For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending .md to those URLs or by sending Accept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
2024 Week 3 · Sun, Sep 22, 2024 · U.S. Bank Stadium
Final
TexansHouston7
BY 27final margin
VikingsMinnesota34
Houston Texans 7 at Minnesota Vikings 34. Final.
Texans -2 upsetU 46 ✓
The verdict · 2024 Week 3
Minnesota Vikings 34, Texans 7 — and it was over early.
It turned at Q1 14:35, 1st and 20, on Kamu Grugier-Hill — 17.0 win-probability points to the Vikings on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 14:35 · 1st and 20
Kamu Grugier-Hill
Vikings
(14:35) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle intended for 3-T.Dell INTERCEPTED by 54-K.Grugier-Hill (97-H.Phillips) at HOU 26. 54-K.Grugier-Hill to HOU 21 for 5 yards (12-N.Collins; 22-C.Akers).
Dome
Texans closed -2 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Minnesota Vikings 34–7 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 14:35, Vikings +17.0% win probability on one snap.
17.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
Dalton SchultzTexansQ1 6:51(6:51) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short right to 86-D.Schultz to MIN 35 for 3 yards (44-J.Metellus).
7.9pts
Ka'imi FairbairnVikingsQ1 4:36(4:36) 15-K.Fairbairn 54 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Right, Center-46-J.Weeks, Holder-6-T.Townsend.
8.2pts
What separated them
Giveaways
Vikings won this one — no giveaways, against Texans at 3 giveaways.
Vikingsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Vikings won this one — 47% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Texans at 31% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Vikingsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Vikings won this one — +0.04 expected points per carry, against Texans at -0.34 expected points per carry.
Vikingsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Vikings won this one — +0.11 expected points per snap, against Texans at -0.22 expected points per snap.
Drawn from the weekly play-by-play file, which paints on the Monday 4:00 AM ET sync after the game.
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
How the game was won
The model and the market were 6.3 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 17 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Vikings.
MarketModelmodel higher on Vikingshigher on Texans165 of 175 plays carry both curves
(14:35) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle intended for 3-T.Dell INTERCEPTED by 54-K.Grugier-Hill (97-H.Phillips) at HOU 26. 54-K.Grugier-Hill to HOU 21 for 5 yards (12-N.Collins; 22-C.Akers).
Swing +17.0 for VikingsExpected points +5.30 for VikingsThe model had Vikings 14 points higher than the market did.play 4
The solid line is the betting market's home win probability; the dashed line is the play-by-play model's. The shaded band between them is the disagreement — emerald where the model liked the home team more, red where it liked the away team more. Drag across the curve or use arrow keys to replay the game; gold diamonds mark the biggest swings.
Highest-leverage plays
1st · 14:35HOU +17% win prob(14:35) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle intended for 3-T.Dell INTERCEPTED by 54-K.Grugier-Hill (97-H.Phillips) at HOU 26. 54-K.Grugier-Hill to HOU 21 for 5 yards (12-N.Collins; 22-C.Akers).
1st · 4:36HOU +8% win prob(4:36) 15-K.Fairbairn 54 yard field goal is No Good, Wide Right, Center-46-J.Weeks, Holder-6-T.Townsend.
1st · 6:51MIN +8% win prob(6:51) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short right to 86-D.Schultz to MIN 35 for 3 yards (44-J.Metellus).
1st · 5:25HOU +8% win prob(5:25) 7-C.Stroud sacked at MIN 36 for -10 yards (58-J.Greenard).
1st · 13:42MIN +6% win prob(13:42) (Shotgun) 14-S.Darnold pass short right to 18-J.Jefferson ran ob at HOU 9 for 9 yards.
1st · 15:00HOU +5% win prob(15:00) 7-C.Stroud pass deep left to 12-N.Collins to HOU 47 for 17 yards (43-A.Van Ginkel). PENALTY on HOU-87-C.Stover, Offensive Holding, 10 yards, enforced at HOU 30 - No Play.
SettledThe modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
The margin ledger
Justin Jefferson's 6-yard touchdown catch with 12:10 left in the 1st put Minnesota Vikings ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 6 scores that followed.
Lead
1st12:10Justin Jefferson·6-yd TD catch6-yard touchdown catchfrom Sam Darnoldfrom Sam DarnoldLead never changed again+70–7
1st1:13Aaron Jones·8-yd TD catch8-yard touchdown catchfrom Sam Darnoldfrom Sam Darnold+70–14
3rd10:26Jalen Nailor·4-yd TD catch4-yard touchdown catchfrom Sam Darnoldfrom Sam Darnold+70–21
4th14:57Will Reichard·35-yd field goal35-yard field goalholder R.Wright · snap A.DePaola+37–24
4th10:16Johnny Mundt·2-yd TD catch2-yard touchdown catchfrom Sam Darnoldfrom Sam Darnold+77–31
4th4:48Will Reichard·58-yd field goal58-yard field goalholder R.Wright · snap A.DePaola+37–34
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Situational splits
Texanscategory by categoryVikings
Texans2–7Vikings
296Total yards274
4.8Yards per play4.6
31%Success rate47%
29%Third-down rate46%
1Red-zone touchdowns4
2Explosive plays4
16First downs17
5Sacks taken4
3Turnovers0
The read
Vikings ahead 7–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
−0.22Texans: −0.22 expected points added per play
+0.11Vikings: +0.11 expected points added per play
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
−0.19Texans: −0.19 expected points added per play
+0.16Vikings: +0.16 expected points added per play
Running itexpected points added per rush
−0.34Texans: −0.34 expected points added per play
+0.04Vikings: +0.04 expected points added per play
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Texans ran 62 snaps at a 82% dropback rate against Vikings’s 59 at 54%. Red-zone trips: Texans 2, Vikings 5.
NoteTexans outgained Vikings 296-274 but lost the turnover battle 3-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
The Read
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
HOU's play-action rate, 7.8%, sat 15.5 points below their season number of 23.3% — they dropped back clean by 2.1 times their own 7.5-point weekly swing.
51 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.5 points.
HOU's early-down pass rate turned over: 53.3% in week 2 against 75.0% here — they ran early then and passed early now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
44 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.9 points.
HOU's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 25.0% in week 2 against 75.0% here — they took the kick then and went for it now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
4 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 11 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 22.4 points.
HOU's blitz rate sent turned over: 37.5% in week 2 against 12.5% here — they sent pressure then and sat back now, a turn of 2.4 of their own weekly swings across the two.
32 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.2 points.
MIN's blitz rate sent turned over: 34.1% in week 2 against 58.8% here — they sat back then and sent pressure now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
51 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 12.4 points.
MIN's play-action rate turned over: 16.1% in week 2 against 31.3% here — they dropped back clean then and faked the run now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
32 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.5 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
Was this normal for them?
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
their week-to-week swingall 32 teams
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -15 pts to 18 pts
inside their normal wobble · +6.0 vs their 15.9%, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (+0.92× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
Vikings15.7%
right on their number · −0.6 vs their 16.3%, and they swing ±6.1 week to week (−0.10× that swing) · 51 dropbacks
NoteHOU's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 7.8%, 15.5 points below their season mean of 23.3% and 2.1 times their own 7.5-point weekly swing.
The Game Day Roster
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 4 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The field map
Every snap, where it happened
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Vikings attack right, the Texans attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
Texans←Vikings→
Q1Q2Q3Q4
C.Stroud pass−13% win probabilitymoment 1 of 4
(14:35) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle intended for 3-T.Dell INTERCEPTED by 54-K.Grugier-Hill (97-H.Phillips) at HOU 26. 54-K.Grugier-Hill to HOU 21 for 5 yards (12-N.Collins; 22-C.Akers).
Q1 14:35 · Texans · 1st & 20 at HOU 20 · gained nothing · -5.30 EP · −12.7% win probability
163 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
The Film Room · post-game
Post-game film: 175 plays across 22 drives, personnel groupings on 163 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 170. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
Possession by possession
The field rail
7 of 22 drives ended in points. The longest march was MIN moving 77 yards from the MIN 23 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; MIN attacks right, HOU attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Every snap
Play stream
175 of 175 plays
Team
Quarter
Down
Play type
Expected points added
Event
Charted
Plays shown
175
EPA per play
-0.08
Success rate
39%
Yards
570
Who was on the field
Personnel groupings
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
Texans1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR45-0.2184%
Vikings1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR32+0.0778%
Vikings1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR19+0.1821%
Texans1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR14-0.3664%
Vikings2 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR7+0.1943%
Texans2 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR3——
Vikings2 RB, 3 TE, 0 WR1——
snapsepapass rate
175 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
Every play
Ball
When
Play
Only
Who
175 plays
Bar length is win probability the play moved
1st quarter39 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
FormationShotgunOffense on the fieldOne quarterback, one back, one tight end and three receiversDefense on the fieldTwo linemen, four linebackers and five backsRoute runCurlCoverageCover 3, three deepMan or zoneZoneIn the boxFive defendersRushing the passerFivePressure (charted)The passer was kept cleanTime to throw1.6 seconds
Intercepted3 plays
Texans0Vikings6
Texans0Vikings7
Touchdown7 plays, from the Texans 21 to the Texans 6
No good15 plays, from the Texans 30 to the Vikings 26
Texans0Vikings13
Texans0Vikings14
Touchdown7 plays, from the Vikings 44 to the Texans 8
The period ended6 plays, from the Texans 30 to the Texans 33
2nd quarter49 plays
Punt1 play
Punt6 plays, from the Vikings 16 to the Vikings 17
Punt11 plays, from the Texans 39 to the Vikings 25
Punt7 plays, from the Vikings 20 to the Texans 48
Punt8 plays, from the Texans 16 to the Texans 47
The period ended11 plays, from the Vikings 13 to the Vikings 47
The period ended5 plays, from the Texans 13 to the Texans 29
3rd quarter41 plays
Texans0Vikings20
Texans0Vikings21
Touchdown12 plays, from the Vikings 23 to the Texans 1
Punt5 plays, from the Texans 30 to the Texans 32
Punt4 plays
Texans6Vikings21
Texans7Vikings21
Touchdown9 plays, from the Texans 28 to the Vikings 8
The period ended11 plays, from the Vikings 40 to the Texans 19
4th quarter46 plays
Texans7Vikings24
Field goal2 plays
Intercepted4 plays, from the Texans 30 to the Texans 33
Texans7Vikings30
Texans7Vikings31
Touchdown9 plays, from the Vikings 47 to the Texans 1
Turnover on downs7 plays, from the Texans 30 to the Texans 48
Texans7Vikings34
Field goal7 plays, from the Vikings 45 to the Texans 40
Turnover on downs15 plays, from the Texans 25 to the Vikings 3
The period ended2 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published