The biggest swing of the game · Q1 2:35 · 2nd and 9
De'Von Achane
Dolphins
(2:35) 28-D.Achane left end for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:42 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 16 · Sun, Dec 21, 2025 · Hard Rock Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 16
It turned at Q1 2:35, 2nd and 9, on De'Von Achane — 12.0 win-probability points to the Dolphins on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 2:35 · 2nd and 9
De'Von Achane
Dolphins
(2:35) 28-D.Achane left end for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Cincinnati Bengals 45–21 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q1 2:35, Dolphins +12.0% win probability on one snap.
12.0
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Staying on schedule
Bengals won this one — 56% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Dolphins at 34% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Bengalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Bengals won this one — no giveaways, against Dolphins at 3 giveaways.
Bengalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Bengals won this one — 6 of 12 on third down, against Dolphins at 2 of 10 on third down.
Bengalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Bengals won this one — +0.37 expected points per snap, against Dolphins at -0.06 expected points per snap.
Bengalsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 10.3 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 21 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Dolphins.
(2:35) 28-D.Achane left end for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Samaje Perine's 4-yard rushing touchdown with 1:28 left in the 2nd put Cincinnati Bengals ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
10 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Bengals ahead 7–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Dolphins, in sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.55 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Bengals ran 61 snaps at a 59% dropback rate against Dolphins’s 58 at 53%. Red-zone trips: Bengals 6, Dolphins 3.
Bengals won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.37 expected points added per play vs -0.06.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
CIN's play-action rate, 30.6%, is past their previous high of 25.8% in week 3 — the highest of their 15 charted games through week 16.
36 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 7.2 points.
CIN's pass rate over expected turned over: −8.3 pts in week 15 against +5.1 pts here — they ran more than the situation asked then and threw more than the situation asked now, a turn of 2.6 of their own weekly swings across the two.
61 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.2 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -22 pts to 16 pts
Over Expected room →inside their normal wobble · +3.5 vs their 1.6 pts, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.68× that swing) · 61 snaps
inside their normal wobble · −6.0 vs their -5.6 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (−0.95× that swing) · 58 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 18% to 84%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −7.3 vs their 61.4%, and they swing ±8.2 week to week (−0.88× that swing) · 48 early downs
right on their number · +1.2 vs their 50.9%, and they swing ±12.9 week to week (+0.09× that swing) · 46 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 63%
Tendencies room →leaned — faked the run · +14.4 vs their 16.2%, and they swing ±7.2 week to week (+1.98× that swing) · 36 dropbacks
right on their number · +6.0 vs their 29.5%, and they swing ±13.2 week to week (+0.45× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -34% to 102%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · −0.6 vs their 34.0%, and they swing ±26.8 week to week (−0.02× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
right on their number · +6.9 vs their 33.1%, and they swing ±23.9 week to week (+0.29× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 60%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −8.3 vs their 21.2%, and they swing ±9.9 week to week (−0.84× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
leaned — sat back · −9.0 vs their 36.8%, and they swing ±8.6 week to week (−1.05× that swing) · 36 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -6% to 34%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −1.0 vs their 13.9%, and they swing ±8.0 week to week (−0.12× that swing) · 31 dropbacks
right on their number · −1.7 vs their 12.8%, and they swing ±4.4 week to week (−0.39× that swing) · 36 dropbacks
CIN's play-action rate was the night's one real departure: 30.6%, 14.4 points above their season mean of 16.2% and 2.0 times their own 7.2-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Cincinnati Bengals
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Miami Dolphins
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · CIN
25/32, 309 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
20.6 expected points added · +15.8% completion over expected
Passing · MIA
20/30, 260 yds, 0 TD, 2 INT
4.7 expected points added · +1.6% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Chase Brown banked 17.5 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.9 | +17.5 | 61% | 67% | 13% | 5% | 12 car, 66 yd, 1 TD · 4/4, 43 yd, 2 TD | |
| 29.0 | +11.5 | 90% | — | 0% | — | 25/32, 309 yd, 4 TD · 2 car, 6 yd | |
| 19.9 | +1.9 | 87% | 92% | 35% | 46% | 9/11, 109 yd | |
| 18.0 | +6.3 | 71% | 65% | 10% | 0% | 15 car, 81 yd, 1 TD · 3/3, 9 yd | |
| 14.3 | +7.9 | 62% | 78% | 10% | 24% | 3/3, 53 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.5 | +3.7 | 48% | 67% | 13% | 23% | 3/4, 35 yd, 1 TD | |
| 12.3 | +2.1 | 31% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 9 car, 35 yd, 1 TD · 1/2, 18 yd | |
| 12.2 | −2.8 | 71% | 74% | 31% | 48% | 5/9, 72 yd | |
| 12.1 | +2.2 | 39% | 39% | 10% | 0% | 7 car, 25 yd, 1 TD · 2/3, 16 yd | |
| 10.2 | +8.0 | 53% | 61% | 3% | 2% | 1 car, 9 yd, 1 TD · 1/1, 23 yd | |
| 7.0 | −0.3 | 49% | 55% | 17% | 18% | 3/5, 40 yd | |
| 6.9 | −3.5 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 20/30, 260 yd, 2 INT · 2 car, 5 yd | |
| 5.6 | +1.2 | 29% | 35% | 10% | 6% | 3/3, 46 yd | |
| 5.2 | −1.8 | 36% | 45% | 14% | 22% | 2/4, 32 yd | |
| 5.1 | +2.6 | 66% | 44% | 6% | 0% | 2/2, 31 yd | |
| 3.1 | +1.2 | 51% | 44% | 3% | 7% | 1/1, 21 yd | |
| 2.1 | +0.5 | 53% | 39% | 3% | 3% | 1/1, 11 yd | |
| 1.9 | +0.3 | 31% | 26% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 9 yd | |
| 1.4 | −0.3 | 25% | 25% | 3% | 2% | 1/1, 4 yd | |
| 1.1 | −0.7 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.7 | −1.1 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.2 | −0.2 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.1 | −0.4 | — | — | — | — | 4 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.9 | 36% | 22% | 3% | 13% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | No snap count on file, so his shares read as a dash. | |
| -0.1 | −0.5 | — | — | — | — | 3 snaps — too few to rate. |
6 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Dolphins attack right, the Bengals attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(2:35) 28-D.Achane left end for 48 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Q1 2:35 · Dolphins · 2nd & 9 at CIN 48 · gained 48 · +4.53 EP · +14.7% win probability
153 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 162 plays across 24 drives, personnel groupings on 153 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 157. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
10 of 24 drives ended in points. The longest march was MIA moving 97 yards from the MIA 3 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; MIA attacks right, CIN attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
162 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
162 plays
How the play was built
Two in the backfield, a man in motion.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown out of the scramble drill, from outside the pocket.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Bengals at Dolphins, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Burrow | 25/32 | 309 | 4 | 0 | 2 | +20.6 |
| Joe Flacco | 1/1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1.0 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chase Brown | 12 | 66 | 5.5 | 1 | +2.3 |
| Samaje Perine | 7 | 25 | 3.6 | 1 | +1.8 |
| Tahj Brooks |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr Chase | 9 | 11 | 109 | 0 | 35% | +6.2 |
| Tee Higgins | 3 | 3 | 53 | 1 | 10% | +5.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Battle | 6 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| D.J. Ivey | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Barrett Carter | 1 | 4 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Joe Giles-Harris |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinn Ewers | 20/30 | 260 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +4.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De'Von Achane |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_16_CIN_MIA
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Bengals closed -3.5 and covered, winning by 24.
Total closed 48.5; the game landed 66 — over by 17.5.
Conditions and crew
| 4 |
| 7 |
| 1.8 |
| 0 |
| −1.7 |
| Joe Burrow | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | +2.0 |
| Ke'Shawn Williams | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −1.2 |
| Chase Brown | 4 | 4 | 43 | 2 | 13% | +6.1 |
| Mike Gesicki | 3 | 4 | 35 | 1 | 13% | +4.5 |
| Drew Sample | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 6% | +2.7 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 3% | +1.6 |
| Samaje Perine | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 10% | +0.7 |
| Tanner Hudson | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | −1.0 |
| Cam Grandy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Mitchell Tinsley | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.9 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Daxton Hill | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Myles Murphy | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Demetrius Knight Jr. | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jalen Davis | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tycen Anderson | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| DJ Turner II | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 |
| 81 |
| 5.4 |
| 1 |
| −1.1 |
| Jaylen Wright | 9 | 35 | 3.9 | 1 | −0.5 |
| Malik Washington | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 1 | +2.5 |
| Quinn Ewers | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | −3.6 |
| Ollie Gordon II | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | −2.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylen Waddle | 5 | 9 | 72 | 0 | 31% | −1.8 |
| Greg Dulcich | 3 | 3 | 46 | 0 | 10% | −1.2 |
| Darren Waller | 3 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 17% | +4.3 |
| Theo Wease Jr. | 2 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 14% | −2.8 |
| Malik Washington | 1 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 3% | +1.8 |
| Jaylen Wright | 1 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 7% | +1.6 |
| Cedrick Wilson Jr. | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 3% | +0.8 |
| De'Von Achane | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 10% | −1.5 |
| Alec Ingold | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 3% | +1.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordyn Brooks | 5 | 9 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tyrel Dodson | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rasul Douglas | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jason Marshall Jr. | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dante Trader Jr. | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jack Jones | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bradley Chubb | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenneth Grant | 0 | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Chop Robinson | 0 | 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Zach Sieler | 1 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |