The biggest swing of the game · Q1 1:48 · 2nd and 5
Baker Mayfield
Packers
(1:48) (Shotgun) 6-B.Mayfield sacked at TB 3 for -6 yards (55-K.Enagbare). FUMBLES (55-K.Enagbare), RECOVERED by GB-55-K.Enagbare at TB 4.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:43 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2023 Week 15 · Sun, Dec 17, 2023 · Lambeau Field
FinalThe verdict · 2023 Week 15
It turned at Q1 1:48, 2nd and 5, on Baker Mayfield — 15.1 win-probability points to the Packers on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 1:48 · 2nd and 5
Baker Mayfield
Packers
(1:48) (Shotgun) 6-B.Mayfield sacked at TB 3 for -6 yards (55-K.Enagbare). FUMBLES (55-K.Enagbare), RECOVERED by GB-55-K.Enagbare at TB 4.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 34–20. Biggest swing: Q1 1:48, Packers +15.1% win probability on one snap.
15.1
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Buccaneers won this one — +0.71 expected points per dropback, against Packers at +0.10 expected points per dropback.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Buccaneers won this one — +0.36 expected points per snap, against Packers at +0.03 expected points per snap.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Buccaneers won this one — 10 chunk plays, against Packers at 6 chunk plays.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Buccaneers won this one — 7 of 11 on third down, against Packers at 6 of 12 on third down.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 3.7 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 10 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Buccaneers.
(1:48) (Shotgun) 6-B.Mayfield sacked at TB 3 for -6 yards (55-K.Enagbare). FUMBLES (55-K.Enagbare), RECOVERED by GB-55-K.Enagbare at TB 4.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Chase McLaughlin's 46-yard field goal with 0:14 left in the 2nd put Tampa Bay Buccaneers ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
10 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Buccaneers ahead 6–1 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Packers, in sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.71 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Buccaneers ran 58 snaps at a 57% dropback rate against Packers’s 57 at 72%. Red-zone trips: Buccaneers 6, Packers 5.
Buccaneers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.36 expected points added per play vs 0.03.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
TB's pass rate over expected turned over: −18.0 pts in week 14 against −1.4 pts here — they ran more than the situation asked then and threw more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.8 of their own weekly swings across the two.
58 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.0 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -17 pts to 17 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +0.4 vs their -1.8 pts, and they swing ±6.0 week to week (+0.06× that swing) · 58 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +3.6 vs their 0.4 pts, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (+0.54× that swing) · 57 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 27% to 84%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −4.3 vs their 54.3%, and they swing ±10.6 week to week (−0.41× that swing) · 46 early downs
leaned — passed early · +12.1 vs their 55.4%, and they swing ±11.3 week to week (+1.07× that swing) · 43 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 46%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +13.6 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (+1.48× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.2 vs their 23.2%, and they swing ±8.4 week to week (+0.14× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -35% to 109%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +4.7 vs their 28.6%, and they swing ±24.5 week to week (+0.19× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · −8.3 vs their 41.7%, and they swing ±25.9 week to week (−0.32× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 76%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +16.9 vs their 39.2%, and they swing ±14.3 week to week (+1.18× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.9 vs their 22.3%, and they swing ±11.1 week to week (+0.17× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 33%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.4 vs their 13.2%, and they swing ±7.7 week to week (+0.18× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.4 vs their 16.6%, and they swing ±6.0 week to week (−0.23× that swing) · 33 dropbacks
TB's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 36.4%, 13.6 points above their season mean of 22.8% and 1.5 times their own 9.2-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Green Bay Packers
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · TB
22/28, 381 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
23.5 expected points added · +14.2% completion over expected
Passing · GB
29/39, 284 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
3.9 expected points added · +11.5% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Baker Mayfield banked 15.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.0 | +15.6 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/28, 381 yd, 4 TD · 2 car, -2 yd | |
| 25.5 | +7.1 | 81% | 91% | 44% | 41% | 10/12, 155 yd | |
| 21.9 | +9.3 | 81% | 79% | 7% | 7% | 21 car, 89 yd · 2/2, 50 yd, 1 TD | |
| 17.5 | +3.1 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 29/39, 284 yd, 2 TD · 2 car, 1 yd | |
| 17.2 | +2.9 | 42% | 41% | 22% | 23% | 6/8, 52 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.7 | +5.0 | 95% | 95% | 17% | 14% | 4/6, 57 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.7 | +5.2 | 78% | 76% | 19% | 23% | 6/7, 97 yd | |
| 15.7 | +3.0 | 85% | 97% | 22% | 23% | 4/6, 57 yd, 1 TD | |
| 14.8 | +11.9 | 26% | 24% | 7% | 8% | 2/2, 68 yd, 1 TD | |
| 10.9 | −6.3 | 48% | 37% | 11% | 0% | 13 car, 53 yd · 4/4, 16 yd | |
| 7.2 | +3.2 | 21% | 9% | 4% | 0% | 1/1, 2 yd, 1 TD | |
| 6.4 | +2.2 | 90% | 94% | 7% | 11% | 2/2, 44 yd | |
| 6.0 | +1.8 | 90% | 88% | 8% | 9% | 3/3, 30 yd | |
| 5.9 | +1.5 | 33% | 39% | 8% | 10% | 3/3, 29 yd | |
| 2.2 | −0.8 | 43% | 56% | 6% | 0% | 1 car, 6 yd · 2/2, -4 yd | |
| 1.5 | −1.6 | 56% | 61% | 7% | 3% | 1/2, 5 yd | |
| 1.3 | −0.1 | 19% | 21% | 0% | — | 3 car, 13 yd | |
| 0.0 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.2 | 17% | 12% | 3% | 11% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| -0.1 | −1.2 | 18% | 6% | 0% | — | 1 car, -1 yd |
1 player played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Packers attack right, the Buccaneers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(1:48) (Shotgun) 6-B.Mayfield sacked at TB 3 for -6 yards (55-K.Enagbare). FUMBLES (55-K.Enagbare), RECOVERED by GB-55-K.Enagbare at TB 4.
Q1 1:48 · Buccaneers · 2nd & 5 at TB 9 · lost 5 · -5.69 EP · −16.3% win probability
151 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 164 plays across 18 drives, personnel groupings on 151 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 159. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
10 of 18 drives ended in points. The longest march was TB moving 75 yards from the TB 25 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; GB attacks right, TB attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
164 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
164 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, the ball was not catchable.
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a man in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Buccaneers at Packers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 22/28 | 381 | 4 | 0 | 5 | +23.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachaad White | 21 | 89 | 4.2 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Chase Edmonds | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Deven Thompkins | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | −0.8 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Godwin | 10 | 12 | 155 | 0 | 44% | +12.5 |
| David Moore | 2 | 2 | 68 | 1 | 7% | +5.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antoine Winfield | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lavonte David | 5 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 |
| K.J. Britt | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christian Izien |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 29/39 | 284 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +3.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Jones |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2023_15_TB_GB
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Packers closed -4 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 54 — over by 12.5.
Conditions and crew
| Baker Mayfield | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 | −3.8 |
| Mike Evans | 4 | 6 | 57 | 1 | 22% | +6.0 |
| Rachaad White | 2 | 2 | 50 | 1 | 7% | +5.4 |
| Cade Otton | 2 | 2 | 44 | 0 | 7% | +3.9 |
| Trey Palmer | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7% | −0.9 |
| Ko Kieft | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4% | +1.2 |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Dee Delaney | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anthony Nelson | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zyon McCollum | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kaevon Merriweather | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jamel Dean | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joe Tryon | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 |
| 53 |
| 4.1 |
| 0 |
| −2.3 |
| Patrick Taylor | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Jordan Love | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | +0.4 |
| Kenyan Drake | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dontayvion Wicks | 6 | 7 | 97 | 0 | 19% | +7.2 |
| Tucker Kraft | 4 | 6 | 57 | 1 | 17% | +3.6 |
| Jayden Reed | 6 | 8 | 52 | 1 | 22% | +0.5 |
| Romeo Doubs | 3 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 8% | +2.3 |
| Malik Heath | 3 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 8% | +1.9 |
| Aaron Jones | 4 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 11% | −1.7 |
| Bo Melton | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6% | −0.6 |
| Ben Sims | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.8 |
| Patrick Taylor | 2 | 2 | -4 | 0 | 6% | −1.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Owens | 6 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rudy Ford | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Quay Walker | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrington Valentine | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tedarrell Slaton | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukas Van Ness | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| De'Vondre Campbell | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devonte Wyatt | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenny Clark | 2 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kingsley Enagbare | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |