The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:19 · 3rd and 1
Jake Browning
Bengals
(:19) 6-J.Browning up the middle for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
25.9
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 3:44 AM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 2 · Sun, Sep 14, 2025 · Paycor Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 2
It turned at Q4 0:19, 3rd and 1, on Jake Browning — 25.9 win-probability points to the Bengals on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Cincinnati Bengals 31–27. Biggest swing: Q4 0:19, Bengals +25.9% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:19 · 3rd and 1
Jake Browning
Bengals
(:19) 6-J.Browning up the middle for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
25.9
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Staying on schedule
Jaguars owned this one and still lost it — 50% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Bengals at 43% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Jaguarsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Giveaways
Jaguars owned this one and still lost it — 2 giveaways, against Bengals at 3 giveaways.
Jaguarsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Every snap
Jaguars owned this one and still lost it — +0.09 expected points per snap, against Bengals at -0.01 expected points per snap.
Jaguarsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Jaguars owned this one and still lost it — +0.09 expected points per dropback, against Bengals at -0.04 expected points per dropback.
Jaguarsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 4.0 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 17 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Jaguars.
(:19) 6-J.Browning up the middle for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Jake Browning's 1-yard rushing touchdown with 0:19 left in the 4th put Cincinnati Bengals ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
10 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Jaguars ahead 6–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Jaguars ran 70 snaps at a 63% dropback rate against Bengals’s 65 at 74%. Red-zone trips: Jaguars 6, Bengals 5.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
1 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
CIN's early-down pass rate turned over: 51.4% in week 1 against 72.0% here — they ran early then and passed early now, a turn of 2.5 of their own weekly swings across the two.
50 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.2 points. · +1.3σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -13 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +4.1 vs their 1.7 pts, and they swing ±5.7 week to week (+0.71× that swing) · 70 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +2.7 vs their 1.6 pts, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.52× that swing) · 65 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 33% to 83%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.5 vs their 56.7%, and they swing ±9.0 week to week (+0.05× that swing) · 56 early downs
leaned — passed early · +10.6 vs their 61.4%, and they swing ±8.2 week to week (+1.28× that swing) · 50 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 36%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +5.4 vs their 21.8%, and they swing ±5.3 week to week (+1.02× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −3.7 vs their 16.2%, and they swing ±7.2 week to week (−0.51× that swing) · 48 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -36% to 120%
Fourth Down room →inside their normal wobble · −14.2 vs their 47.6%, and they swing ±28.0 week to week (−0.51× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 34.0%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 58%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.2 vs their 30.1%, and they swing ±10.9 week to week (+0.11× that swing) · 48 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −5.3 vs their 21.2%, and they swing ±9.9 week to week (−0.53× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 34%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +5.6 vs their 13.2%, and they swing ±4.2 week to week (+1.34× that swing) · 48 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −4.8 vs their 13.9%, and they swing ±8.0 week to week (−0.60× that swing) · 44 dropbacks
JAX's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 18.8%, 5.6 points above their season mean of 13.2% and 1.3 times their own 4.2-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Jacksonville Jaguars
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Cincinnati Bengals
48 dressed · 5 inactive
Inactive · 5
Who moved the needle
Passing · JAX
24/42, 271 yds, 3 TD, 2 INT
5.0 expected points added · -5.0% completion over expected
Passing · CIN
21/32, 241 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT
-2.0 expected points added · +3.6% completion over expected
Receiving · CIN
14/16 for 165 yds, 1 TD
37% of team targets · 11.1 expected points added
Receiving · JAX
5/5 for 76 yds, 0 TD
12% of team targets · 7.2 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Ja'Marr Chase banked 8.4 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr ChaseWR · Alpha Receiver | 36.5 | +8.4 | 96% | 98% | 37% | 31% | 14/16, 165 yd, 1 TD |
| Trevor LawrenceQB · Starter QB | 19.2 | −8.9 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 24/42, 271 yd, 3 TD, 2 INT · 2 car, 4 yd |
| Jake BrowningQB · Starter QB | 17.7 | −0.3 | 70% | — | 0% | — | 21/32, 241 yd, 2 TD, 3 INT · 1 car, 1 yd, 1 TD |
| Dyami BrownWR · Rotational Receiver | 17.6 | +1.6 | 80% | 82% | 17% | 19% | 1 car, 9 yd · 5/7, 57 yd, 1 TD |
| Travis EtienneRB · Committee Back | 16.9 | +3.4 | 66% | 66% | 7% | 0% | 14 car, 71 yd · 2/3, 18 yd, 1 TD |
| Bhayshul TutenRB | 15.4 | +7.3 | 25% | 18% | 5% | 0% | 8 car, 42 yd · 2/2, 32 yd, 1 TD |
| Tee HigginsWR · Featured Receiver | 14.6 | +0.7 | 87% | 96% | 19% | 29% | 3/8, 56 yd, 1 TD |
| Parker WashingtonWR · Rotational Receiver | 12.6 | +3.9 | 24% | 25% | 12% | 11% | 5/5, 76 yd |
| Brian Thomas Jr.WR · Alpha Receiver | 8.9 | −17.6 | 94% | 95% | 29% | 54% | 4/12, 49 yd |
| Chase BrownRB · Bell Cow Back | 8.5 | −5.8 | 71% | 60% | 7% | 2% | 16 car, 47 yd · 2/3, 18 yd |
| Mitchell TinsleyWR · Rotational Receiver | 8.3 | +6.0 | 14% | 10% | 2% | 4% | 1/1, 13 yd, 1 TD |
| Joe BurrowQB | 7.0 | +0.1 | 30% | — | 0% | — | 7/13, 76 yd, 1 TD |
| Noah FantTE · Rotational Receiver | 5.8 | −0.1 | 25% | 25% | 9% | 7% | 3/4, 28 yd |
| Travis HunterWR · Rotational Receiver | 5.2 | −5.3 | 59% | 61% | 15% | 10% | 3/6, 22 yd |
| Mike GesickiTE · Rotational Receiver | 4.8 | −4.0 | 52% | 65% | 9% | 13% | 3/4, 18 yd |
| Brenton StrangeTE · Rotational Receiver | 4.7 | −3.7 | 90% | 93% | 12% | 10% | 3/5, 17 yd |
| Andrei IosivasWR · Rotational Receiver | 2.2 | −5.6 | 84% | 81% | 12% | 17% | 1/5, 12 yd |
| Drew SampleTE · Rotational Receiver | 1.7 | −0.8 | 41% | 25% | 5% | 0% | 1/2, 7 yd |
| LeQuint Allen Jr.RB | 1.3 | 0.0 | 15% | 20% | 0% | — | 2 car, 13 yd |
| Samaje PerineRB | 0.0 | — | 29% | 40% | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Tahj BrooksRB | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Charlie JonesWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. |
| Quintin MorrisTE | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
| Tim PatrickWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −3.2 | 17% | 16% | 2% | 3% | 0/1, 0 yd |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 4 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Bengals attack right, the Jaguars attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:19) 6-J.Browning up the middle for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.
Q4 0:19 · Bengals · 3rd & goal at JAX 1 · gained 1 · +2.54 EP · +34.7% win probability
168 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 180 plays across 23 drives, personnel groupings on 168 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 175. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
10 of 23 drives ended in points. The longest march was CIN moving 92 yards from the CIN 8 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; CIN attacks right, JAX attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
180 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
180 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a screen, a man in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read, dropped.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
No huddle, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A quarterback sneak, a man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Jaguars at Bengals, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor Lawrence | 24/42 | 271 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +5.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Etienne | 14 | 71 | 5.1 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 8 | 42 | 5.3 | 0 | +1.9 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Washington | 5 | 5 | 76 | 0 | 12% | +7.2 |
| Dyami Brown | 5 | 7 | 57 | 1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jourdan Lewis | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Foye Oluokun | 3 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Eric Murray |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Browning | 21/32 | 241 | 2 | 3 | 1 | −2.0 |
| Joe Burrow | 7/13 | 76 | 1 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_02_JAX_CIN
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Bengals closed -3.5 and covered, winning by 4.
Total closed 49.5; the game landed 58 — over by 8.5.
Conditions and crew
| 2 |
| 13 |
| 6.5 |
| 0 |
| +0.7 |
| Dyami Brown | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | +0.8 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | −1.2 |
| 17% |
| +5.4 |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | 4 | 12 | 49 | 0 | 29% | −7.1 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 2 | 2 | 32 | 1 | 5% | +4.1 |
| Travis Hunter | 3 | 6 | 22 | 0 | 15% | −4.9 |
| Travis Etienne | 2 | 3 | 18 | 1 | 7% | +1.3 |
| Brenton Strange | 3 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 12% | +0.1 |
| Tim Patrick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2% | −0.4 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Travon Walker | 3 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Devin Lloyd | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tyson Campbell | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 |
| DaVon Hamilton | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Travis Hunter | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Andrew Wingard | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| +0.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chase Brown | 16 | 47 | 2.9 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Jake Browning | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | +2.5 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr Chase | 14 | 16 | 165 | 1 | 37% | +11.1 |
| Tee Higgins | 3 | 8 | 56 | 1 | 19% | +3.0 |
| Noah Fant | 3 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 9% | −0.0 |
| Chase Brown | 2 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 7% | +2.1 |
| Mike Gesicki | 3 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 9% | −4.5 |
| Mitchell Tinsley | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 2% | +1.7 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 1 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 12% | −8.5 |
| Drew Sample | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 5% | −1.0 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daxton Hill | 9 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Geno Stone | 7 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Wilson | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Demetrius Knight Jr. | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Battle | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Oren Burks | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tedarrell Slaton | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cam Taylor-Britt | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kris Jenkins | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trey Hendrickson | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |