The biggest swing of the game · Q1 11:01 · 3rd and 11
Braxton Berrios
Texans
(11:01) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 17-B.Berrios to SF 33 for 14 yards (53-D.Winters).
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:21 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 8 · Sun, Oct 26, 2025 · NRG Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 8
It turned at Q1 11:01, 3rd and 11, on Braxton Berrios — 7.4 win-probability points to the Texans on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 11:01 · 3rd and 11
Braxton Berrios
Texans
(11:01) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 17-B.Berrios to SF 33 for 14 yards (53-D.Winters).
Houston Texans 26–15. Biggest swing: Q1 11:01, Texans +7.4% win probability on one snap.
7.4
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
49ers owned this one and still lost it — 2 touchdowns on 2 trips, against Texans at 1 touchdown on 6 trips.
49ersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Throwing the ball
Texans won this one — +0.53 expected points per dropback, against 49ers at -0.03 expected points per dropback.
Texansthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Texans won this one — 9 of 16 on third down, against 49ers at 3 of 9 on third down.
Texansthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Texans won this one — 49% of snaps stayed on schedule, against 49ers at 38% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Texansthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 1.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 6 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about 49ers.
(11:01) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 17-B.Berrios to SF 33 for 14 yards (53-D.Winters).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Ka'imi Fairbairn's 33-yard field goal with 5:24 left in the 1st put Houston Texans ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 7 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Texans ahead 7–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.53 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: 49ers ran 45 snaps at a 82% dropback rate against Texans’s 74 at 57%. Red-zone trips: 49ers 2, Texans 6.
Texans won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.24 expected points added per play vs -0.04.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
SF's early-down pass rate, 76.5%, is past their previous high of 69.4% in week 6 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 8.
34 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 11.6 points.
SF's fourth-and-short go rate, 0.0%, is past their previous low of 33.3% in week 4 — the lowest of their 5 charted games through week 8.
3 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 10 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 25.6 points.
SF's blitz rate sent, 33.3%, is past their previous high of 30.0% in week 2 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 8.
42 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.8 points.
SF's pass rate over expected turned over: −11.5 pts in week 7 against +4.0 pts here — they ran more than the situation asked then and threw more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.6 of their own weekly swings across the two.
44 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.9 points.
HOU's early-down pass rate turned over: 76.0% in week 7 against 52.6% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 2.4 of their own weekly swings across the two.
57 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.6 points.
HOU's fourth-and-short go rate turned over: 75.0% in week 7 against 20.0% here — they went for it then and took the kick now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
5 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 15 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 24.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -16 pts to 15 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +4.6 vs their -0.6 pts, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (+0.77× that swing) · 44 snaps
right on their number · +2.2 vs their -1.1 pts, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.42× that swing) · 74 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 25% to 85%
Tendencies room →leaned — passed early · +21.5 vs their 55.0%, and they swing ±11.6 week to week (+1.86× that swing) · 34 early downs
right on their number · −2.1 vs their 54.8%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (−0.22× that swing) · 57 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 5% to 40%
Tendencies room →leaned — dropped back clean · −8.9 vs their 22.4%, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (−1.31× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +8.1 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±6.9 week to week (+1.19× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -41% to 102%
Fourth Down room →leaned — took the kick · −36.3 vs their 36.3%, and they swing ±25.6 week to week (−1.42× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · −3.8 vs their 23.8%, and they swing ±24.9 week to week (−0.15× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 49%
Tendencies room →leaned — sent pressure · +9.9 vs their 23.5%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (+1.00× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −5.7 vs their 21.9%, and they swing ±9.5 week to week (−0.60× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 29%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.8 vs their 9.5%, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (−0.93× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
right on their number · +1.2 vs their 15.0%, and they swing ±5.3 week to week (+0.23× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
SF's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 76.5%, 21.5 points above their season mean of 55.0% and 1.9 times their own 11.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
San Francisco 49ers
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Houston Texans
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · HOU
30/39, 318 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
19.2 expected points added · +8.5% completion over expected
Passing · SF
19/32, 193 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
-2.8 expected points added · -2.3% completion over expected
Receiving · HOU
5/6 for 69 yds, 1 TD
16% of team targets · 4.9 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Xavier Hutchinson banked 7.8 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 | +1.1 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 30/39, 318 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 7 car, 30 yd | |
| 18.0 | +2.6 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 19/32, 193 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 2 car, 23 yd | |
| 17.9 | +7.8 | 71% | 74% | 16% | 15% | 5/6, 69 yd, 1 TD | |
| 15.1 | +3.2 | 40% | 36% | 11% | 0% | 11 car, 62 yd · 4/4, 49 yd | |
| 14.3 | +6.3 | 90% | 86% | 16% | 8% | 4/5, 43 yd, 1 TD | |
| 13.4 | −2.9 | 82% | 76% | 21% | 29% | 4/8, 34 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.3 | +1.4 | 39% | 38% | 16% | 23% | 5/6, 63 yd | |
| 9.8 | −2.2 | 96% | 89% | 19% | 5% | 8 car, 25 yd · 3/6, 43 yd | |
| 8.9 | −2.9 | 44% | 33% | 5% | 0% | 17 car, 56 yd · 2/2, 13 yd | |
| 8.8 | +1.1 | 29% | 38% | 13% | 8% | 5/5, 38 yd | |
| 8.5 | −4.2 | 85% | 78% | 23% | 38% | 4/7, 45 yd | |
| 7.4 | +1.0 | 79% | 76% | 13% | 22% | 3/4, 44 yd | |
| 7.2 | +3.6 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 4.5 | −1.1 | 56% | 62% | 10% | 7% | 2/3, 5 yd | |
| 4.4 | −0.2 | 61% | 79% | 8% | 11% | 2/3, 24 yd | |
| 4.0 | +0.5 | 44% | 33% | 5% | 5% | 2/2, 20 yd | |
| 2.7 | +0.4 | 16% | 24% | 3% | 0% | 1 car, 9 yd · 1/1, 8 yd | |
| 1.7 | −1.4 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.4 | −1.1 | 42% | 30% | 6% | 2% | 1/2, 4 yd | |
| 0.0 | −2.8 | 28% | 12% | 3% | 7% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | 14% | 7% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −2.0 | 19% | 16% | 3% | 14% | 0/1, 0 yd |
5 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 4 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Texans attack right, the 49ers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(11:01) (Shotgun) 7-C.Stroud pass short middle to 17-B.Berrios to SF 33 for 14 yards (53-D.Winters).
Q1 11:01 · Texans · 3rd & 11 at SF 47 · gained 14 · +2.64 EP · +11.0% win probability
153 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 166 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 153 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 161. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was HOU moving 94 yards from the HOU 6 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; HOU attacks right, SF attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
166 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
166 plays
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: 49ers at Texans, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Jones | 19/32 | 193 | 2 | 1 | 2 | −2.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffrey | 8 | 25 | 3.1 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Mac Jones | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 0 | +1.7 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jauan Jennings | 4 | 7 | 45 | 0 | 23% | −1.1 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 3 | 4 | 44 | 0 | 13% | +2.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatum Bethune | 4 | 10 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dee Winters | 7 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malik Mustapha | 6 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Upton Stout |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Stroud | 30/39 | 318 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +19.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woody Marks |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_08_SF_HOU
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Texans closed -2.5 and covered, winning by 11.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 41 — under by 0.5.
Conditions and crew
| Christian McCaffrey | 3 | 6 | 43 | 0 | 19% | +0.1 |
| George Kittle | 4 | 5 | 43 | 1 | 16% | +2.0 |
| Jordan Watkins | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6% | −1.3 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 10% | −0.3 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6% | −1.0 |
| Jake Tonges | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3% | +0.7 |
| Skyy Moore | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.8 |
| 6 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Renardo Green | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Curtis Robinson | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ji'Ayir Brown | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Beal Jr. | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mykel Williams | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deommodore Lenoir | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 11 |
| 62 |
| 5.6 |
| 0 |
| −0.7 |
| Nick Chubb | 17 | 56 | 3.3 | 0 | −5.3 |
| C.J. Stroud | 7 | 30 | 4.3 | 0 | +4.3 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | −0.2 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Hutchinson | 5 | 6 | 69 | 1 | 16% | +4.9 |
| Jaylin Noel | 5 | 6 | 63 | 0 | 16% | +5.3 |
| Woody Marks | 4 | 4 | 49 | 0 | 11% | +1.8 |
| Braxton Berrios | 5 | 5 | 38 | 0 | 13% | +4.1 |
| Jayden Higgins | 4 | 8 | 34 | 1 | 21% | +1.5 |
| Dalton Schultz | 2 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 8% | +1.6 |
| Jared Wayne | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 5% | +0.6 |
| Nick Chubb | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 5% | +0.9 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3% | −0.2 |
| Harrison Bryant | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.7 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Pitre | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamari Lassiter | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Henry To'oTo'o | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| M.J. Stewart | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Azeez Al-Shaair | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| British Brooks | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Calen Bullock | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Stingley Jr. | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Derek Barnett | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| E.J. Speed | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |