · −4.0 vs their 33.0%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (−0.42× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 31%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +4.7 vs their 13.5%, and they swing ±6.9 week to week (+0.68× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −6.9 vs their 12.1%, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−1.11× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
NE's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 30.3%, 14.6 points above their season mean of 15.7% and 1.9 times their own 7.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Los Angeles Chargers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
New England Patriots
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Who moved the needle
Passing · LAC
22/37, 212 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
2.0 expected points added · -4.2% completion over expected
Passing · NE
13/25, 141 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-15.7 expected points added · -11.2% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Alex Erickson banked 1.5 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.2 | −2.1 | 69% | 73% | 21% | 1% | 17 car, 52 yd · 4/5, 40 yd | |
| 10.8 | −4.1 | 89% | 95% | 25% | 39% | 5/9, 58 yd | |
| 10.4 | −3.5 | 86% | 76% | 38% | 50% | 4/9, 64 yd | |
| 10.2 | +0.4 | 77% | 76% | 19% | 22% | 5/7, 52 yd | |
| 8.4 | +0.8 | 64% | 61% | 14% | 8% | 4/5, 44 yd | |
| 8.0 | −5.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/37, 212 yd · 4 car, -5 yd | |
| 7.2 | −2.8 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 13/25, 141 yd · 4 car, 16 yd | |
| 4.7 | −6.2 | 57% | 50% | 8% | 0% | 14 car, 18 yd · 2/3, 9 yd | |
| 4.5 | −2.7 | 43% | 47% | 8% | 0% | 6 car, 16 yd · 2/3, 9 yd | |
| 3.9 | +1.1 | 80% | 76% | 4% | 15% | 1 car, 39 yd · 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 3.5 | −2.5 | 73% | 76% | 17% | 13% | 2/4, 15 yd | |
| 3.3 | +1.5 | 13% | 13% | 3% | 9% | 1/1, 23 yd | |
| 3.2 | −3.2 | 62% | 55% | 11% | 16% | 2/4, 12 yd | |
| 2.9 | −2.6 | 27% | 12% | 4% | 0% | 9 car, 39 yd · 1/1, 0 yd | |
| 2.1 | −2.3 | 92% | 88% | 13% | 15% | 1/3, 11 yd | |
| 2.1 | +0.8 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.5 | −3.2 | 62% | 71% | 8% | 10% | 1/3, 5 yd | |
| 0.2 | −0.2 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −0.9 | 13% | 11% | 3% | 1% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Patriots attack right, the Chargers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(4:25) 38-R.Stevenson up the middle to LAC 32 for -1 yards (45-T.Tuipulotu). FUMBLES (45-T.Tuipulotu), RECOVERED by LAC-45-T.Tuipulotu at LAC 33. NE-38-R.Stevenson was injured during the play. He is Out.
Q1 4:25 · Patriots · 2nd & 5 at LAC 31 · lost 2 · -4.96 EP · −13.4% win probability
151 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 162 plays across 22 drives, personnel groupings on 151 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 157. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
2 of 22 drives ended in points. The longest march was LAC moving 57 yards from the LAC 7 for a punt. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NE attacks right, LAC attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
162 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
162 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Chargers at Patriots, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 22/37 | 212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Ekeler | 14 | 18 | 1.3 | 0 | −5.8 |
| Joshua Kelley | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 0 | −1.9 |
| Justin Herbert | 4 | -5 | -1.3 | 0 | −6.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keenan Allen | 5 | 9 | 58 | 0 | 25% | +1.8 |
| Quentin Johnston | 5 | 7 | 52 | 0 | 19% | +2.0 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Kendricks | 6 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derwin James | 7 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deane Leonard | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kenneth Murray |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bailey Zappe | 13/25 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 5 | −15.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ezekiel Elliott |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_13_LAC_NE
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chargers closed -4.5 and covered, winning by 6.
Total closed 38.5; the game landed 6 — under by 32.5.
Conditions and crew
| Gerald Everett | 4 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 14% | +2.6 |
| Alex Erickson | 1 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 3% | +2.6 |
| Donald Parham | 2 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 11% | −1.7 |
| Austin Ekeler | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 8% | −0.8 |
| Joshua Kelley | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 8% | −0.8 |
| Jalen Guyton | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 8% | −2.2 |
| Stone Smartt | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| 4 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Asante Samuel | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Khalil Mack | 5 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Austin Johnson | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Essang Bassey | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Nicholas Williams | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Hollins | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 |
| 52 |
| 3.1 |
| 0 |
| −5.3 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 9 | 39 | 4.3 | 0 | −2.3 |
| Tyquan Thornton | 1 | 39 | 39.0 | 0 | +2.6 |
| Bailey Zappe | 4 | 16 | 4.0 | 0 | +3.9 |
| Ty Montgomery | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeVante Parker | 4 | 9 | 64 | 0 | 38% | +0.0 |
| Ezekiel Elliott | 4 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 21% | +1.0 |
| Hunter Henry | 2 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 17% | −1.2 |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 13% | −1.2 |
| Jalen Reagor | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 4% | −0.1 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.6 |
| Tyquan Thornton | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −1.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Whaun Bentley | 1 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jahlani Tavai | 3 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Dugger | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Jones | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jabrill Peppers | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| J.C. Jackson | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Myles Bryant | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Anfernee Jennings | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Keion White | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jalen Mills | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |