The biggest swing of the game · Q4 8:50 · 1st and 10
Malik Nabers
Giants
(8:50) (Shotgun) 2-D.Lock pass short right to 1-M.Nabers for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 2:24 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 17 · Sun, Dec 29, 2024 · MetLife Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 17
It turned at Q4 8:50, 1st and 10, on Malik Nabers — 17.2 win-probability points to the Giants on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 8:50 · 1st and 10
Malik Nabers
Giants
(8:50) (Shotgun) 2-D.Lock pass short right to 1-M.Nabers for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
New York Giants 45–33. Biggest swing: Q4 8:50, Giants +17.2% win probability on one snap.
17.2
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Giants won this one — +1.27 expected points per dropback, against Colts at +0.18 expected points per dropback.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Giants won this one — no giveaways, against Colts at 3 giveaways.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Colts owned this one and still lost it — -0.12 expected points per carry, against Giants at -0.48 expected points per carry.
Coltsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Every snap
Giants won this one — +0.38 expected points per snap, against Colts at +0.04 expected points per snap.
Giantsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 19.6 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 35 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Giants.
(8:50) (Shotgun) 2-D.Lock pass short right to 1-M.Nabers for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Malik Nabers's 31-yard touchdown catch with 1:13 left in the 1st put New York Giants ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 11 scores that followed.
13 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Giants ahead 5–4 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±1.27 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Colts ran 74 snaps at a 55% dropback rate against Giants’s 49 at 49%. Red-zone trips: Colts 6, Giants 7.
Colts outgained Giants 446-394 but lost the turnover battle 3-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
NYG's play-action rate, 45.8%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 17 — 6.5 points clear of the next team along.
24 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.4 points.
IND's sack or hit rate, 4.2%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 17 — 0.8 points clear of the next team along.
24 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.5 points.
NYG's early-down pass rate, 38.9%, is past their previous low of 47.8% in week 9 — the lowest of their 16 charted games through week 17.
36 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.2 points.
NYG's pass rate over expected turned over: +12.2 pts in week 16 against −7.6 pts here — they threw more than the situation asked then and ran more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.7 of their own weekly swings across the two.
49 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.4 points.
IND's early-down pass rate turned over: 15.2% in week 16 against 55.2% here — they ran early then and passed early now, a turn of 3.1 of their own weekly swings across the two.
58 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 13.0 points.
IND's pass rate over expected turned over: −25.5 pts in week 16 against −7.8 pts here — they ran more than the situation asked then and threw more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
73 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +0.9 vs their -8.7 pts, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (+0.12× that swing) · 73 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −3.9 vs their -3.6 pts, and they swing ±7.4 week to week (−0.53× that swing) · 49 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 18% to 84%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +4.4 vs their 50.8%, and they swing ±13.0 week to week (+0.33× that swing) · 58 early downs
off script — ran early · −19.0 vs their 57.8%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (−2.05× that swing) · 36 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 54%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.8 vs their 29.9%, and they swing ±9.0 week to week (+0.20× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
off script — faked the run · +21.9 vs their 24.0%, and they swing ±10.4 week to week (+2.11× that swing) · 24 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -28% to 111%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +8.3 vs their 41.7%, and they swing ±27.3 week to week (+0.30× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · −6.4 vs their 39.8%, and they swing ±22.4 week to week (−0.29× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 61%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.8 vs their 20.0%, and they swing ±10.4 week to week (+0.08× that swing) · 24 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −12.1 vs their 29.2%, and they swing ±12.2 week to week (−0.99× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 35%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −8.3 vs their 12.4%, and they swing ±7.5 week to week (−1.10× that swing) · 24 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −5.1 vs their 14.9%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (−0.67× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
NYG's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 45.8%, 21.9 points above their season mean of 24.0% and 2.1 times their own 10.4-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Indianapolis Colts
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
New York Giants
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · IND
26/38, 330 yds, 2 TD, 2 INT
7.2 expected points added · +7.7% completion over expected
Passing · NYG
17/23, 309 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
27.6 expected points added · +10.7% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Malik Nabers banked 18.9 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.1 | +18.9 | 84% | 96% | 36% | 41% | 7/8, 171 yd, 2 TD | |
| 34.4 | +18.9 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 17/23, 309 yd, 4 TD · 5 car, 0 yd, 1 TD | |
| 27.6 | −0.5 | 88% | 80% | 11% | 3% | 32 car, 125 yd, 2 TD · 2/4, 11 yd | |
| 25.9 | +9.4 | 94% | 95% | 27% | 19% | 9/10, 109 yd, 1 TD | |
| 24.2 | +5.7 | 95% | 90% | 24% | 50% | 6/9, 122 yd, 1 TD | |
| 18.1 | +7.0 | 64% | 88% | 27% | 30% | 5/6, 71 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.3 | −5.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 26/38, 330 yd, 2 TD, 2 INT · 1 car, 1 yd | |
| 10.2 | +4.7 | 80% | 79% | 14% | 22% | 1/3, 32 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.3 | −4.2 | 66% | 63% | 14% | 4% | 20 car, 59 yd · 2/3, 14 yd | |
| 6.4 | +0.2 | 40% | 56% | 11% | 4% | 3/4, 34 yd | |
| 6.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 5.2 | −0.6 | 61% | 66% | 11% | 7% | 3/4, 22 yd | |
| 4.2 | −3.2 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 4.0 | +0.1 | 27% | 33% | 5% | 1% | 5 car, 21 yd · 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 2.2 | +0.5 | 45% | 25% | 5% | 4% | 1/1, 12 yd | |
| 2.0 | +0.6 | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −2.4 | 40% | 34% | 3% | 6% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | 89% | 83% | 0% | — | No touches. |
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Giants attack right, the Colts attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(8:50) (Shotgun) 2-D.Lock pass short right to 1-M.Nabers for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q4 8:50 · Giants · 1st & 10 at NYG 41 · gained 59 · +5.15 EP · +14.2% win probability
168 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 181 plays across 25 drives, personnel groupings on 168 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 176. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
13 of 25 drives ended in points. The longest march was NYG moving 70 yards from the NYG 30 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NYG attacks right, IND attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
181 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
181 plays
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
How the play was built
A screen, a man in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Colts at Giants, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Flacco | 26/38 | 330 | 2 | 2 | 2 | +7.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Taylor | 32 | 125 | 3.9 | 2 | −3.6 |
| Joe Flacco | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Pierce | 6 | 9 | 122 | 1 | 24% | +9.0 |
| Michael Pittman | 9 | 10 | 109 | 1 | 27% | +8.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zaire Franklin | 4 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Cross | 2 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaylon Jones | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grover Stewart |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew Lock | 17/23 | 309 | 4 | 0 | 0 | +27.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrone Tracy |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_17_IND_NYG
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Colts closed -7.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 40.5; the game landed 78 — over by 37.5.
Conditions and crew
| Kylen Granson | 3 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 11% | −0.7 |
| Adonai Mitchell | 2 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 11% | +1.6 |
| Josh Downs | 3 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 11% | −0.4 |
| Jonathan Taylor | 2 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 11% | −1.4 |
| Trey Sermon | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.1 |
| Mo Alie-Cox | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −3.6 |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Julian Blackmon | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenny Moore | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kwity Paye | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bernhard Raimann | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samuel Womack | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mo Alie-Cox | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 |
| 59 |
| 3.0 |
| 0 |
| −11.0 |
| Devin Singletary | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Drew Lock | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | −0.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malik Nabers | 7 | 8 | 171 | 2 | 36% | +14.7 |
| Wan'Dale Robinson | 5 | 6 | 71 | 1 | 27% | +10.6 |
| Darius Slayton | 1 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 14% | +2.5 |
| Tyrone Tracy | 2 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14% | −1.3 |
| Chris Manhertz | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 5% | +1.0 |
| Devin Singletary | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 5% | +0.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ty Summers | 1 | 8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jason Pinnock | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dane Belton | 7 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Darius Muasau | 2 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deonte Banks | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Andru Phillips | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Brian Burns | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elijah Chatman | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaiah Simmons | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cordale Flott | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |