The biggest swing of the game · Q2 9:51 · 2nd and 9
Justin Jefferson
Vikings
(9:51) 14-S.Darnold pass deep middle to 18-J.Jefferson for 97 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 7:02 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 2 · Sun, Sep 15, 2024 · U.S. Bank Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 2
It turned at Q2 9:51, 2nd and 9, on Justin Jefferson — 22.5 win-probability points to the Vikings on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 9:51 · 2nd and 9
Justin Jefferson
Vikings
(9:51) 14-S.Darnold pass deep middle to 18-J.Jefferson for 97 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Minnesota Vikings 23–17. Biggest swing: Q2 9:51, Vikings +22.5% win probability on one snap.
22.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Third down
Vikings won this one — 7 of 12 on third down, against 49ers at 2 of 10 on third down.
Vikingsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Vikings won this one — +0.08 expected points per carry, against 49ers at -0.17 expected points per carry.
Vikingsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
49ers owned this one and still lost it — 2 touchdowns on 4 trips, against Vikings at 1 touchdown on 5 trips.
49ersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Explosive plays
49ers owned this one and still lost it — 8 chunk plays, against Vikings at 7 chunk plays.
49ersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 13.9 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 28 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Vikings.
(9:51) 14-S.Darnold pass deep middle to 18-J.Jefferson for 97 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Will Reichard's 22-yard field goal with 4:48 left in the 1st put Minnesota Vikings ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 7 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Deadlocked at 4–4 categories. Biggest gap to Vikings, in third-down rate.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: 49ers ran 67 snaps at a 66% dropback rate against Vikings’s 51 at 61%. Red-zone trips: 49ers 4, Vikings 5.
Vikings won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.04 expected points added per play vs -0.07.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
SF's play-action rate, 4.5%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 2 — 1.8 points clear of the next team along.
44 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.1 points.
SF's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 0.0% in week 1 against 60.0% here — they took the kick then and went for it now, a turn of 2.9 of their own weekly swings across the two.
5 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 11 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 20.8 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -20 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −2.5 vs their -2.3 pts, and they swing ±7.0 week to week (−0.36× that swing) · 67 snaps
right on their number · +1.4 vs their 4.1 pts, and they swing ±4.4 week to week (+0.31× that swing) · 51 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 23% to 86%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +6.7 vs their 54.5%, and they swing ±12.5 week to week (+0.53× that swing) · 54 early downs
right on their number · −0.7 vs their 54.5%, and they swing ±7.7 week to week (−0.09× that swing) · 39 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 47%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −14.8 vs their 19.4%, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (−1.62× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −10.8 vs their 26.9%, and they swing ±7.5 week to week (−1.45× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -31% to 75%
Fourth Down room →leaned — went for it · +38.3 vs their 21.7%, and they swing ±20.8 week to week (+1.84× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 31.0%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -10% to 78%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.3 vs their 20.2%, and they swing ±10.8 week to week (−0.68× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −10.7 vs their 44.8%, and they swing ±12.4 week to week (−0.87× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 33%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +5.6 vs their 13.8%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+0.74× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.9 vs their 16.3%, and they swing ±6.1 week to week (+0.31× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
SF's fourth-and-short go rate was the night's one real departure: 60.0%, 38.3 points above their season mean of 21.7% and 1.8 times their own 20.8-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
San Francisco 49ers
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Minnesota Vikings
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · SF
28/36, 319 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
0.6 expected points added · +8.4% completion over expected
Passing · MIN
17/26, 268 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
-1.3 expected points added · +0.7% completion over expected
Receiving · MIN
4/7 for 133 yds, 1 TD
29% of team targets · 7.3 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Justin Jefferson banked 10.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.3 | +10.6 | 70% | 66% | 29% | 68% | 4/7, 133 yd, 1 TD | |
| 20.6 | +3.9 | 73% | 75% | 22% | 19% | 7/8, 76 yd, 1 TD | |
| 19.9 | +5.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 17/26, 268 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 5 car, 32 yd | |
| 18.0 | −3.0 | 86% | 84% | 28% | 34% | 2 car, -10 yd · 8/10, 110 yd | |
| 17.4 | +4.0 | 81% | 70% | 3% | 1% | 20 car, 100 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, 4 yd | |
| 14.4 | +3.9 | 93% | 91% | 17% | 30% | 3/4, 54 yd, 1 TD | |
| 14.0 | −6.4 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 28/36, 319 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 2 car, 12 yd | |
| 9.8 | −5.4 | 61% | 63% | 25% | 0% | 9 car, 32 yd · 5/6, 36 yd | |
| 8.3 | −1.8 | 87% | 89% | 14% | 14% | 4/5, 43 yd | |
| 8.2 | +2.6 | 35% | 25% | 0% | — | 10 car, 82 yd | |
| 5.7 | −2.7 | 54% | 66% | 11% | 18% | 2/4, 37 yd | |
| 4.9 | −3.3 | 57% | 50% | 14% | 8% | 3/5, 19 yd | |
| 4.6 | +1.5 | 37% | 25% | 6% | 5% | 2/2, 26 yd | |
| 3.6 | +0.4 | 59% | 72% | 8% | 7% | 2/2, 16 yd | |
| 3.2 | −0.9 | 70% | 78% | 13% | 4% | 2/3, 12 yd | |
| 2.7 | −0.9 | 30% | 28% | 8% | 9% | 1/2, 17 yd | |
| 1.4 | 0.0 | 13% | 7% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 4 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 19% | 9% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | −0.4 | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Vikings attack right, the 49ers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(13:33) (Shotgun) 13-B.Purdy pass deep left to 15-J.Jennings to MIN 20 for 25 yards (24-C.Bynum).
Q2 13:33 · 49ers · 4th & 3 at MIN 45 · gained 25 · +4.49 EP · +13.6% win probability
151 snaps placed · 15 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 166 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 151 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 161. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was MIN moving 99 yards from the MIN 1 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; MIN attacks right, SF attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
166 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
166 plays
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, the ball was not catchable.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: 49ers at Vikings, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brock Purdy | 28/36 | 319 | 1 | 1 | 6 | +0.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Mason | 20 | 100 | 5.0 | 1 | +0.4 |
| Brock Purdy | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | −1.6 |
| Isaac Guerendo | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deebo Samuel | 8 | 10 | 110 | 0 | 28% | +3.9 |
| George Kittle | 7 | 8 | 76 | 1 | 22% | +7.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Warner | 6 | 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Deommodore Lenoir | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Bosa | 4 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| De'Vondre Campbell |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Darnold | 17/26 | 268 | 2 | 1 | 3 | −1.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ty Chandler |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_02_SF_MIN
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
49ers closed -4.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 46.5; the game landed 40 — under by 6.5.
Conditions and crew
| Deebo Samuel | 2 | -10 | -5.0 | 0 | −3.8 |
| Brandon Aiyuk | 4 | 5 | 43 | 0 | 14% | +3.9 |
| Jauan Jennings | 2 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 11% | +0.1 |
| Eric Saubert | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 6% | +1.5 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 3 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 14% | −5.1 |
| Jordan Mason | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | +0.7 |
| Chris Conley | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | −0.2 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ji'Ayir Brown | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maliek Collins | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaac Yiadom | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malik Mustapha | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Givens | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| George Odum | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| 10 |
| 82 |
| 8.2 |
| 0 |
| +4.0 |
| Sam Darnold | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Aaron Jones | 9 | 32 | 3.6 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Jefferson | 4 | 7 | 133 | 1 | 29% | +7.3 |
| Jalen Nailor | 3 | 4 | 54 | 1 | 17% | +3.4 |
| Aaron Jones | 5 | 6 | 36 | 0 | 25% | −6.9 |
| Trent Sherfield | 1 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 8% | −5.1 |
| Brandon Powell | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 8% | +2.7 |
| Johnny Mundt | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 13% | −1.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Cashman | 5 | 8 | 1.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Josh Metellus | 5 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Camryn Bynum | 2 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Pace | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Jones | 2 | 3 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephon Gilmore | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harrison Smith | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Byron Murphy | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrew Van Ginkel | 4 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jonathan Greenard | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |