The biggest swing of the game · Q3 14:13 · 3rd and 2
Kimani Vidal
Chargers
(14:13) (Shotgun) 30-K.Vidal left end for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 7:10 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 13 · Sun, Nov 30, 2025 · SoFi Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 13
It turned at Q3 14:13, 3rd and 2, on Kimani Vidal — 11.4 win-probability points to the Chargers on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 14:13 · 3rd and 2
Kimani Vidal
Chargers
(14:13) (Shotgun) 30-K.Vidal left end for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Los Angeles Chargers 31–14 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q3 14:13, Chargers +11.4% win probability on one snap.
11.4
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Running the ball
Chargers won this one — +0.04 expected points per carry, against Raiders at -0.75 expected points per carry.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Chargers won this one — 12 of 17 on third down, against Raiders at 2 of 8 on third down.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Chargers won this one — +0.14 expected points per snap, against Raiders at -0.33 expected points per snap.
Chargersthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Red zone
Raiders owned this one and still lost it — 2 touchdowns on 2 trips, against Chargers at 3 touchdowns on 6 trips.
Raidersthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 10.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 28 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Raiders.
(14:13) (Shotgun) 30-K.Vidal left end for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Kimani Vidal's 59-yard rushing touchdown with 14:13 left in the 3rd put Los Angeles Chargers ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 4 scores that followed.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Chargers ahead 7–1 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — third-down rate.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.75 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Raiders ran 45 snaps at a 62% dropback rate against Chargers’s 65 at 43%. Red-zone trips: Raiders 2, Chargers 6.
Chargers won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.14 expected points added per play vs -0.33.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
LAC's sack or hit rate, 28.6%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 13 — 6.0 points clear of the next team along.
28 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.3 points.
LAC's early-down pass rate, 31.9%, is past their previous low of 43.9% in week 8 — the lowest of their 12 charted games through week 13.
47 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 12.3 points.
LAC's pass rate over expected, −11.5 pts, is past their previous low of −6.5 pts in week 5 — the lowest of their 12 charted games through week 13.
65 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.0 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
10 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -25 pts to 22 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +2.0 vs their -1.6 pts, and they swing ±9.1 week to week (+0.22× that swing) · 45 snaps
leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −12.3 vs their 0.8 pts, and they swing ±8.0 week to week (−1.54× that swing) · 65 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 24% to 92%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.8 vs their 57.9%, and they swing ±13.4 week to week (−0.06× that swing) · 35 early downs
off script — ran early · −26.7 vs their 58.6%, and they swing ±12.3 week to week (−2.17× that swing) · 47 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 3% to 47%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −0.6 vs their 25.6%, and they swing ±8.5 week to week (−0.07× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
leaned — dropped back clean · −9.1 vs their 23.4%, and they swing ±7.8 week to week (−1.17× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -34% to 143%
Fourth Down room →Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 54.5%.
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 21.7%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -13% to 64%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −4.2 vs their 22.0%, and they swing ±6.7 week to week (−0.62× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
leaned — sent pressure · +17.4 vs their 25.5%, and they swing ±15.1 week to week (+1.15× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 34%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.4 vs their 13.9%, and they swing ±7.6 week to week (+0.05× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
leaned — got home · +13.4 vs their 15.2%, and they swing ±7.3 week to week (+1.83× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
LAC's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 31.9%, 26.7 points below their season mean of 58.6% and 2.2 times their own 12.3-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Las Vegas Raiders
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Los Angeles Chargers
48 dressed · 6 inactive
Inactive · 6
Who moved the needle
Passing · LV
18/23, 165 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
-2.1 expected points added · +12.2% completion over expected
Passing · LAC
15/20, 151 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
7.3 expected points added · +10.8% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Brock Bowers banked 12.4 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.3 | +12.4 | 98% | 96% | 18% | 56% | 4/4, 63 yd, 2 TD | |
| 20.7 | −1.3 | 76% | 79% | 5% | 0% | 25 car, 126 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, 11 yd | |
| 13.9 | +0.5 | 76% | 79% | 29% | 26% | 4/6, 39 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.8 | −3.5 | 85% | — | 0% | — | 15/20, 151 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 3 car, 8 yd | |
| 12.1 | −8.0 | 96% | 96% | 36% | 0% | 15 car, 31 yd · 6/8, 30 yd | |
| 12.0 | −0.8 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 18/23, 165 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 2 car, -6 yd | |
| 11.4 | 0.0 | 22% | 4% | 0% | — | 11 car, 54 yd, 1 TD | |
| 11.3 | +6.2 | 67% | 68% | 14% | 9% | 3/3, 23 yd, 1 TD | |
| 7.0 | −1.9 | 60% | 79% | 24% | 27% | 4/5, 30 yd | |
| 6.0 | −0.3 | 51% | 36% | 19% | 22% | 3/4, 30 yd | |
| 5.0 | +1.3 | 96% | 96% | 14% | 19% | 3/3, 20 yd | |
| 4.2 | −0.1 | 56% | 50% | 14% | 19% | 2/3, 22 yd | |
| 3.7 | −0.6 | 70% | 64% | 10% | 17% | 1/2, 27 yd | |
| 2.1 | +0.9 | 52% | 68% | 5% | 5% | 1/1, 11 yd | |
| 2.1 | −0.7 | 29% | 32% | 9% | 31% | 1/2, 11 yd | |
| 1.8 | +0.4 | 56% | 50% | 5% | 1% | 1/1, 8 yd | |
| 0.8 | −0.7 | 15% | — | 0% | — | 1/1, 9 yd · 4 car, 4 yd | |
| 0.6 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 2 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. |
4 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Chargers attack right, the Raiders attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(14:13) (Shotgun) 30-K.Vidal left end for 59 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q3 14:13 · Chargers · 3rd & 2 at LAC 41 · gained 59 · +4.96 EP · +18.5% win probability
140 snaps placed · 16 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 156 plays across 20 drives, personnel groupings on 140 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 151. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 20 drives ended in points. The longest march was LAC moving 91 yards from the LAC 7 for a turnover. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; LAC attacks right, LV attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
156 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
156 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Raiders at Chargers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geno Smith | 18/23 | 165 | 2 | 1 | 5 | −2.1 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashton Jeanty | 15 | 31 | 2.1 | 0 | −9.5 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | −2.1 |
| Geno Smith | 2 | -6 | -3.0 | 0 | −1.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brock Bowers | 4 | 4 | 63 | 2 | 18% | +8.2 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 6 | 8 | 30 | 0 | 36% | −0.4 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chinn | 8 | 9 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin White | 5 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maxx Crosby | 5 | 3 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adam Butler |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 15/20 | 151 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +7.3 |
| Trey Lance | 1/1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +0.9 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_13_LV_LAC
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Chargers closed -10 and covered, winning by 17.
Total closed 40.5; the game landed 45 — over by 4.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Jack Bech | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 14% | +0.2 |
| Tre Tucker | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 14% | +0.8 |
| Dont'e Thornton Jr. | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 9% | −2.0 |
| Tyler Lockett | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 5% | +1.8 |
| Ian Thomas | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 5% | +0.5 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Thomas Booker | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darien Porter | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malcolm Koonce | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaiah Pola-Mao | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyu Blu Kelly | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tyree Wilson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimani Vidal | 25 | 126 | 5.0 | 1 | −0.8 |
| Jaret Patterson | 11 | 54 | 4.9 | 1 | +2.8 |
| Justin Herbert | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Trey Lance | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | −2.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ladd McConkey | 4 | 6 | 39 | 1 | 29% | −1.9 |
| Keenan Allen | 4 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 24% | +3.8 |
| Tre Harris | 3 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 19% | +3.1 |
| Oronde Gadsden II | 1 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 10% | +1.9 |
| Quentin Johnston | 3 | 3 | 23 | 1 | 14% | +4.4 |
| Kimani Vidal | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 5% | +0.8 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuli Tuipulotu | 4 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Denzel Perryman | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elijah Molden | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalil Mack | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Daiyan Henley | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Cam Hart | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Eboigbe | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tony Jefferson | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Teair Tart | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Deane Leonard | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |