The biggest swing of the game · Q3 0:43 · 4th and 4
Zane Gonzalez
Rams
(:43) 45-Z.Gonzalez 37 yard field goal is BLOCKED (8-J.Verse), Center-49-L.McCullough, Holder-13-B.Pinion, RECOVERED by LA-8-J.Verse at LA 24. 8-J.Verse for 76 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 2:23 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 17 · Mon, Dec 29, 2025 · Mercedes-Benz Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 17
It turned at Q3 0:43, 4th and 4, on Zane Gonzalez — 19.6 win-probability points to the Rams on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 0:43 · 4th and 4
Zane Gonzalez
Rams
(:43) 45-Z.Gonzalez 37 yard field goal is BLOCKED (8-J.Verse), Center-49-L.McCullough, Holder-13-B.Pinion, RECOVERED by LA-8-J.Verse at LA 24. 8-J.Verse for 76 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Atlanta Falcons 27–24 — decided on the final possessions. Biggest swing: Q3 0:43, Rams +19.6% win probability on one snap.
19.6
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Giveaways
Falcons won this one — no giveaways, against Rams at 4 giveaways.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Falcons won this one — +0.12 expected points per snap, against Rams at -0.10 expected points per snap.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Falcons won this one — +0.25 expected points per dropback, against Rams at -0.07 expected points per dropback.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Falcons won this one — +0.04 expected points per carry, against Rams at -0.18 expected points per carry.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 18.4 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 36 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Falcons.
(:43) 45-Z.Gonzalez 37 yard field goal is BLOCKED (8-J.Verse), Center-49-L.McCullough, Holder-13-B.Pinion, RECOVERED by LA-8-J.Verse at LA 24. 8-J.Verse for 76 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Zane Gonzalez's 51-yard field goal with 0:25 left in the 4th put Atlanta Falcons ahead for good. It was the last score of the day.
9 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Falcons ahead 4–3 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.35 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Rams ran 61 snaps at a 67% dropback rate against Falcons’s 53 at 38%. Red-zone trips: Rams 4, Falcons 3.
Rams outgained Falcons 363-345 but lost the turnover battle 4-0. That was the game.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
ATL's pass rate over expected, −21.2 pts, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 17 — 0.3 points clear of the next team along.
53 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 6.6 points.
ATL's early-down pass rate, 27.5%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 17 — 1.3 points clear of the next team along.
40 early downs this game, floor 15 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 11.9 points.
ATL's fourth-and-short go rate, 0.0%, was the lowest of the 20 team-games charted in week 17 — 25.0 points clear of the next team along.
3 fourth-and-short calls this game, floor 3 — 11 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 32.3 points.
LA's sack or hit rate, 35.0%, is past their previous high of 28.2% in week 6 — the highest of their 16 charted games through week 17.
20 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 8.8 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
12 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -24 pts to 19 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — ran more than the situation asked · −7.0 vs their 3.2 pts, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (−1.21× that swing) · 61 snaps
off script — ran more than the situation asked · −14.8 vs their -6.3 pts, and they swing ±6.6 week to week (−2.25× that swing) · 53 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 20% to 81%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +5.9 vs their 55.5%, and they swing ±7.9 week to week (+0.74× that swing) · 44 early downs
leaned — ran early · −23.0 vs their 50.5%, and they swing ±11.9 week to week (−1.94× that swing) · 40 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -8% to 61%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −3.7 vs their 35.4%, and they swing ±9.6 week to week (−0.39× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +14.0 vs their 21.0%, and they swing ±10.8 week to week (+1.30× that swing) · 20 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -47% to 118%
Fourth Down room →inside their normal wobble · +17.4 vs their 49.3%, and they swing ±19.3 week to week (+0.90× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
leaned — took the kick · −35.8 vs their 35.8%, and they swing ±32.3 week to week (−1.11× that swing) · 3 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 70%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +0.0 vs their 25.0%, and they swing ±11.3 week to week (+0.00× that swing) · 20 dropbacks
inside their normal wobble · −10.9 vs their 37.7%, and they swing ±12.5 week to week (−0.87× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 40%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +17.1 vs their 17.9%, and they swing ±8.8 week to week (+1.93× that swing) · 20 dropbacks
right on their number · −2.3 vs their 14.5%, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (−0.40× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
ATL's pass rate over expected was the night's one real departure: -21.2 pts, 14.8 points below their season mean of -6.3 pts and 2.2 times their own 6.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Los Angeles Rams
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
Atlanta Falcons
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · LA
22/38, 269 yds, 2 TD, 3 INT
-2.7 expected points added · -3.1% completion over expected
Passing · ATL
13/20, 126 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
4.9 expected points added · +0.5% completion over expected
Receiving · LA
2/4 for 54 yds, 1 TD
11% of team targets · -1.5 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Bijan Robinson banked 12.5 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.9 | +12.5 | 79% | 95% | 40% | 7% | 22 car, 195 yd, 1 TD · 5/8, 34 yd, 1 TD | |
| 9.1 | +0.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 13/20, 126 yd, 1 TD · 1 car, 1 yd | |
| 6.7 | −0.8 | 15% | 35% | 20% | 27% | 3/4, 37 yd | |
| 5.5 | +0.2 | 70% | 95% | 15% | 31% | 2/3, 35 yd | |
| 3.6 | −0.7 | 92% | 95% | 15% | 18% | 2/3, 16 yd | |
| 2.3 | −3.2 | 36% | 25% | 0% | — | 10 car, 23 yd | |
| 1.4 | −1.2 | 98% | 95% | 10% | 17% | 1/2, 4 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | 81% | 55% | 0% | — | No touches. | |
| 0.0 | — | 28% | 5% | 0% | — | No touches. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 5 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Falcons attack right, the Rams attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(:25) 45-Z.Gonzalez 51 yard field goal is GOOD, Center-49-L.McCullough, Holder-13-B.Pinion.
Q4 0:25 · Falcons · 4th & 8 at LA 33 · gained nothing · +1.05 EP · +18.8% win probability
150 snaps placed · 13 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 163 plays across 22 drives, personnel groupings on 150 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 158. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 22 drives ended in points. The longest march was ATL moving 93 yards from the ATL 7 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; ATL attacks right, LA attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
163 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
163 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown on the first read.
How the play was built
Nobody in motion.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
How the play was built
A screen, a man in motion.
A designed throw, the target set before the snap.
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown as a checkdown.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Rams at Falcons, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 22/38 | 269 | 2 | 3 | 3 | −2.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyren Williams | 13 | 92 | 7.1 | 0 | −2.3 |
| Blake Corum | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 0 | −1.5 |
| Ronnie Rivers | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | +0.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Smith | 4 | 6 | 67 | 0 | 17% | +5.6 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 2 | 4 | 54 | 1 | 11% | −1.5 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kam Curl | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Byron Young | 2 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Omar Speights | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nate Landman |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Cousins | 13/20 | 126 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +4.9 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijan Robinson |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_17_LA_ATL
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Rams closed -7.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 48.5; the game landed 51 — over by 2.5.
Conditions and crew
| Colby Parkinson | 6 | 7 | 53 | 0 | 19% | +3.0 |
| Puka Nacua | 5 | 10 | 47 | 1 | 28% | +1.7 |
| Kyren Williams | 3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 8% | +2.9 |
| Konata Mumpfield | 2 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 14% | −9.0 |
| Tutu Atwell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.1 |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Kobie Turner | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamren Kinchens | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jared Verse | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaylen McCollough | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Troy Reeder | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuel Forbes | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 |
| 195 |
| 8.9 |
| 1 |
| +4.9 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 10 | 23 | 2.3 | 0 | −3.4 |
| Kirk Cousins | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Sills | 3 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 20% | +0.6 |
| Darnell Mooney | 2 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 15% | +4.0 |
| Bijan Robinson | 5 | 8 | 34 | 1 | 40% | +1.5 |
| Kyle Pitts | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 15% | −0.5 |
| Drake London | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 10% | −0.6 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divine Deablo | 7 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jessie Bates | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| A.J. Terrell | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Xavier Watts | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 2 | 3 |
| LaCale London | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kaden Elliss | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ronnie Harrison | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| C.J. Henderson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Khalid Kareem | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dee Alford | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |