The biggest swing of the game · Q1 7:27 · 4th and 4
Sam Darnold
49ers
(7:27) (Shotgun) 14-S.Darnold pass incomplete short left to 10-C.Kupp.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:21 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2025 Week 18 · Sat, Jan 3, 2026 · Levi's Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2025 Week 18
It turned at Q1 7:27, 4th and 4, on Sam Darnold — 8.7 win-probability points to the 49ers on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q1 7:27 · 4th and 4
Sam Darnold
49ers
(7:27) (Shotgun) 14-S.Darnold pass incomplete short left to 10-C.Kupp.
Seattle Seahawks 13–3. Biggest swing: Q1 7:27, 49ers +8.7% win probability on one snap.
8.7
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Every snap
Seahawks won this one — +0.07 expected points per snap, against 49ers at -0.36 expected points per snap.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Throwing the ball
Seahawks won this one — +0.21 expected points per dropback, against 49ers at -0.39 expected points per dropback.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Seahawks won this one — 8 chunk plays, against 49ers at 3 chunk plays.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Third down
Seahawks won this one — 6 of 12 on third down, against 49ers at 2 of 9 on third down.
Seahawksthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 7.8 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 17 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about 49ers.
(7:27) (Shotgun) 14-S.Darnold pass incomplete short left to 10-C.Kupp.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Zach Charbonnet's 27-yard rushing touchdown with 4:37 left in the 1st put Seattle Seahawks ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 3 scores that followed.
4 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Seahawks ahead 8–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.39 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Seahawks ran 64 snaps at a 47% dropback rate against 49ers’s 42 at 76%. Red-zone trips: Seahawks 4, 49ers 1.
Seahawks won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.07 expected points added per play vs -0.36.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
SF's pass rate over expected, +8.0 pts, is past their previous high of +5.3 pts in week 5 — the highest of their 17 charted games through week 18.
42 snaps this game, floor 20 — 17 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.9 points.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -23 pts to 15 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · −1.2 vs their -6.7 pts, and they swing ±6.3 week to week (−0.19× that swing) · 64 snaps
leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +8.6 vs their -0.6 pts, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (+1.45× that swing) · 42 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 22% to 85%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −4.7 vs their 47.8%, and they swing ±10.0 week to week (−0.47× that swing) · 51 early downs
leaned — passed early · +12.8 vs their 55.0%, and they swing ±11.6 week to week (+1.10× that swing) · 31 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 4% to 47%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · −5.5 vs their 25.5%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (−0.67× that swing) · 30 dropbacks
leaned — faked the run · +8.8 vs their 22.4%, and they swing ±6.8 week to week (+1.30× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -29% to 101%
Fourth Down room →Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 29.4%.
inside their normal wobble · −16.3 vs their 36.3%, and they swing ±25.6 week to week (−0.64× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -2% to 49%
Tendencies room →right on their number · +3.1 vs their 25.1%, and they swing ±8.3 week to week (+0.37× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
right on their number · +3.2 vs their 23.5%, and they swing ±9.8 week to week (+0.33× that swing) · 30 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -4% to 32%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +9.0 vs their 16.0%, and they swing ±6.1 week to week (+1.47× that swing) · 32 dropbacks
right on their number · +0.5 vs their 9.5%, and they swing ±5.2 week to week (+0.09× that swing) · 30 dropbacks
SEA's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 25.0%, 9.0 points above their season mean of 16.0% and 1.5 times their own 6.1-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Seattle Seahawks
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
San Francisco 49ers
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Who moved the needle
Passing · SEA
20/26, 198 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT
4.8 expected points added · +6.9% completion over expected
Passing · SF
19/27, 127 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT
-13.6 expected points added · +3.2% completion over expected
Receiving · SEA
6/8 for 84 yds, 0 TD
31% of team targets · 5.9 expected points added
Receiving · SEA
4/4 for 36 yds, 0 TD
15% of team targets · 2.1 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Kenneth Walker III banked 3.1 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.7 | +1.9 | 57% | 63% | 15% | 6% | 17 car, 74 yd, 1 TD · 3/4, 23 yd | |
| 17.3 | +3.1 | 42% | 27% | 15% | 0% | 16 car, 97 yd · 4/4, 36 yd | |
| 14.4 | −1.1 | 83% | 87% | 31% | 81% | 6/8, 84 yd | |
| 11.7 | −3.6 | 86% | 81% | 26% | 17% | 8 car, 23 yd · 6/7, 34 yd | |
| 8.8 | −3.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 20/26, 198 yd · 6 car, 9 yd | |
| 7.9 | −1.6 | 95% | 94% | 26% | 22% | 5/7, 29 yd | |
| 7.5 | −0.9 | 88% | 88% | 22% | 28% | 4/6, 35 yd | |
| 5.4 | −0.4 | 88% | 84% | 15% | 23% | 3/4, 24 yd | |
| 5.2 | −4.3 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 19/27, 127 yd, 1 INT · 2 car, 21 yd | |
| 4.9 | −1.6 | 77% | 67% | 12% | 16% | 2/3, 29 yd | |
| 3.4 | −0.8 | 61% | 67% | 12% | 7% | 2/3, 14 yd | |
| 3.0 | −1.3 | 70% | 57% | 12% | 0% | 2/3, 10 yd | |
| 1.5 | −1.1 | 45% | 38% | 7% | 3% | 1/2, 5 yd | |
| 1.2 | −0.1 | 48% | 67% | 4% | 2% | 1/1, 2 yd | |
| 0.9 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 snap — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | −1.0 | 52% | 50% | 4% | 6% | 0/1, 0 yd | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The 49ers attack right, the Seahawks attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(10:27) (Shotgun) 13-B.Purdy pass short right intended for 23-C.McCaffrey INTERCEPTED by 42-D.Thomas (53-B.Mafe) at SEA 3. 42-D.Thomas pushed ob at SEA 3 for no gain (23-C.McCaffrey).
Q4 10:27 · 49ers · 2nd & goal at SEA 6 · gained nothing · -4.78 EP · −15.5% win probability
130 snaps placed · 11 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 141 plays across 17 drives, personnel groupings on 130 snaps, the eleven on the field by name, manual charting on 136. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
4 of 17 drives ended in points. The longest march was SEA moving 94 yards from the SEA 3 for a missed field goal. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; SF attacks right, SEA attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. Open any play above to see the eleven men who were actually on the field for it.
141 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
141 plays
How the play was built
A man in motion.
Thrown as a checkdown, dropped.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Seahawks at 49ers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Darnold | 20/26 | 198 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +4.8 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Walker III | 16 | 97 | 6.1 | 0 | +2.7 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 17 | 74 | 4.4 | 1 | −3.3 |
| Sam Darnold | 6 | 9 | 1.5 | 0 | −2.0 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 6 | 8 | 84 | 0 | 31% | +5.9 |
| Kenneth Walker III | 4 | 4 | 36 | 0 | 15% | +2.1 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Emmanwori | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Drake Thomas | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Ernest Jones | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devon Witherspoon |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brock Purdy | 19/27 | 127 | 0 | 1 | 3 | −13.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffrey |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2025_18_SEA_SF
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Seahawks closed -2.5 and covered, winning by 10.
Total closed 47.5; the game landed 16 — under by 31.5.
Conditions and crew
Division game — familiarity tightens these matchups; closing numbers tend to be sharper.
| Cooper Kupp | 2 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 12% | −0.2 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 3 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 15% | +0.7 |
| AJ Barner | 2 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 12% | −0.7 |
| Eric Saubert | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 12% | +0.0 |
| Rashid Shaheed | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4% | −0.3 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Byron Murphy II | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ty Okada | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Boye Mafe | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Riq Woolen | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Josh Jobe | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jarran Reed | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 |
| 23 |
| 2.9 |
| 0 |
| −2.2 |
| Brock Purdy | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | +0.9 |
| Brian Robinson | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | −0.3 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jauan Jennings | 4 | 6 | 35 | 0 | 22% | −1.3 |
| Christian McCaffrey | 6 | 7 | 34 | 0 | 26% | −4.3 |
| George Kittle | 5 | 7 | 29 | 0 | 26% | −1.4 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 3 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 15% | +1.4 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7% | −3.3 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4% | −1.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ji'Ayir Brown | 5 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renardo Green | 6 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tatum Bethune | 2 | 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Upton Stout | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malik Mustapha | 3 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eric Kendricks | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jason Pinnock | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sam Okuayinonu | 4 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alfred Collins | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Clelin Ferrell | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |