The biggest swing of the game · Q3 10:02 · 4th and 1
Jordan Love
Falcons
(10:02) 10-J.Love pass incomplete short right to 9-C.Watson.
11.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
Not startedThis page's interactive half has not started on this device. Nothing was read, and nothing was invented in its place. Reload the page.
connecting · reading the slate
Game Center
2026 Week 3 · Thu, Sep 24, 2026 · Lambeau Field
FinalThe verdict · 2026 Week 3
It turned at Q3 10:02, 4th and 1, on Jordan Love — 11.5 win-probability points to the Falcons on one snap, the largest move of the game.
The snaps that bent it
Atlanta Falcons 35–14 — never really in doubt late. Biggest swing: Q3 10:02, Falcons +11.5% win probability on one snap.
The biggest swing of the game · Q3 10:02 · 4th and 1
Jordan Love
Falcons
(10:02) 10-J.Love pass incomplete short right to 9-C.Watson.
11.5
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Staying on schedule
Falcons won this one — 65% of snaps stayed on schedule, against Packers at 40% of snaps stayed on schedule.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Running the ball
Falcons won this one — +0.31 expected points per carry, against Packers at -0.30 expected points per carry.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Explosive plays
Falcons won this one — 8 chunk plays, against Packers at 4 chunk plays.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Falcons won this one — +0.33 expected points per snap, against Packers at +0.01 expected points per snap.
Falconsthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 4.3 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 11 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Falcons.
(10:02) 10-J.Love pass incomplete short right to 9-C.Watson.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Nick Folk's 44-yard field goal with 4:53 left in the 2nd put Atlanta Falcons ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 5 scores that followed.
8 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Falcons ahead 8–0 on categories, including the biggest gap of the duel — sacks taken.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.37 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Falcons ran 65 snaps at a 40% dropback rate against Packers’s 63 at 86%. Red-zone trips: Falcons 5, Packers 4.
Falcons won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.33 expected points added per play vs 0.01.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
GB's early-down pass rate, 80.0%, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 3 — 10.6 points clear of the next team along.
45 early downs this game, floor 15 — 6 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 10.1 points. · +1.9σ from their own normal
GB's pass rate over expected, +11.8 pts, was the highest of the 32 team-games charted in week 3 — 2.9 points clear of the next team along.
63 snaps this game, floor 20 — 6 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.6 points. · +1.6σ from their own normal
ATL's early-down pass rate, 31.5%, was the lowest of the 32 team-games charted in week 3 — 2.6 points clear of the next team along.
54 early downs this game, floor 15 — 6 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 15.3 points. · −1.0σ from their own normal
GB's sack or hit rate turned over: 16.7% in week 2 against 3.8% here — they got home then and stayed blocked now, a turn of 2.2 of their own weekly swings across the two.
26 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 6 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 5.9 points. · −1.8σ from their own normal
ATL's sack or hit rate turned over: 15.4% in week 2 against 22.2% here — they stayed blocked then and got home now, a turn of 2.1 of their own weekly swings across the two.
54 dropbacks this game, floor 12 — 6 of their games behind the ruler, and their own week-to-week swing is 3.3 points. · +1.3σ from their own normal
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
11 of 12 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -25 pts to 18 pts
Over Expected room →right on their number · +1.0 vs their -7.7 pts, and they swing ±6.5 week to week (+0.16× that swing) · 64 snaps
leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +8.7 vs their 3.1 pts, and they swing ±5.6 week to week (+1.56× that swing) · 63 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 8% to 89%
Tendencies room →leaned — ran early · −16.0 vs their 47.4%, and they swing ±15.3 week to week (−1.04× that swing) · 54 early downs
leaned — passed early · +19.1 vs their 60.9%, and they swing ±10.1 week to week (+1.88× that swing) · 45 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -11% to 52%
Tendencies room →inside their normal wobble · +7.8 vs their 23.0%, and they swing ±11.3 week to week (+0.69× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
right on their number · −3.1 vs their 19.8%, and they swing ±12.0 week to week (−0.26× that swing) · 54 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -13% to 101%
Fourth Down room →Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency.
inside their normal wobble · −19.2 vs their 44.2%, and they swing ±22.3 week to week (−0.86× that swing) · 4 fourth-and-short calls
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -1% to 70%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −4.4 vs their 26.6%, and they swing ±10.3 week to week (−0.43× that swing) · 54 dropbacks
right on their number · +2.9 vs their 35.6%, and they swing ±13.4 week to week (+0.22× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -0% to 30%
Tendencies room →leaned — got home · +4.2 vs their 18.0%, and they swing ±3.3 week to week (+1.27× that swing) · 54 dropbacks
leaned — stayed blocked · −10.7 vs their 14.6%, and they swing ±5.9 week to week (−1.83× that swing) · 26 dropbacks
GB's early-down pass rate was the night's one real departure: 80.0%, 19.1 points above their season mean of 60.9% and 1.9 times their own 10.1-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Atlanta Falcons
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Green Bay Packers
48 dressed · 5 inactive · 3 never used
Inactive · 5
Dressed, never took a snap · 3
Who moved the needle
Passing · GB
28/53, 312 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT
3.6 expected points added · -8.5% completion over expected
Passing · ATL
18/25, 256 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
9.5 expected points added · +8.8% completion over expected
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land the morning after the game, not live.
Drake London banked 11.1 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijan RobinsonRB · Bell Cow Back | 35.3 | +9.1 | 72% | — | 9% | 0% | 29 car, 194 yd, 2 TD · 2/2, 19 yd |
| Drake LondonWR · Alpha Receiver | 28.4 | +11.1 | 93% | — | 43% | 60% | 9/10, 194 yd |
| Christian WatsonWR · Featured Receiver | 22.6 | +2.3 | 80% | — | 20% | 22% | 7/10, 96 yd, 1 TD |
| Matthew GoldenWR · Featured Receiver | 21.0 | +2.3 | 82% | — | 24% | 49% | 5/12, 100 yd, 1 TD |
| Jordan LoveQB · Starter QB | 18.5 | −2.1 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 28/53, 312 yd, 2 TD, 1 INT · 1 car, 0 yd |
| Michael Penix Jr.QB · Starter QB | 14.0 | +3.6 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 18/25, 256 yd, 1 TD, 1 INT · 2 car, -2 yd |
| Brian RobinsonRB | 11.0 | +5.6 | 27% | — | 0% | — | 10 car, 50 yd, 1 TD |
| Austin HooperTE · Rotational Receiver | 9.1 | +4.1 | 23% | — | 9% | 6% | 2/2, 11 yd, 1 TD |
| Tucker KraftTE · Rotational Receiver | 6.6 | −4.3 | 76% | — | 16% | 9% | 4/8, 26 yd |
| Skyy MooreWR · Rotational Receiver | 6.1 | −4.3 | 52% | — | 14% | 6% | 3/7, 31 yd |
| J. Michael SturdivantWR · Rotational Receiver | 5.2 | +1.3 | 32% | — | 6% | 5% | 3/3, 22 yd |
| MarShawn LloydRB | 3.8 | −3.9 | 23% | — | 6% | 0% | 4 car, 11 yd · 2/3, 7 yd |
| Jonnu SmithTE · Rotational Receiver | 3.6 | −0.9 | 33% | — | 6% | 5% | 2/3, 16 yd |
| Olamide ZaccheausWR · Rotational Receiver | 2.9 | +0.3 | 34% | — | 9% | 0% | 2/2, 9 yd |
| Kaleb JohnsonRB | 2.6 | −3.5 | 36% | — | 6% | 0% | 4 car, 6 yd · 1/3, 10 yd |
| Jahan DotsonWR · Rotational Receiver | 2.1 | −2.9 | 66% | — | 13% | 27% | 1/3, 11 yd |
| Chris BlairWR · Rotational Receiver | 2.0 | +0.8 | 18% | — | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Zachariah BranchWR · Rotational Receiver | 1.7 | −1.2 | 18% | — | 9% | 8% | 1/2, 7 yd |
| Kyle PittsTE · Rotational Receiver | 1.5 | −1.5 | 59% | — | 9% | 5% | 1/2, 5 yd |
| Chris BrooksRB | 1.4 | −0.1 | 41% | — | 2% | 0% | 1/1, 4 yd |
| Nick MuseTE · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | — | 24% | — | 0% | — | No touches. |
| Bo MeltonWR · Rotational Receiver | 0.0 | −1.7 | 32% | — | 2% | 7% | 0/1, 0 yd |
1 line has no expected-points read and sits off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Packers attack right, the Falcons attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(13:33) (Shotgun) 9-M.Penix pass short middle intended for 4-J.Dotson INTERCEPTED by 29-X.McKinney at GB 40. 29-X.McKinney to GB 45 for 5 yards (5-D.London).
Q1 13:33 · Falcons · 2nd & 10 at GB 49 · gained nothing · -4.89 EP · −10.9% win probability
164 snaps placed · 9 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 173 plays across 21 drives, manual charting on 168. Everything here paints the morning after the week's games — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
8 of 21 drives ended in points. The longest march was ATL moving 92 yards from the ATL 8 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; GB attacks right, ATL attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
No personnel grouping was recorded for this game, so the film shows the play detail without a groupings breakdown rather than a column of dashes.
173 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
173 plays
How the play was built
Shotgun, a man in motion.
Four rushed the passer, six in the box.
Thrown on the first read, it should have been intercepted.
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Falcons at Packers, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Penix Jr. | 18/25 | 256 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +9.5 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijan Robinson | 29 | 194 | 6.7 | 2 | +8.7 |
| Brian Robinson | 10 | 50 | 5.0 | 1 | +3.3 |
| Michael Penix Jr. |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drake London | 9 | 10 | 194 | 0 | 43% | +12.3 |
| Bijan Robinson | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 9% |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Henderson | 8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mike Hughes | 6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Xavier Watts |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Love | 28/53 | 312 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +3.6 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2026_03_ATL_GB
The cards are drawn from the charted play-by-play, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Packers closed -4.5 and lost outright — an upset against the closing number.
Total closed 43.5; the game landed 49 — over by 5.5.
Conditions and crew
| 2 |
| -2 |
| -1.0 |
| 0 |
| +0.0 |
| +1.3 |
| Austin Hooper | 2 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 9% | +4.2 |
| Jahan Dotson | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 13% | −4.6 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9% | −0.9 |
| Zachariah Branch | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 9% | −0.9 |
| Kyle Pitts | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 9% | −0.5 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0.0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Harold Perkins Jr. | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Muse | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jessie Bates | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kendal Daniels | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Blair | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameron Thomas | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gervon Dexter Sr. | 1 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| MarShawn Lloyd | 4 | 11 | 2.8 | 0 | −0.6 |
| Kaleb Johnson | 4 | 6 | 1.5 | 0 | −1.8 |
| Jordan Love | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | −0.4 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Golden | 5 | 12 | 100 | 1 | 24% | +4.6 |
| Christian Watson | 7 | 10 | 96 | 1 | 20% | +2.0 |
| Skyy Moore | 3 | 7 | 31 | 0 | 14% | +2.8 |
| Tucker Kraft | 4 | 8 | 26 | 0 | 16% | −2.0 |
| J. Michael Sturdivant | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 6% | +3.2 |
| Jonnu Smith | 2 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 6% | −3.6 |
| Kaleb Johnson | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 6% | −0.5 |
| MarShawn Lloyd | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 6% | −0.3 |
| Chris Brooks | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2% | −0.1 |
| Bo Melton | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2% | −0.3 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evan Williams | 4 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zaire Franklin | 3 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brandon Cisse | 4 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edgerrin Cooper | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Javon Bullard | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Keisean Nixon | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Xavier McKinney | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lukas Van Ness | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devonte Wyatt | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barryn Sorrell | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |