The biggest swing of the game · Q1 2:56 · 3rd and 5
Bo Nix
Panthers
(2:56) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix sacked at CAR 41 for -13 yards (94-A.Robinson).
11.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 2:26 AM ET · 15 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 8 · Sun, Oct 27, 2024 · Empower Field at Mile High
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 8
It turned at Q1 2:56, 3rd and 5, on Bo Nix — 11.0 win-probability points to the Panthers on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
Denver Broncos 28–14. Biggest swing: Q1 2:56, Panthers +11.0% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 2:56 · 3rd and 5
Bo Nix
Panthers
(2:56) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix sacked at CAR 41 for -13 yards (94-A.Robinson).
11.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Third down
Broncos won this one — 12 of 17 on third down, against Panthers at 5 of 14 on third down.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Broncos won this one — +0.04 expected points per snap, against Panthers at -0.15 expected points per snap.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Broncos won this one — +0.09 expected points per dropback, against Panthers at -0.13 expected points per dropback.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Broncos won this one — -0.04 expected points per carry, against Panthers at -0.17 expected points per carry.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 12.7 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 40 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Panthers.
(2:56) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix sacked at CAR 41 for -13 yards (94-A.Robinson).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Adam Trautman's 19-yard touchdown catch with 6:56 left in the 2nd put Denver Broncos ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 3 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Broncos ahead 7–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Panthers ran 60 snaps at a 70% dropback rate against Broncos’s 71 at 59%. Red-zone trips: Panthers 3, Broncos 5.
Broncos won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.04 expected points added per play vs -0.15.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DEN's play-action rate, 45.2%, is past their previous high of 39.4% in week 7 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 8.
42 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.6 points. · +1.7σ from their own normal
DEN's sack or hit rate, 11.9%, is past their previous low of 14.3% in week 5 — the lowest of their 8 charted games through week 8.
42 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.3 points. · −1.0σ from their own normal
CAR's play-action rate turned over: 33.3% in week 7 against 14.3% here — they faked the run then and dropped back clean now, a turn of 2.3 of their own weekly swings across the two.
42 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.3 points. · −0.9σ from their own normal
CAR's early-down pass rate turned over: 41.9% in week 7 against 61.9% here — they ran early then and passed early now, a turn of 2.0 of their own weekly swings across the two.
42 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.8 points. · +0.5σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -18 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −0.5 vs their -2.6 pts, and they swing ±5.7 week to week (−0.10× that swing) · 60 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +5.7 vs their 0.3 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (+0.91× that swing) · 71 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 32% to 82%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +5.1 vs their 56.8%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (+0.52× that swing) · 42 early downs
right on their number · +0.0 vs their 55.8%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+0.00× that swing) · 52 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -0% to 54%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.7 vs their 22.0%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−0.92× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +18.2 vs their 27.0%, and they swing ±10.6 week to week (+1.71× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -57% to 123%
Fourth Down room →Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 41.9%.
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 28.8%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 73%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.4 vs their 29.5%, and they swing ±7.3 week to week (+0.19× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
right on their number · −0.6 vs their 33.9%, and they swing ±15.4 week to week (−0.04× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 38%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −5.2 vs their 10.0%, and they swing ±3.8 week to week (−1.38× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −7.5 vs their 19.4%, and they swing ±7.3 week to week (−1.03× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
DEN's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 45.2%, 18.2 points above their season mean of 27.0% and 1.7 times their own 10.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Carolina Panthers
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Denver Broncos
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · DEN
Bo NixQB
28/37, 284 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT
13.6 expected points added · +13.5% completion over expected
Passing · CAR
24/37, 224 yds, 2 TD, 2 INT
-2.8 expected points added · +5.6% completion over expected
Receiving · DEN
8/11 for 100 yds, 0 TD
29% of team targets · 2.3 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Adam Trautman banked 9.9 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.8 | −0.5 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 28/37, 284 yd, 3 TD · 5 car, 4 yd, 1 TD | |
| 18.5 | +9.9 | 56% | 52% | 11% | 13% | 4/4, 85 yd, 1 TD | |
| 17.8 | +8.2 | 69% | 76% | 17% | 31% | 4/6, 78 yd, 1 TD | |
| 17.1 | −4.9 | 84% | 83% | 29% | 38% | 1/1, 28 yd · 8/11, 100 yd | |
| 13.6 | −0.2 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 24/37, 224 yd, 2 TD, 2 INT · 3 car, 6 yd | |
| 13.4 | +1.5 | 62% | 64% | 20% | 34% | 1 car, 0 yd · 4/7, 34 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.6 | +5.7 | 32% | 26% | 3% | 0% | 8 car, 47 yd · 1/1, 9 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.5 | +1.5 | 34% | 38% | 20% | 0% | 1 car, 7 yd · 7/7, 38 yd | |
| 9.2 | −13.2 | 58% | 55% | 13% | 4% | 17 car, 44 yd · 4/5, 8 yd | |
| 9.1 | −0.1 | 74% | 62% | 6% | 0% | 15 car, 56 yd · 2/2, 15 yd | |
| 7.9 | +0.9 | 82% | 79% | 14% | 12% | 4/5, 39 yd | |
| 7.3 | +3.6 | 48% | 33% | 3% | 1% | 1/1, 3 yd, 1 TD | |
| 5.8 | +0.7 | 34% | 38% | 8% | 7% | 3/3, 28 yd | |
| 4.2 | −8.5 | 60% | 55% | 16% | 13% | 4/6, 22 yd | |
| 3.8 | +1.6 | 15% | 14% | 3% | 4% | 1/1, 28 yd | |
| 3.8 | +0.2 | 37% | 45% | 5% | 2% | 2/2, 18 yd | |
| 3.3 | −0.9 | 61% | 50% | 9% | 5% | 2/3, 13 yd | |
| 1.9 | −3.0 | 37% | 38% | 5% | 9% | 1 car, 3 yd · 1/2, 6 yd | |
| 1.8 | −1.3 | 29% | 31% | 5% | 7% | 1/2, 8 yd | |
| 1.7 | +0.2 | 36% | 40% | 3% | 2% | 1/1, 7 yd | |
| 0.4 | −0.1 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | −4.4 | 54% | 45% | 9% | 13% | 0/3, 0 yd |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Broncos attack right, the Panthers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(13:50) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix pass short left to 84-L.Humphrey to DEN 48 for 8 yards (99-S.Tuttle). FUMBLES (99-S.Tuttle), RECOVERED by CAR-99-S.Tuttle at DEN 49.
Q1 13:50 · Broncos · 1st & 10 at DEN 40 · gained 8 · -5.02 EP · −12.0% win probability
162 snaps placed · 15 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 177 plays across 23 drives, personnel groupings on 162 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 172. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 23 drives ended in points. The longest march was CAR moving 98 yards from the CAR 2 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; DEN attacks right, CAR attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
177 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
177 plays
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Panthers at Broncos, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryce Young | 24/37 | 224 | 2 | 2 | 2 | −2.8 |
| Johnny Hekker | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuba Hubbard | 15 | 56 | 3.7 | 0 | −2.6 |
| Miles Sanders | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | +1.1 |
| Bryce Young |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Coker | 4 | 6 | 78 | 1 | 17% | +5.2 |
| David Moore | 4 | 5 | 39 | 0 | 14% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demani Richardson | 7 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Jackson | 8 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Josey Jewell | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shy Tuttle |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bo Nix | 28/37 | 284 | 3 | 0 | 2 | +13.6 |
| Courtland Sutton | 1/1 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3.6 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_08_CAR_DEN
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Broncos closed -13 and covered, winning by 14.
Total closed 40.5; the game landed 42 — over by 1.5.
Conditions and crew
| 3 |
| 6 |
| 2.0 |
| 0 |
| −1.2 |
| Xavier Legette | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Miles Sanders | 7 | 7 | 38 | 0 | 20% | −2.6 |
| Xavier Legette | 4 | 7 | 34 | 1 | 20% | +2.7 |
| Chuba Hubbard | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 6% | +0.5 |
| Tommy Tremble | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 9% | −1.7 |
| Ja'Tavion Sanders | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3% | +0.2 |
| Sam Franklin | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −2.7 |
| Jonathan Mingo | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9% | −2.2 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jadeveon Clowney | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trevin Wallace | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chau Smith-Wade | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| A'Shawn Robinson | 3 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Xavier Woods | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaycee Horn | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Riley Dixon | 1/1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaleel McLaughlin | 8 | 47 | 5.9 | 0 | +3.6 |
| Javonte Williams | 17 | 44 | 2.6 | 0 | −7.2 |
| Bo Nix | 5 | 4 | 0.8 | 1 | +1.4 |
| Audric Estime | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Troy Franklin | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courtland Sutton | 8 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 29% | +2.3 |
| Adam Trautman | 4 | 4 | 85 | 1 | 11% | +7.0 |
| Michael Burton | 1 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 3% | +3.6 |
| Devaughn Vele | 3 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 8% | +2.7 |
| Lil'Jordan Humphrey | 4 | 6 | 22 | 0 | 16% | −5.1 |
| Lucas Krull | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 5% | −0.6 |
| Jaleel McLaughlin | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3% | +1.6 |
| Javonte Williams | 4 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 13% | −2.1 |
| Marvin Mims | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 5% | +0.2 |
| Troy Franklin | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5% | −2.4 |
| Nate Adkins | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3% | +2.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Jones | 6 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devon Key | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathon Cooper | 4 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Riley Moss | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Strnad | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nik Bonitto | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ja'Quan McMillian | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| John Franklin-Myers | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zach Allen | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cody Barton | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |