The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:35 · 4th and 1
Tyler Shough
Dolphins
(:35) 6-T.Shough up the middle to MIA 36 for no gain (44-C.Robinson).
26.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
polling · 300s tick · as of 12:20 PM ET · 12 to play · 2 final
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 13 · Sun, Nov 30, 2025 · Hard Rock Stadium
FinalMiami Dolphins 21–17. Biggest swing: Q4 0:35, Dolphins +26.3% win probability on one snap.
The verdict · 2025 Week 13
It turned at Q4 0:35, 4th and 1, on Tyler Shough — 26.3 win-probability points to the Dolphins on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:35 · 4th and 1
Tyler Shough
Dolphins
(:35) 6-T.Shough up the middle to MIA 36 for no gain (44-C.Robinson).
26.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Saints owned this one and still lost it — 2 touchdowns on 2 trips, against Dolphins at 0 touchdowns on 3 trips.
Saintsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Explosive plays
Dolphins won this one — 6 chunk plays, against Saints at 0 chunk plays.
Dolphinsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Dolphins won this one — 1 giveaway, against Saints at 2 giveaways.
Dolphinsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Dolphins won this one — +0.08 expected points per carry, against Saints at -0.10 expected points per carry.
Dolphinsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 5.2 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 16 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Saints.
(:35) 6-T.Shough up the middle to MIA 36 for no gain (44-C.Robinson).
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
De'Von Achane's 29-yard rushing touchdown with 11:27 left in the 1st put Miami Dolphins ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 8 scores that followed.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Dolphins ahead 4–3 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Saints, in red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Saints ran 71 snaps at a 65% dropback rate against Dolphins’s 56 at 50%. Red-zone trips: Saints 2, Dolphins 3.
Dolphins won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.13 expected points added per play vs -0.16.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
1 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor in this game, which is under the three this column needs before it will draw the rule. The readings themselves stand.
NO's fourth-and-short go rate, 25.0%, is past their previous low of 33.3% in week 1 — the lowest of their 7 charted games through week 13.
4 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 10 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 21.6 points. · −1.1σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -22 pts to 14 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −2.2 vs their -3.4 pts, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (−0.33× that swing) · 69 snaps
right on their number · +1.2 vs their -5.6 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (+0.19× that swing) · 56 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 18% to 90%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +3.7 vs their 58.8%, and they swing ±11.7 week to week (+0.31× that swing) · 56 early downs
leaned — ran early · −13.7 vs their 50.9%, and they swing ±12.9 week to week (−1.07× that swing) · 43 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 63%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −1.4 vs their 18.8%, and they swing ±7.0 week to week (−0.20× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
right on their number · −0.9 vs their 29.5%, and they swing ±13.2 week to week (−0.07× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29% to 106%
Fourth Down room →leaned — took the kick · −23.8 vs their 48.8%, and they swing ±21.6 week to week (−1.10× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
Only 2 fourth-and-short calls tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 33.1%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -3% to 68%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +3.1 vs their 32.6%, and they swing ±13.9 week to week (+0.23× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +6.7 vs their 36.8%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (+0.79× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 1% to 27%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +7.1 vs their 14.3%, and they swing ±5.1 week to week (+1.38× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · +2.4 vs their 12.8%, and they swing ±4.4 week to week (+0.55× that swing) · 46 dropbacks
NO's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 21.4%, 7.1 points above their season mean of 14.3% and 1.4 times their own 5.1-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
New Orleans Saints
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Miami Dolphins
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · NO
26/38, 239 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
-11.2 expected points added · +9.8% completion over expected
Passing · MIA
12/23, 157 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
-8.0 expected points added · -1.3% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Devaughn Vele banked 10.2 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devaughn VeleWR · Featured Receiver | 23.3 | +10.2 | 88% | 89% | 24% | 36% | 8/8, 93 yd, 1 TD |
| De'Von AchaneRB · Bell Cow Back | 19.4 | +4.7 | 73% | 69% | 5% | 0% | 22 car, 134 yd, 1 TD · 0/1, 0 yd |
| Tyler ShoughQB · Starter QB | 17.4 | +1.3 | 99% | — | 0% | — | 26/38, 239 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 6 car, 18 yd |
| Chris OlaveWR · Featured Receiver | 14.7 | +3.9 | 88% | 93% | 21% | 34% | 4/7, 47 yd, 1 TD |
| Devin NealRB · Committee Back | 9.9 | −0.4 | 82% | 83% | 9% | 0% | 14 car, 47 yd · 3/3, 22 yd |
| Juwan JohnsonTE · Alpha Receiver | 8.9 | −2.1 | 72% | 83% | 26% | 20% | 5/9, 39 yd |
| Malik WashingtonWR · Alpha Receiver | 7.0 | −1.1 | 60% | 66% | 25% | 8% | 4/5, 30 yd |
| Jaylen WaddleWR · Alpha Receiver | 7.0 | −3.3 | 92% | 93% | 30% | 46% | 3/6, 40 yd |
| Darren WallerTE · Rotational Receiver | 6.7 | +0.1 | 47% | 66% | 15% | 18% | 2/3, 47 yd |
| Mason TiptonWR · Rotational Receiver | 4.9 | −1.1 | 85% | 89% | 12% | 8% | 1 car, -1 yd · 3/4, 20 yd |
| Tua TagovailoaQB · Starter QB | 4.7 | −7.6 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 12/23, 157 yd, 1 INT · 4 car, 4 yd |
| Greg DulcichTE · Rotational Receiver | 4.4 | +1.0 | 37% | 38% | 10% | 8% | 2/2, 24 yd |
| Foster MoreauTE · Rotational Receiver | 3.3 | +1.0 | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | 2/2, 13 yd |
| Cedrick Wilson Jr.WR · Rotational Receiver | 2.6 | −0.4 | 17% | 10% | 10% | 16% | 1/2, 16 yd |
| Taysom HillQB | 1.7 | −0.3 | 17% | — | 3% | 2% | 1 car, 2 yd · 1/1, 5 yd |
| Jaylen WrightRB | 1.6 | −0.1 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. |
| Evan HullRB | 1.5 | −0.7 | 18% | 17% | 0% | — | 5 car, 15 yd |
| Ollie Gordon IIRB | 1.0 | −0.3 | 27% | 31% | 0% | — | 3 car, 10 yd |
| Nick Westbrook-IkhineWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | 22% | 28% | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Julian HillTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.8 | 55% | 38% | 5% | 4% | 0/1, 0 yd |
| Dante PettisWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. |
2 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Dolphins attack right, the Saints attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
39-C.Smyth kicks onside 10 yards from NO 35 to NO 45. RECOVERED by NO-14-D.Vele. The Replay Official reviewed the kick touched ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands.
Q4 1:17 · Dolphins · Kickoff at NO 35 · gained nothing · -2.05 EP · −25.5% win probability
162 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 175 plays across 24 drives, personnel groupings on 162 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 170. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 24 drives ended in points. The longest march was MIA moving 69 yards from the MIA 31 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; MIA attacks right, NO attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
175 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
175 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown as a checkdown.
How the play was built
Empty backfield, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a quarterback sneak, a man in motion.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Saints at Dolphins, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Shough | 26/38 | 239 | 2 | 1 | 4 | −11.2 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Neal | 14 | 47 | 3.4 | 0 | −1.1 |
| Tyler Shough | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 0 | +2.0 |
| Evan Hull | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 | −0.1 |
| Taysom Hill | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Mason Tipton | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devaughn Vele | 8 | 8 | 93 | 1 | 24% | +6.5 |
| Chris Olave | 4 | 7 | 47 | 1 | 21% | −1.8 |
| Juwan Johnson | 5 | 9 | 39 | 0 | 26% | −1.8 |
| Devin Neal | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 9% | +0.3 |
| Mason Tipton | 3 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 12% | −2.0 |
| Foster Moreau | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 6% | +0.7 |
| Taysom Hill | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | −0.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demario Davis | 5 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Terrell Burgess | 3 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jonas Sanker | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pete Werner | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Howden | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bryan Bresee | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Davon Godchaux | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Jordan | 2 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carl Granderson | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kool-Aid McKinstry | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tua Tagovailoa | 12/23 | 157 | 0 | 1 | 4 | −8.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De'Von Achane | 22 | 134 | 6.1 | 1 | +4.5 |
| Jaylen Wright | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | +0.2 |
| Ollie Gordon II | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 0 | −2.4 |
| Tua Tagovailoa | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | −1.6 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren Waller | 2 | 3 | 47 | 0 | 15% | +2.0 |
| Jaylen Waddle | 3 | 6 | 40 | 0 | 30% | −2.3 |
| Malik Washington | 4 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 25% | +0.1 |
| Greg Dulcich | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 10% | +2.0 |
| Cedrick Wilson Jr. | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 10% | +0.3 |
| De'Von Achane | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −1.0 |
| Julian Hill | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5% | −1.7 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordyn Brooks | 6 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyrel Dodson | 4 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ifeatu Melifonwu | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minkah Fitzpatrick | 4 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ashtyn Davis | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rasul Douglas | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jack Jones | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chop Robinson | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dante Trader Jr. | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bradley Chubb | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_13_NO_MIA
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Dolphins closed -5.5, won by 4 — but didn't cover.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 38 — under by 3.5.
Conditions and crew