The biggest swing of the game · Q2 9:07 · 1st and 10
Sterling Shepard
Giants
(9:07) (Shotgun) 8-D.Jones pass deep left to 3-S.Shepard for 37 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. Markdown variants of the ranked boards (dynasty and fantasy rankings for NFL, NBA, MLB and CFB) are available by appending.mdto those URLs or by sendingAccept: text/markdown; other pages answer 404.
polling · 1800s tick · as of 12:42 AM ET · 16 to play
Game Center
Game Center
2021 Week 1 · Sun, Sep 12, 2021 · MetLife Stadium
FinalThe verdict · 2021 Week 1
It turned at Q2 9:07, 1st and 10, on Sterling Shepard — 13.3 win-probability points to the Giants on one snap, the largest move of the game, and it still was not enough.
The snaps that bent it
The biggest swing of the game · Q2 9:07 · 1st and 10
Sterling Shepard
Giants
(9:07) (Shotgun) 8-D.Jones pass deep left to 3-S.Shepard for 37 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
Denver Broncos 27–13. Biggest swing: Q2 9:07, Giants +13.3% win probability on one snap.
13.3
win-probability points on one snap
The largest move of the game. The two below are drawn against it.
What separated them
Throwing the ball
Broncos won this one — +0.47 expected points per dropback, against Giants at -0.04 expected points per dropback.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Every snap
Broncos won this one — +0.28 expected points per snap, against Giants at -0.03 expected points per snap.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Giveaways
Giants owned this one and still lost it — 1 giveaway, against Broncos at 2 giveaways.
Giantsthe gap went the other way from the scoreboard
Explosive plays
Broncos won this one — 5 chunk plays, against Giants at 3 chunk plays.
Broncosthe gap went the way the scoreboard did
Who won it for them
What it says about next week
Note
The model against the market, the momentum underneath, every drive — scrub to replay it
The model and the market were 8.6 win-probability points apart on the average play, and 19 apart at the widest — with the model the more convinced about Giants.
(9:07) (Shotgun) 8-D.Jones pass deep left to 3-S.Shepard for 37 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The modelled figures are the league play-by-play model's, not ours.
How the points landed
Tim Patrick's 2-yard touchdown catch with 0:13 left in the 2nd put Denver Broncos ahead for good. The lead never changed over the 4 scores that followed.
7 scores · bar length is the lead after each one
Down-to-down truth
Broncos ahead 6–2 on categories, but the biggest gap belongs to Giants, in turnovers.
Expected points added, per play
The centre line is an average play. A bar to the right of it is a side that gained more than the situation was worth; a bar to the left is a side that lost ground. All six bars share one scale, ±0.47 points.
Every snapexpected points added per play, all downs
Dropping backexpected points added per dropback
Running itexpected points added per rush
Neither side “wins” volume or play-calling mix, so neither is drawn as a duel: Broncos ran 66 snaps at a 62% dropback rate against Giants’s 57 at 74%. Red-zone trips: Broncos 6, Giants 4.
Broncos won the down-to-down efficiency fight: 0.28 expected points added per play vs -0.03.
Derived from the play-by-play, no model
7 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor and were tested against four comparisons: this week's whole slate, the team's own season, the week before, and the team's own ordinary spread. Every bar below is set in that team's own week-to-week swing, never in league points — one team's swing runs 1.6 to 3.1 times the entire league's spread.
Nothing cleared the bars. No reading led the week's slate, set a season mark, reversed the week before, or sat two of the team's own standard deviations off their number — which is what most Sundays look like, and is the finding rather than a gap.
The season-grain rooms, pointed at this one game
7 of 8 readings cleared their snap floor. Every deviation below is measured in that team's own game-to-game swing, not in league points — because one game's swing runs from 1.6 to 3.1 times the whole league's spread.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -30 pts to 26 pts
Over Expected room →leaned — threw more than the situation asked · +5.9 vs their -4.6 pts, and they swing ±5.8 week to week (+1.01× that swing) · 66 snaps
right on their number · −0.1 vs their -1.9 pts, and they swing ±10.9 week to week (−0.01× that swing) · 57 snaps
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale 22% to 94%
Tendencies room →right on their number · −2.2 vs their 52.2%, and they swing ±11.1 week to week (−0.20× that swing) · 48 early downs
inside their normal wobble · +8.9 vs their 57.7%, and they swing ±14.0 week to week (+0.64× that swing) · 42 early downs
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -38% to 98%
Fourth Down room →right on their number · +5.4 vs their 34.6%, and they swing ±24.6 week to week (+0.22× that swing) · 5 fourth-and-short calls
Only 1 fourth-and-short call tonight — too few to read a tendency. Their season number is 29.0%.
upper band = their week-to-week swing · lower rule = all 32 teams · scale -5% to 29%
Tendencies room →leaned — stayed blocked · −5.8 vs their 12.9%, and they swing ±4.6 week to week (−1.25× that swing) · 42 dropbacks
right on their number · +3.0 vs their 11.6%, and they swing ±6.7 week to week (+0.45× that swing) · 41 dropbacks
Play-action rate
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
Blitz rate sent
Charted from 2022. The columns exist for 2021 and are entirely empty, which is not a season of data.
DEN's sack or hit rate was the night's one real departure: 7.1%, 5.8 points below their season mean of 12.9% and 1.3 times their own 4.6-point weekly swing.
Who was out, who dressed and never took a snap, and who was on the field how much. Game-day list and snap counts from the weekly roster and snap feeds. Practice-squad and injured-reserve players are not shown — they were never on the game-day list.
Denver Broncos
48 dressed · 7 inactive · 2 never used
Inactive · 7
Dressed, never took a snap · 2
New York Giants
48 dressed · 6 inactive · 1 never used
Inactive · 6
Dressed, never took a snap · 1
Who moved the needle
Passing · NYG
22/37, 267 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT
-1.7 expected points added · -3.5% completion over expected
Passing · DEN
28/36, 264 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT
23.3 expected points added · +15.4% completion over expected
Receiving · NYG
7/9 for 113 yds, 1 TD
25% of team targets · 8.2 expected points added
What each man’s workload was worth, against what he actually banked. Final. Usage and expected points land with the weekly sync, not live.
Melvin Gordon banked 10.7 more points than his own workload asked for.
| Player | Full PPR | Vs expected | Snap share | Routes | Targets | Air yards | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.3 | +10.1 | 95% | 86% | 25% | 31% | 7/9, 113 yd, 1 TD | |
| 21.4 | 0.0 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 22/37, 267 yd, 1 TD · 6 car, 27 yd, 1 TD | |
| 20.8 | +10.7 | 50% | 51% | 9% | 0% | 11 car, 101 yd, 1 TD · 3/3, 17 yd | |
| 20.5 | −2.7 | 100% | — | 0% | — | 28/36, 264 yd, 2 TD · 3 car, 19 yd | |
| 13.9 | +5.2 | 70% | 61% | 11% | 11% | 4/4, 39 yd, 1 TD | |
| 13.2 | +2.3 | 47% | 56% | 20% | 27% | 6/7, 72 yd | |
| 12.2 | −1.3 | 77% | 66% | 23% | 18% | 6/8, 62 yd | |
| 10.4 | −2.3 | 85% | 79% | 17% | 29% | 4/6, 64 yd | |
| 9.5 | −0.5 | 70% | 72% | 19% | 27% | 3/7, 65 yd | |
| 8.6 | +0.3 | 56% | 44% | 9% | 1% | 3/3, 16 yd, 1 TD | |
| 7.1 | −0.9 | 36% | 46% | 11% | 28% | 3/4, 41 yd | |
| 5.1 | −2.9 | 50% | 41% | 3% | 0% | 14 car, 45 yd · 1/1, -4 yd | |
| 3.7 | −7.3 | 48% | 35% | 8% | 2% | 10 car, 26 yd · 1/3, 1 yd | |
| 2.8 | −6.7 | 77% | 63% | 14% | 11% | 2/5, 8 yd | |
| 2.4 | −2.7 | 80% | 76% | 9% | 16% | 1/3, 14 yd | |
| 2.3 | −1.3 | 39% | 40% | 3% | 1% | 4 car, 7 yd · 1/1, 6 yd | |
| 1.8 | −0.8 | — | — | — | — | 5 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 1.7 | −1.2 | 33% | 22% | 6% | 0% | 1/2, 7 yd | |
| 1.6 | +0.3 | 13% | 16% | 3% | 0% | 1/1, 6 yd | |
| 1.6 | 0.0 | — | — | — | — | 6 snaps — too few to rate. | |
| 0.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Did not take a snap. | |
| 0.0 | — | 48% | 44% | 0% | — | No touches. |
3 players played under 8 snaps, so their shares read as a dash rather than a number. 2 lines have no expected-points read and sit off the plane.
Expected points are modelled in full PPR, so the “vs expected” column stays in that unit whichever format the pills are set to. Switching the pills changes the points column, not the plane.
The whole game as one hundred yards. The Giants attack right, the Broncos attack left, so a change of possession is a reversal you can see. Reading down is the order the snaps were played — not the clock, so a two-minute drill gets the same room as any other fourteen snaps. This game is final.
(4:17) 5-T.Bridgewater pass short left to 85-A.Okwuegbunam to NYG 4 for 6 yards (23-L.Ryan). FUMBLES (23-L.Ryan), RECOVERED by NYG-23-L.Ryan at NYG 4. 23-L.Ryan ran ob at NYG 4 for no gain. The Replay Official reviewed the loose ball recovery ruling, and the play was Upheld. The ruling on the field stands.
Q2 4:17 · Broncos · 2nd & 7 at NYG 10 · gained 6 · -4.38 EP · −14.5% win probability
147 snaps placed · 10 without a recorded yard line, left off the map · 4 marked moments — the largest win-probability swings, one per drive.
Post-game film: 157 plays across 17 drives, personnel groupings on 157 snaps. Everything here paints once the weekly sync ingests the game — there is no live play-level feed in this product, so nothing on this page updates while a game is being played.
7 of 17 drives ended in points. The longest march was DEN moving 94 yards from the DEN 6 for a touchdown. Each bar is the ground a drive actually covered; NYG attacks right, DEN attacks left. Hatching marks a trip inside the twenty.
Offensive grouping on every pass and run. A group needs five snaps in this game before it gets a number — under that the sample is a coin flip and the cell reads a dash instead. The names of the eleven on the field are only recorded from 2023 onward, so this game gives the grouping without the roster.
157 plays · ranked by the win probability each one moved
157 plays
Win probability is the league play-by-play model, 98.5% of plays · a dash means none was published
Just the plays, on their own page: Broncos at Giants, every play.
Full stat lines
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teddy Bridgewater | 28/36 | 264 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +23.3 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melvin Gordon | 11 | 101 | 9.2 | 1 | +2.8 |
| Javonte Williams | 14 | 45 | 3.2 | 0 | −3.6 |
| Teddy Bridgewater | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 0 | +1.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerry Jeudy | 6 | 7 | 72 | 0 | 20% | +4.7 |
| Noah Fant | 6 | 8 | 62 | 0 | 23% | +3.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Darby | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Justin Simmons | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Fuller | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Shelby Harris |
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT | Sacked | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | 22/37 | 267 | 1 | 0 | 2 | −1.7 |
| Player | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones |
Every number on them comes from the same read as this page, and each one says in words where it came from.
How the win probability moved, the three snaps that bent it, and every drive in order.

/football/games/2021_01_DEN_NYG
The cards are drawn from the play-by-play sync, not live, and each one says so on its face.
Closing number vs result
Broncos closed -3 and covered, winning by 14.
Total closed 41.5; the game landed 40 — under by 1.5.
Conditions and crew
| K.J. Hamler | 3 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 11% | +5.1 |
| Tim Patrick | 4 | 4 | 39 | 1 | 11% | +8.8 |
| Melvin Gordon | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 9% | +1.5 |
| Albert Okwuegbunam | 3 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 9% | +0.5 |
| Courtland Sutton | 1 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 9% | −0.4 |
| Eric Saubert | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 6% | −0.4 |
| Javonte Williams | 1 | 1 | -4 | 0 | 3% | −1.2 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Josey Jewell | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Von Miller | 3 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shamar Stephen | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeShawn Williams | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mike Ford | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexander Johnson | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 |
| 27 |
| 4.5 |
| 1 |
| +4.0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 10 | 26 | 2.6 | 0 | −2.1 |
| Devontae Booker | 4 | 7 | 1.8 | 0 | −2.1 |
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling Shepard | 7 | 9 | 113 | 1 | 25% | +8.2 |
| Darius Slayton | 3 | 7 | 65 | 0 | 19% | +1.6 |
| Kenny Golladay | 4 | 6 | 64 | 0 | 17% | −0.9 |
| Kyle Rudolph | 2 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 14% | −2.8 |
| Devontae Booker | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3% | +0.2 |
| C.J. Board | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3% | +0.0 |
| Gary Brightwell | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3% | −0.1 |
| Saquon Barkley | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8% | −1.6 |
| Elijhaa Penny | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3% | −0.5 |
| Kadarius Toney | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 6% | −1.2 |
| Player | Solo | Ast | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Martinez | 6 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Logan Ryan | 7 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| James Bradberry | 4 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Reggie Ragland | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Austin Johnson | 2 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adoree' Jackson | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lorenzo Carter | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tae Crowder | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jabrill Peppers | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Darnay Holmes | 1 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |