The biggest swing of the game · Q1 13:10 · 4th and 1
Unnamed on the sheet
Rams
(13:10) 32-K.Kroeger punts 49 yards to LA 12, Center-49-Z.Wood. 19-X.Smith to LA 12 for no gain (27-I.Yiadom).
3.2
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 300s tick · as of 3:57 PM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 9 · Sun, Nov 2, 2025 · SoFi Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 9
It turned at Q1 13:10, 4th and 1 — 3.2 win-probability points to the Rams on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 13:10 · 4th and 1
Unnamed on the sheet
Rams
(13:10) 32-K.Kroeger punts 49 yards to LA 12, Center-49-Z.Wood. 19-X.Smith to LA 12 for no gain (27-I.Yiadom).
3.2
Los Angeles Rams 34–10 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 13:10, Rams +3.2% win probability on one snap.
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Running the ball
Rams won this one — +0.19 expected points per carry, against Saints at -0.85 expected points per carry.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Staying on schedule
Rams won this one — 56% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Saints at 31% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Rams won this one — +0.27 expected points per snap, against Saints at -0.32 expected points per snap.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Rams won this one — 7 of 13 on third down, against Saints at 2 of 9 on third down.
Ramsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 8.9 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 33 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Saints.
(13:10) 32-K.Kroeger punts 49 yards to LA 12, Center-49-Z.Wood. 19-X.Smith to LA 12 for no gain (27-I.Yiadom).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Tyler Higbee's 1-yard touchdown catch with 6:22 left in the 1st put Los Angeles Rams ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 6 scores that followed.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Rams ahead 8–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.85 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Saints ran 39 snaps at a 64% dropback rate against Rams’s 73 at 47%. Red-zone trips: Saints 3, Rams 6.
Rams won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.27 expected points added per play vs -0.32.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
LA's early-down pass rate, 44.8%, is past their previous low of 49.1% in week 3 — the lowest of their 8 charted games through week 9.
58 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.9 points.
LA's sack or hit rate, 8.0%, is past their previous low of 10.5% in week 3 — the lowest of their 8 charted games through week 9.
25 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.8 points.
NO's pass rate over expected turned over: +9.5 pts in week 8 against −9.1 pts here — they threw more than the situation asked then and ran more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.7 of their own weekly swings across the two.
39 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.8 points.
NO's blitz rate sent turned over: 66.7% in week 8 against 23.5% here — they sent pressure then and sat back now, a turn of 3.1 of their own weekly swings across the two.
34 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 13.9 points.
NO's early-down pass rate turned over: 84.0% in week 8 against 57.1% here — they passed early then and ran early now, a turn of 2.3 of their own weekly swings across the two.
28 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 11.7 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -21 pts to 19 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · −5.7 vs their -3.4 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (−0.83× that swing) · 39 snaps
leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −6.1 vs their 3.2 pts, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (−1.05× that swing) · 73 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 29% to 89%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −1.7 vs their 58.8%, and they swing ±11.7 week to week (−0.14× that swing) · 28 early downs
leaned — ran early · −10.6 vs their 55.5%, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (−1.34× that swing) · 58 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 61%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +1.2 vs their 18.8%, and they swing ±7.0 week to week (+0.17× that swing) · 25 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +8.7 vs their 35.4%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (+0.90× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 104%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +1.2 vs their 48.8%, and they swing ±21.6 week to week (+0.06× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 49.3%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 68%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −9.1 vs their 32.6%, and they swing ±13.9 week to week (−0.65× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.0 vs their 25.0%, and they swing ±11.3 week to week (−0.09× that swing) · 25 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 40%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −2.6 vs their 14.3%, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (−0.50× that swing) · 34 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −9.9 vs their 17.9%, and they swing ±8.8 week to week (−1.12× that swing) · 25 dropbacks
LA's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 44.8%, 10.6 points below their season mean of 55.5% and 1.3 times their own 7.9-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
New Orleans Saints
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Los Angeles Rams
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · LA
24/32, 281 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
11.8 expected points added · +12.7% completion over expected
Passing · NO
15/24, 176 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
-0.1 expected points added · -2.9% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Juwan Johnson banked 6.0 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1 | +6.0 | 71% | 77% | 17% | 11% | 3/4, 31 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.8 | −1.6 | 83% | 88% | 38% | 52% | 5/9, 68 yd | |
| 9.2 | +1.9 | 90% | — | 0% | — | 15/24, 176 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 1 car, 2 yd | |
| 8.7 | +2.9 | 88% | 92% | 17% | 23% | 3/4, 57 yd | |
| 3.6 | −0.7 | 56% | 65% | 13% | 12% | 2/3, 16 yd | |
| 3.0 | −0.9 | 22% | — | 0% | — | 0/1, 0 yd · 4 car, 30 yd | |
| 2.2 | −1.1 | 39% | 42% | 4% | 0% | 3 car, 11 yd · 1/1, 1 yd | |
| 0.7 | −5.5 | 59% | 58% | 13% | 2% | 6 car, 14 yd · 1/3, 3 yd |
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Rams attack right, the Saints attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(14:14) (Shotgun) 9-M.Stafford pass incomplete short right to 12-P.Nacua. PENALTY on NO-4-K.McKinstry, Defensive Pass Interference, 5 yards, enforced at NO 35 - No Play.
Q2 14:14 · Rams · 4th & 3 at NO 35 · gained nothing · +2.45 EP · +5.6% win probability
148 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 157 plays across 19 drives, personnel groupings on 147 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 152. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 19 drives ended in points. The longest march was LA moving 88 yards from the LA 12 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; LA attacks right, NO attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
157 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
157 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Saints at Rams, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Shough | 15/24 | 176 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −0.1 |
| Taysom Hill | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −0.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taysom Hill | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | −2.6 |
| Alvin Kamara | 6 | 14 | 2.3 | 0 | −8.2 |
| Devin Neal |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rashid Shaheed | 5 | 9 | 68 | 0 | 38% | −3.6 |
| Chris Olave | 3 | 4 | 57 | 0 | 17% | +2.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Reid | 7 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Demario Davis | 3 | 9 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alontae Taylor | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danny Stutsman |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 24/32 | 281 | 4 | 0 | 2 | +11.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyren Williams |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_09_NO_LA
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Rams closed -14 and covered, winning by 24.
Total closed 44.5; the game landed 44 — under by 0.5.
Conditions and crew
| 3 |
| 11 |
| 3.7 |
| 0 |
| −0.7 |
| Tyler Shough | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Juwan Johnson | 3 | 4 | 31 | 1 | 17% | +3.8 |
| Brandin Cooks | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 13% | +1.7 |
| Alvin Kamara | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13% | −2.5 |
| Devin Neal | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4% | −0.7 |
| 1 |
| 7 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Jonas Sanker | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kool-Aid McKinstry | 3 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Rumph II | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nathan Shepherd | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaac Yiadom | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carl Granderson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 |
| 114 |
| 4.6 |
| 1 |
| +5.4 |
| Blake Corum | 13 | 58 | 4.5 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Puka Nacua | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | +2.0 |
| Matthew Stafford | 4 | -4 | -1.0 | 0 | −3.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puka Nacua | 7 | 8 | 95 | 1 | 26% | +5.5 |
| Davante Adams | 5 | 7 | 60 | 2 | 23% | +5.8 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 2 | 3 | 54 | 0 | 10% | +4.4 |
| Davis Allen | 3 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 13% | +0.4 |
| Tyler Higbee | 3 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 13% | +0.2 |
| Xavier Smith | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 10% | −0.4 |
| Colby Parkinson | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6% | −0.4 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamren Kinchens | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuel Forbes | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 3 |
| Braden Fiske | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Omar Speights | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kobie Turner | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kam Curl | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quentin Lake | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Byron Young | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyler Davis | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jaylen McCollough | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |