The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:01 · 3rd and 10
Ryan Fitzgerald
Panthers
(:01) 10-R.Fitzgerald 49 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-44-J.Jansen, Holder-6-S.Martin.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 300s tick · as of 3:57 PM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 9 · Sun, Nov 2, 2025 · Lambeau Field
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 9
It turned at Q4 0:01, 3rd and 10, on Ryan Fitzgerald — 33.4 win-probability points to the Panthers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:01 · 3rd and 10
Ryan Fitzgerald
Panthers
(:01) 10-R.Fitzgerald 49 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-44-J.Jansen, Holder-6-S.Martin.
Carolina Panthers 16–13 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q4 0:01, Panthers +33.4% win probability on one snap.
33.4
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Panthers won this one — 2 touchdowns on 3 trips, against Packers at 1 touchdown on 5 trips.
Panthersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Panthers won this one — +0.16 expected points per carry, against Packers at -0.13 expected points per carry.
Panthersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Packers owned this one and still lost it — 7 of 13 on third down, against Panthers at 4 of 10 on third down.
Packersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Giveaways
Panthers won this one — 1 giveaway, against Packers at 2 giveaways.
Panthersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 19.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 33 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Panthers.
(:01) 10-R.Fitzgerald 49 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-44-J.Jansen, Holder-6-S.Martin.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Ryan Fitzgerald's 49-yard field goal with 0:01 left in the 4th put Carolina Panthers ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
6 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Packers ahead 6–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Panthers, in turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Panthers ran 54 snaps at a 43% dropback rate against Packers’s 63 at 60%. Red-zone trips: Panthers 3, Packers 5.
Packers outgained Panthers 369-265 but lost the turnover battle 2-1. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
CAR's pass rate over expected, −16.9 pts, was the lowest of the 28 team-games charted in week 9 — 2.5 points clear of the next team along.
54 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.1 points.
CAR's early-down pass rate, 38.1%, was the lowest of the 28 team-games charted in week 9 — 1.1 points clear of the next team along.
42 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 13.6 points.
GB's blitz rate sent, 34.8%, is past their previous high of 31.1% in week 6 — the highest of their 8 charted games through week 9.
23 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.8 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29 pts to 20 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −11.0 vs their -5.9 pts, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (−1.20× that swing) · 54 snaps
right on their number · −3.3 vs their -4.3 pts, and they swing ±9.4 week to week (−0.35× that swing) · 63 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 18% to 88%
Tendencies room →leaned — ran early · −14.8 vs their 52.9%, and they swing ±13.6 week to week (−1.09× that swing) · 42 early downs
right on their number · +2.9 vs their 50.3%, and they swing ±11.9 week to week (+0.24× that swing) · 47 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 48%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −5.4 vs their 22.8%, and they swing ±10.1 week to week (−0.53× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −10.4 vs their 26.1%, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (−1.32× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -30% to 112%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · −1.3 vs their 68.0%, and they swing ±15.5 week to week (−0.09× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
inside their normal wobble · +27.0 vs their 39.7%, and they swing ±27.4 week to week (+0.98× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 4% to 51%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +3.3 vs their 28.3%, and they swing ±8.7 week to week (+0.38× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
leaned — sent pressure · +10.6 vs their 24.2%, and they swing ±7.8 week to week (+1.36× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 37%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +6.5 vs their 9.3%, and they swing ±5.5 week to week (+1.18× that swing) · 38 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −7.6 vs their 16.3%, and they swing ±8.2 week to week (−0.92× that swing) · 23 dropbacks
GB's blitz rate sent was the night's one real departure: 34.8%, 10.6 points above their season mean of 24.2% and 1.4 times their own 7.8-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Carolina Panthers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Green Bay Packers
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · GB
26/37, 273 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
5.9 expected points added · +9.1% completion over expected
Passing · CAR
11/20, 102 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
-3.3 expected points added · -11.5% completion over expected
Receiving · GB
2/4 for 58 yds, 0 TD
11% of team targets · -0.8 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Rico Dowdle banked 9.6 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.1 | +9.6 | 72% | 61% | 16% | 0% | 25 car, 130 yd, 2 TD · 2/3, 11 yd | |
| 20.0 | −0.8 | 58% | 45% | 14% | 0% | 17 car, 87 yd, 1 TD · 4/5, 13 yd | |
| 16.1 | −0.7 | 92% | 92% | 29% | 36% | 7/10, 91 yd | |
| 9.0 | −4.4 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 26/37, 273 yd, 1 INT · 1 car, 1 yd | |
| 8.6 | −2.0 | 84% | 91% | 32% | 49% | 4/6, 46 yd | |
| 7.8 | +1.2 | 66% | 79% | 11% | 34% | 2/4, 58 yd | |
| 6.4 | +2.8 | 46% | 50% | 9% | 7% | 3/3, 34 yd | |
| 4.4 | +1.8 | 17% | 21% | 6% | 0% | 2/2, 24 yd | |
| 4.0 | +0.4 | 49% | 47% | 9% | 5% | 2/3, 20 yd | |
| 3.2 | −2.0 | 55% | 70% | 16% | 30% | 1/3, 22 yd | |
| 3.0 | −6.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 11/20, 102 yd, 1 INT · 2 car, 9 yd | |
| 2.9 | −2.0 | 37% | 39% | 9% | 14% | 2/3, 9 yd | |
| 2.7 | −5.0 | 32% | 39% | 6% | 0% | 6 car, 16 yd · 1/2, 1 yd | |
| 2.1 | +0.9 | 42% | 39% | 3% | 2% | 1/1, 11 yd | |
| 1.9 | +0.3 | 66% | 70% | 5% | 7% | 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 1.8 | −1.5 | 24% | 26% | 11% | 0% | 1 car, 7 yd · 1/2, 1 yd | |
| 1.8 | +0.4 | 26% | 9% | 5% | 4% | 1/1, 8 yd | |
| 1.7 | −3.4 | 22% | 22% | 5% | 0% | 5 car, 17 yd · 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 1.5 | 0.0 | 50% | 39% | 5% | 4% | 1/1, 5 yd | |
| 1.2 | −3.1 | 29% | 24% | 6% | 1% | 1 car, 0 yd · 2/2, 12 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.4 | 55% | 35% | 5% | 7% | 0/1, 0 yd |
1 player played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Packers attack right, the Panthers attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:01) 10-R.Fitzgerald 49 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-44-J.Jansen, Holder-6-S.Martin.
Q4 0:01 · Panthers · 3rd & 10 at GB 31 · gained nothing · +0.96 EP · +27.3% win probability
144 snaps placed · 12 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 156 plays across 15 drives, personnel groupings on 144 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 151. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
6 of 15 drives ended in points. The longest march was CAR moving 76 yards from the CAR 24 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; GB attacks right, CAR attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
156 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
156 plays
How the play was built
A run-pass option, nobody in motion.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a run-pass option, a man in motion.
How the play was built
No huddle, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
A run-pass option, nobody in motion.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Panthers at Packers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryce Young | 11/20 | 102 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −3.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rico Dowdle | 25 | 130 | 5.2 | 2 | +4.2 |
| Chuba Hubbard | 5 | 17 | 3.4 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Bryce Young | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | +3.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetairoa McMillan | 4 | 6 | 46 | 0 | 32% | +2.3 |
| Xavier Legette | 1 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 16% | −4.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Rozeboom | 7 | 8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trevin Wallace | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tershawn Wharton | 2 | 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lathan Ransom |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 26/37 | 273 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +5.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Jacobs |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_09_CAR_GB
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Packers closed -12.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 29 — under by 14.5.
Conditions and crew
| Jimmy Horn Jr. | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | +0.9 |
| Rico Dowdle | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 16% | +0.1 |
| Jalen Coker | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 5% | +0.7 |
| Brycen Tremayne | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 5% | +0.1 |
| Ja'Tavion Sanders | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5% | +0.2 |
| Jimmy Horn Jr. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11% | −1.3 |
| Chuba Hubbard | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −0.5 |
| Tommy Tremble | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −0.3 |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Nic Scourton | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mike Jackson | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tre'von Moehrig | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Derrick Brown | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaycee Horn | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Nick Scott | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 |
| 87 |
| 5.1 |
| 1 |
| +4.0 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 0 | −1.4 |
| Jordan Love | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.5 |
| Savion Williams | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −5.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romeo Doubs | 7 | 10 | 91 | 0 | 29% | +4.0 |
| Christian Watson | 2 | 4 | 58 | 0 | 11% | −0.8 |
| Luke Musgrave | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 9% | +1.0 |
| Chris Brooks | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 6% | +3.8 |
| Tucker Kraft | 2 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 9% | +2.0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 4 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 14% | −1.6 |
| Savion Williams | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 6% | +0.8 |
| Malik Heath | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 3% | +3.0 |
| Matthew Golden | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9% | −2.0 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6% | −1.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier McKinney | 3 | 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evan Williams | 2 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edgerrin Cooper | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quay Walker | 2 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devonte Wyatt | 1 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Keisean Nixon | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrington Valentine | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Javon Bullard | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Micah Parsons | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |