The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:22 · 4th and 2
Jason Myers
Seahawks
(:22) 5-J.Myers 56 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-41-C.Stoll, Holder-4-M.Dickson.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 7:30 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 15 · Sun, Dec 14, 2025 · Lumen Field
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 15
It turned at Q4 0:22, 4th and 2, on Jason Myers — 28.7 win-probability points to the Seahawks on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q4 0:22 · 4th and 2
Jason Myers
Seahawks
(:22) 5-J.Myers 56 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-41-C.Stoll, Holder-4-M.Dickson.
Seattle Seahawks 18–16 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q4 0:22, Seahawks +28.7% win probability on one snap.
28.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Red zone
Colts owned this one and still lost it — 1 touchdown on 1 trip, against Seahawks at 0 touchdowns on 2 trips.
Coltsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Third down
Colts owned this one and still lost it — 5 of 13 on third down, against Seahawks at 2 of 12 on third down.
Coltsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Staying on schedule
Seahawks won this one — 46% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Colts at 36% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Colts owned this one and still lost it — -0.11 expected points per carry, against Seahawks at -0.33 expected points per carry.
Coltsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 22.1 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 37 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Colts.
(:22) 5-J.Myers 56 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-41-C.Stoll, Holder-4-M.Dickson.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Jason Myers's 56-yard field goal with 0:22 left in the 4th put Seattle Seahawks ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
10 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Seahawks ahead 6–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Colts, in red-zone touchdowns.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Colts ran 58 snaps at a 48% dropback rate against Seahawks’s 56 at 66%. Red-zone trips: Colts 1, Seahawks 2.
Seahawks won the down-to-down efficiency fight: -0.04 expected points added per play vs -0.10.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
IND's play-action rate, 7.1%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 15 — 1.9 points clear of the next team along.
28 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.8 points.
IND's pass rate over expected, −15.8 pts, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 15 — 0.1 points clear of the next team along.
58 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.4 points.
IND's early-down pass rate, 35.6%, is past their previous low of 44.2% in week 1 — the lowest of their 14 charted games through week 15.
45 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 9.8 points.
SEA's early-down pass rate, 62.8%, is past their previous high of 56.8% in week 5 — the highest of their 14 charted games through week 15.
43 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.0 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -24 pts to 21 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −15.2 vs their -0.6 pts, and they swing ±8.4 week to week (−1.80× that swing) · 58 snaps
inside their normal wobble · +5.7 vs their -6.7 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (+0.90× that swing) · 56 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 22% to 82%
Tendencies room →off script — ran early · −20.7 vs their 56.3%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (−2.12× that swing) · 45 early downs
leaned — passed early · +15.0 vs their 47.8%, and they swing ±10.0 week to week (+1.50× that swing) · 43 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 3% to 53%
Tendencies room →off script — dropped back clean · −21.0 vs their 28.1%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (−2.15× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
right on their number · −3.9 vs their 25.5%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−0.47× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -44% to 138%
Fourth Down room →leaned — took the kick · −47.4 vs their 47.4%, and they swing ±35.7 week to week (−1.33× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
inside their normal wobble · −12.7 vs their 29.4%, and they swing ±19.5 week to week (−0.65× that swing) · 6 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 3% to 59%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +5.8 vs their 32.0%, and they swing ±10.4 week to week (+0.56× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
right on their number · +3.5 vs their 25.1%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (+0.42× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 32%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.8 vs their 12.7%, and they swing ±7.5 week to week (+0.11× that swing) · 37 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.8 vs their 16.0%, and they swing ±6.1 week to week (−0.29× that swing) · 28 dropbacks
IND's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 7.1%, 21.0 points below their season mean of 28.1% and 2.1 times their own 9.8-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Indianapolis Colts
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Seattle Seahawks
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Who moved the needle
Passing · SEA
22/36, 271 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
4.6 expected points added · +0.6% completion over expected
Passing · IND
18/27, 120 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
-2.5 expected points added · -0.4% completion over expected
Receiving · SEA
7/9 for 113 yds, 0 TD
27% of team targets · 6.2 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Jaxon Smith-Njigba banked 4.4 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.3 | +4.4 | 92% | 92% | 27% | 28% | 7/9, 113 yd | |
| 13.1 | −3.4 | 85% | 75% | 15% | 6% | 25 car, 87 yd · 3/4, 14 yd | |
| 12.1 | −1.1 | 68% | 79% | 21% | 44% | 1 car, -3 yd · 5/7, 74 yd | |
| 11.3 | −2.5 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/36, 271 yd · 4 car, 5 yd | |
| 10.3 | +3.1 | 72% | 89% | 19% | 19% | 3/5, 13 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.7 | +1.3 | 23% | 25% | 19% | 0% | 4 car, 15 yd · 5/5, 32 yd | |
| 9.6 | −1.4 | 75% | 74% | 21% | 17% | 5/7, 46 yd | |
| 6.8 | +0.2 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 18/27, 120 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 1 car, 0 yd | |
| 5.7 | −1.2 | 83% | 85% | 18% | 10% | 3/6, 27 yd | |
| 5.6 | −1.1 | 93% | 100% | 19% | 33% | 3/5, 26 yd | |
| 4.9 | −2.6 | 82% | 96% | 23% | 30% | 3/6, 19 yd | |
| 3.1 | −2.7 | 55% | 56% | 3% | 0% | 8 car, 31 yd · 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 2.9 | −3.1 | 42% | 36% | 3% | 0% | 9 car, 17 yd · 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 2.6 | +1.2 | 100% | 100% | 4% | 11% | 1/1, 16 yd | |
| 1.9 | +0.4 | 37% | 21% | 3% | 2% | 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | −1.4 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | 17% | 5% | 0% | — | No touches. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 3 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Seahawks attack right, the Colts attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:22) 5-J.Myers 56 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-41-C.Stoll, Holder-4-M.Dickson.
Q4 0:22 · Seahawks · 4th & 2 at IND 38 · gained nothing · +1.78 EP · +33.6% win probability
154 snaps placed · 14 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 168 plays across 21 drives, personnel groupings on 154 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 163. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
10 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was SEA moving 82 yards from the SEA 6 for a field goal. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; SEA attacks right, IND attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
168 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
168 plays
How the play was built
Empty backfield, a man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Play action, nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read, from outside the pocket.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the second read, caught in traffic.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the second read, it should have been intercepted.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Colts at Seahawks, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Rivers | 18/27 | 120 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −2.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Taylor | 25 | 87 | 3.5 | 0 | −1.6 |
| Ameer Abdullah | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Philip Rivers | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −1.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ameer Abdullah | 5 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 19% | −0.2 |
| Michael Pittman | 3 | 5 | 26 | 0 | 19% | +2.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germaine Pratt | 5 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zaire Franklin | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camryn Bynum | 7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Cross |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Darnold | 22/36 | 271 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +4.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Charbonnet |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_15_IND_SEA
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Seahawks closed -13.5, won by 2 — but didn't cover.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 34 — under by 7.5.
Conditions and crew
| Tyler Warren | 3 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 23% | −3.4 |
| Alec Pierce | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 4% | +1.7 |
| Jonathan Taylor | 3 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 15% | −1.1 |
| Josh Downs | 3 | 5 | 13 | 1 | 19% | −0.2 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Johnathan Edwards | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mekhi Blackmon | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaylahn Tuimolaou | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laiatu Latu | 3 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neville Gallimore | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tyler Goodson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 |
| 31 |
| 3.9 |
| 0 |
| −0.2 |
| Kenneth Walker III | 9 | 17 | 1.9 | 0 | −5.2 |
| Sam Darnold | 4 | 5 | 1.3 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Rashid Shaheed | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 7 | 9 | 113 | 0 | 27% | +6.2 |
| Rashid Shaheed | 5 | 7 | 74 | 0 | 21% | +1.5 |
| Cooper Kupp | 5 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 21% | −0.2 |
| AJ Barner | 3 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 18% | +1.7 |
| Eric Saubert | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 3% | +0.7 |
| Kenneth Walker III | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −1.9 |
| Brady Russell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.4 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernest Jones | 5 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Emmanwori | 6 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Devon Witherspoon | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Drake Thomas | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leonard Williams | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarran Reed | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeMarcus Lawrence | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Byron Murphy II | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Coby Bryant | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Uchenna Nwosu | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |