The biggest swing of the game · Q3 5:32 · 4th and 1
Geno Smith
Jets
(5:32) (Shotgun) 7-G.Smith sacked at NYJ 16 for -15 yards (56-Qi.Williams).
20.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 11:23 PM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 13 · Sun, Dec 1, 2024 · MetLife Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 13
It turned at Q3 5:32, 4th and 1, on Geno Smith — 20.2 win-probability points to the Jets on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
Seattle Seahawks 26–21. Biggest swing: Q3 5:32, Jets +20.2% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 5:32 · 4th and 1
Geno Smith
Jets
(5:32) (Shotgun) 7-G.Smith sacked at NYJ 16 for -15 yards (56-Qi.Williams).
20.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Explosive plays
Seahawks won this one — 8 chunk plays, against Jets at 4 chunk plays.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Seahawks won this one — -0.02 expected points per snap, against Jets at -0.27 expected points per snap.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Seahawks won this one — -0.03 expected points per dropback, against Jets at -0.31 expected points per dropback.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Seahawks won this one — +0.01 expected points per carry, against Jets at -0.19 expected points per carry.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 3.5 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 9 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Seahawks.
(5:32) (Shotgun) 7-G.Smith sacked at NYJ 16 for -15 yards (56-Qi.Williams).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Zach Charbonnet's 8-yard rushing touchdown with 5:37 left in the 4th put Seattle Seahawks ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Jets ahead 6–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Seahawks, in explosive plays.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Seahawks ran 56 snaps at a 63% dropback rate against Jets’s 62 at 68%. Red-zone trips: Seahawks 4, Jets 4.
Seahawks won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.02 expected points added per play vs -0.27.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
Nothing cleared the bars. No reading led the week's slate, set a season mark, reversed the week before, or sat two of the team's own standard deviations off their number — which is what most Sundays look like, and is the finding rather than a gap.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -16 pts to 20 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −1.1 vs their 1.7 pts, and they swing ±7.0 week to week (−0.16× that swing) · 56 snaps
right on their number · +1.1 vs their 2.1 pts, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (+0.22× that swing) · 61 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 30% to 93%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −5.3 vs their 61.4%, and they swing ±12.4 week to week (−0.43× that swing) · 41 early downs
right on their number · −2.2 vs their 59.9%, and they swing ±7.1 week to week (−0.30× that swing) · 45 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 47%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +6.4 vs their 19.4%, and they swing ±10.6 week to week (+0.60× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.8 vs their 24.4%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+0.24× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -37% to 124%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · −14.6 vs their 39.6%, and they swing ±29.8 week to week (−0.49× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · +10.7 vs their 55.9%, and they swing ±25.8 week to week (+0.42× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 59%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +9.1 vs their 26.6%, and they swing ±12.6 week to week (+0.72× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
right on their number · +0.2 vs their 28.4%, and they swing ±9.0 week to week (+0.02× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -9% to 36%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −3.3 vs their 17.5%, and they swing ±7.1 week to week (−0.46× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
right on their number · +3.5 vs their 13.6%, and they swing ±8.7 week to week (+0.40× that swing) · 35 dropbacks
Nothing either side did tonight left its own normal range. The widest departure was SEA's blitz rate sent, 35.7% against a season mean of 26.6% — and SEA swings 12.6 points week to week, so that is a Sunday, not a plan.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Seattle Seahawks
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
New York Jets
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · SEA
20/31, 206 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
-1.6 expected points added · +3.1% completion over expected
Passing · NYJ
21/39, 185 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
-14.0 expected points added · -10.2% completion over expected
Receiving · SEA
4/4 for 74 yds, 0 TD
14% of team targets · 8.7 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
A.J. Barner banked 6.4 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante AdamsWR · Alpha Receiver | 17.6 | −2.9 | 97% | 100% | 32% | 48% | 5/12, 66 yd, 1 TD |
| Aaron RodgersQB · Starter QB | 14.0 | −4.0 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 21/39, 185 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 2 car, 6 yd |
| Geno SmithQB · Starter QB | 12.4 | −2.4 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 20/31, 206 yd, 1 TD · 2 car, 2 yd |
| Isaiah DavisRB | 12.2 | +5.3 | 18% | 24% | 8% | 0% | 1 car, 4 yd · 3/3, 28 yd, 1 TD |
| Zach CharbonnetRB · Receiving Back | 12.1 | +5.9 | 45% | 57% | 10% | 1% | 4 car, 28 yd, 1 TD · 2/3, 13 yd |
| Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR · Rotational Receiver | 11.9 | +5.1 | 77% | 83% | 14% | 31% | 1 car, 5 yd · 4/4, 74 yd |
| DK MetcalfWR · Alpha Receiver | 10.6 | −7.2 | 75% | 86% | 31% | 58% | 4/9, 66 yd |
| A.J. BarnerTE · Rotational Receiver | 9.4 | +6.4 | 41% | 26% | 7% | 0% | 2/2, 14 yd, 1 TD |
| Garrett WilsonWR · Alpha Receiver | 9.1 | −6.6 | 97% | 95% | 26% | 34% | 5/10, 41 yd |
| Tyler ConklinTE · Rotational Receiver | 7.2 | +0.4 | 82% | 90% | 13% | 6% | 4/5, 32 yd |
| Kenneth WalkerRB · Bell Cow Back | 6.6 | −9.4 | 61% | 43% | 10% | 0% | 16 car, 49 yd · 2/3, -3 yd |
| Breece HallRB · Committee Back | 6.0 | −3.0 | 62% | 57% | 3% | 1% | 12 car, 60 yd · 0/1, 0 yd |
| Kene NwangwuRB | 6.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Noah FantTE · Rotational Receiver | 5.6 | −2.8 | 67% | 83% | 14% | 8% | 3/4, 26 yd |
| Braelon AllenRB | 4.7 | −0.8 | 28% | 29% | 5% | 0% | 5 car, 11 yd · 2/2, 16 yd |
| Tyler LockettWR · Rotational Receiver | 4.6 | +0.8 | 47% | 66% | 10% | 8% | 3/3, 16 yd |
| Jeremy RuckertTE · Rotational Receiver | 1.3 | −1.9 | 25% | 14% | 5% | 5% | 1/2, 3 yd |
| Xavier GipsonWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.9 | −0.5 | 28% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, -1 yd |
| Malachi CorleyWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.8 | −4.7 | 60% | 60% | 5% | 9% | 1 car, 8 yd · 0/2, 0 yd |
| Irvin CharlesWR | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Pharaoh BrownTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.0 | 41% | 29% | 3% | 3% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| Laviska Shenault Jr.WR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. |
| Jake BoboWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | 30% | 17% | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Brady RussellRB | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Kenny McIntoshRB | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
5 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 6 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Jets attack right, the Seahawks attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:16) (Shotgun) 7-G.Smith pass deep left to 11-J.Smith-Njigba pushed ob at NYJ 20 for 24 yards (30-M.Carter).
Q3 0:16 · Seahawks · 4th & 6 at NYJ 44 · gained 24 · +4.50 EP · +18.6% win probability
159 snaps placed · 8 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 167 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 159 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 162. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was SEA moving 88 yards from the SEA 12 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NYJ attacks right, SEA attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
167 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
167 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, no huddle, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
From outside the pocket, the sack was on the quarterback.
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a man in motion.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
The sack was on the quarterback.
How the play was built
No huddle, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Seahawks at Jets, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geno Smith | 20/31 | 206 | 1 | 0 | 3 | −1.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Walker | 16 | 49 | 3.1 | 0 | −3.2 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 4 | 28 | 7.0 | 1 | +3.2 |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 4 | 4 | 74 | 0 | 14% | +8.7 |
| DK Metcalf | 4 | 9 | 66 | 0 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernest Jones | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Love | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Coby Bryant |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Rodgers | 21/39 | 185 | 2 | 1 | 2 | −14.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_13_SEA_NYJ
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Jets closed -1 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 47 — over by 5.5.
Conditions and crew
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 5.0 |
| 0 |
| +0.2 |
| Geno Smith | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | +0.5 |
| 31% |
| +1.4 |
| Noah Fant | 3 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 14% | +0.1 |
| Tyler Lockett | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 10% | +0.6 |
| A.J. Barner | 2 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 7% | +1.9 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 10% | −0.6 |
| Pharaoh Brown | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Kenneth Walker | 2 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 10% | −1.6 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Byron Murphy | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tariq Woolen | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Josh Jobe | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leonard Williams | 3 | 1 | 2.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Devon Witherspoon | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rayshawn Jenkins | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tre Brown | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Breece Hall | 12 | 60 | 5.0 | 0 | −2.9 |
| Braelon Allen | 5 | 11 | 2.2 | 0 | −2.0 |
| Malachi Corley | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | +0.9 |
| Aaron Rodgers | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | +1.1 |
| Isaiah Davis | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante Adams | 5 | 12 | 66 | 1 | 32% | +1.3 |
| Garrett Wilson | 5 | 10 | 41 | 0 | 26% | −11.6 |
| Tyler Conklin | 4 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 13% | +1.4 |
| Isaiah Davis | 3 | 3 | 28 | 1 | 8% | +1.2 |
| Braelon Allen | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 5% | +1.0 |
| Jeremy Ruckert | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5% | −0.8 |
| Breece Hall | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Malachi Corley | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −1.5 |
| Xavier Gipson | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 3% | −1.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quincy Williams | 4 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| D.J. Reed | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jamien Sherwood | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ashtyn Davis | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Carter | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony Adams | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ahmad Gardner | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Micheal Clemons | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaiah Oliver | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chazz Surratt | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |