The biggest swing of the game · Q1 8:57 · 1st and 10
Marvin Harrison
Cardinals
(8:57) 1-K.Murray pass deep right to 18-M.Harrison for 60 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 6:56 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 2 · Sun, Sep 15, 2024 · State Farm Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 2
It turned at Q1 8:57, 1st and 10, on Marvin Harrison — 8.9 win-probability points to the Cardinals on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 8:57 · 1st and 10
Marvin Harrison
Cardinals
(8:57) 1-K.Murray pass deep right to 18-M.Harrison for 60 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Arizona Cardinals 41–10 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 8:57, Cardinals +8.9% win probability on one snap.
8.9
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Cardinals won this one — +0.81 expected points per dropback, against Rams at -0.35 expected points per dropback.
Cardinalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Cardinals won this one — 7 of 11 on third down, against Rams at 2 of 11 on third down.
Cardinalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Cardinals won this one — 12 chunk plays, against Rams at 4 chunk plays.
Cardinalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Cardinals won this one — +0.35 expected points per snap, against Rams at -0.26 expected points per snap.
Cardinalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 4.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 14 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Cardinals.
(8:57) 1-K.Murray pass deep right to 18-M.Harrison for 60 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Marvin Harrison's 23-yard touchdown catch with 11:09 left in the 1st put Arizona Cardinals ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 8 scores that followed.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Cardinals ahead 8–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.81 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Rams ran 52 snaps at a 62% dropback rate against Cardinals’s 62 at 42%. Red-zone trips: Rams 3, Cardinals 6.
Cardinals won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.35 expected points added per play vs -0.26.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
ARI's sack or hit rate, 28.1%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 2 — 5.0 points clear of the next team along.
32 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.6 points.
LA's pass rate over expected turned over: +4.7 pts in week 1 against −11.1 pts here — they threw more than the situation asked then and ran more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.4 of their own weekly swings across the two.
52 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.7 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -22 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −7.1 vs their -4.0 pts, and they swing ±6.7 week to week (−1.07× that swing) · 52 snaps
right on their number · −2.7 vs their -2.7 pts, and they swing ±7.5 week to week (−0.36× that swing) · 62 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 22% to 86%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.9 vs their 53.3%, and they swing ±12.0 week to week (+0.16× that swing) · 38 early downs
leaned — ran early · −19.5 vs their 56.7%, and they swing ±11.4 week to week (−1.71× that swing) · 51 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 5% to 57%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −12.0 vs their 30.8%, and they swing ±10.1 week to week (−1.19× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +7.5 vs their 27.1%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+0.99× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -34% to 97%
Fourth Down room →leaned — went for it · +28.4 vs their 31.6%, and they swing ±25.7 week to week (+1.10× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 27.3%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 59%
Tendencies room →leaned — sat back · −12.5 vs their 27.8%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (−1.36× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +7.9 vs their 26.5%, and they swing ±12.8 week to week (+0.62× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 31%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −7.7 vs their 11.6%, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−1.26× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
off script — got home · +16.1 vs their 12.0%, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (+2.46× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
ARI's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 28.1%, 16.1 points above their season mean of 12.0% and 2.5 times their own 6.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Los Angeles Rams
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Arizona Cardinals
48 dressed · 6 inactive
Inactive · 6
Who moved the needle
Passing · ARI
17/21, 266 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT
18.1 expected points added · +17.5% completion over expected
Passing · LA
19/27, 216 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-11.2 expected points added · +1.4% completion over expected
Receiving · ARI
4/8 for 130 yds, 2 TD
38% of team targets · 9.6 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Kyler Murray banked 10.4 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.0 | +9.0 | 70% | 77% | 38% | 70% | 4/8, 130 yd, 2 TD | |
| 28.5 | +10.4 | 91% | — | 0% | — | 17/21, 266 yd, 3 TD · 5 car, 59 yd | |
| 19.4 | +4.2 | 62% | 50% | 5% | 0% | 21 car, 122 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 12.7 | +2.1 | 83% | 73% | 29% | 15% | 6/6, 67 yd | |
| 8.8 | +5.7 | 55% | 42% | 5% | 8% | 1/1, 18 yd, 1 TD | |
| 5.1 | +1.6 | 68% | 62% | 10% | 11% | 2/2, 31 yd | |
| 4.6 | +3.6 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 3.1 | 0.0 | 35% | 42% | 10% | 0% | 2/2, 11 yd | |
| 2.7 | −4.3 | 33% | 23% | 5% | 0% | 11 car, 10 yd · 1/1, 7 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| -2.6 | −3.3 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Cardinals attack right, the Rams attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(13:37) (Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass short left to 10-C.Kupp to ARI 40 for 1 yard (3-B.Baker).
Q1 13:37 · Rams · 4th & 2 at ARI 41 · gained 1 · -2.79 EP · −7.1% win probability
144 snaps placed · 8 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 152 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 144 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 147. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
9 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was ARI moving 99 yards from the ARI 1 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; ARI attacks right, LA attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
152 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
152 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Rams at Cardinals, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 19/27 | 216 | 0 | 0 | 5 | −11.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Corum | 8 | 28 | 3.5 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Kyren Williams | 12 | 25 | 2.1 | 1 | −1.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demarcus Robinson | 2 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 15% | +1.1 |
| Tutu Atwell | 3 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 15% | +2.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin Lake | 4 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Troy Reeder | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamren Curl | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jared Verse |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyler Murray | 17/21 | 266 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +18.1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Conner |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_02_LA_ARI
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Rams closed -1 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 47.5; the game landed 51 — over by 3.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Cooper Kupp | 4 | 6 | 37 | 0 | 22% | −3.0 |
| Kyren Williams | 4 | 5 | 27 | 0 | 19% | −0.2 |
| Jordan Whittington | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 7% | +2.4 |
| Tyler Johnson | 2 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 11% | −1.3 |
| Colby Parkinson | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 7% | +1.0 |
| Ronnie Rivers | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.6 |
| 6 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Michael Hoecht | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christian Rozeboom | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Desjuan Johnson | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tre'Davious White | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Bobby Brown | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Byron Young | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 |
| 122 |
| 5.8 |
| 1 |
| +7.1 |
| Kyler Murray | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 0 | +3.9 |
| Emari Demercado | 2 | 46 | 23.0 | 0 | +4.0 |
| Trey Benson | 11 | 10 | 0.9 | 0 | −5.8 |
| Clayton Tune | 1 | -6 | -6.0 | 0 | −5.8 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin Harrison | 4 | 8 | 130 | 2 | 38% | +9.6 |
| Trey McBride | 6 | 6 | 67 | 0 | 29% | +5.9 |
| Michael Wilson | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 10% | +2.8 |
| Elijah Higgins | 1 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 5% | +2.9 |
| Greg Dortch | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 10% | −1.3 |
| Trey Benson | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 5% | +0.2 |
| James Conner | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5% | −0.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budda Baker | 7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kyzir White | 2 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dennis Gardeck | 5 | 0 | 3.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jalen Thompson | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Starling Thomas | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Krys Barnes | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roy Lopez | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Victor Dimukeje | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zaven Collins | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Owen Pappoe | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |