The biggest swing of the game · Q4 11:58 · 3rd and 5
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
Saints
(11:58) (Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass deep right to 10-M.Valdes-Scantling for 28 yards, TOUCHDOWN. NO-64-N.Saldiveri was injured during the play.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 6:57 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 13 · Sun, Dec 1, 2024 · Mercedes-Benz Superdome
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 13
It turned at Q4 11:58, 3rd and 5, on Marquez Valdes-Scantling — 14.3 win-probability points to the Saints on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 11:58 · 3rd and 5
Marquez Valdes-Scantling
Saints
(11:58) (Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass deep right to 10-M.Valdes-Scantling for 28 yards, TOUCHDOWN. NO-64-N.Saldiveri was injured during the play.
Los Angeles Rams 21–14. Biggest swing: Q4 11:58, Saints +14.3% win probability on one snap.
14.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Rams won this one — 3 touchdowns on 3 trips, against Saints at 0 touchdowns on 3 trips.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Rams won this one — +0.24 expected points per carry, against Saints at -0.11 expected points per carry.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Rams won this one — 49% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Saints at 39% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Rams won this one — no giveaways, against Saints at 1 giveaway.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 11.0 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 17 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Saints.
(11:58) (Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass deep right to 10-M.Valdes-Scantling for 28 yards, TOUCHDOWN. NO-64-N.Saldiveri was injured during the play.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Puka Nacua's 7-yard touchdown catch with 8:57 left in the 4th put Los Angeles Rams ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Rams ahead 7–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Rams ran 53 snaps at a 49% dropback rate against Saints’s 69 at 58%. Red-zone trips: Rams 3, Saints 3.
Saints outgained Rams 329-325 but lost the turnover battle 1-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
NO's fourth-and-short go rate, 100.0%, is past their previous high of 57.1% in week 7 — the highest of their 9 charted games through week 13.
3 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 11 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 28.3 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -23 pts to 13 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · −3.6 vs their -4.0 pts, and they swing ±6.7 week to week (−0.54× that swing) · 53 snaps
leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −7.5 vs their -5.1 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (−1.09× that swing) · 68 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 21% to 91%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −10.5 vs their 53.3%, and they swing ±12.0 week to week (−0.87× that swing) · 42 early downs
right on their number · −6.0 vs their 56.0%, and they swing ±13.9 week to week (−0.43× that swing) · 50 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -15% to 61%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +15.4 vs their 30.8%, and they swing ±10.1 week to week (+1.53× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
right on their number · −5.5 vs their 23.0%, and they swing ±14.7 week to week (−0.37× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -37% to 110%
Fourth Down room →Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 31.6%.
off script — went for it · +64.8 vs their 35.2%, and they swing ±28.3 week to week (+2.29× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 2% to 51%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +7.2 vs their 27.8%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (+0.78× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
right on their number · +2.8 vs their 24.1%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (+0.33× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 30%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.1 vs their 11.6%, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−0.66× that swing) · 40 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +11.0 vs their 12.0%, and they swing ±7.1 week to week (+1.56× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
NO's fourth-and-short go rate was the night's one real departure: 100.0%, 64.8 points above their season mean of 35.2% and 2.3 times their own 28.3-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Los Angeles Rams
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 5 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 5
New Orleans Saints
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · NO
24/37, 184 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
-1.6 expected points added · -2.4% completion over expected
Passing · LA
14/24, 183 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
0.3 expected points added · -3.9% completion over expected
Receiving · LA
2/3 for 49 yds, 1 TD
13% of team targets · 3.7 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Marquez Valdes-Scantling banked 5.9 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.9 | −6.0 | 86% | 80% | 18% | 0% | 23 car, 112 yd · 4/6, 7 yd | |
| 14.6 | −0.9 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 24/37, 184 yd, 1 TD · 2 car, 12 yd | |
| 11.6 | +5.9 | 76% | 78% | 9% | 27% | 2/3, 36 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.7 | −3.3 | 59% | — | 21% | 13% | 5 car, 10 yd · 5/7, 37 yd | |
| 8.6 | −2.7 | 70% | 85% | 21% | 18% | 5/7, 36 yd | |
| 7.0 | +0.9 | 61% | 55% | 9% | 9% | 1 car, 9 yd · 3/3, 31 yd | |
| 3.5 | −0.5 | 20% | 20% | 6% | 0% | 1/2, 5 yd | |
| 2.9 | +0.9 | 33% | 35% | 3% | 6% | 1/1, 19 yd | |
| 2.6 | −3.9 | 66% | 50% | 12% | 16% | 2/4, 6 yd | |
| 1.7 | +0.6 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. |
1 player played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Saints attack right, the Rams attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(11:58) (Shotgun) 4-D.Carr pass deep right to 10-M.Valdes-Scantling for 28 yards, TOUCHDOWN. NO-64-N.Saldiveri was injured during the play.
Q4 11:58 · Saints · 3rd & 5 at LA 28 · gained 28 · +3.63 EP · +21.1% win probability
148 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 161 plays across 17 drives, personnel groupings on 148 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 156. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 17 drives ended in points. The longest march was LA moving 82 yards from the LA 18 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NO attacks right, LA attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
161 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
161 plays
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, the ball was not catchable.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A screen, a run-pass option, a man in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Rams at Saints, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 14/24 | 183 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +0.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyren Williams | 15 | 104 | 6.9 | 1 | +4.0 |
| Blake Corum | 8 | 42 | 5.3 | 0 | +0.0 |
| Puka Nacua | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | +0.7 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puka Nacua | 5 | 8 | 56 | 1 | 35% | +5.4 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 2 | 3 | 49 | 1 | 13% | +3.7 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Rozeboom | 7 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Omar Speights | 3 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Quentin Lake | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cobie Durant |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek Carr | 24/37 | 184 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvin Kamara |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_13_LA_NO
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Rams closed -2.5 and covered, winning by 7.
Total closed 48.5; the game landed 35 — under by 13.5.
Conditions and crew
| Matthew Stafford | 4 | 3 | 0.8 | 0 | +2.8 |
| Tutu Atwell | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −1.1 |
| Tutu Atwell | 2 | 2 | 39 | 0 | 9% | +2.6 |
| Cooper Kupp | 3 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 26% | −6.6 |
| Colby Parkinson | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 4% | +0.9 |
| Kyren Williams | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4% | +0.1 |
| Tyler Johnson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| Hunter Long | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Kamren Kinchens | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jared Verse | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Darious Williams | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamren Curl | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Bobby Brown | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Byron Young | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 |
| 112 |
| 4.9 |
| 0 |
| −3.6 |
| Derek Carr | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | +0.8 |
| Taysom Hill | 5 | 10 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Kevin Austin | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | +0.8 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taysom Hill | 5 | 7 | 37 | 0 | 21% | +1.3 |
| Juwan Johnson | 5 | 7 | 36 | 0 | 21% | −5.5 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 2 | 3 | 36 | 1 | 9% | +3.7 |
| Kevin Austin | 3 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 9% | +4.7 |
| Cedrick Wilson | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 3% | +1.8 |
| Alvin Kamara | 4 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 18% | −4.6 |
| Jamaal Williams | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3% | +1.2 |
| Foster Moreau | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 12% | −2.7 |
| Dante Pettis | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 6% | +0.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ugochukwu Amadi | 8 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Pete Werner | 7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Harris | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alontae Taylor | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Demario Davis | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carl Granderson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Jordan | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kool-Aid McKinstry | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyrann Mathieu | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalen Saunders | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |