The biggest swing of the game · Q1 12:04 · 1st and 10
Marvin Mims
Broncos
(12:04) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix pass short right to 19-M.Mims for 32 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:42 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2024 Week 18 · Sun, Jan 5, 2025 · Empower Field at Mile High
FinalThe verdict · 2024 Week 18
It turned at Q1 12:04, 1st and 10, on Marvin Mims — 7.8 win-probability points to the Broncos on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 12:04 · 1st and 10
Marvin Mims
Broncos
(12:04) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix pass short right to 19-M.Mims for 32 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Denver Broncos 38–0 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 12:04, Broncos +7.8% win probability on one snap.
7.8
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Staying on schedule
Broncos won this one — 58% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Chiefs at 12% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Broncos won this one — 10 of 13 on third down, against Chiefs at 1 of 9 on third down.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Broncos won this one — +0.83 expected points per dropback, against Chiefs at -0.47 expected points per dropback.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Broncos won this one — +0.41 expected points per snap, against Chiefs at -0.45 expected points per snap.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 5.7 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 25 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Chiefs.
(12:04) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix pass short right to 19-M.Mims for 32 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Marvin Mims's 32-yard touchdown catch with 12:04 left in the 1st put Denver Broncos ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Broncos ahead 8–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.83 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Chiefs ran 33 snaps at a 70% dropback rate against Broncos’s 71 at 48%. Red-zone trips: Chiefs 0, Broncos 6.
Broncos won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.41 expected points added per play vs -0.45.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
DEN's sack or hit rate, 39.1%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 18 — 15.0 points clear of the next team along.
23 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.3 points.
DEN's blitz rate sent, 0.0%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 18 — 9.3 points clear of the next team along.
23 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 15.4 points.
KC's blitz rate sent, 17.6%, is past their previous low of 25.0% in week 17 — the lowest of their 17 charted games through week 18.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.0 points.
KC's sack or hit rate, 0.0%, is past their previous low of 3.8% in week 1 — the lowest of their 17 charted games through week 18.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.8 points.
DEN's play-action rate turned over: 20.5% in week 17 against 44.1% here — they dropped back clean then and faked the run now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.6 points.
KC's pass rate over expected turned over: +15.3 pts in week 17 against −3.0 pts here — they threw more than the situation asked then and ran more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.7 of their own weekly swings across the two.
33 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.7 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -16 pts to 22 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −8.1 vs their 5.0 pts, and they swing ±6.7 week to week (−1.21× that swing) · 33 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −3.2 vs their 0.3 pts, and they swing ±6.2 week to week (−0.51× that swing) · 71 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 36% to 81%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −3.8 vs their 58.4%, and they swing ±8.8 week to week (−0.44× that swing) · 22 early downs
leaned — ran early · −11.1 vs their 55.8%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (−1.46× that swing) · 56 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -0% to 54%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −3.9 vs their 21.3%, and they swing ±5.5 week to week (−0.71× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +17.1 vs their 27.0%, and they swing ±10.6 week to week (+1.61× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -56% to 114%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +3.6 vs their 29.8%, and they swing ±24.4 week to week (+0.15× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 28.8%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 73%
Tendencies room →off script — sat back · −18.2 vs their 35.8%, and they swing ±9.0 week to week (−2.02× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
off script — sat back · −33.9 vs their 33.9%, and they swing ±15.4 week to week (−2.20× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -7% to 43%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −17.8 vs their 17.8%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (−1.81× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
off script — got home · +19.7 vs their 19.4%, and they swing ±7.3 week to week (+2.71× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
DEN's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 39.1%, 19.7 points above their season mean of 19.4% and 2.7 times their own 7.3-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Kansas City Chiefs
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 6 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 6
Denver Broncos
48 dressed · 6 inactive
Inactive · 6
Who moved the needle
Passing · DEN
Bo NixQB
26/29, 321 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
26.0 expected points added · +19.0% completion over expected
Passing · KC
10/17, 98 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
-8.8 expected points added · -5.4% completion over expected
Receiving · DEN
5/7 for 98 yds, 1 TD
24% of team targets · 5.6 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Marvin Mims banked 14.7 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.5 | +13.1 | 88% | — | 0% | — | 26/29, 321 yd, 4 TD · 7 car, 47 yd | |
| 22.1 | +14.7 | 31% | 41% | 17% | 0% | 5/5, 51 yd, 2 TD | |
| 20.8 | +5.9 | 65% | 76% | 24% | 71% | 5/7, 98 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.0 | +6.2 | 51% | 44% | 14% | 29% | 4/4, 50 yd, 1 TD | |
| 10.8 | +1.3 | 31% | 35% | 14% | 5% | 5 car, 28 yd · 3/4, 50 yd | |
| 9.4 | +0.6 | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. | |
| 6.8 | −6.2 | 41% | 32% | 7% | 0% | 16 car, 39 yd · 2/2, 9 yd | |
| 6.8 | −0.1 | 91% | 91% | 35% | 53% | 2/6, 48 yd | |
| 5.5 | +0.8 | 59% | 35% | 10% | 5% | 3/3, 25 yd | |
| 4.7 | −2.0 | 68% | 52% | 12% | 0% | 8 car, 25 yd · 2/2, 2 yd | |
| 4.6 | +1.3 | 32% | 32% | 7% | 13% | 2/2, 26 yd | |
| 4.5 | +1.8 | 82% | 78% | 12% | 7% | 2/2, 25 yd | |
| 3.9 | +0.6 | 85% | — | 0% | — | 10/17, 98 yd | |
| 3.2 | +0.3 | 35% | 35% | 7% | 0% | 2/2, 12 yd | |
| 2.4 | +0.7 | 38% | 48% | 6% | 0% | 1 car, 1 yd · 1/1, 13 yd | |
| 1.5 | −1.4 | 97% | 91% | 18% | 34% | 1/3, 5 yd | |
| 1.4 | −1.2 | 94% | 96% | 12% | 11% | 1/2, 4 yd | |
| 0.7 | +0.1 | 12% | — | 0% | — | 2 car, 7 yd | |
| 0.7 | −1.3 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.5 | −0.4 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.3 | −1.5 | 32% | 15% | 0% | — | 1 car, 3 yd |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Broncos attack right, the Chiefs attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(12:04) (Shotgun) 10-B.Nix pass short right to 19-M.Mims for 32 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q1 12:04 · Broncos · 1st & 10 at KC 32 · gained 32 · +2.85 EP · +6.5% win probability
134 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 143 plays across 17 drives, personnel groupings on 134 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 138. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 17 drives ended in points. The longest march was DEN moving 89 yards from the DEN 11 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; DEN attacks right, KC attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
143 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
143 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Chiefs at Broncos, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Wentz | 10/17 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 4 | −8.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Steele | 8 | 25 | 3.1 | 0 | −2.1 |
| Chris Oladokun | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Samaje Perine | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikko Remigio | 2 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 35% | −0.4 |
| Peyton Hendershot | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 12% | +0.9 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Jones | 7 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nazeeh Johnson | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joshua Uche | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryan Cook |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2024_18_KC_DEN
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Broncos closed -10.5 and covered, winning by 38.
Total closed 40.5; the game landed 38 — under by 2.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Noah Gray | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | −1.5 |
| Samaje Perine | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 6% | +2.8 |
| Justin Watson | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 18% | −2.8 |
| JuJu Smith-Schuster | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 12% | −1.0 |
| Carson Steele | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 12% | −0.9 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6% | −0.8 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Leo Chenal | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chamarri Conner | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blake Lynch | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaden Hicks | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Malik Herring | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marlon Tuipulotu | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 |
| 47 |
| 6.7 |
| 0 |
| +5.6 |
| Jaleel McLaughlin | 16 | 39 | 2.4 | 0 | −5.3 |
| Audric Estime | 12 | 34 | 2.8 | 1 | −0.4 |
| Javonte Williams | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 0 | +1.8 |
| Jarrett Stidham | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | +1.3 |
| Michael Burton | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courtland Sutton | 5 | 7 | 98 | 1 | 24% | +5.6 |
| Marvin Mims | 5 | 5 | 51 | 2 | 17% | +5.2 |
| Javonte Williams | 3 | 4 | 50 | 0 | 14% | +3.3 |
| Devaughn Vele | 4 | 4 | 50 | 1 | 14% | +6.1 |
| Lil'Jordan Humphrey | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 7% | +3.5 |
| Nate Adkins | 3 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 10% | +1.2 |
| Troy Franklin | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 7% | +1.2 |
| Jaleel McLaughlin | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 7% | −0.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nik Bonitto | 3 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ja'Quan McMillian | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Cody Barton | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Surtain | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Jackson | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Drew Sanders | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathon Cooper | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Strnad | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Burton | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Franklin-Myers | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |