The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:09 · 2nd and 2
Rachaad White
Buccaneers
(:09) 1-R.White right guard for 2 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
31.6
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 11:25 PM ET · 13 to play · 1 final
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 2 · Mon, Sep 15, 2025 · NRG Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 2
It turned at Q4 0:09, 2nd and 2, on Rachaad White — 31.6 win-probability points to the Buccaneers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 20–19 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q4 0:09, Buccaneers +31.6% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:09 · 2nd and 2
Rachaad White
Buccaneers
(:09) 1-R.White right guard for 2 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
31.6
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Buccaneers won this one — 3 touchdowns on 4 trips, against Texans at 0 touchdowns on 4 trips.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Buccaneers won this one — 52% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Texans at 39% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Buccaneers won this one — 6 of 14 on third down, against Texans at 2 of 9 on third down.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Buccaneers won this one — +0.19 expected points per carry, against Texans at -0.03 expected points per carry.
Buccaneersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 2.0 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 8 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Texans.
(:09) 1-R.White right guard for 2 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Rachaad White's 2-yard rushing touchdown with 0:09 left in the 4th put Tampa Bay Buccaneers ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Buccaneers ahead 6–2 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Buccaneers ran 73 snaps at a 63% dropback rate against Texans’s 46 at 67%. Red-zone trips: Buccaneers 4, Texans 4.
Buccaneers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.13 expected points added per play vs -0.07.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
1 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
TB's play-action rate, 4.3%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 2 — 2.1 points clear of the next team along.
46 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.3 points. · −1.5σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -25 pts to 19 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +3.9 vs their -3.3 pts, and they swing ±8.7 week to week (+0.45× that swing) · 72 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +4.9 vs their -1.1 pts, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.93× that swing) · 45 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 22% to 87%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −1.6 vs their 54.2%, and they swing ±12.7 week to week (−0.13× that swing) · 57 early downs
inside their normal wobble · +5.2 vs their 54.8%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (+0.55× that swing) · 35 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 41%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −12.7 vs their 17.1%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−1.54× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −9.9 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±6.9 week to week (−1.44× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -42% to 114%
Fourth Down room →Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 45.1%.
Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 23.8%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 62%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +7.5 vs their 37.7%, and they swing ±9.2 week to week (+0.82× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +8.5 vs their 21.9%, and they swing ±9.5 week to week (+0.90× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 31%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +2.8 vs their 13.3%, and they swing ±7.0 week to week (+0.40× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
right on their number · +0.2 vs their 15.0%, and they swing ±5.3 week to week (+0.04× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
TB's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 4.3%, 12.7 points below their season mean of 17.1% and 1.5 times their own 8.3-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Houston Texans
49 dressed · 5 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · TB
25/38, 215 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
-0.6 expected points added · +1.9% completion over expected
Passing · HOU
13/24, 207 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
-4.5 expected points added · -9.8% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Ryan Miller banked 6.1 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker MayfieldQB · Starter QB | 19.9 | +0.1 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 25/38, 215 yd, 2 TD · 3 car, 33 yd |
| Bucky IrvingRB · Committee Back | 18.1 | +1.9 | 71% | 76% | 17% | 0% | 17 car, 71 yd · 6/6, 50 yd |
| Nick ChubbRB · Bell Cow Back | 15.2 | +3.7 | 53% | 39% | 9% | 0% | 12 car, 43 yd, 1 TD · 2/2, 29 yd |
| C.J. StroudQB · Starter QB | 15.0 | −3.0 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 13/24, 207 yd, 1 TD · 4 car, 27 yd |
| Rachaad WhiteRB | 14.6 | +4.9 | 31% | 26% | 6% | 0% | 10 car, 65 yd, 1 TD · 2/2, 1 yd |
| Nico CollinsWR · Alpha Receiver | 14.2 | −7.3 | 90% | 87% | 39% | 50% | 3/9, 52 yd, 1 TD |
| Emeka EgbukaWR · Featured Receiver | 12.9 | +0.5 | 92% | 98% | 19% | 28% | 4/7, 29 yd, 1 TD |
| Mike EvansWR · Alpha Receiver | 10.6 | −8.5 | 79% | 93% | 31% | 55% | 5/11, 56 yd |
| Ryan MillerWR · Rotational Receiver | 9.0 | +6.1 | 22% | 7% | 3% | 7% | 1/1, 20 yd, 1 TD |
| Sterling ShepardWR · Rotational Receiver | 7.4 | +1.1 | 75% | 89% | 11% | 10% | 4/4, 34 yd |
| Woody MarksRB | 6.1 | +3.2 | 27% | 29% | 4% | 3% | 3 car, 14 yd · 1/1, 37 yd |
| Dalton SchultzTE · Rotational Receiver | 5.9 | +0.3 | 59% | 77% | 17% | 11% | 3/4, 29 yd |
| Cade OttonTE · Rotational Receiver | 5.5 | −1.1 | 91% | 98% | 11% | 5% | 3/4, 25 yd |
| Xavier HutchinsonWR · Rotational Receiver | 4.9 | −0.3 | 57% | 71% | 13% | 19% | 2/3, 29 yd |
| Jayden HigginsWR · Rotational Receiver | 3.8 | +2.3 | 43% | 39% | 4% | 2% | 1/1, 28 yd |
| Justin WatsonWR · Rotational Receiver | 1.3 | −2.8 | 41% | 45% | 9% | 11% | 1/2, 3 yd |
| Harrison BryantTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −2.0 | 39% | 26% | 4% | 8% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| Jakob JohnsonRB | 0.0 | — | 41% | 19% | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Dare OgunbowaleRB | 0.0 | — | 20% | 32% | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Jaylin NoelWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | 31% | 35% | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Sean TuckerRB | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. |
| Payne DurhamTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.2 | 21% | 7% | 3% | 2% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| Kameron JohnsonWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 snaps — too few to rate. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 5 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Texans attack right, the Buccaneers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:09) 1-R.White right guard for 2 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q4 0:09 · Buccaneers · 2nd & goal at HOU 2 · gained 2 · +2.56 EP · +36.0% win probability
156 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 167 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 156 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 162. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was TB moving 80 yards from the TB 20 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; HOU attacks right, TB attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
167 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
167 plays
How the play was built
Play action, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, from outside the pocket, the ball was not catchable.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a man in motion.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
From outside the pocket.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Buccaneers at Texans, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Mayfield | 25/38 | 215 | 2 | 0 | 4 | −0.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bucky Irving | 17 | 71 | 4.2 | 0 | −0.0 |
| Rachaad White | 10 | 65 | 6.5 | 1 | +5.2 |
| Baker Mayfield |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Evans | 5 | 11 | 56 | 0 | 31% | −0.1 |
| Bucky Irving | 6 | 6 | 50 | 0 | 17% |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tykee Smith | 4 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zyon McCollum | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antoine Winfield Jr. |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Stroud | 13/24 | 207 | 1 | 0 | 3 | −4.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_02_TB_HOU
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Texans closed -2.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 42.5; the game landed 39 — under by 3.5.
Conditions and crew
| 3 |
| 33 |
| 11.0 |
| 0 |
| +5.3 |
| +2.3 |
| Sterling Shepard | 4 | 4 | 34 | 0 | 11% | +2.5 |
| Emeka Egbuka | 4 | 7 | 29 | 1 | 19% | +1.9 |
| Cade Otton | 3 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 11% | +1.1 |
| Ryan Miller | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 3% | +2.8 |
| Rachaad White | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6% | −1.2 |
| Payne Durham | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.8 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jamel Dean | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kaevon Merriweather | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vita Vea | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Hall | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| SirVocea Dennis | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yaya Diaby | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lavonte David | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Chubb | 12 | 43 | 3.6 | 1 | −0.2 |
| C.J. Stroud | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 0 | +1.9 |
| Woody Marks | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nico Collins | 3 | 9 | 52 | 1 | 39% | −4.0 |
| Woody Marks | 1 | 1 | 37 | 0 | 4% | +2.8 |
| Nick Chubb | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 9% | +1.9 |
| Dalton Schultz | 3 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 17% | +1.2 |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 2 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 13% | +2.2 |
| Jayden Higgins | 1 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 4% | +1.6 |
| Justin Watson | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9% | −1.5 |
| Harrison Bryant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −0.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry To'oTo'o | 7 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Azeez Al-Shaair | 8 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| C.J. Gardner-Johnson | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danielle Hunter | 3 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jalen Pitre | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamari Lassiter | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Anderson Jr. | 3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Stingley Jr. | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Calen Bullock | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Foley Fatukasi | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |