The biggest swing of the game · Q1 11:02 · 1st and 10
Derrick Henry
Ravens
(11:02) (Shotgun) 22-D.Henry right tackle for 87 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:20 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 4 · Sun, Sep 29, 2024 · M&T Bank Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 4
It turned at Q1 11:02, 1st and 10, on Derrick Henry — 15.7 win-probability points to the Ravens on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 11:02 · 1st and 10
Derrick Henry
Ravens
(11:02) (Shotgun) 22-D.Henry right tackle for 87 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Baltimore Ravens 35–10 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 11:02, Ravens +15.7% win probability on one snap.
15.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Third down
Ravens won this one — 5 of 9 on third down, against Bills at 3 of 13 on third down.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Ravens won this one — +0.29 expected points per snap, against Bills at -0.14 expected points per snap.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Ravens won this one — +0.39 expected points per dropback, against Bills at -0.24 expected points per dropback.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Ravens won this one — 50% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Bills at 35% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Ravensthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market saw this game the same way — never more than 4 points apart.
(11:02) (Shotgun) 22-D.Henry right tackle for 87 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Derrick Henry's 87-yard rushing touchdown with 11:02 left in the 1st put Baltimore Ravens ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 6 scores that followed.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Ravens ahead 8–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.39 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Bills ran 57 snaps at a 65% dropback rate against Ravens’s 54 at 37%. Red-zone trips: Bills 2, Ravens 5.
Ravens won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.29 expected points added per play vs -0.14.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 11 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
BUF's play-action rate turned over: 28.6% in week 3 against 8.1% here — they faked the run then and dropped back clean now, a turn of 2.9 of their own weekly swings across the two.
37 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.1 points.
BUF's blitz rate sent turned over: 7.7% in week 3 against 35.0% here — they sat back then and sent pressure now, a turn of 2.3 of their own weekly swings across the two.
20 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 12.1 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -25 pts to 19 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +1.7 vs their -2.1 pts, and they swing ±8.1 week to week (+0.21× that swing) · 57 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −5.7 vs their -7.7 pts, and they swing ±6.4 week to week (−0.89× that swing) · 54 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 13% to 81%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +6.1 vs their 52.1%, and they swing ±10.9 week to week (+0.56× that swing) · 43 early downs
leaned — ran early · −16.0 vs their 47.1%, and they swing ±13.2 week to week (−1.21× that swing) · 45 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 55%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −9.7 vs their 17.8%, and they swing ±7.1 week to week (−1.37× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +14.6 vs their 25.4%, and they swing ±11.6 week to week (+1.25× that swing) · 20 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29% to 109%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · −8.3 vs their 41.7%, and they swing ±24.5 week to week (−0.34× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
Only 0 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 40.0%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 53%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +12.5 vs their 22.5%, and they swing ±12.1 week to week (+1.04× that swing) · 20 dropbacks
right on their number · +4.3 vs their 22.7%, and they swing ±11.6 week to week (+0.37× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 3% to 30%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.1 vs their 14.9%, and they swing ±4.1 week to week (+0.03× that swing) · 20 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +7.7 vs their 16.7%, and they swing ±5.3 week to week (+1.44× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
BAL's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 24.3%, 7.7 points above their season mean of 16.7% and 1.4 times their own 5.3-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Buffalo Bills
48 dressed · 5 inactive
Inactive · 5
Baltimore Ravens
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · BUF
16/29, 180 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-7.6 expected points added · +1.4% completion over expected
Passing · BAL
13/18, 156 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
9.2 expected points added · +9.5% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Lamar Jackson banked 10.2 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.9 | +10.1 | 65% | 45% | 17% | 1% | 24 car, 199 yd, 1 TD · 3/3, 10 yd, 1 TD | |
| 23.6 | +10.2 | 95% | — | 0% | — | 13/18, 156 yd, 2 TD · 6 car, 54 yd, 1 TD | |
| 21.6 | +8.8 | 35% | 55% | 33% | 10% | 4 car, 18 yd · 6/6, 78 yd, 1 TD | |
| 10.2 | +3.2 | 59% | 68% | 19% | 14% | 4/5, 62 yd | |
| 9.7 | −0.8 | 63% | 57% | 26% | 15% | 5/7, 47 yd | |
| 8.1 | +1.6 | 73% | 68% | 15% | 24% | 3/4, 51 yd | |
| 7.3 | −5.2 | 86% | — | 0% | — | 16/29, 180 yd · 5 car, 21 yd | |
| 6.3 | +3.6 | 19% | 16% | 0% | — | 1 car, 3 yd, 1 TD | |
| 5.8 | +0.1 | 56% | 57% | 4% | 1% | 9 car, 39 yd · 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 3.6 | −0.3 | 54% | 60% | 11% | 26% | 1/2, 26 yd | |
| 3.5 | +0.1 | 37% | 32% | 7% | 2% | 1 car, 7 yd · 2/2, 8 yd | |
| 3.3 | +1.4 | 65% | 70% | 6% | 19% | 1/1, 23 yd | |
| 3.0 | −2.4 | 51% | 45% | 17% | 26% | 2/3, 10 yd | |
| 2.0 | −1.3 | 68% | 80% | 11% | 20% | 1/2, 10 yd | |
| 1.5 | −7.4 | 61% | 73% | 22% | 23% | 1/6, 5 yd | |
| 1.1 | −2.3 | 17% | 8% | 0% | — | 7 car, 11 yd | |
| 1.0 | +0.1 | 46% | 41% | 4% | 0% | 1/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.1 | −0.4 | 14% | — | 0% | — | 1/2, 2 yd | |
| 0.0 | −0.2 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 61% | 55% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | 33% | 20% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 18% | 25% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | −1.8 | 46% | 45% | 6% | 9% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.6 | 42% | 32% | 4% | 5% | 0/1, 0 yd |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 5 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Ravens attack right, the Bills attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(11:02) (Shotgun) 22-D.Henry right tackle for 87 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q1 11:02 · Ravens · 1st & 10 at BAL 13 · gained 87 · +6.51 EP · +15.1% win probability
146 snaps placed · 8 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 154 plays across 22 drives, personnel groupings on 146 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 149. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 22 drives ended in points. The longest march was BAL moving 87 yards from the BAL 13 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; BAL attacks right, BUF attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
154 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
154 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Bills at Ravens, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 16/29 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 3 | −7.6 |
| Mitchell Trubisky | 1/2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Cook | 9 | 39 | 4.3 | 0 | +0.7 |
| Josh Allen | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 | +1.6 |
| Ray Davis |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khalil Shakir | 4 | 5 | 62 | 0 | 19% | +2.9 |
| Keon Coleman | 3 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 15% | +3.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorian Williams | 4 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cole Bishop | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rasul Douglas | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Lewis |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Jackson | 13/18 | 156 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +9.2 |
| Josh Johnson | 1/1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1.4 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_04_BUF_BAL
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Ravens closed -2.5 and covered, winning by 25.
Total closed 46.5; the game landed 45 — under by 1.5.
Conditions and crew
| 7 |
| 11 |
| 1.6 |
| 0 |
| −3.0 |
| Curtis Samuel | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | +0.4 |
| Ty Johnson | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 1 | +0.9 |
| Dalton Kincaid | 5 | 7 | 47 | 0 | 26% | +1.6 |
| James Cook | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4% | +0.9 |
| Curtis Samuel | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 7% | −0.2 |
| Mack Hollins | 1 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 22% | −3.1 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| Dawson Knox | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −1.6 |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Baylon Spector | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dawuane Smoot | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damar Hamlin | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Christian Benford | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeWayne Carter | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taylor Rapp | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 24 | 199 | 8.3 | 1 | +8.6 |
| Lamar Jackson | 6 | 54 | 9.0 | 1 | +0.1 |
| Justice Hill | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justice Hill | 6 | 6 | 78 | 1 | 33% | +9.3 |
| Isaiah Likely | 1 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 11% | +1.2 |
| Rashod Bateman | 1 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 6% | +2.0 |
| Derrick Henry | 3 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 17% | −0.3 |
| Nelson Agholor | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 17% | +0.1 |
| Zay Flowers | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 11% | −0.4 |
| Mark Andrews | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Hamilton | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roquan Smith | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marlon Humphrey | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Malik Harrison | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandon Stephens | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adisa Isaac | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcus Williams | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Odafe Oweh | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Ojabo | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nate Wiggins | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |